Skip to content

New Technologies in the Rehabilitation of Chronic Stroke

Feasibility and Cost Description of Intensive Rehabilitation Involving New Technologies in Patients With Sub-acute Stroke:A Multicenter Single Arm Trial of the Swiss RehabTech Initiative

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03641651
Acronym
SRTI
Enrollment
15
Registered
2018-08-22
Start date
2018-08-31
Completion date
2020-05-31
Last updated
2022-09-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemiplegia, Stroke

Brief summary

The objective of the current study is to develop and investigate training concepts involving rehabilitation technology, which aim at exploiting the potential for regaining the ability to perform skilled movements by maximizing training intensity and keeping the motivation of patients high. The evaluation focuses on feasibility and cost-benefit analyses

Detailed description

This feasibility project aims to establish an efficient setting for intensive rehabilitation with new technology in four trailblazer clinics. This will enable them to provide intensive therapy to the patients in accordance with the study protocol. If this setting is integrated into the clinical routine, the investigators will be able to collect data to get some first insight into economic and functional data required to calculate changes in socioeconomic costs

Interventions

OTHERRehabilitation technology

* Series of tailored rehabilitative training with the use of new technology which provide feedback and allow for a targeted and intensive and dense training. * With supervision based on patients preconditions and therapy device (e.g. patient/ therapist ratio= 3/1). * A training series lasts four weeks and comprises 3-5 training-days per week. Maximum training break of 7 days. Five sessions of training with duration of 45 min per session, and up to four hours each day are foreseen. * The training can take place in an outpatient or inpatient setting. * Training will be organized in individual one-to-one or group session

Sponsors

Klinik Lengg, Zurich
CollaboratorOTHER
Reha Rheinfelden
CollaboratorOTHER
Klinik Valens
CollaboratorOTHER
Rehaklinik Zihlschlacht AG
CollaboratorOTHER
Markus Wirz
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients with residual hemiparesis after cerebrovascular accident * Up to 12 months after the event * Primary rehabilitation terminated * Able to cognitively comprehend the aim of the project with at least 22 points in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) * General health condition allows for intensive rehabilitative training with limited supervision i.e. clearance and prescription of responsible physician * Understand written and spoken German language

Exclusion criteria

Patients with any signs and symptoms showing that the participant is unwilling to participate in the study will result in the patient being excluded from participation Any medical condition preventing participation such as Severe respiratory disease Severe OR unstable cardio-circulatory conditions Orthopaedic conditions, especially in extremities targeted for rehabilitation such as * fixed joint contractures limiting range of motion * non-consolidated fractures Neuro-psychological conditions including cognitive deficits limiting communication or non-cooperation like (self-) aggressive behaviour Infections or inflammatory diseases, like osteomyelitis Specific absolute contraindication for the training with any of the respective devices: * Improper fit of the device, including its harness to relevant extremity(ies) * Contraindicated training position (standing, sitting) Device specific contraindications will be respected and will lead to the exclusion of the device for that patient.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Correlation Between Scheduled and Performed Trainings4 weeksAdherence was operationalized by correlating planned trainings with trainings which were carried out by the participants. Due to the small sample size Spearman's rank correlation was used.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) RecoveryBaseline and 4 weeksQuestionnaire to be completed by the patient, regarding different parts in daily life: 1. physical problems: 4 items, 2. memory and thinking: 7 items, 3. mood and emotional control: 9 items, 4. communication and understanding: 7 items, 5.daily activities: 10 items, 6. mobility at home and community: 9 items, 7. hand function: 5 items, 8. participation in life: 8 items. each item should be rated on on 5-point Lickert scale with 1= extremely difficult OR can't do at all OR no strength at all OR all the time AND 5 means: a lot of strength OR not difficult at all OR none of the time OR Question 9 regarding recovery from stroke rated on a scale from 0 - 100 (0= no recovery, 100= full recovery)
Box and Block TestBaseline and 4 weeksMeasures broader motoric function of the arm and hand as a performance test. Subjects are required to grab and sort wooden blocks from one side of a small dividing wall set up on a table in front of the sitting subject to another side. The unit of the measure is the amount of blocks transferred within 60 seconds.
Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC)Baseline and 4 weeksObserver based measurement to rate the ability to walk independently. Rated from 0 to 6 (0= not able to walk independently, 6= can walk independently in every situation)
Functional Independence Measurement (FIM) Generic Functional PerformanceBaseline and 4 weeksobserver based measurement of the subject performing basic functional tests, e.g. sitting-up from lying position, stand-up from sitting, walking, stair-climbing etc. Observer rate on a scale from 1 to 7 (1= totally dependent on aid, 7= totally independent) for each activity 18 items, that would led to a score from 18 (totally dependent) to 126 (totally independent)
Walking Index of the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment Measure (CMSA)Baseline and 4 weeksThe Walking Index consists of the 5 following items: Walking indoors Walking outdoors, over rough ground, ramps, and curbs Walking outdoors several blocks Stairs Age and sex appropriate walking distance in meters for 2 minutes scored on a 7-point scale (Stage 1 through 7, most impairment through to no impairment, respectively) score from 5 to 35 points, the more points the better
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)Baseline and 4 weeksObserver based measurement of walking, standing and balance with 14 items/task to perform by the subject and rated each on scale from 0 to 4 (0= not able to do without help, 4 = can do safely and independently) score between 0 to 56, the more the better
10m Walk Test= TMT ComfortableBaseline and 4 weekstime needed to walk 10 m with Comfortable walking speed

Countries

Switzerland

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Technology Arm
4 Weeks intervention of intensive rehabilitation using rehabilitation technology, 3-5 h per day, within a 5d week in-or outpatient setting. Rehabilitation technology: •Series of tailored rehabilitative training with the use of new technology which provide feedback and allow for a targeted and intensive and dense training. * With supervision based on patients preconditions and therapy device (e.g. patient/ therapist ratio= 3/1). * A training series lasts four weeks and comprises 3-5 training-days per week. Maximum training break of 7 days. Five sessions of training with duration of 45 min per session, and up to four hours each day are foreseen. * The training can take place in an outpatient or inpatient setting. * Training will be organized in individual one-to-one or group session
14
Total14

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall Studyorganizational issues at one study site1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTechnology Arm
Age, Continuous60.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5
Montreal Cognitive assessment (MoCA)24.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8
Paretic side
Left side
9 Participants
Paretic side
Right side
5 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
14 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 14
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Correlation Between Scheduled and Performed Trainings

Adherence was operationalized by correlating planned trainings with trainings which were carried out by the participants. Due to the small sample size Spearman's rank correlation was used.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Technology ArmCorrelation Between Scheduled and Performed Trainings0.56 correlation coefficient
Secondary

10m Walk Test= TMT Comfortable

time needed to walk 10 m with Comfortable walking speed

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Technology Arm10m Walk Test= TMT Comfortablepre-intervention28.6 secondsStandard Deviation 22.9
Technology Arm10m Walk Test= TMT Comfortablepost-intervention19.0 secondsStandard Deviation 19.6
Secondary

Berg Balance Scale (BBS)

Observer based measurement of walking, standing and balance with 14 items/task to perform by the subject and rated each on scale from 0 to 4 (0= not able to do without help, 4 = can do safely and independently) score between 0 to 56, the more the better

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Technology ArmBerg Balance Scale (BBS)pre-intervention32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24
Technology ArmBerg Balance Scale (BBS)post-intervention39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.8
Secondary

Box and Block Test

Measures broader motoric function of the arm and hand as a performance test. Subjects are required to grab and sort wooden blocks from one side of a small dividing wall set up on a table in front of the sitting subject to another side. The unit of the measure is the amount of blocks transferred within 60 seconds.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Technology ArmBox and Block Testpre-intervention0 blocks/60 secStandard Deviation 19.8
Technology ArmBox and Block Testpost-intervention1 blocks/60 secStandard Deviation 30.8
Secondary

Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC)

Observer based measurement to rate the ability to walk independently. Rated from 0 to 6 (0= not able to walk independently, 6= can walk independently in every situation)

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Technology ArmFunctional Ambulation Categories (FAC)post-intervention3.5 units on a scale
Technology ArmFunctional Ambulation Categories (FAC)pre-intervention2 units on a scale
Secondary

Functional Independence Measurement (FIM) Generic Functional Performance

observer based measurement of the subject performing basic functional tests, e.g. sitting-up from lying position, stand-up from sitting, walking, stair-climbing etc. Observer rate on a scale from 1 to 7 (1= totally dependent on aid, 7= totally independent) for each activity 18 items, that would led to a score from 18 (totally dependent) to 126 (totally independent)

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Technology ArmFunctional Independence Measurement (FIM) Generic Functional Performancepost-intervention104.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.5
Technology ArmFunctional Independence Measurement (FIM) Generic Functional Performancepre-intervention102 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 47.5
Secondary

Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) Recovery

Questionnaire to be completed by the patient, regarding different parts in daily life: 1. physical problems: 4 items, 2. memory and thinking: 7 items, 3. mood and emotional control: 9 items, 4. communication and understanding: 7 items, 5.daily activities: 10 items, 6. mobility at home and community: 9 items, 7. hand function: 5 items, 8. participation in life: 8 items. each item should be rated on on 5-point Lickert scale with 1= extremely difficult OR can't do at all OR no strength at all OR all the time AND 5 means: a lot of strength OR not difficult at all OR none of the time OR Question 9 regarding recovery from stroke rated on a scale from 0 - 100 (0= no recovery, 100= full recovery)

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Technology ArmStroke Impact Scale (SIS) Recoverypre-intervention50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35
Technology ArmStroke Impact Scale (SIS) Recoverypost-intervention65.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.5
Secondary

Walking Index of the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment Measure (CMSA)

The Walking Index consists of the 5 following items: Walking indoors Walking outdoors, over rough ground, ramps, and curbs Walking outdoors several blocks Stairs Age and sex appropriate walking distance in meters for 2 minutes scored on a 7-point scale (Stage 1 through 7, most impairment through to no impairment, respectively) score from 5 to 35 points, the more points the better

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Technology ArmWalking Index of the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment Measure (CMSA)pre-intervention16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3
Technology ArmWalking Index of the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment Measure (CMSA)post-intervention19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026