Angina Pectoris, Cardiac Event, Coronary Artery Disease, Heart Failure, Heart Valve Diseases, Myocardial Infarction
Conditions
Brief summary
The benefits of cardiac rehabilitation are well known. However, despite center based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) representing guideline-based care for patients with cardiovascular disease, most patients do not complete the maximum number of sessions allowed by third party insurance payers. As such, many patients may not be receiving the full clinical benefit ascribed to CR. This study will assess the efficacy of an innovative approach to CR delivery on attendance by combining both center-based and remote- or home-based CR sessions. The intervention group combines center-based CR and remote-/home-based CR and is tailored to the individual needs of each patient, accomplished with the assistance of an easy-to-access telecommunications methodology (telemedicine)
Interventions
This group involves a hybrid design, with the frequency of center based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) visits and HYCR visits individualized and modified based on the subject's personal preferences and their family, transportation and work constraints. Patients in HYCR will engage in at least one CBCR visit. Patients will have the video app loaded to their smart phone or tablet (or that of a willing to assist family member or friend). HYCR patients receive a chest strap/wrist heart rate device to document HR before, during, and/or after exercise during the TM session. Program education for patients in HYCR will be delivered using the twenty-eight, 7-15 min audio PDF's that are free to access from the Health System's web site.
This group will attend 2-3 sessions of cardiac rehabilitation per week at the investigator's Detroit location. Program education for patients in CBCR will be delivered during eight. 1 hour education lectures taught by staff (exercise physiologists and registered dieticians).
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Has agreed to participate in CR and has experienced a cardiac event (myocardial infraction, coronary revascularization, heart valve surgery, or cardiac transplant in the past 6 months; diagnosed with chronic, stable AHA/ACC stage B or C heart failure or Canadian class 0-2 stable angina pectoris) 2. Lives in or plans to remain in the greater Detroit, MI area for the next year 3. Age 18-85 years of age 4. Agrees to attend at least one CBCR session 5. Agrees to scheduling at least 2, up to 3, CR sessions (either CBCR or HYCR)/wk 6. Has demonstrated to research staff their ability to access and connect to the internet via smart phone or tablet and already has access to satisfactory home- or community-based exercise equipment
Exclusion criteria
1. Received a left ventricular assist device, receiving continuous inotropic support (e.g., milrinone), or undergoing hemodialysis 2. Angina at rest or with a low functional capacity (\< 2 METs) 3. Advanced cancer, advanced risk for falling, limiting cognitive impairment, or other advanced disorder that limits participation in CR 1. Advanced risk for falling will be assessed by 5X sit-to-stand test, with a cut-off score of \>15 seconds 2. Cognitive assessment will be completed using the Mini-Cog instrument, with a cut-off score \< 3 used to exclude potential subjects. 4. Severe arrhythmia unless adequately treated (e.g., implantable cardiac defibrillator) 5. Pregnant or plan to become pregnant in the next year. 6. Major cardiovascular procedure or hospitalization planned in the next 6 months 7. Less than 12 month life expectancy 8. Participation in another clinical trial that interferes with iATTEND participation, follow-up, data collection, exercise capacity or quality of life.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of CR Sessions Completed Within 6 Months in Patients Randomized to HYCR vs. Patients Randomized to Traditional CBCR (Usual Care). | Baseline to 6 months | — |
| Percentage of Patients Completing 36 CR Sessions Within 6 Months Among Patients Randomized to the HYCR Program vs. Patients Randomized to the CBCR Program. | Baseline to 6 months | Outcome measure is the percent of people who complete all 36 CR sessions and the mean value reported represents the average percentage for all patients in both study groups. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Improvement in Exercise Capacity, as Measured by Distance Walked During the Six Min Walk (6MW) Test, in Patients Randomized to HYCR vs Patients Randomized to CBCR. | Baseline to 6 months | Improvement in exercise capacity was calculated as the change in distance from the start of cardiac rehab (T1) and within 1 week after the last CR session of a patient or 6 months after completing T1 (whichever came first). |
| Improvement in Exercise Capacity, as Measured by Peak Oxygen Uptake (VO2), in Patients Randomized to HYCR vs Patients Randomized to CBCR. | Baseline to 6 months | Improvement in exercise capacity was calculated as the change in distance from the start of cardiac rehab (T1) and within 1 week after the last CR session of a patient or 6 months after completing T1 (whichever came first). |
| Improvement in Quality of Life (QOL), as Measured by the Total Score for Dartmouth COOP, in Patients Randomized to HYCR vs Patients Randomized to CBCR. | Baseline to 6 months | 5-point Likert-type scaling, with 1 being more positive and 5 being more negative. Lower scores indicate higher levels of quality of life. Improvement in qualify of life was calculated as the change in distance from the start of cardiac rehab (T1) and within 1 week after the last CR session of a patient or 6 months after completing T1 (whichever came first). |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation (HYCR) HYCR: This group involves a hybrid design, with the frequency of center based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) visits and HYCR visits individualized and modified based on the subject's personal preferences and their family, transportation and work constraints. Patients in HYCR will engage in at least one CBCR visit. Patients will have the video app loaded to their smart phone or tablet (or that of a willing to assist family member or friend). HYCR patients receive a chest strap/wrist heart rate device to document HR before, during, and/or after exercise during the TM session. Program education for patients in HYCR will be delivered using the twenty-eight, 7-15 min audio PDF's that are free to access from the Health System's web site. | 142 |
| Center Based Cardiac Rehabilitation (CBCR) CBCR: This group will attend 2-3 sessions of cardiac rehabilitation per week at the investigator's Detroit location. Program education for patients in CBCR will be delivered during eight. 1 hour education lectures taught by staff (exercise physiologists and registered dieticians). | 140 |
| Total | 282 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation (HYCR) | Center Based Cardiac Rehabilitation (CBCR) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 56 Participants | 72 Participants | 128 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 86 Participants | 68 Participants | 154 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 3 Participants | 4 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 76 Participants | 76 Participants | 152 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 62 Participants | 59 Participants | 121 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 45 Participants | 46 Participants | 91 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 97 Participants | 94 Participants | 191 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 1 / 142 | 3 / 140 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 8 / 142 | 3 / 140 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 1 / 142 | 0 / 140 |
Outcome results
Number of CR Sessions Completed Within 6 Months in Patients Randomized to HYCR vs. Patients Randomized to Traditional CBCR (Usual Care).
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation (HYCR) | Number of CR Sessions Completed Within 6 Months in Patients Randomized to HYCR vs. Patients Randomized to Traditional CBCR (Usual Care). | 28.7 Number of cardiac rehab sessions | Standard Error 11.8 |
| Center Based Cardiac Rehabilitation (CBCR) | Number of CR Sessions Completed Within 6 Months in Patients Randomized to HYCR vs. Patients Randomized to Traditional CBCR (Usual Care). | 27.6 Number of cardiac rehab sessions | Standard Error 11.8 |
Percentage of Patients Completing 36 CR Sessions Within 6 Months Among Patients Randomized to the HYCR Program vs. Patients Randomized to the CBCR Program.
Outcome measure is the percent of people who complete all 36 CR sessions and the mean value reported represents the average percentage for all patients in both study groups.
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation (HYCR) | Percentage of Patients Completing 36 CR Sessions Within 6 Months Among Patients Randomized to the HYCR Program vs. Patients Randomized to the CBCR Program. | 58.5 % of patients completing 36 sessions |
| Center Based Cardiac Rehabilitation (CBCR) | Percentage of Patients Completing 36 CR Sessions Within 6 Months Among Patients Randomized to the HYCR Program vs. Patients Randomized to the CBCR Program. | 50.7 % of patients completing 36 sessions |
Improvement in Exercise Capacity, as Measured by Distance Walked During the Six Min Walk (6MW) Test, in Patients Randomized to HYCR vs Patients Randomized to CBCR.
Improvement in exercise capacity was calculated as the change in distance from the start of cardiac rehab (T1) and within 1 week after the last CR session of a patient or 6 months after completing T1 (whichever came first).
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Population: Analyses represent complete cases for Center Based Only CR and Hybrid CR
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation (HYCR) | Improvement in Exercise Capacity, as Measured by Distance Walked During the Six Min Walk (6MW) Test, in Patients Randomized to HYCR vs Patients Randomized to CBCR. | 46 Meters | Standard Deviation 46 |
| Center Based Cardiac Rehabilitation (CBCR) | Improvement in Exercise Capacity, as Measured by Distance Walked During the Six Min Walk (6MW) Test, in Patients Randomized to HYCR vs Patients Randomized to CBCR. | 50 Meters | Standard Deviation 53 |
Improvement in Exercise Capacity, as Measured by Peak Oxygen Uptake (VO2), in Patients Randomized to HYCR vs Patients Randomized to CBCR.
Improvement in exercise capacity was calculated as the change in distance from the start of cardiac rehab (T1) and within 1 week after the last CR session of a patient or 6 months after completing T1 (whichever came first).
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Population: Analyses represent complete cases for Center Based Only CR and Hybrid CR
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation (HYCR) | Improvement in Exercise Capacity, as Measured by Peak Oxygen Uptake (VO2), in Patients Randomized to HYCR vs Patients Randomized to CBCR. | 2.3 mL/kg/min | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
| Center Based Cardiac Rehabilitation (CBCR) | Improvement in Exercise Capacity, as Measured by Peak Oxygen Uptake (VO2), in Patients Randomized to HYCR vs Patients Randomized to CBCR. | 1.9 mL/kg/min | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
Improvement in Quality of Life (QOL), as Measured by the Total Score for Dartmouth COOP, in Patients Randomized to HYCR vs Patients Randomized to CBCR.
5-point Likert-type scaling, with 1 being more positive and 5 being more negative. Lower scores indicate higher levels of quality of life. Improvement in qualify of life was calculated as the change in distance from the start of cardiac rehab (T1) and within 1 week after the last CR session of a patient or 6 months after completing T1 (whichever came first).
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Population: Analyses represent complete cases for Center Based Only CR and Hybrid CR
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation (HYCR) | Improvement in Quality of Life (QOL), as Measured by the Total Score for Dartmouth COOP, in Patients Randomized to HYCR vs Patients Randomized to CBCR. | -3.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5 |
| Center Based Cardiac Rehabilitation (CBCR) | Improvement in Quality of Life (QOL), as Measured by the Total Score for Dartmouth COOP, in Patients Randomized to HYCR vs Patients Randomized to CBCR. | -3.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.3 |