Skip to content

Cytoreductive Prostatectomy Versus Cytoreductive Prostate Irradiation As a Local Treatment Option for Metastatic Prostate Cancer: a Multicentric Feasibility Trial

Cytoreductive Prostatectomy Versus Cytoreductive Prostate Irradiation As a Local Treatment Option for Metastatic Prostate Cancer: a Multicentric Feasibility Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03655886
Acronym
LoMP II
Enrollment
43
Registered
2018-08-31
Start date
2018-08-15
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2025-03-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer Metastatic

Keywords

metastatic, prostate cancer, local, cytoreductive

Brief summary

According to the guidelines of the European Association of Urology (EAU), the first-line treatment for newly diagnosed mPC consists of immediate castration with the addition of docetaxel or abiraterone acetate. As seen in other well-known solid tumours - such as ovarian, colon and renal cancer - local treatment (LT) of the primary tumour could lead to a survival benefit compared to standard of care (SOC). Several retrospective studies have suggested a survival benefit of local treatment of the primary tumour with SOC versus SOC only in mPC. These patients also have less local symptoms of their disease, which has a major impact on quality of life (QoL). Several prospective studies have already been set up to compare either surgery or radiotherapy with the SOC. In expectation of their results and because randomization seems challenging, the investigators want to set up a trial to evaluate the feasibility of randomization between both local treatment groups.

Interventions

PROCEDUREradical prostatectomy

can be performed either open, laparoscopic or robot-assisted, which is chosen by the discretion and expertise of the performing surgeon

RADIATIONWhole pelvis radiotherapy

radiation of prostate bed and pelvis

Sponsors

University Hospital, Ghent
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male ≥18y * Histologically proven PC * Newly diagnosed metastatic PC as assessed by standard imaging (CT and bone scintigraphy) or PSMA PET-CT * ECOG 0-1 (2 if related to local PC symptoms) * Eligible for local treatment * Written informed consent and able and willing to comply with protocol requirements

Exclusion criteria

* Previous systemic treatment for PC except ADT started within 3 months before randomization * Previous radiotherapy to the pelvis interfering with prostate irradiation * Previous surgery in the pelvis interfering with radical prostatectomy * Symptoms related to metastatic lesions, persisting for at least 2 weeks after initiation of ADT * Metastatic brain disease, leptomeningeal disease or imminent spinal cord compression * Previous or current malignant disease which is likely to interfere with LoMP II treatment or assessment * Psychological disorder intervening with understanding the information or the informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility of randomization between both treatment arms as assessed by the randomized proportion48 monthsIn this trial we want to assess whether it is feasible to randomize patients into both treatment arms. All patients eligible for inclusion will be reported. The eventual proportion of randomized patients will be evaluated. Reasons for exclusion will be monitored.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiographic progression-free survival48 monthsCalculated starting from date of randomization to radiographic progression or death from any cause whichever occurred first
Clinical progression-free survival48 monthsCalculated starting from date of randomization to the date of radiographic progression, symptoms, initiation of new treatment, or death, whichever occurred first.
Quality of life (QLQ-C30 + QLQ-PR25)48 monthsEvaluation of quality of life will be done using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 questionnaire, extended by the QLQ-PR25.
Acute and late toxicity due to local treatment48 monthsEarly complications after radical prosatatectomy will be evaluated using the Clavien-Dindo classification for surgical complications. Acute and late toxicity after radiotherapy will be evaluated using the Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). This outcome will be assessed descriptively, as a direct comparison between the two toxicity classifications would be inappropriate.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Castration-resistant free survival48 monthsCalculated starting from date of randomization until castration-resistant disease development, as defined by the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026