Skip to content

The Improving ATTENDance to Cardiac Rehabilitation Trial

The Improving ATTENDance to Cardiac Rehabilitation Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03646760
Acronym
iATTEND
Enrollment
282
Registered
2018-08-24
Start date
2019-03-01
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2025-07-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Angina Pectoris, Cardiac Event, Coronary Artery Disease, Heart Failure, Heart Valve Diseases, Myocardial Infarction

Brief summary

The benefits of cardiac rehabilitation are well known. However, despite center based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) representing guideline-based care for patients with cardiovascular disease, most patients do not complete the maximum number of sessions allowed by third party insurance payers. As such, many patients may not be receiving the full clinical benefit ascribed to CR. This study will assess the efficacy of an innovative approach to CR delivery on attendance by combining both center-based and remote- or home-based CR sessions. The intervention group combines center-based CR and remote-/home-based CR and is tailored to the individual needs of each patient, accomplished with the assistance of an easy-to-access telecommunications methodology (telemedicine)

Interventions

BEHAVIORALHYCR

This group involves a hybrid design, with the frequency of center based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) visits and HYCR visits individualized and modified based on the subject's personal preferences and their family, transportation and work constraints. Patients in HYCR will engage in at least one CBCR visit. Patients will have the video app loaded to their smart phone or tablet (or that of a willing to assist family member or friend). HYCR patients receive a chest strap/wrist heart rate device to document HR before, during, and/or after exercise during the TM session. Program education for patients in HYCR will be delivered using the twenty-eight, 7-15 min audio PDF's that are free to access from the Health System's web site.

BEHAVIORALCBCR

This group will attend 2-3 sessions of cardiac rehabilitation per week at the investigator's Detroit location. Program education for patients in CBCR will be delivered during eight. 1 hour education lectures taught by staff (exercise physiologists and registered dieticians).

Sponsors

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
Henry Ford Health System
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Has agreed to participate in CR and has experienced a cardiac event (myocardial infraction, coronary revascularization, heart valve surgery, or cardiac transplant in the past 6 months; diagnosed with chronic, stable AHA/ACC stage B or C heart failure or Canadian class 0-2 stable angina pectoris) 2. Lives in or plans to remain in the greater Detroit, MI area for the next year 3. Age 18-85 years of age 4. Agrees to attend at least one CBCR session 5. Agrees to scheduling at least 2, up to 3, CR sessions (either CBCR or HYCR)/wk 6. Has demonstrated to research staff their ability to access and connect to the internet via smart phone or tablet and already has access to satisfactory home- or community-based exercise equipment

Exclusion criteria

1. Received a left ventricular assist device, receiving continuous inotropic support (e.g., milrinone), or undergoing hemodialysis 2. Angina at rest or with a low functional capacity (\< 2 METs) 3. Advanced cancer, advanced risk for falling, limiting cognitive impairment, or other advanced disorder that limits participation in CR 1. Advanced risk for falling will be assessed by 5X sit-to-stand test, with a cut-off score of \>15 seconds 2. Cognitive assessment will be completed using the Mini-Cog instrument, with a cut-off score \< 3 used to exclude potential subjects. 4. Severe arrhythmia unless adequately treated (e.g., implantable cardiac defibrillator) 5. Pregnant or plan to become pregnant in the next year. 6. Major cardiovascular procedure or hospitalization planned in the next 6 months 7. Less than 12 month life expectancy 8. Participation in another clinical trial that interferes with iATTEND participation, follow-up, data collection, exercise capacity or quality of life.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of CR Sessions Completed Within 6 Months in Patients Randomized to HYCR vs. Patients Randomized to Traditional CBCR (Usual Care).Baseline to 6 months
Percentage of Patients Completing 36 CR Sessions Within 6 Months Among Patients Randomized to the HYCR Program vs. Patients Randomized to the CBCR Program.Baseline to 6 monthsOutcome measure is the percent of people who complete all 36 CR sessions and the mean value reported represents the average percentage for all patients in both study groups.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement in Exercise Capacity, as Measured by Distance Walked During the Six Min Walk (6MW) Test, in Patients Randomized to HYCR vs Patients Randomized to CBCR.Baseline to 6 monthsImprovement in exercise capacity was calculated as the change in distance from the start of cardiac rehab (T1) and within 1 week after the last CR session of a patient or 6 months after completing T1 (whichever came first).
Improvement in Exercise Capacity, as Measured by Peak Oxygen Uptake (VO2), in Patients Randomized to HYCR vs Patients Randomized to CBCR.Baseline to 6 monthsImprovement in exercise capacity was calculated as the change in distance from the start of cardiac rehab (T1) and within 1 week after the last CR session of a patient or 6 months after completing T1 (whichever came first).
Improvement in Quality of Life (QOL), as Measured by the Total Score for Dartmouth COOP, in Patients Randomized to HYCR vs Patients Randomized to CBCR.Baseline to 6 months5-point Likert-type scaling, with 1 being more positive and 5 being more negative. Lower scores indicate higher levels of quality of life. Improvement in qualify of life was calculated as the change in distance from the start of cardiac rehab (T1) and within 1 week after the last CR session of a patient or 6 months after completing T1 (whichever came first).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation (HYCR)
HYCR: This group involves a hybrid design, with the frequency of center based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) visits and HYCR visits individualized and modified based on the subject's personal preferences and their family, transportation and work constraints. Patients in HYCR will engage in at least one CBCR visit. Patients will have the video app loaded to their smart phone or tablet (or that of a willing to assist family member or friend). HYCR patients receive a chest strap/wrist heart rate device to document HR before, during, and/or after exercise during the TM session. Program education for patients in HYCR will be delivered using the twenty-eight, 7-15 min audio PDF's that are free to access from the Health System's web site.
142
Center Based Cardiac Rehabilitation (CBCR)
CBCR: This group will attend 2-3 sessions of cardiac rehabilitation per week at the investigator's Detroit location. Program education for patients in CBCR will be delivered during eight. 1 hour education lectures taught by staff (exercise physiologists and registered dieticians).
140
Total282

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation (HYCR)Center Based Cardiac Rehabilitation (CBCR)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
56 Participants72 Participants128 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
86 Participants68 Participants154 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
76 Participants76 Participants152 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
62 Participants59 Participants121 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
45 Participants46 Participants91 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
97 Participants94 Participants191 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 1423 / 140
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 1423 / 140
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 1420 / 140

Outcome results

Primary

Number of CR Sessions Completed Within 6 Months in Patients Randomized to HYCR vs. Patients Randomized to Traditional CBCR (Usual Care).

Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation (HYCR)Number of CR Sessions Completed Within 6 Months in Patients Randomized to HYCR vs. Patients Randomized to Traditional CBCR (Usual Care).28.7 Number of cardiac rehab sessionsStandard Error 11.8
Center Based Cardiac Rehabilitation (CBCR)Number of CR Sessions Completed Within 6 Months in Patients Randomized to HYCR vs. Patients Randomized to Traditional CBCR (Usual Care).27.6 Number of cardiac rehab sessionsStandard Error 11.8
Primary

Percentage of Patients Completing 36 CR Sessions Within 6 Months Among Patients Randomized to the HYCR Program vs. Patients Randomized to the CBCR Program.

Outcome measure is the percent of people who complete all 36 CR sessions and the mean value reported represents the average percentage for all patients in both study groups.

Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation (HYCR)Percentage of Patients Completing 36 CR Sessions Within 6 Months Among Patients Randomized to the HYCR Program vs. Patients Randomized to the CBCR Program.58.5 % of patients completing 36 sessions
Center Based Cardiac Rehabilitation (CBCR)Percentage of Patients Completing 36 CR Sessions Within 6 Months Among Patients Randomized to the HYCR Program vs. Patients Randomized to the CBCR Program.50.7 % of patients completing 36 sessions
Secondary

Improvement in Exercise Capacity, as Measured by Distance Walked During the Six Min Walk (6MW) Test, in Patients Randomized to HYCR vs Patients Randomized to CBCR.

Improvement in exercise capacity was calculated as the change in distance from the start of cardiac rehab (T1) and within 1 week after the last CR session of a patient or 6 months after completing T1 (whichever came first).

Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

Population: Analyses represent complete cases for Center Based Only CR and Hybrid CR

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation (HYCR)Improvement in Exercise Capacity, as Measured by Distance Walked During the Six Min Walk (6MW) Test, in Patients Randomized to HYCR vs Patients Randomized to CBCR.46 MetersStandard Deviation 46
Center Based Cardiac Rehabilitation (CBCR)Improvement in Exercise Capacity, as Measured by Distance Walked During the Six Min Walk (6MW) Test, in Patients Randomized to HYCR vs Patients Randomized to CBCR.50 MetersStandard Deviation 53
Secondary

Improvement in Exercise Capacity, as Measured by Peak Oxygen Uptake (VO2), in Patients Randomized to HYCR vs Patients Randomized to CBCR.

Improvement in exercise capacity was calculated as the change in distance from the start of cardiac rehab (T1) and within 1 week after the last CR session of a patient or 6 months after completing T1 (whichever came first).

Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

Population: Analyses represent complete cases for Center Based Only CR and Hybrid CR

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation (HYCR)Improvement in Exercise Capacity, as Measured by Peak Oxygen Uptake (VO2), in Patients Randomized to HYCR vs Patients Randomized to CBCR.2.3 mL/kg/minStandard Deviation 2.8
Center Based Cardiac Rehabilitation (CBCR)Improvement in Exercise Capacity, as Measured by Peak Oxygen Uptake (VO2), in Patients Randomized to HYCR vs Patients Randomized to CBCR.1.9 mL/kg/minStandard Deviation 2.8
Secondary

Improvement in Quality of Life (QOL), as Measured by the Total Score for Dartmouth COOP, in Patients Randomized to HYCR vs Patients Randomized to CBCR.

5-point Likert-type scaling, with 1 being more positive and 5 being more negative. Lower scores indicate higher levels of quality of life. Improvement in qualify of life was calculated as the change in distance from the start of cardiac rehab (T1) and within 1 week after the last CR session of a patient or 6 months after completing T1 (whichever came first).

Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

Population: Analyses represent complete cases for Center Based Only CR and Hybrid CR

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation (HYCR)Improvement in Quality of Life (QOL), as Measured by the Total Score for Dartmouth COOP, in Patients Randomized to HYCR vs Patients Randomized to CBCR.-3.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5
Center Based Cardiac Rehabilitation (CBCR)Improvement in Quality of Life (QOL), as Measured by the Total Score for Dartmouth COOP, in Patients Randomized to HYCR vs Patients Randomized to CBCR.-3.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026