Skip to content

DEep VEin Lesion OPtimisation (DEVELOP) Trial

DEep VEin Lesion OPtimisation (DEVELOP) Trial: A Randomised, Assessor-blinded Feasibility Study of Iliac Vein Intervention for Venous Leg Ulcers

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03640689
Acronym
Develop
Enrollment
60
Registered
2018-08-21
Start date
2019-07-15
Completion date
2024-09-01
Last updated
2021-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Venous Leg Ulcer

Keywords

Venous ulcer, Great saphenous incompetence, Iliac vein, Endovenous therapy

Brief summary

This is a prospective, single centre, randomised controlled, feasibility study recruiting patients with lower limb venous ulceration and Great Saphenous incompetence. Patients will be randomised to undergo either truncal ablation and compression therapy or truncal ablation, simultaneous iliac interrogation with intravascular ultrasound and stenting of significant (\>50%) iliac vein lesions plus compression therapy. The primary endpoints will be ulcer healing and procedural safety. Secondary endpoints include time to healing, quality of life and clinical scores, ulcer recurrence rates and rates of post-thrombotic syndrome. Follow up will be over a five-year period. This feasibility study is designed to include 60 patients. Should it be practicable a total of 594 patients would be required to adequately power the study to definitively address ulcer-healing rates.

Detailed description

The single main research question for this trial is as follows: in adult patients with venous ulceration and great saphenous vein incompetence; does iliac vein assessment with IVUS and stenting of significant occlusive disease in addition to superficial great saphenous venous ablation and compression compared to superficial venous ablation and compression alone offer improved ulcer healing rates at three months following treatment? Primary Objective To determine whether superficial venous ablation plus early iliac vein interrogation plus endovascular stenting in the presence of significant occlusive disease results in improved venous ulcer healing compared to superficial venous ablation plus compression therapy alone. Secondary Objectives 1\. To determine the relative performance of duplex ultrasound compared to IVUS for the prediction of NIVLs 3. To determine the rate of primary or recurrent ulceration up to five years following intervention 4. To assess patient quality of life in the short and medium term following each mode of intervention

Interventions

DEVICEEndovenous ablation + iliac US +/- iliac stenting

Concomitant Ablation of the GSV with endovenous therapy with associated iliac vein interrogation and stenting if required

DEVICEEndovenous ablation of Great Saphenous Vein

Ablation of the Great Saphenous Vein and subsequent Graduated Compression

Sponsors

National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Consenting patients * aged 18 and over * ultrasound detected Great Saphenous Venous incompetence * an associated primary or recurrent lower limb venous ulcer(s)

Exclusion criteria

* Ankle-brachial pressure index \<0.8 * Previous inability to tolerate lower limb compression bandaging * Inability to provide informed consent * Previous lower limb arterial revascularisation procedure * Contrast allergy * Previous history of pelvic malignancy or pelvic radiotherapy * Pregnancy * Previous iliac vein intervention * Previous superficial vein intervention * Infection in previous 30 days * Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \< 60 mls/kg/min * Isolated short saphenous or perforator vein reflux only * Leg ulcer of non-venous aetiology (as assessed by clinician) * Unfit for endovascular intervention based on history and examination * Any compression therapy within six-months * Evidence of deep venous incompetence/thrombosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ulcer Healing - Proportion of ulcers healed3-monthsProportion of ulcers healed
Iliac Vein Patency on duplex ultrasound6-monthsPatency of the iliac vein on duplex
Reintervention12-monthsFreedom from re-intervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ulcer healing - Time to ulcer healingIn daysTime to ulcer healing
Patient Quality of life using the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire12-monthsAberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire measured from 0(no effect)-100(severe effect). The higher the score the greater the negative impact on patient quality of life.
Recurrence - Ulcer recurrence12-monthsUlcer recurrence

Countries

Ireland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026