Fear of Childbirth, Labor Pain
Conditions
Keywords
Labor Pain, Labor dance, Music, Fear of childbirth
Brief summary
The study was conducted to investigate the effect of labor dance and music used during the active phase of labor on labor pain and fear of childbirth. The study was designed as a single-blind randomized controlled intervention trial. The participants included in sample are taken into 3 groups (totally 93 participants). A total of 93 individuals, 31 of whom were in the dance group (D), 30 in the music group (M), and 32 in the control group (C), were included in the survey. Data were collected between 15 February 2018 and 15 June 2018 by means of a Personal Information Form, the Labor Monitoring Form, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and version A of the Wijma Delivery Expectancy Questionnaire (W-DEQA).
Detailed description
The study was designed as a single-blind randomized controlled trial with one control and two intervention groups. The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of labor dance and music used in the active phase of labor on perceived labor pain and fear of childbirth. The hypotheses of our study are as follows: H1: The labor dance used in the active phase of labor has an effect on reducing the perceived labor pain. H2: The music used in the active phase of labor has an effect on reducing the perceived labor pain. H3: The labor dance used in the active phase of labor has an effect on reducing the fear of childbirth. H4: The music used in the active phase of labor has an effect on reducing the fear of childbirth. H5: The labor dance is a more effective method in reducing the labor pain perceived in the active phase of labor compared to music. H6: The labor dance is a more effective method in reducing the fear of childbirth in the active phase of labor compared to music. There were three groups in the study: the dance group (D) which involved pregnant women who performed the labor dance; the music group (M) involving pregnant women who were exposed to music; the control group (C) which included pregnant women who were administered routine hospital practices. The sampling included pregnant women who met the inclusion criteria and agreed to participate in the study. D; The pregnant women performed labor dance when the cervical dilatation reached 4-5 cm. The dance was performed in the company of music played through headphones. The labor dance lasted 30 minutes. M; The pregnant women listened to music for 30 minutes when the cervical dilatation reached 4-5 cm. They took any position they wanted while listening to music. C; No intervention was made to relieve the labor pain and reduce the fear of childbirth in the control group of the study. They were administered routine hospital applications.The study data were collected using a Personal Information Form, the Labor Monitoring Form, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and version A of the Wijma Delivery Expectancy Questionnaire (W-DEQA). After the pregnant women were randomly assigned to groups, the personal information form was filled in. The perceived pain and fear of the pregnant women in group D and group M were measured and recorded prior to the intervention (when cervical dilatation reached 4-5 cm). A 30-minute long intervention was administered in groups D and M. The pain and fear measurements were repeated soon after the intervention, 30 minutes and 60 minutes after the intervention. On the other hand, the pain and fear assessments in the control group were made when the cervical dilatation reached 4-5 cm. The assessment of the perceived pain and fear in controls who were administered routine hospital practices were repeated 30 minutes after the first measurement, after 60 minutes, and after 90 minutes .
Interventions
BEHAVIORALLabor dance
The dance group which involved pregnant women who performed the labor dance
BEHAVIORALMusic
The music group involving pregnant women who were exposed to music.
Sponsors
Ankara University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)
Masking description
In order to avoid bias in assessing pain and fear, three midwives who were not involved in the study team, who worked in the hospital where the study was carried out and who did not know the groups of the participants administered the scales. The midwives who were involved in data collection during the study were trained by the researchers on the use of data collection tools.
Intervention model description
a single-blind randomized controlled intervention trial
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
1. An indication for vaginal delivery 2. Primipara 3. Cervical dilatation of 3 cm or over 4. Full-term pregnancy (38-42 gestational weeks) 5. Single healthy fetus in vertex position 6. No complication that can cause dystocia in labor (such as contraction anomalies, birth object, birth canal associated dystocia, maternal psychology associated dystocia) 7. Not using analgesia and anesthesia during the first phase of the labor 8. Having no physical disability to dance 9. Having no difficulty to take upright position and move 10. Having no communication problem.
Exclusion criteria
1. Giving up participating in the study 2. Abnormal changes in fetal heartbeat 3. Emergence of an unexpected complication in the pregnant woman or the fetus 4) Taking analgesics and anesthesia 5\) Incomplete intervention and follow-up due to rapid labor 6) Being taken to C/S before the completion of the intervention and follow-up.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Analogue Scale Score, | Baseline | The perceived pain pregnant women in groups were measured and recorded prior to the intervention (when cervical dilatation reached 4-5 cm). Assessed the labor pain level with Visual Analogue Scale score. This is a 10 cm scale which is labeled no pain at one end and severe pain at the other end. (0=no pain; 10= pain as bad as can be). Increasing scores indicate women's labor pain. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Version A of the Wijma Delivery Expectancy Questionnaire Score | Baseline | The fear pregnant women in groups were measured and recorded prior to the intervention (when cervical dilatation reached 4-5 cm). Assessed childbirth of fear with version A of the Wijma Delivery Expectancy. Questionnaire score. The minimum and maximum scores that can be obtained from the scale range between 0 and 165. Increasing scores indicate women's fear of childbirth. |
| Recurrence of Fear of Childbirth | 30 minutes, 60 minutes and 90 minutes | A 30-minute long intervention was administered in groups Dance and Music. The fear measurements were repeated soon after the intervention, 30 minutes and 60 minutes after the intervention. Assessed childbirth of fear with version A of the Wijma Delivery Expectancy. Questionnaire score. The minimum and maximum scores that can be obtained from the scale range between 0 and 165. Increasing scores indicate women's fear of childbirth. |
| Recurrence of perceived pain | 30 minutes, 60 minutes and 90 minutes | Measurements were repeated 30 minutes after the first measurement, after 60 minutes, and after 90 minutes. Assessed the labor pain level with Visual Analogue Scale score. This is a 10 cm scale which is labeled no pain at one end and severe pain at the other end. (0=no pain; 10= pain as bad as can be). Increasing scores indicate women's labor pain. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed