Skip to content

Continuous Chest Wall Vibration in COPD Rehabilitation

Effects of Continuous Chest Wall Vibration on Dyspnea and Exercise Tolerance in COPD Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03644888
Enrollment
40
Registered
2018-08-23
Start date
2018-09-12
Completion date
2019-09-30
Last updated
2020-02-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

COPD

Keywords

COPD, Vibration, Rehabilitation

Brief summary

Dyspnea, the sensation of breathing discomfort or shortness of breath, is one of the main symptoms for patients affected by Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), particularly during exercise. Previous study show that chest wall vibration decrease dyspnea in COPD patients and precisely when applied during the inspiration phase, called in-phase vibration (IPV) which provide vibration directly on intercostal muscles. These findings have been obtained in laboratory context and the intercostals muscles vibration has been tested only in single phases of breathing, during inspiration with IPV and during exhalation with out-of-phase vibration (OPV). None study has evaluated the effect of a continuous chest wall vibration (CCWV), namely muscles vibration during the whole cycle of breathing, on dyspnea in patients with COPD in a clinical context. Continuous high frequency vibration has been proven to reduce myoelectrical manifestation of fatigue, probably modifying the centrally driven motor unit recruitment hierarchy, in healthy subjects. Moreover, CCWV is a modality of provide vibration more suitable and cost-effective in a clinical context than single-phases vibration that requires specific instruments for the detection of breathing phases and the coupling with vibration device. On these bases, the investigators hypothesized that CCWV at high frequency, applied during a cycle ergometer training program, could decrease dyspnea and enhance the exercise tolerance in COPD patients. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of high frequency CCWV on dyspnea and exercise tolerance in patients with COPD patients compared to usual care and to sham intervention.

Interventions

Already in arm/group descriptions

OTHERAirway clearance program

Already in arm/group descriptions

DEVICEVibration therapy

Already in arm/group descriptions

DEVICESham vibration therapy

Already in arm/group descriptions

Sponsors

Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- COPD diagnosis (GOLD stage: 2-3-4)

Exclusion criteria

* Restrictive lung disease * Active pulmonary infection * Pulmonary embolism (less than 3 months) * Pneumotorax * Thoracic/abdominal operation (less than 3 months) * Myocardial infarction (less than 6 months) * Congestive heart failure/ heart failure/ right heart failure * Angina/severe angina * Incapability of perform the cycle ergometer training (e.g. orthopaedic or urogenital conditions) * Incapability to understand the intructions required to carry out the tests and assessments planned

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of DyspneaChange from Baseline Barthel Index based on dyspnea at 4 weeksBarthel Index based on dyspnea. The scale measures the level of dyspnea perceived in performing basic daily living activities, Range: 0 - 100 Higher values represent a worse outcome
Change of exercise toleranceChange from Baseline exercise tolerance at 4 weeksSix Minutes Walking Test. This test assesses distance walked over 6 minutes as a sub-maximal test of aerobic capacity/endurance. Higher values represent a better outcome

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of respiratory muscles strengthChange from Baseline respiratory muscles strength at 4 weeksMaximum inspiratory pressure / Minimum expiratory pressure. Maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) are global measures of maximal strength of respiratory muscles and they are respectively the greater pressure which may be generated during maximal inspiration and expiration against an occluded airway. The way to measure maximal respiratory pressures is very simple, using a hand-held mouth pressure meter in cmH2O. Higher values represent a better outcome
Change of Risk of deathChange from Baseline risk of death at 4 weeksBODE Index. Is a multidimensional 10-point grading system that predicts the risk of death from any cause and from respiratory causes among patients with COPD. It is composed by subscales, combined to compute a total score as follows: FEV1 (% of predicted): 0 (≥65); 1 (50-64); 2 (36-49); 3 (≤35). Distance walked in 6 minutes (m): 0 (≥350); 1 (250-349); 2 150-249); 3 (≤149). MMRC dyspnea scale:0 (0-1); 1 (2); 2 (3); 3 (4). Body-mass Index: 0 (\>21); 1 (≤21). Range: 0-10 Higher scores indicate a worse outcome (higher risk of death)
Change of Health-related quality of lifeChange from Baseline health-related quality at 4 weeksSaint George Respiratory Questionnaire. Is a self-reported, disease-specific, health-related quality of life questionnaire. Range: 0 (no health impairment) - 100 (maximum health impairment). Higher values represent a worse outcome
Change of Sympatho-vagal balanceChange from Baseline sympatho-vagal balance at 2 weeks and at 4 weeksHeart Rate Variability

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026