Orthodontic Appliance Complication
Conditions
Keywords
Surgical guide, Surgical stent, orthodontic mini screw, temporary anchorage device
Brief summary
Although mini screw insertion is considered as a simple and non-invasive technique, it's a critical procedure which requires precision and accuracy. The placement of mini-screw poses a challenge to the orthodontist, particularly if the space available for mini-screws is limited.4 The proximity to the vital structures surrounding the proposed mini-screw position necessitates the precise knowledge of the anatomy of the insertion area.5 The incidence of mini-screw to tooth contact in the placement of inter-radicular region was 27%.6 Although failure of mini screw is considered a multi-factorial concern, many studies reported the proximity of a mini-screw to tooth structures is a major risk factor for failure, especially in the inter-radicular inserted mini-screws. guided insertion was believed to give more favorable results. Above all, the recent technology of the scanning and three-dimensional printing could pave the way to construct a simple accurate guide. Additionally all previous studies assessed the insertion accuracy using CBCT post-operatively, that can't be applied on human subjects for ethical reasons. Thus a non-invasive method for assessment of mini-screw insertion should be implemented.
Detailed description
PICOs P: Adult orthodontic patients need mini screws in maxillary arch bilaterally for anchorage I: Three dimensional printed digital guide for mini screw insertion C: Conventional free hand insertion technique \- O: Primary outcome: Root proximity Secondary outcomes: * Patient discomfort during insertion 17 * Insertion accuracy * Angular deviation * Linear deviation * Failure 18 S: Split Mouth Randomized clinical Trial
Interventions
A CAD/CAM printed plate with a channel for mini-screw insertion
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
during the insertion procedure the principle investigator and the co supervisor couldn't be blinded, as the two insertion techniques are completely different.
Intervention model description
adult orthodontic participants
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Orthodontic patients with Angle's Class I bimaxillary protrusion • Patients having average mandibular plane angle
Exclusion criteria
* Mixed dentition patients * Smoker patients * Patients with Increased lower facial height * Patients with missing posterior teeth * Bleeding disorders or anticoagulant therapy * Patients with cleft lip & palate * Patients with facial asymmetry * Patients with transverse maxillary deficiency
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Root proximity | immediately after mini-screw insertion (T0) | Distance between inserted mini screw and the adjacent roots in microns |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patient discomfort: | immediately after mini-screw insertion (T0) | Likert scale, it is scale divided into five points to measure the degree of patient discomfort maximum value(5) strongly discomfort, discomfort, neutral, little discomfort, and minimum value (0)no discomfort |