Cardiovascular Disease
Conditions
Keywords
cardiovascular disease, social support
Brief summary
This pilot study will use a hybrid reciprocal peer support and peer coach model to initiate and sustain heart-healthy behavioral changes in Veterans. Veterans who are at-risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) will be enrolled in the study and paired with another Veteran to receive and provide social support around engaging in CVD risk reduction behaviors. Enrolled participants will be offered a series of 3 group sessions focused on CVD risk reduction, goal setting and action plan development. Between group sessions, peer partners will be asked to have weekly calls to discuss action plan challenges, explore options for problem solving, and provide encouragement and accountability for personal goals. Participants who do not engage in the group sessions or weekly phone calls, or who request additional help, will receive support from trained peer coaches. The goal of this pilot study is to evaluate the proof of concept for a hybrid reciprocal peer support (RPS) and peer coach intervention to improve heart healthy behaviors among Veterans at risk for CVD.
Detailed description
A total of 24 Veterans enrolled at the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center will be screened and enrolled. Eligible Veterans are 35-64 years old, with at least one uncontrolled or poorly controlled risk factor for CVD. In addition, 3-6 veterans will be enrolled and trained as heart health peer coaches, with eligibility being 35-64 years old, with at least one documented CVD factor who have sustained improvement in physical activity or dietary change in the previous 3-6 months. All participants complete a baseline assessment, three structured group meetings, and a 12 week post-intervention assessment. At the first group, each participant creates a behavioral goal, and peer partners are paired with another Veteran based on behavioral goal and gender. They are expected to call their peer once a week to discuss progress or difficulty with their action plan and support each other with problem solving. Post enrollment and prior to the first group meeting, Peer coaches will have 3-5 hours of motivational and communication training with study staff focusing on skills such as active listening, non-directive support, eliciting change-talk, promoting incremental change, and patient confidentiality. Peer coaches will interact with peer buddies during a) group sessions, b) at a 6 week phone check-in, and c) on-going support if needed. Additional support will be initiated if there are no phone calls between pairs, there is a lack of participant engagement in calls to partner or attending group sessions, or upon request by the peer. There are two Aims of the current pilot study. Aim 1: examine the feasibility and acceptability of a 12-week hybrid peer coach-reciprocal peer support intervention. Feasibility will be evaluated by ease of recruitment, and enrollment and retention rates. Acceptability will be assessed by self-report of amount, frequency and modality of contacts, participation rates for group sessions, and through post-intervention qualitative interviews. Aim 2: explore gender differences in feasibility/acceptability of the hybrid peer support model. Gender differences will be evaluated through qualitative comparison of participant reported experiences with intervention content as well as peer and group interactions by gender; and, quantitatively via exploration of differences in enrollment, retention, refusal reasons and frequency of peer contacts.
Interventions
Peers and peer coaches provide mutual or one-way support to initiate and sustain behavioral improvements for cardiovascular health, with additional education from study staff.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
single group assignment
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Peer partners and peer coaches: * Enrolled in a Durham Veterans Administration Health Care System primary care clinic (including the women's health clinic) * At risk for cardiovascular disease as defined by having at least one of the following: * Uncontrolled hypertension * history of obesity defined as (BMI \>30) * uncontrolled non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus * In addition, Peer coaches have made and sustained a behavioral change in past 3-6 months to improve heart health * English as preferred language * no significant hearing impairment * lives approximately 30 minutes from the Durham Veterans affairs Medical Center * agrees to attend regular visits per study protocol * no contraindication to engage in at least moderate physical activity * willing to use personal phone for peer and coach contacts
Exclusion criteria
* insulin-dependent diabetes * serious mental illness defined as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, dementia, active psychosis psychiatric hospitalization within the last 12 months or current high-risk suicide flag in their electronic medical record * active substance use as documented in electronic or positive screening during telephone screening * limited Life expectancy (\<6 months) or severely ill defined as enrolled in hospice or actively undergoing chemotherapy or radiation therapy for cancer * currently pregnant or planning to become pregnant in next 6 months
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility of Enrollment | 12 weeks | Number of participants contacted, screened and enrolled in the pilot |
| Feasibility Retention | 12 weeks | Retention rates from consent to enrollment and from enrollment to completion of study. |
| Acceptability | 12 weeks | Acceptability of study based on successful peer buddy contacts per pair (not applicable to coaches) and participation in group sessions. |
| Acceptability - Weeks Contact With Peer Buddy | 12 weeks | Acceptability of study based on successful peer buddy contacts per pair (not applicable to coaches) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Gender Differences-enrollment | 12 weeks | Quantitative and qualitative gender differences in feasibility and acceptance will be evaluated through quantitative differences in enrollment, retention and frequency of peer contacts, and qualitative comparison of participant-reported experiences with intervention content, peer and group interactions by gender. Data are presented only for reciprocal peer partner group as this was pre-specified to compare outcomes between men and women in the reciprocal peer partner group. Thus, peer coaches are not described in this outcome. |
| Gender Differences - Mean Contacts Per Buddy Pair | 12 weeks | Quantitative and qualitative gender differences in feasibility and acceptance will be evaluated through quantitative differences in enrollment, retention and frequency of peer contacts, and qualitative comparison of participant-reported experiences with intervention content, peer and group interactions by gender. |
| Gender Differences - Retention | 12 weeks | Quantitative and qualitative gender differences in feasibility and acceptance will be evaluated through quantitative differences in enrollment, retention and frequency of peer contacts, and qualitative comparison of participant-reported experiences with intervention content, peer and group interactions by gender. Data are presented only for reciprocal peer partner group as this was pre-specified to compare outcomes between men and women in the reciprocal peer partner group. Thus, peer coaches are not described in this outcome. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Reciprocal Peer Partner Veterans with at least one cardiovascular disease risk factor who are interested in increasing heart healthy behaviors through peer support receive phone-based weekly support from a reciprocal peer support partner and as needed help from a peer coach. | 12 |
| Peer Coach Veterans with at least one cardiovascular disease risk factor who have made and sustained changes in diet or exercise in the past 3-6 months prior to enrollment serve as peer coaches and provide supplemental one-way support to reciprocal peer partners as needed. | 3 |
| Total | 15 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 2 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Reciprocal Peer Partner | Total | Peer Coach |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 54.42 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.39 | 55.87 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.25 | 61.67 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.08 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 11 Participants | 13 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 7 Participants | 9 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 12 Participants | 15 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 6 Participants | 7 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 6 Participants | 8 Participants | 2 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 12 | 0 / 3 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 3 / 12 | 2 / 3 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 12 | 0 / 3 |
Outcome results
Acceptability
Acceptability of study based on successful peer buddy contacts per pair (not applicable to coaches) and participation in group sessions.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Population: participants who attended at least 1 group session
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Reciprocal Peer Partner | Acceptability | 2.1 group sessions attended per participant |
| Peer Coach | Acceptability | 2 group sessions attended per participant |
Acceptability - Weeks Contact With Peer Buddy
Acceptability of study based on successful peer buddy contacts per pair (not applicable to coaches)
Time frame: 12 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Reciprocal Peer Partner | Acceptability - Weeks Contact With Peer Buddy | 8.33 weeks |
Feasibility of Enrollment
Number of participants contacted, screened and enrolled in the pilot
Time frame: 12 weeks
Population: Number of participants contacted for participation
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reciprocal Peer Partner | Feasibility of Enrollment | contacted but not screened | 25 Participants |
| Reciprocal Peer Partner | Feasibility of Enrollment | screened by not enrolled | 13 Participants |
| Reciprocal Peer Partner | Feasibility of Enrollment | consented | 12 Participants |
| Peer Coach | Feasibility of Enrollment | contacted but not screened | 7 Participants |
| Peer Coach | Feasibility of Enrollment | screened by not enrolled | 0 Participants |
| Peer Coach | Feasibility of Enrollment | consented | 3 Participants |
Feasibility Retention
Retention rates from consent to enrollment and from enrollment to completion of study.
Time frame: 12 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reciprocal Peer Partner | Feasibility Retention | did not complete study | 3 Participants |
| Reciprocal Peer Partner | Feasibility Retention | completed study | 9 Participants |
| Peer Coach | Feasibility Retention | did not complete study | 0 Participants |
| Peer Coach | Feasibility Retention | completed study | 3 Participants |
Gender Differences-enrollment
Quantitative and qualitative gender differences in feasibility and acceptance will be evaluated through quantitative differences in enrollment, retention and frequency of peer contacts, and qualitative comparison of participant-reported experiences with intervention content, peer and group interactions by gender. Data are presented only for reciprocal peer partner group as this was pre-specified to compare outcomes between men and women in the reciprocal peer partner group. Thus, peer coaches are not described in this outcome.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Population: participants by gender contacted by invitation letter for study participation
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reciprocal Peer Partner | Gender Differences-enrollment | sent invitation letter by not reached by phone | 17 Participants |
| Reciprocal Peer Partner | Gender Differences-enrollment | reached by phone but not consented | 6 Participants |
| Reciprocal Peer Partner | Gender Differences-enrollment | consented | 6 Participants |
| Peer Coach | Gender Differences-enrollment | sent invitation letter by not reached by phone | 11 Participants |
| Peer Coach | Gender Differences-enrollment | reached by phone but not consented | 4 Participants |
| Peer Coach | Gender Differences-enrollment | consented | 6 Participants |
Gender Differences - Mean Contacts Per Buddy Pair
Quantitative and qualitative gender differences in feasibility and acceptance will be evaluated through quantitative differences in enrollment, retention and frequency of peer contacts, and qualitative comparison of participant-reported experiences with intervention content, peer and group interactions by gender.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Population: consented participants by gender
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Reciprocal Peer Partner | Gender Differences - Mean Contacts Per Buddy Pair | 9 weeks |
| Peer Coach | Gender Differences - Mean Contacts Per Buddy Pair | 7.66 weeks |
Gender Differences - Retention
Quantitative and qualitative gender differences in feasibility and acceptance will be evaluated through quantitative differences in enrollment, retention and frequency of peer contacts, and qualitative comparison of participant-reported experiences with intervention content, peer and group interactions by gender. Data are presented only for reciprocal peer partner group as this was pre-specified to compare outcomes between men and women in the reciprocal peer partner group. Thus, peer coaches are not described in this outcome.
Time frame: 12 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Reciprocal Peer Partner | Gender Differences - Retention | 5 Participants |
| Peer Coach | Gender Differences - Retention | 4 Participants |