Skip to content

Lumbopelvic Fixation Versus Novel Adjustable Plate for Displaced Sacral Fracture

Lumbopelvic Fixation Versus Novel Adjustable Plate for Displaced Sacral Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03647410
Enrollment
20
Registered
2018-08-27
Start date
2011-06-30
Completion date
2018-09-30
Last updated
2018-08-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Reduction Deformity of Limb

Brief summary

Patients of unilaterally displaced sacral fractures fixed with lumbopelvic technique or novel adjustable plate from June 2011 to June 2017 were recruited into this study and were divided into two groups: group A (lumbopelvic fixation) and groups B (novel adjustable plate). Surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy, reduction quality, related complications were reviewed. Fracture healing was assessed by the radiographs conducted at follow-up. Functional outcome was evaluated according to the Majeed score at the final follow-up.

Detailed description

Patients of unilateral displaced sacral fractures from June 2011 to June 2017 were recruited into this study. The inclusion criteria were as follows: 18-65 years, with normal activity ability before injury, fixed with lumbopelvic technique or novel adjustable plate, completed more than a year follow-up. The exclusion criteria were as follows: pathologic fractures, open fractures, associated with other severe injuries (traumatic brain injury), risk factors affecting bone healing (osteoporosis, smoking, and metabolic diseases) and non-completion of one-year follow-up. Surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy, related complications were reviewed. Reduction quality was assessed on the postoperative radiographs and CT scans. Functional outcome was evaluated according to the Majeed score system at the final follow-up.

Interventions

DEVICElumbopelvic fixation

Sacral fractures fixed with lumbopelvic fixation or novel adjustable plate were divided into two groups. Surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy, reduction quality, related complications, and functional outcome were reviewed.

Sponsors

Hebei Medical University Third Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

* 18-65 years, with normal activity ability before injury * Fixed with lumbopelvic technique or novel adjustable plate * Completed more than a year follow-up

Exclusion criteria

* Pathologic fractures * Open fractures * Associated with other severe injuries (traumatic brain injury) * Risk factors affecting bone healing (osteoporosis, smoking, and metabolic diseases) * Non-completion of one-year follow-up

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
postoperative reduction quality of sacral fractures after different surgical techniques1 yearmaximum displacement distance of the sacral fracture in the postoperative CT scans

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the incidence of complication1 yearthe incidence of wound infection, iatrogenic injury of vessels and nerves, nonunion

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactRuipeng Zhang
zhangruipengdoctor@126.com+8615613390624

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026