Skip to content

Patient-controlled Sedation Versus Target-controlled Infusion in Orthopaedic Surgery Under Central Neuraxial Block

Propofol Sedation in Orthopaedic Surgery Under Central Neuraxial Block: Patient-controlled Sedation Versus Target-controlled Infusion

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03647735
Enrollment
78
Registered
2018-08-27
Start date
2017-06-22
Completion date
2018-05-03
Last updated
2018-08-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patient-controlled Sedation

Brief summary

Orthopaedic surgeries involving the legs can be done under nerve block, where patients will be numb of pain at the operated site but awake during surgery. Sedation can be given to allay anxiety and provide comfort throughout the surgery. Sedation can be given by the anaesthetic doctors by using target-comtrolled infusion pump, or self-administered by patients by means of specialised machines. This study compares two method of administration of sedation, patient-controlled sedation (PCS) versus target-controlled infusion sedation (TCIS) by anaesthetic doctors, in people undergoing orthopaedic surgeries under nerve block.

Detailed description

Central neuraxial block (CNB) is one of the mainstays of anaesthesia methods in various disciplines particularly orthopaedic surgeries. However the state of consciousness can potentially cause patient anxiety thus sedation is often utilized as a mean to improve patient satisfaction and increase patient acceptance of CNB. Conventionally, the anaesthesiologist administers sedatives for the patients. Propofol is the commonly used drug for sedation due to its favourable pharmacokinetic profile, which results in fast induction, easy control of depth of sedation and rapid recovery. It can be infused by using target-controlled infusion (TCI) devices where the anaesthetists titrates propofol by setting desired target plasma and effect site concentration. However it is difficult to judge precisely patient requirements for adequate patient sedation, comfort and analgesia as patients' needs differ. Patient-controlled sedation (PCS) is a valid option, initially adapted from post surgery patient-controlled analgesia. It allows patients to titrate sedative medication to their comfort and therefore present an option that addresses the needs of patients with strong desire to maintain sense of control during procedures. This study was designed to compare total propofol requirement between PCS versus TCI sedation (TCIS), complications and patient satisfaction, in patients undergoing lower limb orthopaedic surgery under CNB.

Interventions

Patient-controlled propofol boluses for patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery under central neuraxial block

Sponsors

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I or II. 2. Aged 18-65 years. 3. Elective lower limb orthopaedic surgery under CNB anticipated to last for 1.5 to 2 hours

Exclusion criteria

1. Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 30kg/m2 2. Unable to cooperate (eg. mental disorders, language barrier) 3. Drug abuse 4. Alcoholism (chronic daily alcohol intake greater than 75 g of pure alcohol for ≥ 2 years, where 75g of alcohol = 5 cans of beer, 1 bottle of wine or half a pint of distilled spirit) 5. Contraindications to the study drugs 6. Pregnancy 7. Significant pulmonary or cardiovascular diseases, including obstructive sleep apnoea and obesity hypoventilation syndrome 8. Features of difficult airway

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
total propofol requirement between PCS versus TCI sedation (TCIS)Assessed from the beginning to the end of sedation, at the average of 120 minutesTotal propofol requirement in both groups was calculated in mg/kg/hour.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient satisfaction assessed by a 10-point numerical scaleWithin one hour after recovery from sedationAssessed using a 10-point verbal numerical rating scale (1 to 10), where 1 was regarded as extremely dissatisfied and 10 extremely satisfied.
Complications including incidence of hypotension, bradycardia, hypopnea, oxygen desaturation and over sedationAssessed from the beginning to the end of sedation, at the average of 120 minutesDocumented as Yes or No for each specified complication

Countries

Malaysia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026