Skip to content

Symptom Perception

Symptom Perception, Behavior, and Outcomes in Older Asthmatics

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03646669
Enrollment
58
Registered
2018-08-24
Start date
2019-02-15
Completion date
2022-04-01
Last updated
2023-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Keywords

Older adults, Asthma, Symptom perception, Self-management behaviors, Medication adherence

Brief summary

Older asthmatics have considerably worse outcomes than younger patients with asthma. In this study, the investigators will evaluate the role of symptom perception as a key determinant of poorer outcomes and lower adherence to asthma self-management behaviors among older asthmatics. The proposed study is significant for its potential to greatly advance understanding of the mechanisms related to worse outcomes in older adults, and it will provide actionable data for new interventions to improve self-management.

Detailed description

Asthma is a common condition in the older population and associated with worse morbidity and mortality compared to younger individuals. Various self-management behaviors (SMB), medication adherence in particular, are key for achieving good asthma control. Unfortunately, less than half of older asthmatics regularly adhere to their controller medications and to other SMB. Several observations suggest that symptom perception may be a major determinant of asthma SMB and outcomes in older adults. First, experimental studies consistently demonstrate that many older adults are substantially less aware of their level of airway obstruction. Second, under-perception of asthma symptoms is linked to elevated risk of near-fatal and fatal asthma attacks and increased morbidity among younger adults. Third, cognitive impairment, commonly associated with aging, has been identified as a key determinant of under-perception of symptoms in younger asthmatics. Fourth, interventions to correct symptom under-perception in children have been shown to improve asthma medication adherence. Despite the greater vulnerability of older asthmatics to poor asthma outcomes and their diminished ability to perceive the severity of their airway obstruction, the association of symptom perception with asthma SMB and outcomes has not been studied in this population. The goal of this project is to determine how symptom perception influences the management and outcomes of older asthmatics and to pilot test an intervention to correct under-perception. The Specific Aims are: 1) Prospectively assess the association between symptom perception and asthma morbidity among older adults; 2) Examine the association between symptom perception and asthma SMB among older adults and identify the pathways (via illness and medication beliefs) linking them; 3) Determine the influence of cognition on symptom perception among older adults with asthma; 4) Pilot test an intervention to correct under-perceptions of asthma symptoms in older adults. The investigators will conduct a prospective cohort study of 400 asthmatics ≥60 years of age recruited from East Harlem and the Bronx in New York City. The investigators will measure symptom perception in naturalistic settings using an innovative and validated methodology and repeatedly collect data on illness and medication beliefs, cognitive functioning, SMB (including objective measures of medication adherence), and asthma morbidity over 12 months. At the end of the observation period, the investigators will pilot test an intervention to improve symptom perception on a random sample of 80 participants. The proposed study is significant for its potential to greatly advance understanding of the mechanisms related to low adherence to SMB and worse outcomes in older asthmatics, a vulnerable and understudied population.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPEF Feedback

Patients in the PEF feedback arm will receive a one-time session including asthma management education, discussion of their asthma symptoms, review of individual PEF results and perception of symptoms, and problem-solving techniques to improve asthma self-management. After the session, the participants in this arm will be able to view in the display of the AM2 device their PEF values and will be instructed to mentally note their actual results with their pre-effort estimated BPF. They will also set a motivational message for themselves that will appear on the device.

General asthma education, AM2 training, and positive counseling, but no discussion linking asthma symptom perception to SMB. Following the session, these participants will use the AM2 to track PEF actual and perceived values twice per day, but they will be blinded to the actual PEF values. Control arm patients will see a standard motivational message appear on the screen of the AM2 device.

Sponsors

Albert Einstein College of Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
Jacobi Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥60 years * English or Spanish speaking * Asthma diagnosis made by a health care provider

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of dementia * Diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or other chronic respiratory illness * Smoking history of ≥15 pack-years owing to possible undiagnosed COPD * Moderate or severe cardiac disease (including New York Heart Association stages 4 or 5 congestive heart failure, because dyspnea among patients with severe heart failure is more likely to be attributable to their heart condition than their asthma) * Dependence on assistance for medication administration * Uncorrectable visual impairment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)Baseline, 1 week follow up, 1 month follow upChange in self-reported asthma control validated survey, with a total score range from 0-6, with a higher score indicating severely uncontrolled asthma , used to assess current asthma control at pre-intervention, 1week post-pilot follow up visit and 4 weeks post-pilot follow-up visit
Change in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)Baseline, 1 week follow up, 1 month follow upChange in self-reported asthma-related quality of life validated survey used to assess asthma-related quality of life at at pre-intervention, 1week post-pilot follow up visit and 4 weeks post-pilot follow-up visit. Total Score from 1-7, with higher score indicating better quality of life.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Beliefs About Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ)Baseline, 1 week follow upThe BIPQ includes 9 items designed to rapidly assess the cognitive and emotional representations of illness- consequences, timeline, personal control, treatment control, experience symptoms, concerns, emotions and comprehensibility. For analyses, the first 8 items are summed and item 9 which is part of the causal scale is excluded. Items for personal control, treatment control and comprehensibility were reverse coded. All of the 8 items, are rated using a 0 (none) to 10 (extreme) response scale giving a sum total score of 0-80. Higher total scores indicate worse asthma perception.
Symptom Perception Measures AdjustedBaseline, 1 week follow up, 1 month follow upAssessed based on alignment of patient guesses and actual PEF values recorded by the AM2 device and then categorizing into accurate, under or over-perception, adjusted for age, sex, race, monthly income Assesses if training and feedback can improve under perception of airflow obstruction and lead to better control in older adults with asthma
Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Score - AdjustedBaseline, 1 week follow up, 1 month follow upChange in self-reported asthma control validated survey, with a total score range from 0-6, with a higher score indicating severely uncontrolled asthma, used to assess current asthma control at pre-intervention, 1week post-pilot follow up visit and 4 weeks post-pilot follow-up visit adjusted for age, sex, race, monthly income
Change in Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS)Baseline, 1 week follow up, 1 month follow upMARS is a self-reported questionnaire with the total score range from 0-10 with a higher score indicating better adherence.
Treatment Expectancy1 week follow up, 1 month follow upTreatment Expectancy adjusted for age, sex, race, monthly income. Outcome expectancy consists of patients' beliefs about how likely they are to benefit from a treatment. The CEQ expectancy factor, reflecting an affectively-based process, is based on patients' responses to three items reflecting how much they think they will improve by the end of treatment, how much they feel therapy will help reduce their symptoms, and how much they feel they will improve by the end of treatment. Because one item is on the same 7-point scale as the credibility items and two are assessed on an 11-point scale (from 0% to 100% in 10-point increments), responses are first standardized before summing to render the expectancy total score. The total score possible range is 3 to 33. Higher scores indicate higher treatment expectancy.
Change in Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS) AdjustedBaseline, 1 week follow up, 1 month follow upMARS is a self-reported questionnaire with the total score range from 0-10 with a higher score indicating better adherence. MARS, adjusted for age, sex, race, monthly income
Treatment Credibility1 week follow up, 1 month follow upTreatment Credibility adjusted for age, sex, race, monthly income The credibility of a treatment rationale consists of how believable, convincing, and logical the treatment is. The CEQ credibility factor, reflecting a cognitively-based process, is based on patients' summed responses to three items measuring how logical the therapy seems, how successful one thinks it will be in reducing symptoms, and how confident one would be in recommending it to a friend with similar symptoms. The modified version used in this study included items rated on 7 point scales ranging from 1 (Not at all logical/successful /confident) to 7 (Very logical/successful /confident), with a total score possible range of 3 to 21. Higher scores indicate higher treatment credibility.
Change in Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) - Necessity Score and Concerns ScoreBaseline, 1 week follow up, 1 month follow up10-item scale that measures beliefs about asthma controller medication in 2 subdomains: necessity and concerns. All items have a five-point Likert answer option, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree, with total range from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicate stronger beliefs about the corresponding concepts.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Asthma Education and PEF Feedback
Patients receive asthma education and personal Peak expiratory flow (PEF) feedback PEF Feedback: Patients in the PEF feedback arm will receive a one-time session including asthma management education, discussion of their asthma symptoms, review of individual PEF results and perception of symptoms, and problem-solving techniques to improve asthma self-management. After the session, the participants in this arm will be able to view in the display of the AM2 device their PEF values and will be instructed to mentally note their actual results with their pre-effort estimated BPF. They will also set a motivational message for themselves that will appear on the device.
28
Asthma Education
No PEF feedback arm Asthma education: General asthma education, AM2 training, and positive counseling, but no discussion linking asthma symptom perception to SMB. Following the session, these participants will use the AM2 to track PEF actual and perceived values twice per day, but they will be blinded to the actual PEF values. Control arm patients will see a standard motivational message appear on the screen of the AM2 device.
25
Total53

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject50

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalAsthma Education and PEF FeedbackAsthma Education
Age, Continuous66.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2
67.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9
65.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6
Education
College graduate or higher degree
20 Participants9 Participants11 Participants
Education
High school graduate
7 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Education
Less than high school
8 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Education
Some college
17 Participants8 Participants9 Participants
Education
Unknown or Not reported
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
21 Participants13 Participants8 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
32 Participants15 Participants17 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Health Insurance
Medicaid or Medicare
36 Participants20 Participants16 Participants
Health Insurance
No insurance
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Health Insurance
Private or Other
12 Participants6 Participants6 Participants
Health Insurance
Unknown or Not reported
4 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Marital Status
Married
17 Participants13 Participants4 Participants
Marital Status
Single/Divorced/Widowed
35 Participants14 Participants21 Participants
Marital Status
Unknown or Not reported
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Monthly Income
≤$1500
25 Participants13 Participants12 Participants
Monthly Income
>$1500
22 Participants12 Participants10 Participants
Monthly Income
Unknown or Not reported
6 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
3 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
17 Participants8 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
12 Participants7 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
15 Participants9 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
44 Participants21 Participants23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants7 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 280 / 25
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 280 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 280 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)

Change in self-reported asthma control validated survey, with a total score range from 0-6, with a higher score indicating severely uncontrolled asthma , used to assess current asthma control at pre-intervention, 1week post-pilot follow up visit and 4 weeks post-pilot follow-up visit

Time frame: Baseline, 1 week follow up, 1 month follow up

Population: data not available for participants with missing questionnaire

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)Baseline1.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)1 week follow up0.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)1 month follow up0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Asthma EducationAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)Baseline1.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Asthma EducationAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)1 week follow up1.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Asthma EducationAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)1 month follow up1.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Primary

Change in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)

Change in self-reported asthma-related quality of life validated survey used to assess asthma-related quality of life at at pre-intervention, 1week post-pilot follow up visit and 4 weeks post-pilot follow-up visit. Total Score from 1-7, with higher score indicating better quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 week follow up, 1 month follow up

Population: data not available for participants with missing questionnaire

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackChange in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)Baseline5.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackChange in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)1 week follow up5.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackChange in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)1 month follow up5.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Asthma EducationChange in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)Baseline5.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Asthma EducationChange in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)1 week follow up4.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Asthma EducationChange in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)1 month follow up5.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Secondary

Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Score - Adjusted

Change in self-reported asthma control validated survey, with a total score range from 0-6, with a higher score indicating severely uncontrolled asthma, used to assess current asthma control at pre-intervention, 1week post-pilot follow up visit and 4 weeks post-pilot follow-up visit adjusted for age, sex, race, monthly income

Time frame: Baseline, 1 week follow up, 1 month follow up

Population: data not available for participants with missing questionnaire

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Score - AdjustedBaseline1.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Score - Adjusted1 week follow up0.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Score - Adjusted1 month follow up0.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Asthma EducationAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Score - Adjusted1 month follow up1.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Asthma EducationAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Score - AdjustedBaseline1.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Asthma EducationAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Score - Adjusted1 week follow up1.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Secondary

Change in Beliefs About Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ)

The BIPQ includes 9 items designed to rapidly assess the cognitive and emotional representations of illness- consequences, timeline, personal control, treatment control, experience symptoms, concerns, emotions and comprehensibility. For analyses, the first 8 items are summed and item 9 which is part of the causal scale is excluded. Items for personal control, treatment control and comprehensibility were reverse coded. All of the 8 items, are rated using a 0 (none) to 10 (extreme) response scale giving a sum total score of 0-80. Higher total scores indicate worse asthma perception.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 week follow up

Population: data not available for participants with missing questionnaire

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackChange in Beliefs About Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ)Baseline33.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.9
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackChange in Beliefs About Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ)1 week follow up30.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.9
Asthma EducationChange in Beliefs About Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ)Baseline34.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Asthma EducationChange in Beliefs About Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ)1 week follow up34.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.8
Secondary

Change in Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) - Necessity Score and Concerns Score

10-item scale that measures beliefs about asthma controller medication in 2 subdomains: necessity and concerns. All items have a five-point Likert answer option, ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree, with total range from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicate stronger beliefs about the corresponding concepts.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 week follow up, 1 month follow up

Population: data not available for participants with missing questionnaire

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackChange in Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) - Necessity Score and Concerns ScoreNecessity 1 week follow up18.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackChange in Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) - Necessity Score and Concerns ScoreConcerns Baseline14.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackChange in Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) - Necessity Score and Concerns ScoreNecessity Baseline17.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.9
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackChange in Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) - Necessity Score and Concerns ScoreNecessity 1 month follow up18.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.5
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackChange in Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) - Necessity Score and Concerns ScoreConcerns 1 month follow up13.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackChange in Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) - Necessity Score and Concerns ScoreConcerns 1 week follow up13.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
Asthma EducationChange in Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) - Necessity Score and Concerns ScoreConcerns 1 month follow up12.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
Asthma EducationChange in Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) - Necessity Score and Concerns ScoreNecessity Baseline18.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
Asthma EducationChange in Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) - Necessity Score and Concerns ScoreNecessity 1 week follow up17.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.5
Asthma EducationChange in Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) - Necessity Score and Concerns ScoreNecessity 1 month follow up18.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2
Asthma EducationChange in Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) - Necessity Score and Concerns ScoreConcerns Baseline14.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
Asthma EducationChange in Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) - Necessity Score and Concerns ScoreConcerns 1 week follow up12.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.5
Secondary

Change in Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS)

MARS is a self-reported questionnaire with the total score range from 0-10 with a higher score indicating better adherence.

Time frame: Baseline, 1 week follow up, 1 month follow up

Population: data not available for participants with missing questionnaire

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackChange in Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS)Baseline4.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackChange in Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS)1 week follow up4.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackChange in Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS)1 month follow up4.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Asthma EducationChange in Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS)1 month follow up4.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Asthma EducationChange in Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS)Baseline4.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Asthma EducationChange in Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS)1 week follow up4.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Secondary

Change in Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS) Adjusted

MARS is a self-reported questionnaire with the total score range from 0-10 with a higher score indicating better adherence. MARS, adjusted for age, sex, race, monthly income

Time frame: Baseline, 1 week follow up, 1 month follow up

Population: data not available for participants with missing questionnaire

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackChange in Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS) AdjustedBaseline4.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackChange in Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS) Adjusted1 week follow up4.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackChange in Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS) Adjusted1 month follow up4.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Asthma EducationChange in Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS) AdjustedBaseline4.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Asthma EducationChange in Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS) Adjusted1 week follow up4.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Asthma EducationChange in Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS) Adjusted1 month follow up4.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Secondary

Symptom Perception Measures Adjusted

Assessed based on alignment of patient guesses and actual PEF values recorded by the AM2 device and then categorizing into accurate, under or over-perception, adjusted for age, sex, race, monthly income Assesses if training and feedback can improve under perception of airflow obstruction and lead to better control in older adults with asthma

Time frame: Baseline, 1 week follow up, 1 month follow up

Population: data not available for participants with missing questionnaire

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackSymptom Perception Measures AdjustedSymptom Accurate Perception Baseline55.3 percentStandard Error 6.5
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackSymptom Perception Measures AdjustedSymptom Accurate Perception 1 week follow up71.5 percentStandard Error 6.3
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackSymptom Perception Measures AdjustedSymptom Accurate Perception 1 month follow up72.2 percentStandard Error 7.6
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackSymptom Perception Measures AdjustedSymptom Under-Perception Baseline39.7 percentStandard Error 7
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackSymptom Perception Measures AdjustedSymptom Under-Perception 1 week follow up11.9 percentStandard Error 6.4
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackSymptom Perception Measures AdjustedSymptom Under-Perception 1 month follow up11.8 percentStandard Error 7.4
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackSymptom Perception Measures AdjustedSymptom Over-Perception Baseline5.0 percentStandard Error 2.1
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackSymptom Perception Measures AdjustedSymptom Over-Perception 1 week follow up16.6 percentStandard Error 4.9
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackSymptom Perception Measures AdjustedSymptom Over-Perception 1 month follow up16 percentStandard Error 5.9
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackSymptom Perception Measures AdjustedActual Best, personal best baseline67 percentStandard Error 0.4
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackSymptom Perception Measures AdjustedActual Best, personal best 1 week follow up80.8 percentStandard Error 0.6
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackSymptom Perception Measures AdjustedActual Best, personal best 1 month follow up78.6 percentStandard Error 0.5
Asthma EducationSymptom Perception Measures AdjustedActual Best, personal best 1 week follow up71.9 percentStandard Error 0.7
Asthma EducationSymptom Perception Measures AdjustedSymptom Accurate Perception Baseline51.1 percentStandard Error 6.9
Asthma EducationSymptom Perception Measures AdjustedSymptom Over-Perception Baseline3.9 percentStandard Error 2.3
Asthma EducationSymptom Perception Measures AdjustedSymptom Accurate Perception 1 week follow up52.7 percentStandard Error 6.4
Asthma EducationSymptom Perception Measures AdjustedActual Best, personal best baseline68.2 percentStandard Error 0.6
Asthma EducationSymptom Perception Measures AdjustedSymptom Accurate Perception 1 month follow up42.9 percentStandard Error 8.3
Asthma EducationSymptom Perception Measures AdjustedSymptom Over-Perception 1 week follow up13.6 percentStandard Error 5
Asthma EducationSymptom Perception Measures AdjustedSymptom Under-Perception Baseline44.9 percentStandard Error 7.5
Asthma EducationSymptom Perception Measures AdjustedActual Best, personal best 1 month follow up67.7 percentStandard Error 0.7
Asthma EducationSymptom Perception Measures AdjustedSymptom Under-Perception 1 week follow up33.8 percentStandard Error 6.4
Asthma EducationSymptom Perception Measures AdjustedSymptom Over-Perception 1 month follow up12 percentStandard Error 6.4
Asthma EducationSymptom Perception Measures AdjustedSymptom Under-Perception 1 month follow up45.1 percentStandard Error 8
Secondary

Treatment Credibility

Treatment Credibility adjusted for age, sex, race, monthly income The credibility of a treatment rationale consists of how believable, convincing, and logical the treatment is. The CEQ credibility factor, reflecting a cognitively-based process, is based on patients' summed responses to three items measuring how logical the therapy seems, how successful one thinks it will be in reducing symptoms, and how confident one would be in recommending it to a friend with similar symptoms. The modified version used in this study included items rated on 7 point scales ranging from 1 (Not at all logical/successful /confident) to 7 (Very logical/successful /confident), with a total score possible range of 3 to 21. Higher scores indicate higher treatment credibility.

Time frame: 1 week follow up, 1 month follow up

Population: data not available for participants with missing questionnaire

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackTreatment Credibility1 week follow up19.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.7
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackTreatment Credibility1 month follow up19.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.4
Asthma EducationTreatment Credibility1 week follow up19.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
Asthma EducationTreatment Credibility1 month follow up18.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.7
Secondary

Treatment Expectancy

Treatment Expectancy adjusted for age, sex, race, monthly income. Outcome expectancy consists of patients' beliefs about how likely they are to benefit from a treatment. The CEQ expectancy factor, reflecting an affectively-based process, is based on patients' responses to three items reflecting how much they think they will improve by the end of treatment, how much they feel therapy will help reduce their symptoms, and how much they feel they will improve by the end of treatment. Because one item is on the same 7-point scale as the credibility items and two are assessed on an 11-point scale (from 0% to 100% in 10-point increments), responses are first standardized before summing to render the expectancy total score. The total score possible range is 3 to 33. Higher scores indicate higher treatment expectancy.

Time frame: 1 week follow up, 1 month follow up

Population: data not available for participants with missing questionnaire

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackTreatment Expectancy1 week follow up25.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.6
Asthma Education and PEF FeedbackTreatment Expectancy1 month follow up25.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 4.8
Asthma EducationTreatment Expectancy1 week follow up25.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.7
Asthma EducationTreatment Expectancy1 month follow up21.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 8.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026