Skip to content

Long-term Safety and Performance of the ARGOS-IO Intraocular Pressure Sensor System in Subjects With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG)

A Prospective, Open-label, Multicenter Clinical Follow-up Investigation of the ARGOS-01 and ARGOS-02 Patients to Assess the Long-term Safety and Performance of the ARGOS-IO Intraocular Pressure Sensor System in Subjects With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03651336
Enrollment
16
Registered
2018-08-29
Start date
2018-08-15
Completion date
2022-04-27
Last updated
2025-05-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Open-angle Glaucoma

Keywords

POAG, Primary Open Angle Glaucoma, Cataract, Intraocular Pressure, Intraocular Pressure Sensor System, IOP, Self-monitoring of intraocular pressure

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety and performance of the ARGOS-IO system in patients with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG)

Detailed description

This study is a prospective open-label, multicenter study for clinical follow-up of the ARGOS-01 and ARGOS-02 patients. From the ARGOS-01 to the ARGOS-02 study, some modifications were made to the form of the ARGOS-IO implant in consequence of the outcomes of the ARGOS-01 study. Maximal 5 patients of the ARGOS-01 study and maximal 21 patients of the ARGOS-02 study will take part in this study. The sensor was always implanted in one eye only which will be the study eye.

Interventions

DEVICEARGOS-IO Sensor Pressure System

The ARGOS-IO Pressure sensor have been additionally implanted during local routine working procedures for cataract surgery in Patients with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG) and indicated cataract surgery in previous studies ARGOS-01 and ARGOS-02

Sponsors

Implandata Ophthalmic Products GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects of the ARGOS-01 and ARGOS-02 study with an implanted ARGOS-IO pressure sensor.

Exclusion criteria

* N/A

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety: Number of Patients Experiencing a Device Related Serious Adverse Events (SADE) and Device Related Adverse Events (ADE)Baseline visit to Day 1080 (V01 [Baseline visit] to V07)Number of patients experiencing a device related SAE (SADE) and device related complications (ADE) over the 36-months' clinical follow-up time.
Performance: Level of Agreement Between GAT and the ARGOS-IO SystemBaseline visit to Day 1080 (V01 [Baseline visit] to V07)Level of Agreement between intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements made using GAT & the ARGOS-IO system (IOP in mmHg) following the Bland-Altman method.
Performance: Device MalfunctionsBaseline visit to Day 1080 (V01 [Baseline visit] to V07)Incidence, nature and seriousness of observed device malfunctions / deficiencies (DDs)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient's Compliance in IOP Self-monitoring (Daily Self-measurements)Baseline visit to Day 1080 (V01 [Baseline visit] to V07)The patients' compliance in IOP self-monitoring throughout the clinical follow-up study. Daily self-measurements with the ARGOS-IO sensor were to be done at least 4 times daily (morning, noon, afternoon, evening).
Patient's Compliance in IOP Self-monitoring (Self-measurement Sequences / Day)Baseline visit to Day 1080 (V01 [Baseline visit] to V07)The patients' compliance in IOP self-monitoring throughout the clinical follow-up study. Daily self-measurements with the ARGOS-IO sensor were to be done at least 4 times daily (morning, noon, afternoon, evening).

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment from August 2018 to May 2019 in medical clinics.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ARGOS-IO System
In this prospective open-label, multicenter study for clinical follow-up of the ARGOS-01 and ARGOS-02 patients, 16 patients were enrolled. Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) measurements were compared with the sensors' IOP measurements and comprehensive ophthalmic examinations were performed at all follow-up visits (V01-V07) through 36 months.
16
Total16

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject4

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicARGOS-IO System
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
14 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
2 Participants
Age, Continuous72.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
16 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
16 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 16
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Performance: Device Malfunctions

Incidence, nature and seriousness of observed device malfunctions / deficiencies (DDs)

Time frame: Baseline visit to Day 1080 (V01 [Baseline visit] to V07)

Population: All device deficiencies.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ARGOS-IO SystemPerformance: Device MalfunctionsReader device (external handheld device)8 DDs
ARGOS-IO SystemPerformance: Device MalfunctionsARGOS-IO sensor0 DDs
Primary

Performance: Level of Agreement Between GAT and the ARGOS-IO System

Level of Agreement between intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements made using GAT & the ARGOS-IO system (IOP in mmHg) following the Bland-Altman method.

Time frame: Baseline visit to Day 1080 (V01 [Baseline visit] to V07)

Population: All available pairs of GAT and the ARGOS-IO System IOP measurements.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
ARGOS-IO SystemPerformance: Level of Agreement Between GAT and the ARGOS-IO System1.4 mmHg
Primary

Safety: Number of Patients Experiencing a Device Related Serious Adverse Events (SADE) and Device Related Adverse Events (ADE)

Number of patients experiencing a device related SAE (SADE) and device related complications (ADE) over the 36-months' clinical follow-up time.

Time frame: Baseline visit to Day 1080 (V01 [Baseline visit] to V07)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ARGOS-IO SystemSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing a Device Related Serious Adverse Events (SADE) and Device Related Adverse Events (ADE)SADEs0 Participants
ARGOS-IO SystemSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing a Device Related Serious Adverse Events (SADE) and Device Related Adverse Events (ADE)ADEs0 Participants
Secondary

Patient's Compliance in IOP Self-monitoring (Daily Self-measurements)

The patients' compliance in IOP self-monitoring throughout the clinical follow-up study. Daily self-measurements with the ARGOS-IO sensor were to be done at least 4 times daily (morning, noon, afternoon, evening).

Time frame: Baseline visit to Day 1080 (V01 [Baseline visit] to V07)

Population: All available ARGOS-IO measurements. Of the 16 patients, 3 patients were not included in the summarizing analysis for reasons related to early withdrawal from the study and dementia, hence the 13 participants analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ARGOS-IO SystemPatient's Compliance in IOP Self-monitoring (Daily Self-measurements)79 percentage of daily self-measurementsStandard Deviation 29
Secondary

Patient's Compliance in IOP Self-monitoring (Self-measurement Sequences / Day)

The patients' compliance in IOP self-monitoring throughout the clinical follow-up study. Daily self-measurements with the ARGOS-IO sensor were to be done at least 4 times daily (morning, noon, afternoon, evening).

Time frame: Baseline visit to Day 1080 (V01 [Baseline visit] to V07)

Population: All available ARGOS-IO measurements. Of the 16 patients, 3 patients were not included in the summarizing analysis for reasons related to early withdrawal from the study and dementia, hence the 13 participants analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ARGOS-IO SystemPatient's Compliance in IOP Self-monitoring (Self-measurement Sequences / Day)3.4 number of self-measurement sequences/dayStandard Deviation 0.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026