Skip to content

Anatomy-based Resection or Margin-based Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Anatomy-based Resection or Margin-based Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03652896
Enrollment
60
Registered
2018-08-29
Start date
2019-01-01
Completion date
2023-12-30
Last updated
2018-08-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatocellular Carcinoma by BCLC Stage

Keywords

hepatocellular carcinoma, anatomical liver resection

Brief summary

Anatomical liver resection was widely accepted as first line curative therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. However, number of retrospective clinical studies showed no priority of anatomical resection for hepatocellular, compared with non-anatomical resection. Surgical resection margin is a essential factor that may affect tumor prognosis. It is controversial whether adequate liver resection margin is associated with improved survival outcome in patients with hepatocellular. There was few prospective clinical trial to investigate whether anatomical liver resection is superior to non-anatomical resection or liver resection with adequate margin is superior to that with inadequate margin. This prospective clinical trial aims at fix these issues.

Detailed description

In the anatomical liver resection group, liver segmentectomy or lobectomy is performed to insure curative resection (R0 resection). The region of liver resected is based on the anatomy or portal vein and hepatic vein. The liver pedicle of the tumor located lobe is exposed and dissected, which is principle to perform anatomical liver resection. In the non-anatomical liver resection group, the liver parenchyma transection is around 0-2 cm from the tumor margin, according to tumor size and location.

Interventions

Liver resection is performed to achieve R0 resection for patients with appropriate BCLC staging, indocyanine green retention rate, Child-pugh grading and adequate liver remnant.

Sponsors

Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
17 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma of BCLC stage A * liver function Child-pugh A * normal indocyanine green retention rate * adequate liver remnant

Exclusion criteria

* age less than 17 y or older than 65 y * unresectable liver cancer * intraoperative ablation * contraindication for liver resection * preoperative treatment for hepatocellular * active hepatitis * pregnant * multi-original tumors * mixed liver cancer (hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocellular carcinoma) * tumor recurrence

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
prognosis5 years3 year and 5 year overall survival and disease free survival

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
postoperative recovery30 days postoperativelypostoperative complications
hospital stay60 days postoperativelyhospital days after operation

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
surgery duration24 hourstime duration of liver parenchyma transection
volume of bleeding24 hoursmillilitre of blood lost during operation
volume of transfusion24 hoursunits of blood transfusion

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactBinhao Zhang, M.D.
bhzhang8@163.com+86 83663400

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026