Skip to content

Randomised, Controlled Trial of an Individual Deprescribing Intervention for Nursing Homes Residents

Opportunities and Limits to Deprescribing in Nursing Homes: Randomised, Controlled Trial of an Individual Deprescribing Intervention for Nursing Homes Residents.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03655405
Acronym
OLD-NH-IDeI
Enrollment
62
Registered
2018-08-31
Start date
2018-10-30
Completion date
2019-08-22
Last updated
2021-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Inappropriate Prescribing, Polypharmacy

Keywords

Deprescribing, Nursing Home, Potentially Inappropriate Medication

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the effects of a pharmacist-led, deprescribing-focused medication review on the use of inappropriate medications by nursing home residents

Detailed description

Nursing home residents are often prescribed inappropriate medication, drugs whose negative effects outweigh potential benefits or which are not useful anymore. Inappropriate medication have been linked with worse health outcomes, hospitalisations and death. Deprescribing, the structured process of withdrawing or tapering inappropriate medications, has been studied as a potential solution to this problem. In this study, nursing home residents living in institution which are already engaged in a deprescribing process will be randomly allocated to receive a medication review or usual care. The medication review will be performed by the nursing home pharmacist an its results will be discussed with the responsible physicians and nurses to create a deprescribing plan specifically tailored to the needs of the resident.

Interventions

OTHERIndividual Deprescribing Intervention

The pharmacist responsible for the nursing home will perform a medication review (type 3). The results of this review will be discussed with the physician and nurse responsible for this participant, with the goal of creating a personalised deprescribing plan. Once validated by the physician, this plan will be submitted to the participant for approval.

Sponsors

Anne Niquille
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Take 5 or more prescribed drugs daily; * Reside in the Nursing Home since at least 4 months.

Exclusion criteria

* Physician judges that discussing deprescribing with them risks destabilising them.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Inappropriate Medication at Follow-up4 monthsNumber of inappropriate medications prescribed at follow-up, assessed using the French translation of STOPP v2.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of New Drugs Prescribed as a Result of the Intervention4 monthsThis outcome was not analysed
Number of Chronic DDDs Prescribed to Participants4 monthsNumber of chronic DDDs prescribed to participants
Number of Potentially Inappropriate DDDs Prescribed to Participants at Follow-up4 monthsAppropriateness assessed using the French translation of STOPP v2; DDD defined by WHO.
Number of Chronic Drugs Prescribed to Participants4 monthsNumber of Chronic Drugs Prescribed to Participants
Health-related Quality of Life4 monthsThe EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Levels (EQ-5D-5L) tool was used to assess quality of life; this tool includes * a visual analog scale, ranging from 0 to 100, 100 indicating the best health you can imagine and 0 the worst health you can imagine. Higher results indicate an higher quality of life. * 5 questions, each with 5 possible answers. Using a valuation set, the answers to individual questions were transformed in a numeric index value for each participants, with a maximum of 1 and an infinitely low minimum. Higher values indicates higher perceived health-related quality of life.
Number of Common Drug-related Complaints at Follow-up4 monthsNumber of common drug-related complaints at follow-up

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Falls in Participants That Fell at Least Once4 months
Number of Days Spent With Physical Restraints4 months
Number of Deaths4 monthsNumber of deaths
Number of Participants Hospitalized4 monthsNumber of participants hospitalized at any time during the study
Days Spent in Hospital4 monthsAverage number of days spent in hospital during the study period
Number of Falls Per Participant4 monthsAverage number of falls during the study period
Number of Participants Who Fell4 monthsNumber of participants who fell at least once during the study period

Countries

Switzerland

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Individual Deprescribing Intervention
Participants allocated to the intervention arm will receive the Individual Deprescribing Intervention (pharmacist-led medication review, followed by the creation of a deprescribing plan by the pharmacist, physician and responsible nurse). Individual Deprescribing Intervention: The pharmacist responsible for the nursing home will perform a medication review (type 3). The results of this review will be discussed with the physician and nurse responsible for this participant, with the goal of creating a personalised deprescribing plan. Once validated by the physician, this plan will be submitted to the participant for approval.
31
Control
Participants allocated to the control group will receive usual care.
27
Total58

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath after initial data collection42
Overall StudyDied before initial data collection12
Overall StudyProtocol Violation01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIndividual Deprescribing InterventionControlTotal
Age, Continuous87 years84 years87 years
Duration of stay in years3.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3
3.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6
3.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9
Number of chronic DDDs9.6 chronic DDD
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
9.3 chronic DDD
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6
9.5 chronic DDD
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1
Number of chronic drugs12 drugs11 drugs11 drugs
Number of drugs prescribed15 drugs15 drugs15 drugs
Number of PIM DDDs3.6 PIM DDD
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8
3.4 PIM DDD
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1
3.5 PIM DDD
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
Number of PIMs5 potentially inappropriate medications6 potentially inappropriate medications5 potentially inappropriate medications
Quality of life: EQ-5D-5L analog scale56.5 analog scale units
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.8
61.4 analog scale units
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.5
58.9 analog scale units
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.8
Quality of life: EQ-5D-5L index0.46 index
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.34
0.50 index
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.33
0.48 index
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.34
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
31 participants27 participants58 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants20 Participants36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants7 Participants22 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
5 / 324 / 30
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 310 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 310 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Inappropriate Medication at Follow-up

Number of inappropriate medications prescribed at follow-up, assessed using the French translation of STOPP v2.

Time frame: 4 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Individual Deprescribing InterventionNumber of Inappropriate Medication at Follow-up4.35 drugsStandard Deviation 2.72
ControlNumber of Inappropriate Medication at Follow-up4.85 drugsStandard Deviation 2.58
p-value: 0.72395% CI: [0.83, 1.138]Regression, Poisson
Secondary

Health-related Quality of Life

The EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Levels (EQ-5D-5L) tool was used to assess quality of life; this tool includes * a visual analog scale, ranging from 0 to 100, 100 indicating the best health you can imagine and 0 the worst health you can imagine. Higher results indicate an higher quality of life. * 5 questions, each with 5 possible answers. Using a valuation set, the answers to individual questions were transformed in a numeric index value for each participants, with a maximum of 1 and an infinitely low minimum. Higher values indicates higher perceived health-related quality of life.

Time frame: 4 months

Population: Data on this outcome were missing for some participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Individual Deprescribing InterventionHealth-related Quality of LifeEQ-5D-5L scale63.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.2
Individual Deprescribing InterventionHealth-related Quality of LifeEQ-5D-l index0.51 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
ControlHealth-related Quality of LifeEQ-5D-5L scale65.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.4
ControlHealth-related Quality of LifeEQ-5D-l index0.61 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.33
Comparison: Analysis for the scale componentp-value: 0.76995% CI: [-10.6, 7.89]Regression, Linear
Comparison: Analysis for the index componentp-value: 0.07595% CI: [-0.202, 0.01]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Number of Chronic DDDs Prescribed to Participants

Number of chronic DDDs prescribed to participants

Time frame: 4 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Individual Deprescribing InterventionNumber of Chronic DDDs Prescribed to Participants7.82 DDDStandard Deviation 3.85
ControlNumber of Chronic DDDs Prescribed to Participants7.65 DDDStandard Deviation 2.74
p-value: 0.85795% CI: [0.833, 1.246]Regression, Poisson
Secondary

Number of Chronic Drugs Prescribed to Participants

Number of Chronic Drugs Prescribed to Participants

Time frame: 4 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Individual Deprescribing InterventionNumber of Chronic Drugs Prescribed to Participants9.68 drugsStandard Deviation 3.59
ControlNumber of Chronic Drugs Prescribed to Participants9.67 drugsStandard Deviation 3.1
p-value: 0.06495% CI: [0.834, 1.005]Regression, Poisson
Secondary

Number of Common Drug-related Complaints at Follow-up

Number of common drug-related complaints at follow-up

Time frame: 4 months

Population: Data on this outcome at follow-up were missing for some participants, because of death or hospitalisation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Individual Deprescribing InterventionNumber of Common Drug-related Complaints at Follow-up2.35 Number of complaintsStandard Deviation 2.6
ControlNumber of Common Drug-related Complaints at Follow-up1.44 Number of complaintsStandard Deviation 1.26
p-value: 0.21295% CI: [0.886, 1.727]Mixed-effect regression, Poisson
Secondary

Number of New Drugs Prescribed as a Result of the Intervention

This outcome was not analysed

Time frame: 4 months

Population: This outcome was not analyzed, as the drugs newly prescribed as a result of the intervention could not be distinguished from the other drugs newly prescribed.

Secondary

Number of Potentially Inappropriate DDDs Prescribed to Participants at Follow-up

Appropriateness assessed using the French translation of STOPP v2; DDD defined by WHO.

Time frame: 4 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Individual Deprescribing InterventionNumber of Potentially Inappropriate DDDs Prescribed to Participants at Follow-up2.73 DDDStandard Deviation 2.97
ControlNumber of Potentially Inappropriate DDDs Prescribed to Participants at Follow-up3.10 DDDStandard Deviation 1.99
p-value: 0.03395% CI: [0.594, 0.979]Regression, Poisson
Other Pre-specified

Days Spent in Hospital

Average number of days spent in hospital during the study period

Time frame: 4 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Individual Deprescribing InterventionDays Spent in Hospital3.6 Number of daysStandard Deviation 15.8
ControlDays Spent in Hospital0.6 Number of daysStandard Deviation 2.9
p-value: 0.366Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Other Pre-specified

Number of Days Spent With Physical Restraints

Time frame: 4 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Individual Deprescribing InterventionNumber of Days Spent With Physical Restraints15.6 daysStandard Deviation 39.1
ControlNumber of Days Spent With Physical Restraints15.1 daysStandard Deviation 39.1
p-value: 0.911Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Other Pre-specified

Number of Deaths

Number of deaths

Time frame: 4 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Individual Deprescribing InterventionNumber of Deaths4 Participants
ControlNumber of Deaths2 Participants
p-value: 0.675Fisher Exact
Other Pre-specified

Number of Falls in Participants That Fell at Least Once

Time frame: 4 months

Population: Only the participants who fell at least once were included in this analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Individual Deprescribing InterventionNumber of Falls in Participants That Fell at Least Once1.6 Number of fallsStandard Deviation 1
ControlNumber of Falls in Participants That Fell at Least Once1.4 Number of fallsStandard Deviation 0.7
p-value: 0.958Fisher Exact
Other Pre-specified

Number of Falls Per Participant

Average number of falls during the study period

Time frame: 4 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Individual Deprescribing InterventionNumber of Falls Per Participant0.45 fallsStandard Deviation 0.89
ControlNumber of Falls Per Participant0.48 fallsStandard Deviation 0.8
p-value: 0.738Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants Hospitalized

Number of participants hospitalized at any time during the study

Time frame: 4 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Individual Deprescribing InterventionNumber of Participants Hospitalized3 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants Hospitalized1 Participants
p-value: 0.615Fisher Exact
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants Who Fell

Number of participants who fell at least once during the study period

Time frame: 4 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Individual Deprescribing InterventionNumber of Participants Who Fell9 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants Who Fell9 Participants
p-value: 0.781Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026