Skip to content

Soy Bread Diet in Improving Immune Function in Participants With Prostate Cancer

The Effect of a Soy Bread Diet Intervention on Immune Function in Men With Prostate Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03654638
Enrollment
25
Registered
2018-08-31
Start date
2018-08-15
Completion date
2022-03-09
Last updated
2025-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Adenocarcinoma

Brief summary

This phase II trial studies the effects of a soy bread versus a wheat bread in improving immune function in participants who are beginning a course of androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. Components found in soy foods may influence the immune system in a way that may be beneficial for prostate cancer prevention and survivorship.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To precisely define the impact of soy on myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC) in a human model clinical trial. OUTLINE: Participants are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I (SOY BREAD): Participants consume 2 slices of soy bread daily for approximately 20 weeks in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. Concurrent with the intervention, participants will be staring androgen deprivation therapy at the direction of their medical oncologist. ARM II (WHEAT BREAD): Participants consume 2 slices of wheat bread daily for approximately 20 weeks in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. Concurrent with the intervention, participants will be staring androgen deprivation therapy at the direction of their medical oncologist.

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTDietary Intervention

The dietary intervention requires men to consume 2 slices soy bread each day for 20 weeks while initiating hormone therapy

OTHERQuestionnaire Administration

Ancillary studies

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Have biopsy proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate (no small cell, sarcomatoid, or other rare subtypes) * Be planning a course of at least 5 months of androgen deprivation therapy. Patients who have had androgen deprivation therapy in the past as part of salvage therapy or primary therapy, but are initiating a new course will be eligible. * Have a testosterone concentration within normal limits. * No neoadjuvant hormonal or chemotherapy (other clinical trials) for their prostate cancer * Have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1. * Have blood, urea, nitrogen (BUN)/creatinine (Cr), liver enzymes, complete blood count (CBC), and prothrombin time (PT)/partial thromboplastin time (PTT)/international normalized ratio (INR) within normal limits * Voluntarily agree to participate and a sign an informed consent document * Agree to have prostate biopsy blocks provided to the study for evaluation * Willing to discontinue all current vitamin/mineral supplements * Not currently be taking complementary or alternative products (i.e. PC-SPES, Saw Palmetto) that target the prostate or may impact the hormonal environment * Agree to consume a standardized vitamin and mineral supplement (provided by the study) and avoid other nutrition, dietary, or alternative medications/supplements for the duration of the study

Exclusion criteria

* Have an active malignancy other than prostate cancer that requires therapy * No diagnosed hematologic malignancy * Not currently taking steroid medications (i.e., chronic lymphocytic leukemia \[CLL\]) * No chronic infection (i.e., human immunodeficiency virus-positive \[HIV+\]) * No history of organ transplant requiring immunosuppressive medications * History of nephrolithiasis (renal stones) * Renal insufficiency with creatinine \> 1.8, including anyone on dialysis regardless of nadir creatinine * Have certain medical conditions. Have no history of malabsorptive disorders or other metabolic disorders requiring special diet recommendations (for example, Crohn?s disease or gluten enteropathy)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in peripheral blood myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC)Week 0 to week 20A two-sample t-test will be used to compare the differences (log-transformed if necessary to improve normality).
Treatment effect on peripheral blood MDSCUp to week 20Mixed-effects regression models will be used to estimate the treatment effect on peripheral blood MDSC after adjusting for covariates such as age, compliance, and weight. A condition by time (pre versus \[vs.\] post) interaction will be included to test for a treatment effect. A random effect will be included for each subject to account for the dependency between the pre-post measurements. Correlations (Pearson and Spearman) between measures will be evaluated to determine if positive or negative relationships exist between the measures themselves or the week 0 to week 5 differences (e.g. MSDC vs. T-cell proliferation, MDSC vs. cytokines). Model adequacy and assumptions will be evaluated via residual plots. In the event that model assumptions are violated, outcomes will be transformed or non-parametric methods will be used. Tissue MDSC will be compared using linear regression.
Treatment effects in plasma cytokinesUp to week 20Mixed-effects regression models will be used to estimate the treatment effect. Correlations (Pearson and Spearman) between measures will be evaluated to determine if positive or negative relationships exist between the measures themselves or the week 0 to week 5 differences (e.g. MSDC vs. T-cell proliferation, MDSC vs. cytokines). Model adequacy and assumptions will be evaluated via residual plots. In the event that model assumptions are violated, outcomes will be transformed or non-parametric methods will be used.
Treatment effects in T-cell proliferationUp to week 20Mixed-effects regression models will be used to estimate the treatment effect. Correlations (Pearson and Spearman) between measures will be evaluated to determine if positive or negative relationships exist between the measures themselves or the week 0 to week 20 differences (e.g. MSDC vs. T-cell proliferation, MDSC vs. cytokines). Model adequacy and assumptions will be evaluated via residual plots. In the event that model assumptions are violated, outcomes will be transformed or non-parametric methods will be used.
Treatment effects in prostate specific antigen (PSA)Up to week 20Mixed-effects regression models will be used to estimate the treatment effect.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PSA responseUp to week 20Mixed-effects models will be used to explore treatment effects in PSA outcomes

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026