Skip to content

PK of Melphalan During Treatment With Melflufen and Dexamethasone in Patients With RRMM and Impaired Renal Function

A Study of the Pharmacokinetics of Melphalan During Treatment With Melflufen and Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma and Impaired Renal Function

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03639610
Acronym
BRIDGE
Enrollment
35
Registered
2018-08-21
Start date
2018-08-28
Completion date
2021-12-22
Last updated
2023-03-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Myeloma, Renal Impairment

Brief summary

This was a multicenter study of the pharmacokinetics (PK) of melphalan during treatment with melflufen and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and impaired renal function.

Detailed description

This was a multicenter study assessing the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of melflufen given on Day 1 of a 28-day cycle, together with weekly dexamethasone, in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma or RRMM and impaired renal function, as well as the relationship between renal function and PK parameters for the active metabolite melphalan.

Interventions

Melflufen was distributed in the European Union (EU) as a powder for concentrate for solution for infusion; in the US, it was distributed as a powder for injection. Melflufen was administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion on Day 1 of every 28-day cycle via a central catheter.

DRUGDexamethasone

Tablets. Administered orally on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each 28-day cycle. Dose of 40 mg for patients aged \<75 years. Dose of 20 mg for patients aged ≥75 years.

Sponsors

Oncopeptides AB
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Arms differed based on patients' level of renal function (moderate or severe impairment) and starting dose of melflufen.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female, age 18 years or older, at the time of signing the informed consent; 2. A prior diagnosis of multiple myeloma (MM) with documented disease progression in need of treatment at time of screening; 3. Received at least 2 prior lines of therapy; 4. Measurable disease defined as any of the following: * Serum monoclonal protein ≥0.5 g/dL by serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP). * ≥200 mg/24 hours of monoclonal protein in the urine on 24-hour urine electrophoresis (UPEP) * Serum free light chain (SFLC) ≥10 mg/dL AND abnormal serum kappa to lambda free light chain ratio 5. Life expectancy of ≥6 months; 6. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤2. (Patients with lower performance status based solely on bone pain secondary to MM may be eligible following consultation and approval of the medical monitor); 7. Patient is a female of childbearing potential (FCBP)\* with a negative serum or urine pregnancy test prior to initiation of therapy and agrees to practice appropriate methods of birth control, or the patient is male and agrees to practice appropriate methods of birth control; 8. Ability to understand the purpose and risks of the study and provide signed and dated informed consent; 9. 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) with QT interval calculated by Fridericia Formula (QTcF) interval of ≤470 msec; 10. Renal function: Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula on 2 consecutive screening evaluations. Patients meeting criteria for Screening 1, must also meet criteria for Screening 2 following optimal hydration (as determined by the investigator). Screening 2 must be on or as close as possible to treatment start date (preferably \<24-48 hours) but cannot exceed 72 hours. • Cohort 1 (a and b): Screening 1: eGFR between ≥25 mL/min/1.73m² to \<45 mL/min/1.73m². Screening 2: eGFR between ≥30 mL/min/1.73m² to \<45 mL/min/1.73m². • Cohort 2 (a and b): Screening 1: eGFR between ≥10 mL/min/1.73m² to \<35 mL/min/1.73m². Screening 2: eGFR between ≥15 mL/min/1.73m² to \<30 mL/min/1.73m². Cohort 2b will only be enrolled following approval of Data Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC) after evaluating data from Cohort 1a, 1b and 2a. Patients with fluctuating values of eGFR may be eligible following consideration of additional assessments in consultation with the medical monitor. 11. The following laboratory results must be met during screening (within 21 days) and immediately before study drug administration on Cycle 1 Day 1: * Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1,000 cells/mm³ (1.0 x 10⁹/L) (Growth factors cannot be used within 10 days \[14 days for pegfilgrastim\] prior to initiation of therapy) * Platelet count ≥75,000 cells/mm³ (75 x 10⁹/L) (without required transfusions during the 10 days prior to initiation of therapy) * Hemoglobin ≥8.0 g/dL (red blood cell \[RBC\] transfusions are permitted) * Total Bilirubin ≤1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN), or higher in patients diagnosed with Gilbert's syndrome, that have been reviewed and approved by the medical monitor * Aspartate transaminase / serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (AST / SGOT) and alanine transaminase / serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (ALT / SGPT) ≤3.0 x ULN; 12. Must have, or be willing to have, an acceptable central catheter. (Port a cath, peripherally inserted central catheter \[PICC\] line, or central venous catheter). Footnote \*FCBP is any sexually mature female who: 1) has not undergone a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy or 2) has not been naturally postmenopausal (not having menstrual cycles due to cancer therapy does not rule out childbearing potential) for at least 24 consecutive months.

Exclusion criteria

1. Primary refractory disease (i.e., never responded with ≥ minimal response \[MR\] to any prior therapy); 2. Evidence of mucosal or internal bleeding and/or platelet transfusion refractory (platelet count fails to increase by \>10,000 cells/mm³ \[10.0 x 10⁹/L\] after a transfusion of an appropriate dose of platelets); 3. Any medical conditions that, in the Investigator's opinion, would impose excessive risk to the patient or would adversely affect his/her participating in this study. Examples of such conditions are: a significant history of cardiovascular disease (e.g., myocardial infarction, significant conduction system abnormalities, uncontrolled hypertension, ≥Grade 3 thromboembolic event in the last 6 months); 4. Known active infection requiring parenteral or oral anti-infective treatment within 14 days of initiation of therapy; 5. Other malignancy diagnosed or requiring treatment within the past 3 years with the exception of adequately treated basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell skin cancer, carcinoma in-situ of the cervix or breast or very low and low risk prostate cancer in active surveillance; 6. Pregnant or breast-feeding females; 7. Serious psychiatric illness, active alcoholism, or drug addiction that may hinder or confuse compliance or follow-up evaluation; 8. Known human immunodeficiency virus or active hepatitis B or C viral infection; 9. Concurrent symptomatic amyloidosis or plasma cell leukemia; 10. POEMS syndrome (plasma cell dyscrasia with polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal protein and skin changes); 11. Previous cytotoxic therapies, including cytotoxic investigational agents, for MM within 3 weeks (6 weeks for nitrosoureas) prior to initiation of therapy. The use of live vaccines within 30 days before initiation of therapy. Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), proteasome inhibitors (PIs) or corticosteroids within 2 weeks prior to initiation of therapy. Other investigational therapies and monoclonal antibodies (mAb) within 4 weeks of initiation of therapy. Prednisone up to but no more than 10 mg orally once daily (q.d.) or its equivalent for symptom management of comorbid conditions is permitted but dose should be stable for at least 7 days prior to initiation of therapy; 12. Residual side effects to previous therapy \>Grade 1 prior to initiation of therapy (Alopecia any grade and/or neuropathy Grade 2 without pain are permitted); 13. Prior peripheral stem cell transplant within 12 weeks of initiation of therapy; 14. Prior allogeneic stem cell transplantation with active graft-versus-host-disease; 15. Prior major surgical procedure or radiation therapy within 4 weeks of initiation of study therapy (this does not include limited course of radiation used for management of bone pain to be completed within 7 days of initiation of study therapy). Plasmapheresis is not permitted within 14 days of initiation of therapy; 16. Known intolerance to steroid therapy; 17. Prior renal transplant; 18. Currently in need of renal dialysis.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cmax of MelphalanSamples were drawn 5-10 minutes after the end of infusion, 2-3 hours after the end of infusion, and 5-7 hours after the end of infusion.Maximum observed concentration (Cmax)
Tmax of MelphalanSamples were drawn 5-10 minutes after the end of infusion, 2-3 hours after the end of infusion, and 5-7 hours after the end of infusion.Time of maximum observed concentration (Tmax)
Area Under the Curve (0-t) of MelphalanSamples were drawn 5-10 minutes after the end of infusion, 2-3 hours after the end of infusion, and 5-7 hours after the end of infusion.Area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0h to the last measurable concentration.
Area Under the Curve (Inf) of MelphalanSamples were drawn 5-10 minutes after the end of infusion, 2-3 hours after the end of infusion, and 5-7 hours after the end of infusion.Area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0 hours to infinity
T1/2 of MelphalanSamples were drawn 5-10 minutes after the end of infusion, 2-3 hours after the end of infusion, and 5-7 hours after the end of infusion.Elimination half-life of melphalan

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of Clinical BenefitPatients were assessed from the first measure of a confirmed MR or better until confirmed progression, death, or initiation of subsequent therapy (maximum duration 127.1 weeks).Duration of clinical benefit (DOCB) was calculated as time in months from the first evidence of confirmed assessment of stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), partial response (PR), or minimal response (MR) to first confirmed disease progression, or to death due to any cause. DOCB was defined only for patients with a confirmed MR or better. DOCB was summarized using the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method. The median DOCB was estimated from the 50th percentile of the corresponding K-M estimates. The 95% confidence interval for median DOCB was constructed using the method of Brookmeyer (Brookmeyer, 1982).
Time to ResponseFrom initiation of therapy until documented disease response (maximum duration 127.1 weeks).Time from first dose of therapy to first documented confirmed response of partial response (PR) or better.
Best Confirmed ResponsePatients were assessed for response after each cycle. After discontinuation of therapy, patients continued to be assessed until documented progression (confirmed on 2 consecutive assessments) or initiation of subsequent therapy (max duration 127.1 weeks).Best confirmed response required 2 consecutive assessments with the same response result made at any time. In case at the second consecutive assessment (made at any time) the response is higher than the previous one, then confirmed response (linked to the first assessment visit) will be the first one (e.g., PR - VGPR consecutive pair will lead to a PR confirmed response at the first visit). In case the second consecutive response is lower than the first one, then confirmed response (linked to the first assessment visit) will be the second one (e.g. CR-VGPR consecutive pair will lead to a VGPR confirmed response at the first visit).
Overall SurvivalPatients were followed for overall survival until death or until the last patient in the study had documented progression (confirmed on 2 consecutive assessments) or initiation of subsequent therapy (maximum of 39.2 months).Overall survival was defined as the time in months from initiation of therapy to death due to any cause. Patients still alive at the end of the study, or lost to follow up, were censored at last day known alive.
Time to Clinical BenefitPatients were assessed for response after each cycle. After discontinuation of therapy, patients continued to be assessed until documented progression (confirmed on 2 consecutive assessments) or initiation of subsequent therapy (max duration 127.1 weeks).Time to clinical benefit was defined as the time from first dose of therapy to first documented confirmed response of minimal response (MR) or better.
Overall Response RatePatients were assessed for response after each cycle. After discontinuation of therapy, patients continued to be assessed until disease progression (confirmed on 2 consecutive assessments) (maximum duration 127.1 weeks).Overall response rate (ORR) is the percentage of patients who achieved a confirmed response of stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), or partial response (PR) as best response, as assessed by the Investigator.
Clinical Benefit RatePatients were assessed for response after each cycle (maximum duration 127.1 weeks).Clinical benefit rate (CBR) is the proportion of patients who achieved a confirmed minimal response (MR) or better (stringent complete response \[sCR\], complete response \[CR\], very good partial response \[VGPR\], partial response \[PR\], and MR) as their best response, as assessed by the Investigator.
Progression-free SurvivalPatients were assessed from the initiation of therapy until documented disease progression or initiation of new therapy (maximum duration 127.1 weeks).Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the date of first study drug (the earliest of melflufen and dexamethasone start date) initiation to the date of first documentation of confirmed PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants were deemed 'progressed' in case of i) unconfirmed progressive disease (PD) as the final response assessment, ii) death after at least one response assessment or PD based on at least two consecutive response assessments at any time, or iii) death before the first response assessment. The distribution of PFS was summarized using the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method. The median PFS was estimated from the 50th percentile of the corresponding K-M estimates. The 95% confidence interval for median PFS was constructed using the method of Brookmeyer (Brookmeyer, 1982).
Duration of ResponsePatients were assessed for response from the first measure of a confirmed response (PR or better) until confirmed progression, death, or initiation of subsequent therapy (maximum duration 127.1 weeks).Duration of response (DOR) is defined as the time from the first evidence of confirmed assessment of stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), or partial response (PR) to first confirmed disease progression, or to death due to any cause. The distribution of DOR was summarized using the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method. The median DOR was estimated from the 50th percentile of the corresponding K-M estimates. The 95% confidence interval for median DOR was constructed using the method of Brookmeyer (Brookmeyer, 1982).

Countries

Czechia, Greece, Poland

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The first patient (in Cohort 1a) received their first dose of study drug on 17 September 2018. The last patient (in Cohort 2a) received their first dose of study drug on 29 June 2021.

Pre-assignment details

All enrolled patients received study treatment and were included in the Safety Analysis Set.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort 1a, Melflufen 40 mg
Patients with moderate renal impairment (eGFR ≥30 to \<45 mL/min/1.73m²) and a starting dose of melflufen of 40 mg.
21
Cohort 1b, Melflufen 30 mg
Patients with moderate renal impairment (eGFR ≥30 to \<45 mL/min/1.73m²) and a starting dose of melflufen of 30 mg.
10
Cohort 2a, Melflufen 20 mg
Patients with severe renal impairment (eGFR ≥15 to \<30 mL/min/1.73m²) and a starting dose of melflufen of 20 mg.
4
Total35

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event710
Overall StudyDisease progression853
Overall StudyPatient request to stop treatment120
Overall StudyPhysician Decision310
Overall StudyStudy terminated by sponsor211

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalCohort 1a, Melflufen 40 mgCohort 2a, Melflufen 20 mgCohort 1b, Melflufen 30 mg
Age, Continuous70.0 years70.0 years62.5 years72.0 years
Age, Customized
≥65 to ≤75 years
14 Participants9 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Age, Customized
<65 years
10 Participants4 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Age, Customized
>75 years
11 Participants8 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score
score = 0
17 Participants11 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score
score = 1
15 Participants8 Participants1 Participants6 Participants
Baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score
score = 2
3 Participants2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)
≥15 to <30 mL/min/1.73m²
6 Participants0 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)
≥30 to <45 mL/min/1.73m²
27 Participants19 Participants0 Participants8 Participants
Baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)
≥45 mL/min/1.73m²
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Baseline height168.0 cm165.0 cm172.5 cm169.0 cm
Baseline weight74.00 kg73.00 kg85.50 kg75.25 kg
Cytogenetics abnormalities by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) at study entry
High-risk abnormalities
10 Participants5 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Cytogenetics abnormalities by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) at study entry
Missing
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Cytogenetics abnormalities by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) at study entry
Standard-risk abnormalities
23 Participants16 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Cytogenetics abnormalities by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) at study entry
Unknown
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Disease status at study entry
Relapsed
18 Participants13 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Disease status at study entry
Relapsed-refractory
17 Participants8 Participants2 Participants7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
35 Participants21 Participants4 Participants10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Evidence of extramedullary disease at study entry
No
32 Participants20 Participants3 Participants9 Participants
Evidence of extramedullary disease at study entry
Yes
3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Evidence of lytic bone disease at study entry
No
6 Participants5 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Evidence of lytic bone disease at study entry
Yes
29 Participants16 Participants4 Participants9 Participants
International Staging System (ISS) stage at study entry
stage I
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
International Staging System (ISS) stage at study entry
stage II
14 Participants9 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
International Staging System (ISS) stage at study entry
stage III
18 Participants9 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
International Staging System (ISS) stage at study entry
unknown
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Number of prior systemic therapy lines
2 prior lines of therapy
13 Participants5 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Number of prior systemic therapy lines
3 prior lines of therapy
10 Participants7 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Number of prior systemic therapy lines
4 prior lines of therapy
12 Participants9 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Prior autologous transplant11 Participants9 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
35 Participants21 Participants4 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
9 participants4 participants1 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Greece
16 participants9 participants3 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
10 participants8 participants0 participants2 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants9 Participants1 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
19 Participants12 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Time since diagnosis4.78 years6.47 years5.13 years3.82 years
Time since most recent relapse/progression1.25 months1.12 months3.29 months1.49 months

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
16 / 213 / 101 / 4
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 2110 / 103 / 4
serious
Total, serious adverse events
9 / 215 / 100 / 4

Outcome results

Primary

Area Under the Curve (0-t) of Melphalan

Area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0h to the last measurable concentration.

Time frame: Samples were drawn 5-10 minutes after the end of infusion, 2-3 hours after the end of infusion, and 5-7 hours after the end of infusion.

Population: Some patients were not evaluable for PK and were excluded from Cycle 1 and/or Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1a, Melflufen 40 mgArea Under the Curve (0-t) of MelphalanCycle 178250.3462 minutes*ng/mLStandard Deviation 21391.384
Cohort 1a, Melflufen 40 mgArea Under the Curve (0-t) of MelphalanCycle 274415.5556 minutes*ng/mLStandard Deviation 21354.648
Cohort 1b, Melflufen 30 mgArea Under the Curve (0-t) of MelphalanCycle 170303.4400 minutes*ng/mLStandard Deviation 16874.787
Cohort 1b, Melflufen 30 mgArea Under the Curve (0-t) of MelphalanCycle 267458.0000 minutes*ng/mLStandard Deviation 19241.04
Cohort 2a, Melflufen 20 mgArea Under the Curve (0-t) of MelphalanCycle 127912.7125 minutes*ng/mLStandard Deviation 10385.219
Cohort 2a, Melflufen 20 mgArea Under the Curve (0-t) of MelphalanCycle 232146.0000 minutes*ng/mLStandard Deviation 5804.816
Primary

Area Under the Curve (Inf) of Melphalan

Area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0 hours to infinity

Time frame: Samples were drawn 5-10 minutes after the end of infusion, 2-3 hours after the end of infusion, and 5-7 hours after the end of infusion.

Population: Some patients were not evaluable for PK and were excluded from Cycle 1 and/or Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1a, Melflufen 40 mgArea Under the Curve (Inf) of MelphalanCycle 185123.3635 minutes*ng/mLStandard Deviation 22765.646
Cohort 1a, Melflufen 40 mgArea Under the Curve (Inf) of MelphalanCycle 280365.5468 minutes*ng/mLStandard Deviation 22334.049
Cohort 1b, Melflufen 30 mgArea Under the Curve (Inf) of MelphalanCycle 177173.0689 minutes*ng/mLStandard Deviation 15347.431
Cohort 1b, Melflufen 30 mgArea Under the Curve (Inf) of MelphalanCycle 272830.2410 minutes*ng/mLStandard Deviation 20632.358
Cohort 2a, Melflufen 20 mgArea Under the Curve (Inf) of MelphalanCycle 131712.9042 minutes*ng/mLStandard Deviation 11597.404
Cohort 2a, Melflufen 20 mgArea Under the Curve (Inf) of MelphalanCycle 239685.8277 minutes*ng/mLStandard Deviation 6405.267
Primary

Cmax of Melphalan

Maximum observed concentration (Cmax)

Time frame: Samples were drawn 5-10 minutes after the end of infusion, 2-3 hours after the end of infusion, and 5-7 hours after the end of infusion.

Population: Some patients were not evaluable for pharmacokinetics (PK) and were excluded from Cycle 1 and/or Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1a, Melflufen 40 mgCmax of MelphalanCycle 1550.1538 ng/mLStandard Deviation 170.024
Cohort 1a, Melflufen 40 mgCmax of MelphalanCycle 2539.4444 ng/mLStandard Deviation 178.246
Cohort 1b, Melflufen 30 mgCmax of MelphalanCycle 1472.2000 ng/mLStandard Deviation 141.505
Cohort 1b, Melflufen 30 mgCmax of MelphalanCycle 2469.5000 ng/mLStandard Deviation 177.34
Cohort 2a, Melflufen 20 mgCmax of MelphalanCycle 1181.2500 ng/mLStandard Deviation 76.098
Cohort 2a, Melflufen 20 mgCmax of MelphalanCycle 2194.0000 ng/mLStandard Deviation 57.663
Primary

T1/2 of Melphalan

Elimination half-life of melphalan

Time frame: Samples were drawn 5-10 minutes after the end of infusion, 2-3 hours after the end of infusion, and 5-7 hours after the end of infusion.

Population: Some patients were not evaluable for PK and were excluded from Cycle 1 and/or Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1a, Melflufen 40 mgT1/2 of MelphalanCycle 189.1390 minutesStandard Deviation 15.575
Cohort 1a, Melflufen 40 mgT1/2 of MelphalanCycle 287.5544 minutesStandard Deviation 15.86
Cohort 1b, Melflufen 30 mgT1/2 of MelphalanCycle 198.3568 minutesStandard Deviation 27.249
Cohort 1b, Melflufen 30 mgT1/2 of MelphalanCycle 290.7844 minutesStandard Deviation 14.411
Cohort 2a, Melflufen 20 mgT1/2 of MelphalanCycle 1109.5502 minutesStandard Deviation 22.221
Cohort 2a, Melflufen 20 mgT1/2 of MelphalanCycle 2136.2193 minutesStandard Deviation 13.679
Primary

Tmax of Melphalan

Time of maximum observed concentration (Tmax)

Time frame: Samples were drawn 5-10 minutes after the end of infusion, 2-3 hours after the end of infusion, and 5-7 hours after the end of infusion.

Population: Some patients were not evaluable for PK and were excluded from Cycle 1 and/or Cycle 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1a, Melflufen 40 mgTmax of MelphalanCycle 138.0000 minutes
Cohort 1a, Melflufen 40 mgTmax of MelphalanCycle 237.0000 minutes
Cohort 1b, Melflufen 30 mgTmax of MelphalanCycle 240.0000 minutes
Cohort 1b, Melflufen 30 mgTmax of MelphalanCycle 140.0000 minutes
Cohort 2a, Melflufen 20 mgTmax of MelphalanCycle 236.0000 minutes
Cohort 2a, Melflufen 20 mgTmax of MelphalanCycle 137.0000 minutes
Secondary

Best Confirmed Response

Best confirmed response required 2 consecutive assessments with the same response result made at any time. In case at the second consecutive assessment (made at any time) the response is higher than the previous one, then confirmed response (linked to the first assessment visit) will be the first one (e.g., PR - VGPR consecutive pair will lead to a PR confirmed response at the first visit). In case the second consecutive response is lower than the first one, then confirmed response (linked to the first assessment visit) will be the second one (e.g. CR-VGPR consecutive pair will lead to a VGPR confirmed response at the first visit).

Time frame: Patients were assessed for response after each cycle. After discontinuation of therapy, patients continued to be assessed until documented progression (confirmed on 2 consecutive assessments) or initiation of subsequent therapy (max duration 127.1 weeks).

Population: This analysis was performed in the Safety Analysis Set, which is defined as all patients who received at least 1 or partial dose of melflufen or dexamethasone.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1a, Melflufen 40 mgBest Confirmed ResponseStringent complete response (sCR)0 Participants
Cohort 1a, Melflufen 40 mgBest Confirmed ResponseComplete response (CR)0 Participants
Cohort 1a, Melflufen 40 mgBest Confirmed ResponseVery good partial response (VGPR)3 Participants
Cohort 1a, Melflufen 40 mgBest Confirmed ResponsePartial response (PR)7 Participants
Cohort 1a, Melflufen 40 mgBest Confirmed ResponseMinimal response (MR)1 Participants
Cohort 1a, Melflufen 40 mgBest Confirmed ResponseStable disease (SD)5 Participants
Cohort 1a, Melflufen 40 mgBest Confirmed ResponseProgressive disease (PD)2 Participants
Cohort 1a, Melflufen 40 mgBest Confirmed ResponseNon-evaluable3 Participants
Cohort 1b, Melflufen 30 mgBest Confirmed ResponseVery good partial response (VGPR)1 Participants
Cohort 1b, Melflufen 30 mgBest Confirmed ResponseProgressive disease (PD)0 Participants
Cohort 1b, Melflufen 30 mgBest Confirmed ResponsePartial response (PR)4 Participants
Cohort 1b, Melflufen 30 mgBest Confirmed ResponseMinimal response (MR)1 Participants
Cohort 1b, Melflufen 30 mgBest Confirmed ResponseStable disease (SD)2 Participants
Cohort 1b, Melflufen 30 mgBest Confirmed ResponseStringent complete response (sCR)0 Participants
Cohort 1b, Melflufen 30 mgBest Confirmed ResponseComplete response (CR)2 Participants
Cohort 1b, Melflufen 30 mgBest Confirmed ResponseNon-evaluable0 Participants
Cohort 2a, Melflufen 20 mgBest Confirmed ResponseVery good partial response (VGPR)0 Participants
Cohort 2a, Melflufen 20 mgBest Confirmed ResponseComplete response (CR)0 Participants
Cohort 2a, Melflufen 20 mgBest Confirmed ResponseStringent complete response (sCR)0 Participants
Cohort 2a, Melflufen 20 mgBest Confirmed ResponsePartial response (PR)1 Participants
Cohort 2a, Melflufen 20 mgBest Confirmed ResponseProgressive disease (PD)3 Participants
Cohort 2a, Melflufen 20 mgBest Confirmed ResponseStable disease (SD)0 Participants
Cohort 2a, Melflufen 20 mgBest Confirmed ResponseMinimal response (MR)0 Participants
Cohort 2a, Melflufen 20 mgBest Confirmed ResponseNon-evaluable0 Participants
Secondary

Clinical Benefit Rate

Clinical benefit rate (CBR) is the proportion of patients who achieved a confirmed minimal response (MR) or better (stringent complete response \[sCR\], complete response \[CR\], very good partial response \[VGPR\], partial response \[PR\], and MR) as their best response, as assessed by the Investigator.

Time frame: Patients were assessed for response after each cycle (maximum duration 127.1 weeks).

Population: This analysis was performed in the Safety Analysis Set, which is defined as all patients who received at least 1 or partial dose of melflufen or dexamethasone.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1a, Melflufen 40 mgClinical Benefit Rate11 Participants
Cohort 1b, Melflufen 30 mgClinical Benefit Rate8 Participants
Cohort 2a, Melflufen 20 mgClinical Benefit Rate1 Participants
Secondary

Duration of Clinical Benefit

Duration of clinical benefit (DOCB) was calculated as time in months from the first evidence of confirmed assessment of stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), partial response (PR), or minimal response (MR) to first confirmed disease progression, or to death due to any cause. DOCB was defined only for patients with a confirmed MR or better. DOCB was summarized using the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method. The median DOCB was estimated from the 50th percentile of the corresponding K-M estimates. The 95% confidence interval for median DOCB was constructed using the method of Brookmeyer (Brookmeyer, 1982).

Time frame: Patients were assessed from the first measure of a confirmed MR or better until confirmed progression, death, or initiation of subsequent therapy (maximum duration 127.1 weeks).

Population: This analysis included patients who achieved a best response of MR or better.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1a, Melflufen 40 mgDuration of Clinical Benefit9.26 months
Cohort 1b, Melflufen 30 mgDuration of Clinical Benefit10.58 months
Cohort 2a, Melflufen 20 mgDuration of Clinical BenefitNA months
Secondary

Duration of Response

Duration of response (DOR) is defined as the time from the first evidence of confirmed assessment of stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), or partial response (PR) to first confirmed disease progression, or to death due to any cause. The distribution of DOR was summarized using the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method. The median DOR was estimated from the 50th percentile of the corresponding K-M estimates. The 95% confidence interval for median DOR was constructed using the method of Brookmeyer (Brookmeyer, 1982).

Time frame: Patients were assessed for response from the first measure of a confirmed response (PR or better) until confirmed progression, death, or initiation of subsequent therapy (maximum duration 127.1 weeks).

Population: This analysis included patients who achieved a best confirmed response of PR or better.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1a, Melflufen 40 mgDuration of Response8.31 months
Cohort 1b, Melflufen 30 mgDuration of Response13.83 months
Cohort 2a, Melflufen 20 mgDuration of ResponseNA months
Secondary

Overall Response Rate

Overall response rate (ORR) is the percentage of patients who achieved a confirmed response of stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), or partial response (PR) as best response, as assessed by the Investigator.

Time frame: Patients were assessed for response after each cycle. After discontinuation of therapy, patients continued to be assessed until disease progression (confirmed on 2 consecutive assessments) (maximum duration 127.1 weeks).

Population: This analysis was performed in the Safety Analysis Set, which is defined as all patients who received at least 1 or partial dose of melflufen or dexamethasone.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1a, Melflufen 40 mgOverall Response Rate10 Participants
Cohort 1b, Melflufen 30 mgOverall Response Rate7 Participants
Cohort 2a, Melflufen 20 mgOverall Response Rate1 Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the time in months from initiation of therapy to death due to any cause. Patients still alive at the end of the study, or lost to follow up, were censored at last day known alive.

Time frame: Patients were followed for overall survival until death or until the last patient in the study had documented progression (confirmed on 2 consecutive assessments) or initiation of subsequent therapy (maximum of 39.2 months).

Population: This analysis was performed in the Safety Analysis Set, which is defined as all patients who received at least 1 or partial dose of melflufen or dexamethasone.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1a, Melflufen 40 mgOverall Survival9.76 months
Cohort 1b, Melflufen 30 mgOverall SurvivalNA months
Cohort 2a, Melflufen 20 mgOverall SurvivalNA months
Secondary

Progression-free Survival

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the date of first study drug (the earliest of melflufen and dexamethasone start date) initiation to the date of first documentation of confirmed PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants were deemed 'progressed' in case of i) unconfirmed progressive disease (PD) as the final response assessment, ii) death after at least one response assessment or PD based on at least two consecutive response assessments at any time, or iii) death before the first response assessment. The distribution of PFS was summarized using the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method. The median PFS was estimated from the 50th percentile of the corresponding K-M estimates. The 95% confidence interval for median PFS was constructed using the method of Brookmeyer (Brookmeyer, 1982).

Time frame: Patients were assessed from the initiation of therapy until documented disease progression or initiation of new therapy (maximum duration 127.1 weeks).

Population: This analysis was performed in the Safety Analysis Set, which is defined as all patients who received at least 1 or partial dose of melflufen or dexamethasone.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1a, Melflufen 40 mgProgression-free Survival8.61 months
Cohort 1b, Melflufen 30 mgProgression-free Survival7.66 months
Cohort 2a, Melflufen 20 mgProgression-free Survival3.43 months
Secondary

Time to Clinical Benefit

Time to clinical benefit was defined as the time from first dose of therapy to first documented confirmed response of minimal response (MR) or better.

Time frame: Patients were assessed for response after each cycle. After discontinuation of therapy, patients continued to be assessed until documented progression (confirmed on 2 consecutive assessments) or initiation of subsequent therapy (max duration 127.1 weeks).

Population: This analysis included patients who achieved a best response of MR or better.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1a, Melflufen 40 mgTime to Clinical Benefit1.12 months
Cohort 1b, Melflufen 30 mgTime to Clinical Benefit1.12 months
Cohort 2a, Melflufen 20 mgTime to Clinical Benefit2.83 months
Secondary

Time to Response

Time from first dose of therapy to first documented confirmed response of partial response (PR) or better.

Time frame: From initiation of therapy until documented disease response (maximum duration 127.1 weeks).

Population: This analysis included patients who achieved a best confirmed response of PR or better.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1a, Melflufen 40 mgTime to Response2.45 months
Cohort 1b, Melflufen 30 mgTime to Response1.18 months
Cohort 2a, Melflufen 20 mgTime to Response2.83 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026