Skip to content

The Evaluation Of The Efficiency Of Micro-osteoperforation

Efficiency Of Micro-osteoperforation During Alignment Stage

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03652454
Enrollment
28
Registered
2018-08-29
Start date
2017-10-03
Completion date
2019-06-24
Last updated
2022-10-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Crowding of Teeth

Keywords

regional acceleratory phenomenon, micro-osteoperforation, orthodontic alignment

Brief summary

Prolonged orthodontic treatment increases the risc of caries, periodontal problems and root resorption. Many different techniques were developed to shorten the treatment time. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of micro-osteoperforations (MOP) performed in the alignment stage. Twenty eight patients with mandibular arch discrepancy will be included in this research. After the patients are informed about the study they will be requested to sign the consent form.. At the beginning of the treatment routine orthodontic records (photographs, dental models and radiographs) will be taken and the gingival pocket measurements will be made. The twenty eight patients will be randomly divided in two groups. In the first group, 3 or 4 micro-osteoperforations will be made in the parts of the gingiva nearby the discrepancy by perforating the keratinized or non-keratinized mucosa and reaching the alveolar bone under local anesthesia. In the further appointments the traditional aligning procedures will be used and controls will be made every 7-9 days. In the other group 20 patients will be treated in the traditional way and controls will be made each month. Every patient will be requested to answer questions related to treatment comfort and other problems like pain within the first week after each activations. The records will be repeated after the leveling phase. Tooth movement rate will be calculated according to the measurements made on dental casts. Measurements related to cephalometrics and gingival thickness will be evaluated. The results of two groups will be compared in terms of tooth movement rate, gingival thickness, pain and patient comfort.

Detailed description

Twenty eight patients who have crowding in mandibular arch will be included in the study. At the beginning of the study, routine orthodontic records and gingival measurements will be taken.All the records will be repeated after alignment stage. Clinical periodontal parameters including plaque index, gingival index, pocket depth and bleeding were measured with Williams periodontal scaler (Hu Friedy®, Chicago, IL, USA). Gingival thickness will be recorded with a ultrasonic device (Pirop® Ultrasonic Biometer A- Scan, Echo-Son, Krancowa, Poland) Irregularity index will be calculated for each patient using dental casts. After bracket placement; twenty eight patients will be randomly allocated to treatment and control groups (fourteen patients in each group) While micro-osteoperforations will be applied to treatment group, the control group will receive no additional treatment. Each patient will be asked to fulfill a questionnaire to evaluate patient satisfaction and ease of operation. The data was analyzed statistically and the level of statistical significance was determined as p ≤ .05.

Interventions

Propel device (ABD) using for regional acceleratory phenomenon

OTHERconventional fixed appliance treatment

conventional fixed appliance treatment

Sponsors

Izmir Katip Celebi University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

single outcome assessor

Intervention model description

parallel assignment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Existence of all permanent teeth (except molars 2 and 3) 2. Subjects aged 30 and below 3. Confusion of less than 8 mm according to model analysis of the upper and lower sieves 4. Gingival and periodontal indices of less than 1 5. Good oral hygiene

Exclusion criteria

1. Congenitally missing tooth 2. Severe skeletal malocclusion 3. Systemic disease affecting tooth movement 4. Active periodontal disease 5. Smoking 6. Radiographically detected bone loss 7. Gingival pocket depth greater than 4 mm 8. Previous surgical periodontal or orthodontic treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of Mandibular Teeth AlignmentFrom the initiation of the treatment to the completion of alignment stage (approximately 6 months)tooth movement rate (mm/month) was calculated. From the initiation of the treatment to the completion of alignment stage (approximately 6 months). All tooth movement rate measurements were performed in each month.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Micro-Osteoperforation, Regional Acceleration Phenomenon, Orthodontic Alignment Inclusion Criteria: * All permanent teeth have been worn (except 3rd molar) * More than 5 mm perforation compared to LII * Gingival and periodontal indices less than 1 * Good hygiene

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Micro-osteoperforation
Propel device (ABD) micro-osteoperforation: Propel device (ABD) using for regional acceleratory phenomenon. Propel device (ABD) micro-osteoperforation: Propel device (ABD) using for regional acceleratory phenomenon. Propel® is a single-use device specially produced for micro-osteoperforation. The device contains a 1.5 mm thick perforation tip. It has a depth adjustment of 3, 5 and 7 mm and the LED depth indicator gives a warning when the desired depth is reached. The device was removed from its sterile packaging and, after setting the desired depth, was gently placed on the gum and turned clockwise with a slight pressure. When the desired skin was reached, it was removed by turning counterclockwise with the LED indicator on. Micro-osteoperforations were performed directly and atraummatically in the keratinized gum from two or three points, 3 mm between canine canine, 5 mm between canine molar, and 7 mm deep in the posterior region and 1.5 mm in diameter in the alveolar bone.
14
Conventional Treatment
conventional fixed appliance treatment conventional fixed appliance treatment: conventional fixed appliance treatment conventional fixed appliance treatment conventional fixed appliance treatment: conventional fixed appliance treatment. Leveling with 0.014 inch nickel titanium (Ni-Ti, American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, WI, USA) arc wire was started in patients in each group using traditional fixed orthodontic bracket. All patients were invited to the controls once a month and each session was measured and a plaster model was created until the leveling phase was completed. Depending on the leveling, 0.014 inch, 0.016 inch, 0.016x0.022 inch and finally 0.019x0.025 inch Ni-Ti (American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, WI, USA) wires were used respectively. In both groups, arc wires were connected to the slots with prefabricated steel wire ligatures.
14
Total28

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMicro-osteoperforationConventional TreatmentTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
11 Participants12 Participants23 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
little irregularity index9.99 millimetres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.63
8.87 millimetres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5
9.42 millimetres
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.17
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
14 Participants14 Participants28 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Turkey
14 participants14 participants28 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants6 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants8 Participants12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 140 / 14
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 140 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 140 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Rate of Mandibular Teeth Alignment

tooth movement rate (mm/month) was calculated. From the initiation of the treatment to the completion of alignment stage (approximately 6 months). All tooth movement rate measurements were performed in each month.

Time frame: From the initiation of the treatment to the completion of alignment stage (approximately 6 months)

Population: * All permanent teeth have been erupted (except the 3rd molars)~* Presence of more than 5 mm crowding in the lower arc according to Little irregularity index~* Gingival and periodontal indices less than 1~* Good oral hygiene~* Patient and / or guardian volunteering to participate in the study

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Micro-osteoperforationRate of Mandibular Teeth Alignmentsecond months2.08 millimeter (mm)Standard Deviation 0.91
Micro-osteoperforationRate of Mandibular Teeth Alignmentfourth months0.84 millimeter (mm)Standard Deviation 0.95
Micro-osteoperforationRate of Mandibular Teeth Alignmentthird months1.94 millimeter (mm)Standard Deviation 0.99
Micro-osteoperforationRate of Mandibular Teeth Alignmentfifth months0.34 millimeter (mm)Standard Deviation 0.57
Micro-osteoperforationRate of Mandibular Teeth Alignmentfirst month4.27 millimeter (mm)Standard Deviation 1.75
Conventional TreatmentRate of Mandibular Teeth Alignmentfifth months0.93 millimeter (mm)Standard Deviation 0.7
Conventional TreatmentRate of Mandibular Teeth Alignmentfirst month2.82 millimeter (mm)Standard Deviation 0.87
Conventional TreatmentRate of Mandibular Teeth Alignmentsecond months2.31 millimeter (mm)Standard Deviation 1.29
Conventional TreatmentRate of Mandibular Teeth Alignmentthird months1.54 millimeter (mm)Standard Deviation 0.65
Conventional TreatmentRate of Mandibular Teeth Alignmentfourth months0.89 millimeter (mm)Standard Deviation 0.49

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026