Skip to content

Randomized Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Low Intensity Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (Tdcs) for the Relief of Dyspnea

Etude Pilote Randomisee Versus Placebo Evaluant l'Efficacite de la Stimulation Electrique Transcranienne de Faible Intensite (Tdcs) Dans le Soulagement de la Dyspnee Chez Les Patients Sous Ventilation Mecanique en Reanimation

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03640455
Acronym
tDCS-DYSP-REA
Enrollment
63
Registered
2018-08-21
Start date
2018-11-09
Completion date
2022-01-09
Last updated
2021-11-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dyspnea, Mechanical Ventilation Complication

Brief summary

Nearly half (47%) of patients with mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit report having dyspnea. This respiratory distress, with a feeling of thirst for air, often reaches unbearable limits and is a major factor in the deterioration of the quality of life and the prognosis of patients. Physiopathological mechanisms of dyspnea are beginning better understood and have analogies with those of pain. Like pain, dyspnea often persists despite appropriate treatment of the cause, because of perceptual dysfunction related to changes in cortical excitability and neuronal plasticity and requires specific treatments. Studies have shown that Transcranial Stimulation by low Current (tDCS) was able to modulate the perception of acute pain induced and chronic pain. The tDCS modulates the functioning of a whole set of brain structures including the anterior cingulate gyrus, the prefrontal cortex, the thalamus and the brain stem, some of which have an established role in the central integration of pain and dyspnea. The investigators have recently demonstrated that the application of tDCS on the primary cortical motor area reduces the excitability of the central neurological pathways dedicated to the respiratory muscles in healthy subjects. The investigators therefore hypothesize that tDCS could relieve dyspnea in intensive care. In this research project, the investigators propose to evaluate the efficiency of tDCS on dyspnea in patients admitted to intensive care unit, having sepsis and mechanically ventilated.

Interventions

DEVICEPlacebo

A tDCS (Low Current Transcranial Stimulation) device with two electrodes: active and reference, will be used. The tDCS will be applied next to the cortical representation zone of the primary motor cortex and left pre-motor for 30 minutes; placebo (dummy stimulation), according to the patient's randomization arm.

DEVICEAnodal

A tDCS (Low Current Transcranial Stimulation) device with two electrodes: active and reference, will be used. The tDCS will be applied next to the cortical representation zone of the primary motor cortex and left pre-motor for 30 minutes; intensity 2 mA, in anodal polarity, according to the patient's randomization arm.

DEVICECathodal

A tDCS (Low Current Transcranial Stimulation) device with two electrodes: active and reference, will be used. The tDCS will be applied next to the cortical representation zone of the primary motor cortex and left pre-motor for 30 minutes; intensity 2 mA, in cathodal polarity, according to the patient's randomization arm.

Sponsors

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patient, hospitalized in intensive care unit, presenting a sepsis, having required a mechanical ventilation since at least 24h. * Non-sedated or showing good wake up (Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score (RASS)\> -3 at inclusion (Sessler et al., 2002)) within 48 hours after cessation of sedation * Patient able to answer by yes or no to simple questions * Showing significant dyspnea (level ≥ 4) on the A1 sub-scale of the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MPD-A1 ≥ 4). * Signature of informed consent by the patient or his relative.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient under guardianship, * Wake up delay, coma (GCS ≤ 8), or severe agitation. * chronic respiratory pathology * respiratory pathology, neuromuscular or neuro-sensory disability (auditory or visual). * Cranioplasty * Language barrier, refusal to participate in the study or to sign the informed consent, * Pregnant or nursing woman, * No affiliation to a social security scheme.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Differential of the Dyspnea30 minAssessing differential of the Dyspnea Multidimensional Profile (MPD-A1) Scale A1 (from 0 to 10): between before (30 min before) and after (30 min after) the use of tDCS. The scale name is Multidimensional dyspnea profile. The A1 dimension will be used and measures affective dimensions unpleasantness and overall breathing discomfort. The minimum score is 0 ( neutral) and the maximum score is 10 (unbearable discomfort).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pre-inspiratory potentials (PIP)1 dayPresence of possible PIP on Electroencephalography (EEG)
Delirium28 daysCumulative incidence of delirium and its duration
Mechanical ventilation28 daysCumulative incidence of mechanical ventilation
ICU length of stay28 days
Differential of the QS30 minAssessing differentials of the QS of the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile measured between before and after the tDCS (MPD-QS scales) between before (30 min before) and after (30 min after) the use of tDCS.
Differential of the A2 dimension30 minAssessing differentials of the sale A2 of the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile measured between before and after the tDCS (MPD-A2 scales) between before (30 min before) and after (30 min after) the use of tDCS.
Differential of IC-RDOS30 minDifferential of Diagnostic Accuracy of Respiratory Distress Observation Scales (IC-RDOS scale) between before (30 min before) and after (30 min after) the use of tDCS. Persichini, R., Gay, F., Schmidt, M., Mayaux, J., Demoule, A., Morélot-Panzini, C., & Similowski, T. (2015). Diagnostic accuracy of respiratory distress observation scales as surrogates of dyspnea self-report in intensive care unit patients. Anesthesiology: The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, 123(4), 830-837.
Death28 days

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
tidal volume30 mindifferences of tidal volume between before (30 min before) and after (30 min after) the use of tDCS
respiratory rate30 mindifferences of respiratory rate between before (30 min before) and after (30 min after) the use of tDCS
mouth pressure30 mindifferences of mouth pressure between before (30 min before) and after (30 min after) the use of tDCS

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026