Skip to content

Effects of Digital Stories Intervention on Psychosocial Well-being

Effects of Digital Stories Intervention on Psychosocial Well-being for Cancer Patients and Caregivers Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03654599
Enrollment
202
Registered
2018-08-31
Start date
2017-09-01
Completion date
2021-07-23
Last updated
2024-10-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anxiety, Bone Marrow Transplant, Depression, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Information Disclosure, Narrative, Psychosocial Health, Stress

Keywords

Digital Storytelling, Narrative, Cancer patients, Psychosocial health, bone marrow transplant

Brief summary

Patients and caregivers undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation often continue to experience anxiety, depression, isolation, and other psychosocial distress. A narrative-based digital stories intervention has shown promise in a pilot study with breast cancer patients in helping to alleviate emotional distress. This study is designed to test digital stories to be viewed and discussed by other HCT patients/caregivers as a psychosocial intervention in a randomized controlled trial and to test the effects of digital stories on how 110 patient and caregiver dyads (N=220) undergoing one of the most rigorous and aggressive treatments cope with treatment-related distress through supportive open dyadic communication and emotional expression.

Detailed description

Patients and caregivers undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) are at particular risk for reduced psychological and social well-being due to the rigorous and unique nature of the transplant experience, such as prolonged immunosuppression and multiple post HCT complications resulting in frequent hospitalizations. However, few studies have evaluated interventions to alleviate psychosocial distress for both patients and caregivers, and those have yielded inconclusive results. A narrative-based (storytelling) approach may be an effective intervention tool for HCT patients and caregivers coping with psychosocial distress. The preliminary data show that stories shared by individuals in which a range of emotional expression or resolutions are described, may have beneficial effects on emotional well-being. In a recent pilot study of a 3-day digital storytelling workshop, investigators produced a series of digital videos with narratives from a panel of post-HCT patients. The purpose of this study is to use these digital stories (DS), to be viewed and discussed by HCT patient/caregiver dyads, as a therapeutic intervention and to examine influences on both patients' and caregivers' psychosocial status. This cost-effective, non-invasive, and easy-to-deliver psychosocial support vehicle has never been formally tested as an intervention for HCT patients or patient-caregiver dyads. To build upon investigators' preliminary studies and to pilot test the efficacy of this series of DS, 110 adult patients undergoing HCT at the Mayo Clinic Arizona and patient respective adult caregivers (N=220 total participants) will be randomized to either (a) an intervention using DS (dyadic exposure to four 5-minute modules) or (b) an information control (IC) video group (dyadic exposure to four videos containing only information about post-HCT care) followed by encouragement to discuss as a dyad. Exposure will occur once per week over 4 weeks via a secure web-based data collection platform (REDcap) with a weekly email notification and reminder phone call. Using investigator's model of Narrative Effects on Socio-Emotional Well-Being, we will also examine expected mediating factors to determine how stories may work to reduce psychosocial distress by fostering emotional processing, acceptance, and dyadic disclosure of emotions.

Interventions

Baseline surveys contained a series of scaled questions, including sociodemographic variables (age, sex, cancer type, and etc), profile of mood states, social well-being, emotional processing and acceptance.

BEHAVIORALDigital Stories Intervention

Digital Stories Intervention Videos contain the following content: caregiver burden, positive and cognitive coping, support from other family and friends, fear of losing the patient, spirituality, guilt of being sick, and expressing emotions/feelings

Information Control Intervention Videos include Information about post-HCT. The topics in the IC include specific guidelines to return to wellness post HCT through (1) an exercise plan, (2) a nutrition (dietary) plan, (3) pain management, (4) information about the complications, (5) caregiver responsibilities, (6) social support, (7) preventing from infections, and (8) symptom management. Participants randomized to the IC will receive the full set of DS modules only after the final 3-month post-intervention data collection point has passed and they can view them as desired.

Sponsors

Mayo Clinic
CollaboratorOTHER
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Arizona State University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patient Inclusion Criteria: * age 18 or older * recently underwent Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) (within a month after hospital discharge) * must be able to speak, read, and write in English * access to a working phone and e-mail account Patient

Exclusion criteria

* no primary caregiver * cognitive impairment that prohibits completion of study assessment * visual or hearing impairment * other (e.g., provider non-approval or logistical constraints such as patient moving out of town) Caregiver Inclusion Criteria: * age 18 or older * family caregivers who are identified as a primary caregiver by a patient * have primary responsibility for the care of patients throughout the HCT process * Must be able to speak, read, and write in English * Access to a working phone and e-mail account

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes From Baseline Profile of Mood States (POMS) Short Version (Emotional Well-being or /Reduction of Emotional Distress) at 4 WeeksBaseline (T1), T2 (after 4-week intervention)Emotional Well-Being (Reduction of Emotional Distress) will be measured using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) short version (15 items, 5-point Likert scale; 0=not at all, 4=extremely). The POMS is one of the most frequently used and validated scales in studies of psychosocial interventions for cancer patients. The POMS Total Mood Disturbance (TMD) score has been shown to be most sensitive to interventions designed to facilitate emotional expression.The POMS consists of the TMD dimensions (tension-anxiety; depression-dejection; anger-hostility; and confusion-bewilderment) (Cronbach's a = .93) to be used in the current study as the primary outcome measure; and two others (fatigue-inertia; vigor-activity) will be documented. Total of Mood Disturbance= (anxious+depression+anger+fatigue)- vigor (Range from 12 to 48). The higher values represent a worse emotional well-being.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes From Baseline Emotional Well-being (Using the Emotional Acceptance Scale) at 4 WeeksBaseline (T1), T2 (after 4-week intervention)The 13-item Emotional Acceptance (EA) Scale assesses the extent to which subjects are accepting toward their feelings, with statements such as I naturally and easily attend to my feelings. Respondents estimate the percentage of time each statement is true, in increments of 10 (0 = never/not at all to 100 = always/perfectly; total score = mean item rating). In Dr. Weihs' sample of 91 breast cancer patients, internal consistency was strong (= .92), as was 15-month test re-test reliability (r = .58).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Four enrolled participants were excluded from the study before assignment to groups due to patients' health issues (e.g., readmitted to the hospital, illness, and/or complications after the transplant).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Baseline and Digital Stories (DS) for Patients
In-person baseline surveys using the web-based data collection platform, Research Electronic Data Capture before the random assignment to DS arm. Eight Digital Stories Intervention (4 patient and 4 caregiver stories about hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) over the course of 4 weeks (2 videos per week) with a weekly email notification and reminder phone call. Each story was made with voice, images, and sound (3-5 minutes each). Baseline Surveys: Baseline surveys contained a series of scaled questions, including sociodemographic variables (age, sex, cancer type, and etc), profile of mood states, social well-being, emotional processing and acceptance. Digital Stories Intervention: Digital Stories Intervention Videos contain the following content: caregiver burden, positive and cognitive coping, support from other family and friends, fear of losing the patient, spirituality, guilt of being sick, and expressing emotions/feelings
53
Baseline and Digital Stories (DS) for Caregivers
In-person baseline surveys using the web-based data collection platform, Research Electronic Data Capture before the random assignment to DS arm. Eight Digital Stories Intervention (4 patient and 4 caregiver stories about hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) over the course of 4 weeks (2 videos per week) with a weekly email notification and reminder phone call. Each story was made with voice, images, and sound (3-5 minutes each). Baseline Surveys: Baseline surveys contained a series of scaled questions, including sociodemographic variables (age, sex, cancer type, and etc), profile of mood states, social well-being, emotional processing and acceptance. Digital Stories Intervention: Digital Stories Intervention Videos contain the following content: caregiver burden, positive and cognitive coping, support from other family and friends, fear of losing the patient, spirituality, guilt of being sick, and expressing emotions/feelings
53
Baseline and Information Control (IC) for Patients
n-person baseline surveys using the web-based data collection platform, Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) before the random assignment to IC arm. Eight Information Control Intervention videos containing only information about post-HCT care (as opposed to story/narrative) over the course of 4 weeks (2 videos per week) with a weekly email notification and reminder phone call. Baseline Surveys: Baseline surveys contained a series of scaled questions, including sociodemographic variables (age, sex, cancer type, and etc), profile of mood states, social well-being, emotional processing and acceptance. Information Control Intervention: Information Control Intervention Videos include Information about post-HCT. The topics in the IC include specific guidelines to return to wellness post HCT through (1) an exercise plan, (2) a nutrition (dietary) plan, (3) pain management, (4) information about the complications, (5) caregiver responsibilities, (6) social support, (7) preventing from infections, and (8) symptom management. Participants randomized to the IC will receive the full set of DS modules only after the final 3-month post-intervention data collection point has passed and they can view them as desired.
46
Baseline and Information Control (IC) for Caregivers
n-person baseline surveys using the web-based data collection platform, Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) before the random assignment to IC arm. Eight Information Control Intervention videos containing only information about post-HCT care (as opposed to story/narrative) over the course of 4 weeks (2 videos per week) with a weekly email notification and reminder phone call. Baseline Surveys: Baseline surveys contained a series of scaled questions, including sociodemographic variables (age, sex, cancer type, and etc), profile of mood states, social well-being, emotional processing and acceptance. Information Control Intervention: Information Control Intervention Videos include Information about post-HCT. The topics in the IC include specific guidelines to return to wellness post HCT through (1) an exercise plan, (2) a nutrition (dietary) plan, (3) pain management, (4) information about the complications, (5) caregiver responsibilities, (6) social support, (7) preventing from infections, and (8) symptom management. Participants randomized to the IC will receive the full set of DS modules only after the final 3-month post-intervention data collection point has passed and they can view them as desired.
46
Total198

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath86
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1412
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject64

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBaseline and Digital Stories (DS) for PatientsBaseline and Digital Stories (DS) for CaregiversBaseline and Information Control (IC) for PatientsBaseline and Information Control (IC) for CaregiversTotal
Age, Continuous56.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3
56.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
53.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2
51.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.4
54.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2
Cancer diagnosis
Leukemia
10 Participants0 Participants14 Participants0 Participants24 Participants
Cancer diagnosis
Lymphoma
10 Participants0 Participants10 Participants0 Participants20 Participants
Cancer diagnosis
Multiple Myeloma
19 Participants0 Participants9 Participants0 Participants28 Participants
Cancer diagnosis
Myelodysplastic Syndrome
11 Participants0 Participants11 Participants0 Participants22 Participants
Cancer diagnosis
Other
3 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Education
4-year college degree
18 Participants21 Participants10 Participants10 Participants59 Participants
Education
Graduate degree
11 Participants8 Participants8 Participants9 Participants36 Participants
Education
High School
4 Participants6 Participants13 Participants9 Participants32 Participants
Education
Some college
20 Participants18 Participants15 Participants18 Participants71 Participants
Employment Status
Employed full time
25 Participants21 Participants17 Participants16 Participants79 Participants
Employment Status
Employed part time
2 Participants7 Participants2 Participants7 Participants18 Participants
Employment Status
Not employed
26 Participants25 Participants27 Participants23 Participants101 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants7 Participants8 Participants8 Participants28 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
46 Participants44 Participants37 Participants37 Participants164 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants6 Participants
Health insurance
Medicaid
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Health insurance
Medicare
16 Participants15 Participants7 Participants14 Participants52 Participants
Health insurance
Other
2 Participants1 Participants6 Participants1 Participants10 Participants
Health insurance
Private Coverage
34 Participants36 Participants31 Participants29 Participants130 Participants
Main source of support
Friends
9 Participants2 Participants7 Participants3 Participants21 Participants
Main source of support
Other
6 Participants4 Participants4 Participants4 Participants18 Participants
Main source of support
Parents
10 Participants9 Participants9 Participants6 Participants34 Participants
Main source of support
Sibling
8 Participants2 Participants9 Participants1 Participants20 Participants
Main source of support
Son/Daughter
22 Participants4 Participants13 Participants7 Participants46 Participants
Main source of support
Spouse
35 Participants32 Participants29 Participants25 Participants121 Participants
Marital Status
Divorced, widowed or separated
8 Participants6 Participants6 Participants3 Participants23 Participants
Marital Status
Married
39 Participants39 Participants34 Participants31 Participants143 Participants
Marital Status
Never Married
3 Participants3 Participants2 Participants6 Participants14 Participants
Marital Status
Not married
3 Participants5 Participants4 Participants6 Participants18 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants2 Participants3 Participants3 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
3 Participants3 Participants4 Participants4 Participants14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
46 Participants46 Participants38 Participants37 Participants167 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
53 Participants53 Participants46 Participants46 Participants198 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants42 Participants18 Participants30 Participants112 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
31 Participants11 Participants28 Participants16 Participants86 Participants
Transplant type
Allogeneic
39 Participants39 Participants33 Participants33 Participants144 Participants
Transplant type
Autologous
14 Participants14 Participants11 Participants11 Participants50 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
4 / 534 / 533 / 463 / 46
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 530 / 530 / 460 / 46
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 530 / 530 / 460 / 46

Outcome results

Primary

Changes From Baseline Profile of Mood States (POMS) Short Version (Emotional Well-being or /Reduction of Emotional Distress) at 4 Weeks

Emotional Well-Being (Reduction of Emotional Distress) will be measured using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) short version (15 items, 5-point Likert scale; 0=not at all, 4=extremely). The POMS is one of the most frequently used and validated scales in studies of psychosocial interventions for cancer patients. The POMS Total Mood Disturbance (TMD) score has been shown to be most sensitive to interventions designed to facilitate emotional expression.The POMS consists of the TMD dimensions (tension-anxiety; depression-dejection; anger-hostility; and confusion-bewilderment) (Cronbach's a = .93) to be used in the current study as the primary outcome measure; and two others (fatigue-inertia; vigor-activity) will be documented. Total of Mood Disturbance= (anxious+depression+anger+fatigue)- vigor (Range from 12 to 48). The higher values represent a worse emotional well-being.

Time frame: Baseline (T1), T2 (after 4-week intervention)

Population: HCT patients and caregivers

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Baseline and Digital Stories (DS)Changes From Baseline Profile of Mood States (POMS) Short Version (Emotional Well-being or /Reduction of Emotional Distress) at 4 WeeksPost-Intervention2.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Baseline and Digital Stories (DS)Changes From Baseline Profile of Mood States (POMS) Short Version (Emotional Well-being or /Reduction of Emotional Distress) at 4 WeeksBaseline3.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Baseline and Information Control (IC)Changes From Baseline Profile of Mood States (POMS) Short Version (Emotional Well-being or /Reduction of Emotional Distress) at 4 WeeksPost-Intervention2.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Baseline and Information Control (IC)Changes From Baseline Profile of Mood States (POMS) Short Version (Emotional Well-being or /Reduction of Emotional Distress) at 4 WeeksBaseline3.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
Secondary

Changes From Baseline Emotional Well-being (Using the Emotional Acceptance Scale) at 4 Weeks

The 13-item Emotional Acceptance (EA) Scale assesses the extent to which subjects are accepting toward their feelings, with statements such as I naturally and easily attend to my feelings. Respondents estimate the percentage of time each statement is true, in increments of 10 (0 = never/not at all to 100 = always/perfectly; total score = mean item rating). In Dr. Weihs' sample of 91 breast cancer patients, internal consistency was strong (= .92), as was 15-month test re-test reliability (r = .58).

Time frame: Baseline (T1), T2 (after 4-week intervention)

Population: HCT patients and caregivers

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Baseline and Digital Stories (DS)Changes From Baseline Emotional Well-being (Using the Emotional Acceptance Scale) at 4 WeeksBaseline2.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.57
Baseline and Digital Stories (DS)Changes From Baseline Emotional Well-being (Using the Emotional Acceptance Scale) at 4 WeeksPost-intervention3.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
Baseline and Information Control (IC)Changes From Baseline Emotional Well-being (Using the Emotional Acceptance Scale) at 4 WeeksBaseline2.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
Baseline and Information Control (IC)Changes From Baseline Emotional Well-being (Using the Emotional Acceptance Scale) at 4 WeeksPost-intervention3.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.49

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026