Skip to content

Treating Phobia With Multivoxel Neuro-reinforcement

Treating Phobia With Multivoxel Neuro-reinforcement

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03655262
Enrollment
23
Registered
2018-08-31
Start date
2018-10-01
Completion date
2022-06-30
Last updated
2024-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Phobia

Keywords

unconscious fear extinction, anxiety disorders, decoded neuro-reinforcement

Brief summary

Specific phobias and other anxiety disorders represent a major mental health problem, and present a significant challenge to researchers because effective treatment usually involves repeated exposure to feared stimuli, and the high levels of associated distress can lead to termination of treatment. Recent advances in computational functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) provide a method by which individuals may be unconsciously exposed to fearful stimuli, leading to effective fear reduction while eliminating a primary cause of attrition. The objective of the current study is to use the novel approach of neuro-reinforcement based on decoded fMRI information to reduce fear responses to fearful stimuli (e.g., spiders, heights) in individuals with phobias, directly and unconsciously in the brain, without repeatedly exposing participants to their feared stimuli. Participants will be randomized into one of three groups of varying neuro-reinforcement sessions (1, 3, or 5). They will complete tests of subjective fear and directed attention while being scanned by fMRI to measure engagement of amygdala activity to fearful stimuli as well as measured through other indicators of fear such as skin conductance response.

Detailed description

Anxiety disorders, the most common group of mental disorders in the United States, represent a major mental health problem. Phobias, in which fear and anxiety are triggered by a specific stimulus or situation, are the largest category of anxiety disorders and affect 5 - 12% of the world's population. Exposure-based therapies are effective in reducing symptoms, but their effectiveness depends on the individual's capacity or willingness to consciously confront their feared object. The associated distress can be so extreme that it prevents patients from seeking treatment, and contributes to attrition from exposure once treatment begins. As a result, there is an unmet need for treatment that minimizes attrition and subjective patient discomfort. The current study uses a novel technique of neuro-reinforcement based on decoded fMRI information to reduce fear responses to fearful stimuli directly and unconsciously without repeatedly exposing participants to those stimuli. The goals are to (1) confirm that our method decreases amygdala reactivity to images of phobic stimuli as well as (2) determine dosage-response optimization.

Interventions

Individuals will complete an implicit fmri neuro-reinforcement task where real-time brain activity is matched to a desired activation. Individuals will also receive financial reward for activating the desired activation. Visual feedback will be presented to indicate how well individuals' brain activity matches the desired activation. Individuals will complete x day(s) of neuro-reinforcement.

Sponsors

University of California, Los Angeles
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Individual has normal or corrected to normal vision * Individual has normal or corrected to normal hearing * Individual is competent to understand informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Individual is unable to fill in consent form correctly * Individual is unable to respond adequately to screening questions * Individual is unable to maintain focus or to sit during assessment * Individual has history of: neurological disease or defect (e.g., stroke, traumatic brain injury, schizophrenia or other psychological disorders, or seizures) * Individual has vision problems (including cataracts, amblyopia, or glaucoma) * Individual presents with: PTSD, Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, Substance Use Disorder, Current Major Depression, Bipolar Disorder, Psychosis, neurologic diagnoses or unstable serious medical conditions * Individual does not present with more than one object of specific phobia * Individual can touch the phobic object category during the pre¬treatment Behavioral Approach Test without presenting significant distress * Individual is currently prescribed psychotropic medication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Amygdala Reactivity10 days (measured at pre-treatment and post-treatment)The neural measure of difference in amygdala reactivity (measured by fMRI) to target phobic animals compared to control phobic animals from pre-treatment to post-treatment. Lower numbers (i.e. more negative numbers) indicate greater amygdala decrease and and better outcomes.
Subjective Fear Post-treatment Minus Pre-treatment10 days (measured at pre-treatment and post-treatment)Subjective Fear Ratings of images of targeted phobic stimuli Minimum score of 0, Maximum score of 180, higher scores mean worse outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Skin Conductance Response: Physiological Arousal Post-treatment Minus Pre-treatment10 days (measured at pre-treatment and post-treatment)Skin conductance to image presentation of targeted phobic stimuli post-treatment minus pre-treatment
Fear Survey Schedule10 days (measured at pre-treatment and post-treatment)Subjective fear ratings of a list of typical phobic stimuli Minimum score of 40, maximum of 200, higher scores mean worse outcome.
Stroop Task Post-treatment Minus Pre-treatment10 days (measured at pre-treatment and post-treatment)Measure of preferential allocation of attentional resources measured in reaction time (seconds) for visual presentation of the targeted phobic stimulus

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
1 Session
1 neuro-reinforcement session Unconscious Neuro-reinforcement: Individuals will complete an implicit fmri neuro-reinforcement task where real-time brain activity is matched to a desired activation. Individuals will also receive financial reward for activating the desired activation. Visual feedback will be presented to indicate how well individuals' brain activity matches the desired activation. Individuals will complete 1 day(s) of neuro-reinforcement.
7
3 Sessions
3 neuro-reinforcement sessions Unconscious Neuro-reinforcement: Individuals will complete an implicit fmri neuro-reinforcement task where real-time brain activity is matched to a desired activation. Individuals will also receive financial reward for activating the desired activation. Visual feedback will be presented to indicate how well individuals' brain activity matches the desired activation. Individuals will complete 3 day(s) of neuro-reinforcement.
8
5 Sessions
5 neuro-reinforcement sessions Unconscious Neuro-reinforcement: Individuals will complete an implicit fmri neuro-reinforcement task where real-time brain activity is matched to a desired activation. Individuals will also receive financial reward for activating the desired activation. Visual feedback will be presented to indicate how well individuals' brain activity matches the desired activation. Individuals will complete 5 day(s) of neuro-reinforcement.
8
Total23

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject001

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic1 Session3 Sessions5 SessionsTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
7 Participants8 Participants8 Participants23 Participants
Age, Continuous26 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.78
24.14 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.24
25.86 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.11
25.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.88
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants1 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants7 Participants4 Participants17 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants8 Participants4 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants0 Participants4 Participants5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 70 / 80 / 8
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 70 / 80 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 70 / 80 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Amygdala Reactivity

The neural measure of difference in amygdala reactivity (measured by fMRI) to target phobic animals compared to control phobic animals from pre-treatment to post-treatment. Lower numbers (i.e. more negative numbers) indicate greater amygdala decrease and and better outcomes.

Time frame: 10 days (measured at pre-treatment and post-treatment)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1 SessionChange in Amygdala Reactivity-.691 Beta CoefficientStandard Deviation 0.796
3 SessionsChange in Amygdala Reactivity-.827 Beta CoefficientStandard Deviation 1.62
5 SessionsChange in Amygdala Reactivity-.278 Beta CoefficientStandard Deviation 1.682
Primary

Subjective Fear Post-treatment Minus Pre-treatment

Subjective Fear Ratings of images of targeted phobic stimuli Minimum score of 0, Maximum score of 180, higher scores mean worse outcome.

Time frame: 10 days (measured at pre-treatment and post-treatment)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1 SessionSubjective Fear Post-treatment Minus Pre-treatment0.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.32
3 SessionsSubjective Fear Post-treatment Minus Pre-treatment-0.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.37
5 SessionsSubjective Fear Post-treatment Minus Pre-treatment0.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
Secondary

Fear Survey Schedule

Subjective fear ratings of a list of typical phobic stimuli Minimum score of 40, maximum of 200, higher scores mean worse outcome.

Time frame: 10 days (measured at pre-treatment and post-treatment)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1 SessionFear Survey Schedule-2.46 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.13
3 SessionsFear Survey Schedule-5.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.12
5 SessionsFear Survey Schedule-11.93 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.02
Secondary

Skin Conductance Response: Physiological Arousal Post-treatment Minus Pre-treatment

Skin conductance to image presentation of targeted phobic stimuli post-treatment minus pre-treatment

Time frame: 10 days (measured at pre-treatment and post-treatment)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1 SessionSkin Conductance Response: Physiological Arousal Post-treatment Minus Pre-treatment-0.010 Square Rooted MicrosiemensStandard Deviation 0
3 SessionsSkin Conductance Response: Physiological Arousal Post-treatment Minus Pre-treatment-0.097 Square Rooted MicrosiemensStandard Deviation 0.181
5 SessionsSkin Conductance Response: Physiological Arousal Post-treatment Minus Pre-treatment-0.030 Square Rooted MicrosiemensStandard Deviation 0.192
Secondary

Stroop Task Post-treatment Minus Pre-treatment

Measure of preferential allocation of attentional resources measured in reaction time (seconds) for visual presentation of the targeted phobic stimulus

Time frame: 10 days (measured at pre-treatment and post-treatment)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1 SessionStroop Task Post-treatment Minus Pre-treatment-0.080 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.079
3 SessionsStroop Task Post-treatment Minus Pre-treatment-0.137 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.198
5 SessionsStroop Task Post-treatment Minus Pre-treatment-0.030 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.203

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026