Child Maltreatment
Conditions
Keywords
Child Abuse Prevention, Primary Care, Professional Education in Primary Care
Brief summary
This study aims to understand what influences the adoption and implementation of an innovative approach to pediatric primary care by medical professionals and staff providing that care. The innovation concerns addressing common psychosocial problems such as parental depression and substance abuse. Different approaches to training medical professionals will be examined as well as the use of software versus traditional 'paper and pencil' to facilitate implementation.
Detailed description
The proposed study, based on SEEK I and II findings is designed to study the effectiveness of technology driven training strategies to facilitate use of SEEK in helping prevent child maltreatment (CM) and its adoption and implementation in pediatric and family medicine settings. The implementation approach is anchored in four stages of the EPIS conceptual model: Exploration, adoption/Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment. The strong evidence for SEEK's effectiveness has been underscored by its listing on the websites of the CDC, AHRQ, AAP, and by the California Clearinghouse for Evidence-Based Interventions in Child Welfare. Early adopters are increasingly implementing SEEK in primary care settings, including in Sweden. Four of the 5 healthcare systems in this proposal have implemented SEEK in some of their practices. However, practices within these systems operate independently of one another, and there should not be contamination among them. Each practice has its own lead physician, primary care providers (PCPs) and administrative staff and several have integrated behavioral health. Design. The investigator selected a rigorous Hybrid Type III design which is an approach to examine implementation outcomes while also examining SEEK's effectiveness in preventing CM, measured by electron health record (EHR) indicators. Type III designs are facilitated by good EHR systems due to the low cost of data routinely gathered for clinical, services, and financial purposes. Five healthcare systems have committed to participating in the project, without committing individual practices and primary care providers (PCPs). Professionals, office staff and parents are nested within practices which are nested within the 5 participating healthcare systems. Practices will choose whether to participate, as will medical professionals within those practices. Participating practices will be randomized to one of the two training strategies for PCPs - Independent online training vs. a Maintenance of Certification (MOC) activity approved by the Boards of Pediatrics and of Family Physicians. Practices will be able to select the facilitation strategy (SEEKonline software or Traditional 'paper and pencil'). Participating professionals and staff within practices will need to adhere to the approach adopted by the practice. The design accounts for heterogeneity in geography, size of healthcare systems, type of primary care (pediatric and family medicine), and presence of integrated behavioral health. A small random sample of parents will be recruited from each practice. For Aim 1, practices and PCPs will be randomized to one of the two training approaches. Using baseline and follow-up surveys, the investigators will assess the impact of each approach on PCPs' attitudes, knowledge, sense of competence, level of comfort and practice behavior with regard to addressing the targeted problems (e.g., parental depression). Aim 2 focuses on the implementation of the SEEK model in pediatric and family medicine primary care practices. Practices will have the option of implementing the model using the SEEKonline software or the traditional paper and pencil approach. The evaluation involves measuring aspects of implementation such rates of adoption, fidelity to the model, and sustainment beyond the training. In addition, qualitative interviews will provide data regarding what facilitates or impedes optimal implementation. For Aim 3, The investigators will assess the impact of the interventions on rates of child maltreatment (CM) based on ICD 10 diagnoses in EHRs. The investigators will include a cost-effectiveness analysis by estimating the costs associated with the different approaches to implementing SEEK.
Interventions
MOC training will lead to more positive attitudes, comfort level and competence in addressing risk factors for Child Maltreatment.
IND refers to practitioners Independently doing the online training.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
RCT
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Practice not already implementing the SEEK model. * The practice provides primary care to children. * The practice agrees to participate in the study. * PCPs, office staff and parents of children 0-5 years agree to participate. * Able to comprehend basic English * Access to a computer to complete online surveys.
Exclusion criteria
* None
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Stages of SEEK Implementation Completion (SIC) - Startup (at a Practice Level) | up to 30 months | The SIC is an assessment tool with 8 stages extending from Engagement to achievement of Competency. Each stage maps onto 3 phases of implementation (Pre-Implementation, Implementation and Sustainment). Startup reflects whether the practice implemented SEEK - Yes/No. Yes = practice started implemented SEEK. Practices that did start are reported. |
| Stages of Implementation Completion (SIC) - as Assessed by the Safe Environment for Every Kid (SEEK) Fidelity Score (at a Practice Level) | up to 30 months | The SIC is an assessment tool with 8 stages extending from Engagement to achievement of Fidelity. Each stage maps onto 3 phases of implementation (Pre-Implementation, Implementation and Sustainment). Competence/Fidelity score reflects the extent to which a practice implemented the intervention as intended. Score range: 0-100; higher is better fidelity to the intervention as planned. |
| Stages of SEEK Implementation Completion (SIC) - Sustainability | up to 30 months | The SIC is an assessment tool with 8 stages extending from Engagement to achievement of Competency. Each stage maps onto 3 phases of implementation (Pre-Implementation, Implementation and Sustainability). Sustainability was determined if the practice was implementing SEEK 24 months after initiation and doing so with fidelity. Reporting the number of practices that achieved sustainability. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Rates of Under Immunized Children | 2 years prior to implementing SEEK, 2 years after implementing SEEK., 48 months total. | ICD-10 codes related to possible maltreatment (child abuse and neglect) are readily accessible through EHRs. De-identified aggregate data were gathered towards the end of the study for all children in the practice 0-66 months of age. |
| Rates of Children With Possible Abuse. | 2 years prior to implementing SEEK, 2 years after implementing SEEK., 48 months total. | ICD-10 codes related to possible maltreatment (child abuse and neglect) are readily accessible through EHRs. De-identified aggregate data were gathered towards the end of the study for all children in the practice 0-66 months of age. |
| The Safe Environment for Every Kid (SEEK) PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Addressing Depression Subscale | 30 months | The PCPQ, used in both SEEK RCTs has 5 vignettes, with 7-12 statements assessing PCPs' thinking and practice with regard to addressing the targeted CM risk factors. Items were grouped conceptually into 6 topical scales (e.g., Substance Abuse) and 5 cross-cutting themes (e.g., Perceived Competence). The mean subscale scores ranged from 0-3. Higher scores reflect PCPs more optimal capability to address the problem. |
| SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Addressing Food Insecurity | 30 months | The PCPQ, used in both SEEK RCTs has 5 vignettes, with 7-12 statements assessing PCPs' thinking and practice with regard to addressing the targeted CM risk factors. Items were grouped conceptually into 6 topical scales (e.g., Substance Abuse) and 5 cross-cutting themes (e.g., Perceived Competence). The mean subscale scores ranged from 0-3. Higher scores reflect PCPs more optimal capability to address the problem. |
| SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Addressing Major Stress | 30 months | The PCPQ, used in both SEEK RCTs has 5 vignettes, with 7-12 statements assessing PCPs' thinking and practice with regard to addressing the targeted CM risk factors. Items were grouped conceptually into 6 topical scales (e.g., Substance Abuse) and 5 cross-cutting themes (e.g., Perceived Competence). The mean subscale scores ranged from 0-3. Higher scores reflect PCPs more optimal capability to address the problem. |
| SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Addressing Intimate Partner Violence | 30 months | The PCPQ, used in both SEEK RCTs has 5 vignettes, with 7-12 statements assessing PCPs' thinking and practice with regard to addressing the targeted CM risk factors. Items were grouped conceptually into 6 topical scales (e.g., Substance Abuse) and 5 cross-cutting themes (e.g., Perceived Competence). The mean subscale scores ranged from 0-3. Higher scores reflect PCPs more optimal capability to address the problem. |
| SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Addressing Harsh Punishment | 30 months | The PCPQ, used in both SEEK RCTs has 5 vignettes, with 7-12 statements assessing PCPs' thinking and practice with regard to addressing the targeted CM risk factors. Items were grouped conceptually into 6 topical scales (e.g., Substance Abuse) and 5 cross-cutting themes (e.g., Perceived Competence). The mean subscale scores ranged from 0-3. Higher scores reflect PCPs more optimal capability to address the problem. |
| SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Addressing Substance Abuse | 30 months | The PCPQ, used in both SEEK RCTs has 5 vignettes, with 7-12 statements assessing PCPs' thinking and practice with regard to addressing the targeted CM risk factors. Items were grouped conceptually into 6 topical scales (e.g., Substance Abuse) and 5 cross-cutting themes (e.g., Perceived Competence). The mean subscale scores ranged from 0-3. Higher scores reflect PCPs more optimal capability to address the problem. |
| Overall Rates of Children With Possible Abuse and Neglect. | 2 years prior to implementing SEEK, 2 years after implementing SEEK., 48 months total. | International Classification of Diseases - 10 (ICD-10) codes related to possible child maltreatment (CM or child abuse and neglect) are readily accessible through EHRs. De-identified aggregate data were gathered towards the end of the study for all children in the practice 0-66 months of age. |
| SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Comfort Level Regarding Addressing Health-related Social Needs | 30 months | The PCPQ, used in both SEEK RCTs has 5 vignettes, with 7-12 statements assessing PCPs' thinking and practice with regard to addressing the targeted CM risk factors. Items were grouped conceptually into 6 topical scales (e.g., Substance Abuse) and 5 cross-cutting themes (e.g., Perceived Competence). The mean subscale scores ranged from 0-3. Higher scores reflect PCPs more optimal capability to address the problem. |
| SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Perceived Competence Regarding Addressing Health-related Social Needs | 30 months | The PCPQ, used in both SEEK RCTs has 5 vignettes, with 7-12 statements assessing PCPs' thinking and practice with regard to addressing the targeted CM risk factors. Items were grouped conceptually into 6 topical scales (e.g., Substance Abuse) and 5 cross-cutting themes (e.g., Perceived Competence). The mean subscale scores ranged from 0-3. Higher scores reflect PCPs more optimal capability to address the problem. |
| SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Knowledge Regarding Addressing Health-related Social Needs | 30 months | The PCPQ, used in both SEEK RCTs has 5 vignettes, with 7-12 statements assessing PCPs' thinking and practice with regard to addressing the targeted CM risk factors. Items were grouped conceptually into 6 topical scales (e.g., Substance Abuse) and 5 cross-cutting themes (e.g., Perceived Competence). The mean subscale scores ranged from 0-3. Higher scores reflect PCPs more optimal capability to address the problem. |
| SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Practice Behavior Regarding Addressing Health-related Social Needs | 30 months | The PCPQ, used in both SEEK RCTs has 5 vignettes, with 7-12 statements assessing PCPs' thinking and practice with regard to addressing the targeted CM risk factors. Items were grouped conceptually into 6 topical scales (e.g., Substance Abuse) and 5 cross-cutting themes (e.g., Perceived Competence). The mean subscale scores ranged from 0-3. Higher scores reflect PCPs more optimal capability to address the problem. |
| SEEK Parent View of Relationship With Child's PCP Subscale - Adapted From the Patient-Doctor Interaction Scale | 24 months | Parents rate their child's PCP on this measure adapted for pediatric practice from the Patient-Doctor Interaction Scale. The Likert scale included 8 questions; the response set was from 1 (no) to 4 (always). Subscale mean scores range from 1 - 4; higher scores indicate greater satisfaction. The mean of the Likert subscale response is reported. |
| SEEK Parent View of the Attentiveness of the Child's PCP Subscale - Adapted From the Patient-Doctor Interaction Scale | 24 months | Parents rate their child's PCP on this measure adapted for pediatric practice from the Patient-Doctor Interaction Scale. The Likert scale included 8 questions; the response set was from 1 (no) to 4 (always). Subscale mean scores range from 1 - 4; higher scores indicate greater satisfaction. The mean of the Likert subscale response is reported. |
| SEEK Parent View of the Comprehensiveness of the Child's PCP Subscale - Adapted From the Patient-Doctor Interaction Scale | 24 months | Parents rate their child's PCP on this measure adapted for pediatric practice from the Patient-Doctor Interaction Scale. The Likert scale included 8 questions; the response set was from 1 (no) to 4 (always). Subscale mean scores range from 1 - 4; higher scores indicate greater satisfaction. The mean of the Likert subscale response is reported. |
| SEEK Parent View of the Communication Skills of the Child's PCP Subscale - Adapted From the Patient-Doctor Interaction Scale | 24 months | Parents rate their child's PCP on this measure adapted for pediatric practice from the Patient-Doctor Interaction Scale. The Likert scale included 8 questions; the response set was from 1 (no) to 4 (always). Subscale mean scores range from 1 - 4; higher scores indicate greater satisfaction. The mean of the Likert subscale response is reported. |
| SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Attitudes Regarding Addressing Health-related Social Needs | 30 months | The PCPQ, used in both SEEK RCTs has 5 vignettes, with 7-12 statements assessing PCPs' thinking and practice with regard to addressing the targeted CM risk factors. Items were grouped conceptually into 6 topical scales (e.g., Substance Abuse) and 5 cross-cutting themes (e.g., Perceived Competence). The mean subscale scores ranged from 0-3. Higher scores reflect PCPs more optimal capability to address the problem. |
| Rates of Children With Possible Neglect. | 2 years prior to implementing SEEK, 2 years after implementing SEEK., 48 months total. | ICD-10 codes related to possible maltreatment (child abuse and neglect) are readily accessible through EHRs. De-identified aggregate data were gathered towards the end of the study for all children in the practice 0-66 months of age. |
| Rates of Children With Non-adherence to Medical Care | 2 years prior to implementing SEEK, 2 years after implementing SEEK., 48 months total. | ICD-10 codes related to possible maltreatment (child abuse and neglect) are readily accessible through EHRs. De-identified aggregate data were gathered towards the end of the study for all children in the practice 0-66 months of age. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Pediatric and family medicine practices across the U.S. were contacted from March 2019 to June 2022 through several avenues: American Academy of Pediatrics state chapters, collegial networks, healthcare system liaisons, and primary care networks. To be eligible, practices had to agree to randomization to either training modality and to introducing SEEK into their practice.
Pre-assignment details
Of the 44 practices that expressed initial interest, 29 agreed to participation. Four withdrew prior to randomization, so 25 practices were randomized to IND (13) or MOC (12), stratified by practice type (family medicine/pediatrics) and resident training site (yes/no). 6 additional practices withdrew early on. Reasons included feeling already overwhelmed, compounded by the pandemic; the sole family medicine practice cited plans for universal screening within their healthcare system.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Independent Online Training (IND) IND refers to practitioners independently doing the online training per practice assignment.
We did not conduct separate analyses on the other subsamples: practice leaders, behavioral health professionals, admin/nursing and parents. Particularly in the 1st three groups the n was too low. | 90 |
| Independent Online Training (IND) IND refers to practitioners independently doing the online training per practice assignment.
We did not conduct separate analyses on the other subsamples: practice leaders, behavioral health professionals, admin/nursing and parents. Particularly in the 1st three groups the n was too low. | 13 |
| Maintenance of Certification (MOC) MOC refers to practitioners trained via the SEEK MOC-4 Activity per practice assignment. involves a guided learning experience, approved by the American Board of Pediatrics and the American Board of Family Medicine for Maintenance of Certification credits. This involves a Quality Improvement project with 3 waves of data collection to assess and improve implementation while participating in 4 monthly webinars led by Dr. Dubowitz.
We did not conduct separate analyses on the other subsamples: practice leaders, behavioral health professionals, admin/nursing and parents. Particularly in the 1st three groups the n was too low. | 120 |
| Maintenance of Certification (MOC) MOC refers to practitioners trained via the SEEK MOC-4 Activity per practice assignment. involves a guided learning experience, approved by the American Board of Pediatrics and the American Board of Family Medicine for Maintenance of Certification credits. This involves a Quality Improvement project with 3 waves of data collection to assess and improve implementation while participating in 4 monthly webinars led by Dr. Dubowitz.
We did not conduct separate analyses on the other subsamples: practice leaders, behavioral health professionals, admin/nursing and parents. Particularly in the 1st three groups the n was too low. | 12 |
| Total | 235 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Independent Online Training (IND) | Maintenance of Certification (MOC) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 90 Participants | 120 Participants | 210 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 4 Participants | 10 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 84 Participants | 108 Participants | 192 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 23 Participants | 23 Participants | 46 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 4 Participants | 5 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 4 Participants | 5 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 4 Participants | 7 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 55 Participants | 80 Participants | 135 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 90 Participants | 120 Participants | 210 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Sex Female | 71 Participants | 95 Participants | 166 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Sex Male | 19 Participants | 25 Participants | 44 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 148 | 0 / 212 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 148 | 0 / 212 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 148 | 0 / 212 |
Outcome results
Stages of Implementation Completion (SIC) - as Assessed by the Safe Environment for Every Kid (SEEK) Fidelity Score (at a Practice Level)
The SIC is an assessment tool with 8 stages extending from Engagement to achievement of Fidelity. Each stage maps onto 3 phases of implementation (Pre-Implementation, Implementation and Sustainment). Competence/Fidelity score reflects the extent to which a practice implemented the intervention as intended. Score range: 0-100; higher is better fidelity to the intervention as planned.
Time frame: up to 30 months
Population: The n is different because 6 practices dropped out early on and were not included in the analyses.~3 dropped out from each arm.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Online Training (IND) | Stages of Implementation Completion (SIC) - as Assessed by the Safe Environment for Every Kid (SEEK) Fidelity Score (at a Practice Level) | 90.4 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.9 |
| Maintenance of Certification (MOC) | Stages of Implementation Completion (SIC) - as Assessed by the Safe Environment for Every Kid (SEEK) Fidelity Score (at a Practice Level) | 91.0 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.5 |
Stages of SEEK Implementation Completion (SIC) - Startup (at a Practice Level)
The SIC is an assessment tool with 8 stages extending from Engagement to achievement of Competency. Each stage maps onto 3 phases of implementation (Pre-Implementation, Implementation and Sustainment). Startup reflects whether the practice implemented SEEK - Yes/No. Yes = practice started implemented SEEK. Practices that did start are reported.
Time frame: up to 30 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Independent Online Training (IND) | Stages of SEEK Implementation Completion (SIC) - Startup (at a Practice Level) | 10 practices |
| Maintenance of Certification (MOC) | Stages of SEEK Implementation Completion (SIC) - Startup (at a Practice Level) | 9 practices |
Stages of SEEK Implementation Completion (SIC) - Sustainability
The SIC is an assessment tool with 8 stages extending from Engagement to achievement of Competency. Each stage maps onto 3 phases of implementation (Pre-Implementation, Implementation and Sustainability). Sustainability was determined if the practice was implementing SEEK 24 months after initiation and doing so with fidelity. Reporting the number of practices that achieved sustainability.
Time frame: up to 30 months
Population: The n is different because 6 practices dropped out early on and were not included in the analyses.~3 dropped out from each arm.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Independent Online Training (IND) | Stages of SEEK Implementation Completion (SIC) - Sustainability | 6 practices |
| Maintenance of Certification (MOC) | Stages of SEEK Implementation Completion (SIC) - Sustainability | 8 practices |
Overall Rates of Children With Possible Abuse and Neglect.
International Classification of Diseases - 10 (ICD-10) codes related to possible child maltreatment (CM or child abuse and neglect) are readily accessible through EHRs. De-identified aggregate data were gathered towards the end of the study for all children in the practice 0-66 months of age.
Time frame: 2 years prior to implementing SEEK, 2 years after implementing SEEK., 48 months total.
Population: Electronic Health Record (EHR) data were collected from 14 of the participating practices.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Online Training (IND) | Overall Rates of Children With Possible Abuse and Neglect. | Pre-SEEK | 4.1 percentage of patients |
| Independent Online Training (IND) | Overall Rates of Children With Possible Abuse and Neglect. | Post-SEEK | 4.3 percentage of patients |
| Maintenance of Certification (MOC) | Overall Rates of Children With Possible Abuse and Neglect. | Pre-SEEK | 8.2 percentage of patients |
| Maintenance of Certification (MOC) | Overall Rates of Children With Possible Abuse and Neglect. | Post-SEEK | 9.3 percentage of patients |
Rates of Children With Non-adherence to Medical Care
ICD-10 codes related to possible maltreatment (child abuse and neglect) are readily accessible through EHRs. De-identified aggregate data were gathered towards the end of the study for all children in the practice 0-66 months of age.
Time frame: 2 years prior to implementing SEEK, 2 years after implementing SEEK., 48 months total.
Population: EHR data were collected from 14 of the participating practices.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Online Training (IND) | Rates of Children With Non-adherence to Medical Care | Pre-SEEK | 0.02 percentage of patients |
| Independent Online Training (IND) | Rates of Children With Non-adherence to Medical Care | Post-SEEK | 0.01 percentage of patients |
| Maintenance of Certification (MOC) | Rates of Children With Non-adherence to Medical Care | Pre-SEEK | 0.1 percentage of patients |
| Maintenance of Certification (MOC) | Rates of Children With Non-adherence to Medical Care | Post-SEEK | 0.05 percentage of patients |
Rates of Children With Possible Abuse.
ICD-10 codes related to possible maltreatment (child abuse and neglect) are readily accessible through EHRs. De-identified aggregate data were gathered towards the end of the study for all children in the practice 0-66 months of age.
Time frame: 2 years prior to implementing SEEK, 2 years after implementing SEEK., 48 months total.
Population: EHR data were collected from 14 of the participating practices.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Online Training (IND) | Rates of Children With Possible Abuse. | Pre-SEEK | 0.8 percentage of patients |
| Independent Online Training (IND) | Rates of Children With Possible Abuse. | Post-SEEK | 0.7 percentage of patients |
| Maintenance of Certification (MOC) | Rates of Children With Possible Abuse. | Pre-SEEK | 1.3 percentage of patients |
| Maintenance of Certification (MOC) | Rates of Children With Possible Abuse. | Post-SEEK | 1.2 percentage of patients |
Rates of Children With Possible Neglect.
ICD-10 codes related to possible maltreatment (child abuse and neglect) are readily accessible through EHRs. De-identified aggregate data were gathered towards the end of the study for all children in the practice 0-66 months of age.
Time frame: 2 years prior to implementing SEEK, 2 years after implementing SEEK., 48 months total.
Population: EHR data were collected from 14 of the participating practices.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Online Training (IND) | Rates of Children With Possible Neglect. | Pre-SEEK | 3.3 percentage of patients |
| Independent Online Training (IND) | Rates of Children With Possible Neglect. | Post-SEEK | 3.6 percentage of patients |
| Maintenance of Certification (MOC) | Rates of Children With Possible Neglect. | Pre-SEEK | 7.0 percentage of patients |
| Maintenance of Certification (MOC) | Rates of Children With Possible Neglect. | Post-SEEK | 8.3 percentage of patients |
Rates of Under Immunized Children
ICD-10 codes related to possible maltreatment (child abuse and neglect) are readily accessible through EHRs. De-identified aggregate data were gathered towards the end of the study for all children in the practice 0-66 months of age.
Time frame: 2 years prior to implementing SEEK, 2 years after implementing SEEK., 48 months total.
Population: EHR data were collected from 14 of the participating practices.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Online Training (IND) | Rates of Under Immunized Children | Pre-SEEK | 0.009 percentage of patients |
| Independent Online Training (IND) | Rates of Under Immunized Children | Post-SEEK | 0.01 percentage of patients |
| Maintenance of Certification (MOC) | Rates of Under Immunized Children | Pre-SEEK | 0.02 percentage of patients |
| Maintenance of Certification (MOC) | Rates of Under Immunized Children | Post-SEEK | 0.018 percentage of patients |
SEEK Parent View of Relationship With Child's PCP Subscale - Adapted From the Patient-Doctor Interaction Scale
Parents rate their child's PCP on this measure adapted for pediatric practice from the Patient-Doctor Interaction Scale. The Likert scale included 8 questions; the response set was from 1 (no) to 4 (always). Subscale mean scores range from 1 - 4; higher scores indicate greater satisfaction. The mean of the Likert subscale response is reported.
Time frame: 24 months
Population: Represents all the data collected from parents.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Online Training (IND) | SEEK Parent View of Relationship With Child's PCP Subscale - Adapted From the Patient-Doctor Interaction Scale | 3.53 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Maintenance of Certification (MOC) | SEEK Parent View of Relationship With Child's PCP Subscale - Adapted From the Patient-Doctor Interaction Scale | 3.48 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.44 |
SEEK Parent View of the Attentiveness of the Child's PCP Subscale - Adapted From the Patient-Doctor Interaction Scale
Parents rate their child's PCP on this measure adapted for pediatric practice from the Patient-Doctor Interaction Scale. The Likert scale included 8 questions; the response set was from 1 (no) to 4 (always). Subscale mean scores range from 1 - 4; higher scores indicate greater satisfaction. The mean of the Likert subscale response is reported.
Time frame: 24 months
Population: Represents all the data collected from parents.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Online Training (IND) | SEEK Parent View of the Attentiveness of the Child's PCP Subscale - Adapted From the Patient-Doctor Interaction Scale | 3.67 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.38 |
| Maintenance of Certification (MOC) | SEEK Parent View of the Attentiveness of the Child's PCP Subscale - Adapted From the Patient-Doctor Interaction Scale | 3.62 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.44 |
SEEK Parent View of the Communication Skills of the Child's PCP Subscale - Adapted From the Patient-Doctor Interaction Scale
Parents rate their child's PCP on this measure adapted for pediatric practice from the Patient-Doctor Interaction Scale. The Likert scale included 8 questions; the response set was from 1 (no) to 4 (always). Subscale mean scores range from 1 - 4; higher scores indicate greater satisfaction. The mean of the Likert subscale response is reported.
Time frame: 24 months
Population: Represents all the data collected from parents.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Online Training (IND) | SEEK Parent View of the Communication Skills of the Child's PCP Subscale - Adapted From the Patient-Doctor Interaction Scale | 3.61 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.41 |
| Maintenance of Certification (MOC) | SEEK Parent View of the Communication Skills of the Child's PCP Subscale - Adapted From the Patient-Doctor Interaction Scale | 3.51 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.43 |
SEEK Parent View of the Comprehensiveness of the Child's PCP Subscale - Adapted From the Patient-Doctor Interaction Scale
Parents rate their child's PCP on this measure adapted for pediatric practice from the Patient-Doctor Interaction Scale. The Likert scale included 8 questions; the response set was from 1 (no) to 4 (always). Subscale mean scores range from 1 - 4; higher scores indicate greater satisfaction. The mean of the Likert subscale response is reported.
Time frame: 24 months
Population: Represents all the data collected from parents.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Online Training (IND) | SEEK Parent View of the Comprehensiveness of the Child's PCP Subscale - Adapted From the Patient-Doctor Interaction Scale | 3.08 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.56 |
| Maintenance of Certification (MOC) | SEEK Parent View of the Comprehensiveness of the Child's PCP Subscale - Adapted From the Patient-Doctor Interaction Scale | 2.92 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.56 |
SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Addressing Food Insecurity
The PCPQ, used in both SEEK RCTs has 5 vignettes, with 7-12 statements assessing PCPs' thinking and practice with regard to addressing the targeted CM risk factors. Items were grouped conceptually into 6 topical scales (e.g., Substance Abuse) and 5 cross-cutting themes (e.g., Perceived Competence). The mean subscale scores ranged from 0-3. Higher scores reflect PCPs more optimal capability to address the problem.
Time frame: 30 months
Population: The analysis is based on PCPs with data collected between 8 - 24 months after startup.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Online Training (IND) | SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Addressing Food Insecurity | 2.19 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.35 |
| Maintenance of Certification (MOC) | SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Addressing Food Insecurity | 2.09 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.41 |
SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Addressing Harsh Punishment
The PCPQ, used in both SEEK RCTs has 5 vignettes, with 7-12 statements assessing PCPs' thinking and practice with regard to addressing the targeted CM risk factors. Items were grouped conceptually into 6 topical scales (e.g., Substance Abuse) and 5 cross-cutting themes (e.g., Perceived Competence). The mean subscale scores ranged from 0-3. Higher scores reflect PCPs more optimal capability to address the problem.
Time frame: 30 months
Population: The analysis is based on PCPs with data collected between 8 - 24 months after startup.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Online Training (IND) | SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Addressing Harsh Punishment | 2.16 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.35 |
| Maintenance of Certification (MOC) | SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Addressing Harsh Punishment | 2.26 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.31 |
SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Addressing Intimate Partner Violence
The PCPQ, used in both SEEK RCTs has 5 vignettes, with 7-12 statements assessing PCPs' thinking and practice with regard to addressing the targeted CM risk factors. Items were grouped conceptually into 6 topical scales (e.g., Substance Abuse) and 5 cross-cutting themes (e.g., Perceived Competence). The mean subscale scores ranged from 0-3. Higher scores reflect PCPs more optimal capability to address the problem.
Time frame: 30 months
Population: The analysis is based on PCPs with data collected between 8 - 24 months after startup.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Online Training (IND) | SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Addressing Intimate Partner Violence | 2.14 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Maintenance of Certification (MOC) | SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Addressing Intimate Partner Violence | 2.02 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.35 |
SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Addressing Major Stress
The PCPQ, used in both SEEK RCTs has 5 vignettes, with 7-12 statements assessing PCPs' thinking and practice with regard to addressing the targeted CM risk factors. Items were grouped conceptually into 6 topical scales (e.g., Substance Abuse) and 5 cross-cutting themes (e.g., Perceived Competence). The mean subscale scores ranged from 0-3. Higher scores reflect PCPs more optimal capability to address the problem.
Time frame: 30 months
Population: The analysis is based on PCPs with data collected between 8 - 24 months after startup.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Online Training (IND) | SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Addressing Major Stress | 1.93 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.35 |
| Maintenance of Certification (MOC) | SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Addressing Major Stress | 1.98 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.39 |
SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Addressing Substance Abuse
The PCPQ, used in both SEEK RCTs has 5 vignettes, with 7-12 statements assessing PCPs' thinking and practice with regard to addressing the targeted CM risk factors. Items were grouped conceptually into 6 topical scales (e.g., Substance Abuse) and 5 cross-cutting themes (e.g., Perceived Competence). The mean subscale scores ranged from 0-3. Higher scores reflect PCPs more optimal capability to address the problem.
Time frame: 30 months
Population: The analysis is based on PCPs with data collected between 8 - 24 months after startup.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Online Training (IND) | SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Addressing Substance Abuse | 1.98 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.34 |
| Maintenance of Certification (MOC) | SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Addressing Substance Abuse | 1.94 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.31 |
SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Attitudes Regarding Addressing Health-related Social Needs
The PCPQ, used in both SEEK RCTs has 5 vignettes, with 7-12 statements assessing PCPs' thinking and practice with regard to addressing the targeted CM risk factors. Items were grouped conceptually into 6 topical scales (e.g., Substance Abuse) and 5 cross-cutting themes (e.g., Perceived Competence). The mean subscale scores ranged from 0-3. Higher scores reflect PCPs more optimal capability to address the problem.
Time frame: 30 months
Population: The analysis is based on PCPs with data collected between 8 - 24 months after startup.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Online Training (IND) | SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Attitudes Regarding Addressing Health-related Social Needs | 2.33 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.32 |
| Maintenance of Certification (MOC) | SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Attitudes Regarding Addressing Health-related Social Needs | 2.26 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Comfort Level Regarding Addressing Health-related Social Needs
The PCPQ, used in both SEEK RCTs has 5 vignettes, with 7-12 statements assessing PCPs' thinking and practice with regard to addressing the targeted CM risk factors. Items were grouped conceptually into 6 topical scales (e.g., Substance Abuse) and 5 cross-cutting themes (e.g., Perceived Competence). The mean subscale scores ranged from 0-3. Higher scores reflect PCPs more optimal capability to address the problem.
Time frame: 30 months
Population: The analysis is based on PCPs with data collected between 8 - 24 months after startup.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Online Training (IND) | SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Comfort Level Regarding Addressing Health-related Social Needs | 2.02 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
| Maintenance of Certification (MOC) | SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Comfort Level Regarding Addressing Health-related Social Needs | 1.99 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.43 |
SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Knowledge Regarding Addressing Health-related Social Needs
The PCPQ, used in both SEEK RCTs has 5 vignettes, with 7-12 statements assessing PCPs' thinking and practice with regard to addressing the targeted CM risk factors. Items were grouped conceptually into 6 topical scales (e.g., Substance Abuse) and 5 cross-cutting themes (e.g., Perceived Competence). The mean subscale scores ranged from 0-3. Higher scores reflect PCPs more optimal capability to address the problem.
Time frame: 30 months
Population: The analysis is based on PCPs with data collected between 8 - 24 months after startup.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Online Training (IND) | SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Knowledge Regarding Addressing Health-related Social Needs | 2.26 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.28 |
| Maintenance of Certification (MOC) | SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Knowledge Regarding Addressing Health-related Social Needs | 2.21 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.27 |
SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Perceived Competence Regarding Addressing Health-related Social Needs
The PCPQ, used in both SEEK RCTs has 5 vignettes, with 7-12 statements assessing PCPs' thinking and practice with regard to addressing the targeted CM risk factors. Items were grouped conceptually into 6 topical scales (e.g., Substance Abuse) and 5 cross-cutting themes (e.g., Perceived Competence). The mean subscale scores ranged from 0-3. Higher scores reflect PCPs more optimal capability to address the problem.
Time frame: 30 months
Population: The analysis is based on PCPs with data collected between 8 - 24 months after startup.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Online Training (IND) | SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Perceived Competence Regarding Addressing Health-related Social Needs | 1.78 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.41 |
| Maintenance of Certification (MOC) | SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Perceived Competence Regarding Addressing Health-related Social Needs | 1.73 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.43 |
SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Practice Behavior Regarding Addressing Health-related Social Needs
The PCPQ, used in both SEEK RCTs has 5 vignettes, with 7-12 statements assessing PCPs' thinking and practice with regard to addressing the targeted CM risk factors. Items were grouped conceptually into 6 topical scales (e.g., Substance Abuse) and 5 cross-cutting themes (e.g., Perceived Competence). The mean subscale scores ranged from 0-3. Higher scores reflect PCPs more optimal capability to address the problem.
Time frame: 30 months
Population: The analysis is based on PCPs with data collected between 8 - 24 months after startup.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Online Training (IND) | SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Practice Behavior Regarding Addressing Health-related Social Needs | 2.07 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.39 |
| Maintenance of Certification (MOC) | SEEK PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Practice Behavior Regarding Addressing Health-related Social Needs | 2.04 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
The Safe Environment for Every Kid (SEEK) PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Addressing Depression Subscale
The PCPQ, used in both SEEK RCTs has 5 vignettes, with 7-12 statements assessing PCPs' thinking and practice with regard to addressing the targeted CM risk factors. Items were grouped conceptually into 6 topical scales (e.g., Substance Abuse) and 5 cross-cutting themes (e.g., Perceived Competence). The mean subscale scores ranged from 0-3. Higher scores reflect PCPs more optimal capability to address the problem.
Time frame: 30 months
Population: The analysis is based on PCPs with data collected between 8 - 24 months after startup.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Online Training (IND) | The Safe Environment for Every Kid (SEEK) PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Addressing Depression Subscale | 2.12 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.36 |
| Maintenance of Certification (MOC) | The Safe Environment for Every Kid (SEEK) PCP Questionnaire (PCPQ) - Addressing Depression Subscale | 2.08 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.41 |