Skip to content

Family Empowerment for Enhanced Development

Family Empowerment for Enhanced Development

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03641716
Acronym
Project FEED
Enrollment
20
Registered
2018-08-22
Start date
2019-02-26
Completion date
2020-01-02
Last updated
2021-11-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Feeding Behavior, Obesity, Childhood

Keywords

early childhood, family, occupational therapy

Brief summary

This study evaluates the feasibility and preliminary effects of offering the Mealtime PREP intervention to low-income families with young children. All enrolled families will receive the Mealtime PREP intervention in the home to evaluate the effects on child nutrition.

Detailed description

Children have not been spared from the obesity epidemic. There is a great need for innovative interventions to help families build healthy habits early in life for obesity prevention. Low-income preschoolers have a disproportionately high rate of childhood obesity, and their families face complex barriers to healthy behavior change. This proposed pilot study will examine the feasibility of delivering the Promoting Routines of Exploration and Play during Mealtime (Mealtime PREP) intervention in a sample of low-income families with young children (ages 2-5). Our parent-mediated intervention is designed to promote healthy dietary variety using routine family meals, positive reinforcement, social modeling, and food exploration and play. By harnessing the behavior change capacity of behavioral activation to alter daily mealtimes incrementally, parents are empowered to overcome barriers to healthy habit formation. Each family will participate in a six-week intervention that is delivered by occupational therapy clinicians in the home environment. Each session will last approximately one hour and include individualized parent-training and a parent-led mealtime with direct feedback from the clinician. We planned to screen up to 100 potential parent and child participants, with a plan to deliver intervention to 20 child participants.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMealtime PREP Intervention

Each session will include didactic elements and skills training along with skills practice and feedback. Parents will learn to build structured mealtime routines, manage child mealtime behavior, and incorporate exploration and play into routines.

Sponsors

National Institutes of Health (NIH)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Pittsburgh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Repeated Measures

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Child: * within age range 2-5 years * reside in a low-income household (as specified by income within the range to qualify for Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children. Parent: * \>18 years old * ability to read and speak in English * willing to participate in 6 home-based intervention sessions

Exclusion criteria

* None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline 3-Day Food Diary (Dietary Variety) at 3 Monthsbaseline and 3 monthsThe 3-Day Food Diary is the preferred method of dietary assessment (intake and variety of food consumed) because of a balance between validity and burden. Includes all food consumed and approximate servings for 3 days. Servings of foods consumed from each food group will be tallied and compared to national daily recommendations. We calculated the number of unique foods consumed at baseline and the 3-month follow-up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline Parenting-Stress Inventory, Short-Form (PSI-SF) to 3 MonthsBaseline, 3 months36 item scale validated in a sample of low-income families with preschoolers to assess parental stress in three domains and overall. Raw scores are converted to percentiles for interpretation using this tool. For the total parenting stress score, and all three domain scores (Parental Distress, Parent-Child Dysfunctional Interaction, and Difficult Child), higher percentiles are interpreted as higher stress (range =1-99%) with scores \>90% indicating clinically significant levels of parenting stress. We are reporting the Total parenting stress score.
Change From Baseline Nutrition Screening Tool for Every Preschooler (Nutritional Risk) at 3 Monthsbaseline and 3 months17 item, validated screen for young children (1-5 years) that categorizes risk of nutritional problems into 3 categories (score range = 1 (minimum) - 68 (maximum); 1 - 20 = low risk, 21-25 = moderate risk, and 26+ = high risk). Higher scores indicate higher risk for nutritional problems (i.e. lower scores are better).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited between February and June of 2019 using research registry (Pitt + Me) and in the community at WIC (Supplemental Nutrition for Women, Infants and Children) program sites.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Mealtime PREP Intervention
Parents of young children will receive 6 weekly sessions, each lasting approximately one-hour, in the home environment. An occupational therapy clinician will deliver the Mealtime PREP intervention to the family. Mealtime PREP Intervention: Each session will include didactic elements and skills training along with skills practice and feedback. Parents will learn to build structured mealtime routines, manage child mealtime behavior, and incorporate exploration and play into routines.
20
Total20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMealtime PREP Intervention
3-Day Food Diary19 number of unique foods
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
20 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants
Age, Continuous43.76 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.49
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
19 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Nutrition Screening Tool for Every Preschooler22.90 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.94
Parenting Stress Index - Short Form75.67 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.16
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline 3-Day Food Diary (Dietary Variety) at 3 Months

The 3-Day Food Diary is the preferred method of dietary assessment (intake and variety of food consumed) because of a balance between validity and burden. Includes all food consumed and approximate servings for 3 days. Servings of foods consumed from each food group will be tallied and compared to national daily recommendations. We calculated the number of unique foods consumed at baseline and the 3-month follow-up.

Time frame: baseline and 3 months

Population: We only received completed 3-Day Food Diaries from three participants at both baseline and the 3-month follow-up time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mealtime PREP InterventionChange From Baseline 3-Day Food Diary (Dietary Variety) at 3 Months3.66 number of unique foodsStandard Deviation 2.08
Secondary

Change From Baseline Nutrition Screening Tool for Every Preschooler (Nutritional Risk) at 3 Months

17 item, validated screen for young children (1-5 years) that categorizes risk of nutritional problems into 3 categories (score range = 1 (minimum) - 68 (maximum); 1 - 20 = low risk, 21-25 = moderate risk, and 26+ = high risk). Higher scores indicate higher risk for nutritional problems (i.e. lower scores are better).

Time frame: baseline and 3 months

Population: 5 participants lost to follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mealtime PREP InterventionChange From Baseline Nutrition Screening Tool for Every Preschooler (Nutritional Risk) at 3 Months-2.80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.43
Comparison: After examining the data to ensure it met the statistical assumptions (e.g. normality, no outliers), we ran a paired-sample pre-post t-test to examine the difference in scores from baseline to 3 months on the NutriSTEP (Screening Tool for Every Preschooler) assessment.p-value: <0.01t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline Parenting-Stress Inventory, Short-Form (PSI-SF) to 3 Months

36 item scale validated in a sample of low-income families with preschoolers to assess parental stress in three domains and overall. Raw scores are converted to percentiles for interpretation using this tool. For the total parenting stress score, and all three domain scores (Parental Distress, Parent-Child Dysfunctional Interaction, and Difficult Child), higher percentiles are interpreted as higher stress (range =1-99%) with scores \>90% indicating clinically significant levels of parenting stress. We are reporting the Total parenting stress score.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months

Population: We experienced a significant amount of missing data for the first 8 participants completing this form, which led to an inability to calculate scores for baseline. Research procedures were adjusted, but only had complete data on 9 of 12 remaining participants at 3 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mealtime PREP InterventionChange From Baseline Parenting-Stress Inventory, Short-Form (PSI-SF) to 3 Months0.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.04
Comparison: Due to limited size of sub-sample, we calculated a Cohen's d effect size for raw total score on the PSI from baseline to the 3-month follow-up, with a 95% confidence interval.95% CI: [-0.66, 0.65]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026