Skip to content

Optimizing Resource Utilization During Proficiency-based Training of Suturing Skills to Medical Students

Optimizing Resource Utilization During Proficiency-Based Training of Suturing Skills to Medical Students: a Randomized Controlled Trial of Faculty-Led, Peer Tutor-Led, and Computer Augmented Methods of Teaching

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03650959
Enrollment
44
Registered
2018-08-29
Start date
2018-06-04
Completion date
2019-06-16
Last updated
2024-09-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Education, Medical, Sutures

Brief summary

Evidence favours teaching procedural skills to medical students using a proficiency-based rather than time-based approach. Basic suturing skills can be taught through faculty-led, peer tutor-led, and computer augmented approaches. One method has yet to be identified as superior in terms of educational outcomes, resource utilization, and participant perspectives. Pre-clerkship medical students were randomized to: faculty, peer tutor, or computer augmented learning. Participants practiced suturing through their randomized method until they reached targeted proficiency defined using hand motion analysis (HMA). Proficiency was defined as a score of the average plus a standard deviation of five surgeons' HMA for two of three consecutive sutures using appropriate technique. The primary outcome was the number of stitches placed to achieve proficiency. The secondary outcomes were the number of sutures used, time, and costs incurred. Learning curves were constructed. Participants' perceptions were assessed using a follow-up survey.

Interventions

OTHERMethod of learning simple interrupted sutures with instrument tie

Students will train to proficiency (defined by hand motion analysis) on simple interrupted sutures with an instrument tie via one of three different methods: faculty-led, peer tutor-led, or computer augmented self-directed learning.

Sponsors

Queen's University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Second year, pre-clerkship medical students

Exclusion criteria

* None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of stitched laid to reach proficiencyFive days

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Number of sutures used to reach proficiencyFive days
Minutes to reach proficiencyFive days
Individual costs to reach proficiencyFive days

Other

MeasureTime frame
Learning curvesFive days
Student preferencesFive days

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026