Skip to content

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Compared to Traditional Care After Skin Grafting

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Compared to Traditional Care After Split-thickness Skin Grafting - a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03649308
Acronym
TRUTH
Enrollment
160
Registered
2018-08-28
Start date
2018-09-19
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2024-02-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Skin Scarring, Skin Wound, Wound, Wound Breakdown, Wound Heal, Wound of Skin, Wound Open

Keywords

Negative pressure wound therapy, Skin graft, split-thickness skin graft

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compare negative pressure wound therapy to traditional care after split-thickness skin grafting in patients aged over 18.

Detailed description

Split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) is one of the most commonly used techniques in reconstructive plastic surgery and dermatology. Skin grafts are being used to cover skin defects caused by multiple etiologies. Traditionally, patients are immobilized in bed or in wheelchair for up to five days after surgery. Long immobilization decreases patients overall ability to function and increases the length of the stay in hospital. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) have been used successfully in treatment of acute, chronic and diabetic ulcers. It is proposed that NPWT increases capillary blood flow, decreases bacterial contamination, seroma formation and swelling. Using NPWT on split-thickness skin grafts after burns is well documented. It increases skin graft take ratio and speeds up healing. Aim of this study is to compare NPWT to traditional treatment after STSG for any indication in patients aged 18 to 99. This is a two-arm, multicenter, randomized prospective trial with 160 patients.

Interventions

DEVICENegative Pressure Wound Therapy

An immediate mobilization and negative pressure wound therapy (PICO) initiated after surgery.

PROCEDUREConventional treatment

Traditional treatment with conventional wound dressing and 5 days of immobilization after surgery.

Sponsors

Tampere University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Eastern Finland
CollaboratorOTHER
Central Finland Hospital District
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

After split-thickness skin graft procedure, the participants are assigned to either conventional treatment or negative pressure wound therapy group in parallel for the duration of the study.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Wound requiring skin graft surgery * Voluntary

Exclusion criteria

* Not voluntary * Size of wound exceeding 15x15cm or 5x20cm * Previous skin graft operation to the same wound * Inability to co-operate * Wound depth over 1.5cm * Multiple wounds requiring skin grafting * Active infection in wound * Active osteomyelitis in region of wound * Flap reconstruction of the wound * Region of wound not suitable for negative pressure wound therapy (for example toes, foot sole)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Between group difference in skin graft take2 weeks after surgerySplit-thickness skin graft take ratio (percentage of surface area)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Between group difference in skin graft take5 to 7 days after surgerySplit-thickness skin graft take ratio (percentage of surface area)
Strength of pain (wound)5 to 7 days after surgeryStrength of pain in wound (Numeric rating scale 0 to 10; 0= no pain)
Strength of pain (donor site)1 week after surgeryStrength of pain in skin graft donor site (Numeric rating scale 0 to 10; 0= no pain)
POSAS score (wound)8 weeks after surgeryPatient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (range 7 to 70 points; 7=best) (wound)
POSAS score (donor site)8 weeks after surgeryPatient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (range 7 to 70 points; 7=best) (skin graft donor site)
Overall satisfaction5 to 7 days after surgeryOverall satisfaction with treatment (Likert)
Strength of itching (wound)5 to 7 days after surgeryStrength of itching in wound (Numeric rating scale 0 to 10, 0= no itching)
Strength of itching (donor site)5 to 7 days after surgeryStrength of itching in skin graft donor site (Numeric rating scale 0 to 10, 0= no itching)
Length of stayUntil 8 weeks after surgeryLength of hospital ward stay due to wound treatment (days)
Number of visitsUntil 8 weeks after surgeryNumber of visits to hospital due to wound treatment
Change in quality of life5 to7 days after surgeryChange in EuroQol Group 5-dimension self-report questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) compared to baseline (before surgery)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
ContaminationImmediately before skin graft procedure and antimicrobial prophylaxisType of bacterial flora in wound

Countries

Finland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026