Anxiety, Bone Marrow Transplant, Depression, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Information Disclosure, Narrative, Psychosocial Health, Stress
Conditions
Keywords
Digital Storytelling, Narrative, Cancer patients, Psychosocial health, bone marrow transplant
Brief summary
Patients and caregivers undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation often continue to experience anxiety, depression, isolation, and other psychosocial distress. A narrative-based digital stories intervention has shown promise in a pilot study with breast cancer patients in helping to alleviate emotional distress. This study is designed to test digital stories to be viewed and discussed by other HCT patients/caregivers as a psychosocial intervention in a randomized controlled trial and to test the effects of digital stories on how 110 patient and caregiver dyads (N=220) undergoing one of the most rigorous and aggressive treatments cope with treatment-related distress through supportive open dyadic communication and emotional expression.
Detailed description
Patients and caregivers undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) are at particular risk for reduced psychological and social well-being due to the rigorous and unique nature of the transplant experience, such as prolonged immunosuppression and multiple post HCT complications resulting in frequent hospitalizations. However, few studies have evaluated interventions to alleviate psychosocial distress for both patients and caregivers, and those have yielded inconclusive results. A narrative-based (storytelling) approach may be an effective intervention tool for HCT patients and caregivers coping with psychosocial distress. The preliminary data show that stories shared by individuals in which a range of emotional expression or resolutions are described, may have beneficial effects on emotional well-being. In a recent pilot study of a 3-day digital storytelling workshop, investigators produced a series of digital videos with narratives from a panel of post-HCT patients. The purpose of this study is to use these digital stories (DS), to be viewed and discussed by HCT patient/caregiver dyads, as a therapeutic intervention and to examine influences on both patients' and caregivers' psychosocial status. This cost-effective, non-invasive, and easy-to-deliver psychosocial support vehicle has never been formally tested as an intervention for HCT patients or patient-caregiver dyads. To build upon investigators' preliminary studies and to pilot test the efficacy of this series of DS, 110 adult patients undergoing HCT at the Mayo Clinic Arizona and patient respective adult caregivers (N=220 total participants) will be randomized to either (a) an intervention using DS (dyadic exposure to four 5-minute modules) or (b) an information control (IC) video group (dyadic exposure to four videos containing only information about post-HCT care) followed by encouragement to discuss as a dyad. Exposure will occur once per week over 4 weeks via a secure web-based data collection platform (REDcap) with a weekly email notification and reminder phone call. Using investigator's model of Narrative Effects on Socio-Emotional Well-Being, we will also examine expected mediating factors to determine how stories may work to reduce psychosocial distress by fostering emotional processing, acceptance, and dyadic disclosure of emotions.
Interventions
Baseline surveys contained a series of scaled questions, including sociodemographic variables (age, sex, cancer type, and etc), profile of mood states, social well-being, emotional processing and acceptance.
Digital Stories Intervention Videos contain the following content: caregiver burden, positive and cognitive coping, support from other family and friends, fear of losing the patient, spirituality, guilt of being sick, and expressing emotions/feelings
Information Control Intervention Videos include Information about post-HCT. The topics in the IC include specific guidelines to return to wellness post HCT through (1) an exercise plan, (2) a nutrition (dietary) plan, (3) pain management, (4) information about the complications, (5) caregiver responsibilities, (6) social support, (7) preventing from infections, and (8) symptom management. Participants randomized to the IC will receive the full set of DS modules only after the final 3-month post-intervention data collection point has passed and they can view them as desired.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Patient Inclusion Criteria: * age 18 or older * recently underwent Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) (within a month after hospital discharge) * must be able to speak, read, and write in English * access to a working phone and e-mail account Patient
Exclusion criteria
* no primary caregiver * cognitive impairment that prohibits completion of study assessment * visual or hearing impairment * other (e.g., provider non-approval or logistical constraints such as patient moving out of town) Caregiver Inclusion Criteria: * age 18 or older * family caregivers who are identified as a primary caregiver by a patient * have primary responsibility for the care of patients throughout the HCT process * Must be able to speak, read, and write in English * Access to a working phone and e-mail account
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Changes From Baseline Profile of Mood States (POMS) Short Version (Emotional Well-being or /Reduction of Emotional Distress) at 4 Weeks | Baseline (T1), T2 (after 4-week intervention) | Emotional Well-Being (Reduction of Emotional Distress) will be measured using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) short version (15 items, 5-point Likert scale; 0=not at all, 4=extremely). The POMS is one of the most frequently used and validated scales in studies of psychosocial interventions for cancer patients. The POMS Total Mood Disturbance (TMD) score has been shown to be most sensitive to interventions designed to facilitate emotional expression.The POMS consists of the TMD dimensions (tension-anxiety; depression-dejection; anger-hostility; and confusion-bewilderment) (Cronbach's a = .93) to be used in the current study as the primary outcome measure; and two others (fatigue-inertia; vigor-activity) will be documented. Total of Mood Disturbance= (anxious+depression+anger+fatigue)- vigor (Range from 12 to 48). The higher values represent a worse emotional well-being. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Changes From Baseline Emotional Well-being (Using the Emotional Acceptance Scale) at 4 Weeks | Baseline (T1), T2 (after 4-week intervention) | The 13-item Emotional Acceptance (EA) Scale assesses the extent to which subjects are accepting toward their feelings, with statements such as I naturally and easily attend to my feelings. Respondents estimate the percentage of time each statement is true, in increments of 10 (0 = never/not at all to 100 = always/perfectly; total score = mean item rating). In Dr. Weihs' sample of 91 breast cancer patients, internal consistency was strong (= .92), as was 15-month test re-test reliability (r = .58). |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Four enrolled participants were excluded from the study before assignment to groups due to patients' health issues (e.g., readmitted to the hospital, illness, and/or complications after the transplant).
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Baseline and Digital Stories (DS) for Patients In-person baseline surveys using the web-based data collection platform, Research Electronic Data Capture before the random assignment to DS arm. Eight Digital Stories Intervention (4 patient and 4 caregiver stories about hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) over the course of 4 weeks (2 videos per week) with a weekly email notification and reminder phone call. Each story was made with voice, images, and sound (3-5 minutes each).
Baseline Surveys: Baseline surveys contained a series of scaled questions, including sociodemographic variables (age, sex, cancer type, and etc), profile of mood states, social well-being, emotional processing and acceptance.
Digital Stories Intervention: Digital Stories Intervention Videos contain the following content: caregiver burden, positive and cognitive coping, support from other family and friends, fear of losing the patient, spirituality, guilt of being sick, and expressing emotions/feelings | 53 |
| Baseline and Digital Stories (DS) for Caregivers In-person baseline surveys using the web-based data collection platform, Research Electronic Data Capture before the random assignment to DS arm. Eight Digital Stories Intervention (4 patient and 4 caregiver stories about hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) over the course of 4 weeks (2 videos per week) with a weekly email notification and reminder phone call. Each story was made with voice, images, and sound (3-5 minutes each).
Baseline Surveys: Baseline surveys contained a series of scaled questions, including sociodemographic variables (age, sex, cancer type, and etc), profile of mood states, social well-being, emotional processing and acceptance.
Digital Stories Intervention: Digital Stories Intervention Videos contain the following content: caregiver burden, positive and cognitive coping, support from other family and friends, fear of losing the patient, spirituality, guilt of being sick, and expressing emotions/feelings | 53 |
| Baseline and Information Control (IC) for Patients n-person baseline surveys using the web-based data collection platform, Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) before the random assignment to IC arm. Eight Information Control Intervention videos containing only information about post-HCT care (as opposed to story/narrative) over the course of 4 weeks (2 videos per week) with a weekly email notification and reminder phone call.
Baseline Surveys: Baseline surveys contained a series of scaled questions, including sociodemographic variables (age, sex, cancer type, and etc), profile of mood states, social well-being, emotional processing and acceptance.
Information Control Intervention: Information Control Intervention Videos include Information about post-HCT. The topics in the IC include specific guidelines to return to wellness post HCT through (1) an exercise plan, (2) a nutrition (dietary) plan, (3) pain management, (4) information about the complications, (5) caregiver responsibilities, (6) social support, (7) preventing from infections, and (8) symptom management. Participants randomized to the IC will receive the full set of DS modules only after the final 3-month post-intervention data collection point has passed and they can view them as desired. | 46 |
| Baseline and Information Control (IC) for Caregivers n-person baseline surveys using the web-based data collection platform, Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) before the random assignment to IC arm. Eight Information Control Intervention videos containing only information about post-HCT care (as opposed to story/narrative) over the course of 4 weeks (2 videos per week) with a weekly email notification and reminder phone call.
Baseline Surveys: Baseline surveys contained a series of scaled questions, including sociodemographic variables (age, sex, cancer type, and etc), profile of mood states, social well-being, emotional processing and acceptance.
Information Control Intervention: Information Control Intervention Videos include Information about post-HCT. The topics in the IC include specific guidelines to return to wellness post HCT through (1) an exercise plan, (2) a nutrition (dietary) plan, (3) pain management, (4) information about the complications, (5) caregiver responsibilities, (6) social support, (7) preventing from infections, and (8) symptom management. Participants randomized to the IC will receive the full set of DS modules only after the final 3-month post-intervention data collection point has passed and they can view them as desired. | 46 |
| Total | 198 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 8 | 6 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 14 | 12 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 6 | 4 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Baseline and Digital Stories (DS) for Patients | Baseline and Digital Stories (DS) for Caregivers | Baseline and Information Control (IC) for Patients | Baseline and Information Control (IC) for Caregivers | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 56.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3 | 56.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9 | 53.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2 | 51.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.4 | 54.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2 |
| Cancer diagnosis Leukemia | 10 Participants | 0 Participants | 14 Participants | 0 Participants | 24 Participants |
| Cancer diagnosis Lymphoma | 10 Participants | 0 Participants | 10 Participants | 0 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Cancer diagnosis Multiple Myeloma | 19 Participants | 0 Participants | 9 Participants | 0 Participants | 28 Participants |
| Cancer diagnosis Myelodysplastic Syndrome | 11 Participants | 0 Participants | 11 Participants | 0 Participants | 22 Participants |
| Cancer diagnosis Other | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Education 4-year college degree | 18 Participants | 21 Participants | 10 Participants | 10 Participants | 59 Participants |
| Education Graduate degree | 11 Participants | 8 Participants | 8 Participants | 9 Participants | 36 Participants |
| Education High School | 4 Participants | 6 Participants | 13 Participants | 9 Participants | 32 Participants |
| Education Some college | 20 Participants | 18 Participants | 15 Participants | 18 Participants | 71 Participants |
| Employment Status Employed full time | 25 Participants | 21 Participants | 17 Participants | 16 Participants | 79 Participants |
| Employment Status Employed part time | 2 Participants | 7 Participants | 2 Participants | 7 Participants | 18 Participants |
| Employment Status Not employed | 26 Participants | 25 Participants | 27 Participants | 23 Participants | 101 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 5 Participants | 7 Participants | 8 Participants | 8 Participants | 28 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 46 Participants | 44 Participants | 37 Participants | 37 Participants | 164 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Health insurance Medicaid | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Health insurance Medicare | 16 Participants | 15 Participants | 7 Participants | 14 Participants | 52 Participants |
| Health insurance Other | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 6 Participants | 1 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Health insurance Private Coverage | 34 Participants | 36 Participants | 31 Participants | 29 Participants | 130 Participants |
| Main source of support Friends | 9 Participants | 2 Participants | 7 Participants | 3 Participants | 21 Participants |
| Main source of support Other | 6 Participants | 4 Participants | 4 Participants | 4 Participants | 18 Participants |
| Main source of support Parents | 10 Participants | 9 Participants | 9 Participants | 6 Participants | 34 Participants |
| Main source of support Sibling | 8 Participants | 2 Participants | 9 Participants | 1 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Main source of support Son/Daughter | 22 Participants | 4 Participants | 13 Participants | 7 Participants | 46 Participants |
| Main source of support Spouse | 35 Participants | 32 Participants | 29 Participants | 25 Participants | 121 Participants |
| Marital Status Divorced, widowed or separated | 8 Participants | 6 Participants | 6 Participants | 3 Participants | 23 Participants |
| Marital Status Married | 39 Participants | 39 Participants | 34 Participants | 31 Participants | 143 Participants |
| Marital Status Never Married | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 6 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Marital Status Not married | 3 Participants | 5 Participants | 4 Participants | 6 Participants | 18 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 4 Participants | 4 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 46 Participants | 46 Participants | 38 Participants | 37 Participants | 167 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 53 Participants | 53 Participants | 46 Participants | 46 Participants | 198 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 22 Participants | 42 Participants | 18 Participants | 30 Participants | 112 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 31 Participants | 11 Participants | 28 Participants | 16 Participants | 86 Participants |
| Transplant type Allogeneic | 39 Participants | 39 Participants | 33 Participants | 33 Participants | 144 Participants |
| Transplant type Autologous | 14 Participants | 14 Participants | 11 Participants | 11 Participants | 50 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 4 / 53 | 4 / 53 | 3 / 46 | 3 / 46 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 53 | 0 / 53 | 0 / 46 | 0 / 46 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 53 | 0 / 53 | 0 / 46 | 0 / 46 |
Outcome results
Changes From Baseline Profile of Mood States (POMS) Short Version (Emotional Well-being or /Reduction of Emotional Distress) at 4 Weeks
Emotional Well-Being (Reduction of Emotional Distress) will be measured using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) short version (15 items, 5-point Likert scale; 0=not at all, 4=extremely). The POMS is one of the most frequently used and validated scales in studies of psychosocial interventions for cancer patients. The POMS Total Mood Disturbance (TMD) score has been shown to be most sensitive to interventions designed to facilitate emotional expression.The POMS consists of the TMD dimensions (tension-anxiety; depression-dejection; anger-hostility; and confusion-bewilderment) (Cronbach's a = .93) to be used in the current study as the primary outcome measure; and two others (fatigue-inertia; vigor-activity) will be documented. Total of Mood Disturbance= (anxious+depression+anger+fatigue)- vigor (Range from 12 to 48). The higher values represent a worse emotional well-being.
Time frame: Baseline (T1), T2 (after 4-week intervention)
Population: HCT patients and caregivers
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline and Digital Stories (DS) | Changes From Baseline Profile of Mood States (POMS) Short Version (Emotional Well-being or /Reduction of Emotional Distress) at 4 Weeks | Post-Intervention | 2.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.1 |
| Baseline and Digital Stories (DS) | Changes From Baseline Profile of Mood States (POMS) Short Version (Emotional Well-being or /Reduction of Emotional Distress) at 4 Weeks | Baseline | 3.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3 |
| Baseline and Information Control (IC) | Changes From Baseline Profile of Mood States (POMS) Short Version (Emotional Well-being or /Reduction of Emotional Distress) at 4 Weeks | Post-Intervention | 2.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.1 |
| Baseline and Information Control (IC) | Changes From Baseline Profile of Mood States (POMS) Short Version (Emotional Well-being or /Reduction of Emotional Distress) at 4 Weeks | Baseline | 3.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
Changes From Baseline Emotional Well-being (Using the Emotional Acceptance Scale) at 4 Weeks
The 13-item Emotional Acceptance (EA) Scale assesses the extent to which subjects are accepting toward their feelings, with statements such as I naturally and easily attend to my feelings. Respondents estimate the percentage of time each statement is true, in increments of 10 (0 = never/not at all to 100 = always/perfectly; total score = mean item rating). In Dr. Weihs' sample of 91 breast cancer patients, internal consistency was strong (= .92), as was 15-month test re-test reliability (r = .58).
Time frame: Baseline (T1), T2 (after 4-week intervention)
Population: HCT patients and caregivers
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline and Digital Stories (DS) | Changes From Baseline Emotional Well-being (Using the Emotional Acceptance Scale) at 4 Weeks | Baseline | 2.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.57 |
| Baseline and Digital Stories (DS) | Changes From Baseline Emotional Well-being (Using the Emotional Acceptance Scale) at 4 Weeks | Post-intervention | 3.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.64 |
| Baseline and Information Control (IC) | Changes From Baseline Emotional Well-being (Using the Emotional Acceptance Scale) at 4 Weeks | Baseline | 2.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.59 |
| Baseline and Information Control (IC) | Changes From Baseline Emotional Well-being (Using the Emotional Acceptance Scale) at 4 Weeks | Post-intervention | 3.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.49 |