Skip to content

NBF Gingival Gel Application After Impacted Lower Third Molar Surgery

Effect of NBF Gingival Gel Application in Controlling Post-surgical Complications After Impacted Lower Third Molar Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03641482
Enrollment
13
Registered
2018-08-22
Start date
2016-09-01
Completion date
2018-02-20
Last updated
2019-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alveolar Osteitis

Keywords

third molar surgery, oral surgery, propolis, NBF gingival gel, post-surgical complications, clinica trial

Brief summary

Background: Alveolar osteitis is one of the most frequent complications after lower third molar extraction, and is usually accompanied by inflammation, pain and poor wound healing. Several local interventions have been used to reduce these complications with limited effectiveness. Purpose: To clinically evaluate the use of propolis extract, nanovitamin C and nanovitamin E gel for the prevention of surgical complications related to impacted lower third molar extraction. Methods: A randomized, triple-blind, split-mouth, pilot study is being performed in patients needing bilateral lower third molar extraction with similar surgical difficulty. Surgical extractions are randomly being performed and NBF gingival gel (TG) or placebo (PBG) are randomly being applied inside postextraction sockets by a blinded surgeon. The patients are being instructed to apply it 3 times/day in the surgical wound for 7 days. One month later, the contralateral wisdom tooth is being extracted and the opposite gel is being applied. Alveolar osteitis (AO) is being diagnosed following Blum's criteria. Swelling is being assessed by measuring the facial perimeter. Wound healing is being evaluated with a semi-quantitative scale as good, satisfactory or insufficient. Postoperative pain is being recorded using a visual analog scale (VAS) for 7 days. Analgesic pill intake is being recorded by each patient. Variables are being registered by a blinded researcher to 3M extractions at one, two, three and seven postoperative days.

Interventions

DRUGNBF

Once the molar is extracted, the socket is cleaned with water, NBF gel is introduced, and the flap is closed. Then, the patients are instructed to apply NBF Gel in the surgical wound 3 times per day for 7 days after brushing their teeth. Previously they have to dry the area of the wound with gauze.

DEVICEPlacebo

Once the molar is extracted, the socket is cleaned with water, placebo gel is introduced, and the flap is closed. Then, the patients are instructed to apply placebo gel in the surgical wound 3 times per day for 7 days after brushing their teeth. Previously they have to dry the area of the wound with gauze.

Sponsors

Bio Nature Essences S.L
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Intervention model description

split mouth design

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria are: * cooperative adult patients able to fulfil the study protocol, * needing surgical extractions of both lower third molars, * with similar surgical difficulty according to Pederson scale.

Exclusion criteria

The

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Alveolar Osteitis: intense neuralgic pain in the post-extraction socket in the second or third postoperative day that do not disappear with analgesics beside a partially or totally disintegrated clotfrom baseline to 24, 48, 72 hours post interventionyes or no

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of rescue analgesic pills consumption: recorded for the first 3 days by the patients.from baseline to 3 days post interventionnumber
Swelling: it was evaluated with a flexible metric tape measuring the facial perimeter from trago to pogonion. A first measurement was made before surgery, which was compared with the measurements taken at 24, 48 and 72 hours of the extraction.from baseline to 24, 48, 72 hours and 7 days post interventionchanges
Trismus: it was assessed measuring the maximum opening from the inter incisive points.from baseline to 24, 48, 72 hours and 7 days post interventionchanges
Wound healing: it was assessed with a semi-quantitative scale (good, satisfactory or insufficient).from baseline to 1 week post interventionchanges
Post extraction pain: it was recorded using a visual analog scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain imaginable) at 9 pm of 7 consecutive days.from baseline to 1 week post interventionchanges

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026