Skip to content

Personal Sound Amplification Smartphone Application Feasibility

Personal Sound Amplification Smartphone Application Feasibility Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03652909
Acronym
PSAD
Enrollment
32
Registered
2018-08-29
Start date
2021-02-26
Completion date
2021-09-20
Last updated
2023-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hearing Loss

Brief summary

Find a personal sound amplification device that can help people hear better.

Detailed description

Personal sound amplification devices (PSADs) have recently become available to the public. PSADs serve a potentially important role in providing audibility of sounds for adults who find themselves having difficulty hearing and understanding speech in some daily living situations, but may not be candidates for traditional, high-amplification hearing aids. Despite hearing loss being a very common problem, few adults who could benefit from some level of amplification actually access the technology. Only approximately 1 in 7 adults (14%) over the age of 50 with a hearing loss using amplification. High cost is the most commonly cited reason for not wanting to try amplification, and indeed, hearing aids range from $1000 to $5000 each (i.e., per ear). PSADs range from $50-$600 each, and may provide a reasonable option for people who are not ready, or are unwilling, to wear a hearing aid. This project aims to examine the feasibility of a PSAD to provide audible and clear sound signal to adult listeners. The significance of this project is its potential to develop an option for individuals to take advantage of amplification and access sound to improve quality of life, who may not otherwise do so without this technology.

Interventions

DEVICEAscending Hearing Technologies device

Personal Sound Amplification Device

Sponsors

University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
CollaboratorNIH
Medical College of Wisconsin
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adults who report difficulty hearing in some daily listening situations. * Primarily English-speaking * Able to follow instructions and perform study procedures.

Exclusion criteria

* Children * Non-English speaking * Unable to perform research procedures and/or follow necessary instructions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sentence Perception in Noise Fine-tuned v UnamplifiedThe patient will wear the Personal Sound Amplification Device for approximately 30 minutesThe fine-tuned Personal Sound Amplification Device sound output will show speech perception benefit over the unamplified condition. Measure is percent of words heard correctly.
Sentence Perception in Noise Initial Fit v UnamplifiedThe patient will wear the Personal Sound Amplification Device for approximately 30 minutesThe prescription gain (initial fit) Personal Sound Amplification Device sound output will show speech perception benefit over the unamplified condition. Measure is percent of words heard correctly.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Words ClearThe patient will wear the personal sound amplification device on average for 30 minutes.The Likert Scale rating scale measures the subject's perception of how well he/she heard both with the Personal Sound Amplification Device and without the device. The patient will rate the following questions on a scale from Strongly Disagree (0), Disagree (1), Neutral (2), Agree (3), and Strongly Agree (4) for the statement 'the words were clear.' Higher values mean better outcome.
Sentences Easy to UnderstandThe patient will wear the Personal Sound Amplification Device for approximately 30 minutesThe Likert Scale rating scale measures the subject's perception of how well he/she heard both with the Personal Sound Amplification Device and without the device. The patient will rate the following questions on a scale from Strongly Disagree (0), Disagree (1), Neutral (2), Agree (3), and Strongly Agree (4) for the statement 'sentences were easy to understand.' Higher values mean better outcome.
Sounds Are DistortedThe patient will wear the Personal Sound Amplification Device for approximately 30 minutesThe patient will rate the following questions on a scale from Strongly Disagree (0), Disagree (1), Neutral (2), Agree (3), and Strongly Agree (4) for the statement 'the words were clear.' Lower values mean better outcome.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment occurred February through September 2021. Participants were recruited from the audiology and ear nose and throat clinics.

Pre-assignment details

Not applicable. Enrollment and subject participation in the experiment occurred sequentially within the same study visit.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PSAD
Patients try the personal sound amplification device. Ascending Hearing Technologies device: Personal Sound Amplification Device
32
Total32

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPSAD
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
21 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
11 Participants
Age, Continuous62.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
31 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
29 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
32 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants
Sound quality: Sentences were easy to understand1.4 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
Sound quality: sounds were distorted2.5 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3
Sound quality: Words were clear1.5 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
Speech perception percent correct57 percent words correct
STANDARD_DEVIATION 34

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 32
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 32
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 32

Outcome results

Primary

Sentence Perception in Noise Fine-tuned v Unamplified

The fine-tuned Personal Sound Amplification Device sound output will show speech perception benefit over the unamplified condition. Measure is percent of words heard correctly.

Time frame: The patient will wear the Personal Sound Amplification Device for approximately 30 minutes

Population: All subjects

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Personal AmplificationSentence Perception in Noise Fine-tuned v Unamplified78 percentage of words heard correctlyStandard Deviation 20
Primary

Sentence Perception in Noise Initial Fit v Unamplified

The prescription gain (initial fit) Personal Sound Amplification Device sound output will show speech perception benefit over the unamplified condition. Measure is percent of words heard correctly.

Time frame: The patient will wear the Personal Sound Amplification Device for approximately 30 minutes

Population: All subjects

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Personal AmplificationSentence Perception in Noise Initial Fit v Unamplified83 percentage of words heard correctlyStandard Deviation 18
Secondary

Sentences Easy to Understand

The Likert Scale rating scale measures the subject's perception of how well he/she heard both with the Personal Sound Amplification Device and without the device. The patient will rate the following questions on a scale from Strongly Disagree (0), Disagree (1), Neutral (2), Agree (3), and Strongly Agree (4) for the statement 'sentences were easy to understand.' Higher values mean better outcome.

Time frame: The patient will wear the Personal Sound Amplification Device for approximately 30 minutes

Population: All subjects

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Personal AmplificationSentences Easy to Understand2.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Secondary

Sounds Are Distorted

The patient will rate the following questions on a scale from Strongly Disagree (0), Disagree (1), Neutral (2), Agree (3), and Strongly Agree (4) for the statement 'the words were clear.' Lower values mean better outcome.

Time frame: The patient will wear the Personal Sound Amplification Device for approximately 30 minutes

Population: All subjects

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Personal AmplificationSounds Are Distorted1.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Words Clear

The Likert Scale rating scale measures the subject's perception of how well he/she heard both with the Personal Sound Amplification Device and without the device. The patient will rate the following questions on a scale from Strongly Disagree (0), Disagree (1), Neutral (2), Agree (3), and Strongly Agree (4) for the statement 'the words were clear.' Higher values mean better outcome.

Time frame: The patient will wear the personal sound amplification device on average for 30 minutes.

Population: All subjects

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Personal AmplificationWords Clear2.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026