Oncology
Conditions
Brief summary
The aims of this study are * to evaluate the image quality and robustness of a whole-body MRI protocol by using an innovative partially automatic algorithm (DOT engine), that automatically optimizes protocol parameters depending on body region (e.g. thorax versus abdomen) * to compare lesion detectability between wb-MRI and the gold standard positron emission tomography (PET)/CT * to compare patient comfort between PET/CT and wb-MRI using a dedicated questionnaire * to compare duration of image acquisition with regards to cost-effectiveness
Detailed description
Whole-body imaging becomes increasingly important in oncologic patients not only for primary cancer staging, but also for assessment of response to therapy. So far, PET/CT is a key method to assess cancer-related changes of metabolism in tumors, which is crucial for response evaluation and to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions. Limitations of PET/CT include the assessment of sclerotic bone metastasis, which often do not show increased tracer uptake. Certain organ metastasis (especially in brain and liver) are also barely detectable due to physiologically increased uptake. Moreover, both CT and administration of radioactive tracer are associated with radiation exposure for patients. Whole-body MRI (wb-MRI) including functional techniques (e.g. Diffusion-weighted Imaging (DWI) to evaluate cell density) enables a functional staging and therapy assessment without use of ionizing radiation. Advantages to assess sclerotic bone lesions and organ metastases have been confirmed in recent literature. Limitations of MRI include detection of lesions in organs with high susceptibility and motion like the thorax.
Interventions
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTSemi whole-body MRI
Single semi-automatic, semi whole-body MRI protocol (Dot engine)
Sponsors
Kantonsspital Baden
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
Clinically-indicated PET/CT and additional study-related MRI as a single Intervention.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Clinically indicated PET/CT for cancer staging or response assess-ment in patients with histopathologically confirmed solid tumors (e.g.prostate, breast, gastrointestinal, testicles) * MRI can be scheduled within 1 week to PET/CT exam
Exclusion criteria
* general MRI contraindications (devices (e.g. certain pacemakers), pregnancy, claustrophobia) * severely reduced general condition * impaired renal function
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| to compare lesion detectability between wb-MRI and the gold standard PET/CT | 30 minutes duration of study-related MRI protocol | \- Primary outcome will be the organ based malignant lesion detectability (Thorax, Abdomen). This will be quantified as a dichotomous variable (present/absent) for MRI and PET/CT. Outcome will be based on two board certified radiologists. In case of disagreement, consensus will be taken. Results will be obtained in a single reading after inclusion of 50 patients. Readers will be blinded to clinical patient data and results of PET/CT. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Secondary outcome will be the number of lesions | 5 minutes assessment of a dedicated questionnaire to assess patient comfort | Secondary outcome will be the number of lesions (Hereby, more than 5 lesions per organ will be regarded as diffuse organ involvement (e.g. diffuse bone metastasis)). Moreover, subjective image perception (e.g. image quality (1-5), quality of lesion demarcation (1-3), diagnostic confidence (1-3) will be assessed. A dedicated questionnaire to assess patient comfort and compare patient acceptance of MRI and PET/CT will be evaluated. |
Countries
Switzerland
Outcome results
None listed