Skip to content

Safety, Preliminary Efficacy and PK of Isatuximab (SAR650984) Alone or in Combination With Atezolizumab in Patients With Advanced Malignancies

A Phase 1/2 Open-label, Multi-center, Safety, Preliminary Efficacy and Pharmacokinetic (PK) Study of Isatuximab (SAR650984) in Combination With Atezolizumab or Isatuximab Alone in Patients With Advanced Malignancies

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03637764
Enrollment
107
Registered
2018-08-20
Start date
2018-08-06
Completion date
2022-05-11
Last updated
2023-07-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neoplasm

Keywords

Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody

Brief summary

Primary Objectives: * Phase 1: To characterize the safety and tolerability of isatuximab in combination with atezolizumab in participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), platinum-refractory recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), platinum-resistant/refractory epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), or recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), and to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). * Phase 2: To assess response rate (RR) of isatuximab in combination with atezolizumab in participants with HCC or SCCHN or EOC. * Phase 2: To assess the progression free survival rate at 6 months (PFS-6) of isatuximab in combination with atezolizumab, or as a single agent in participants with GBM. Secondary Objectives: * To evaluate the safety profile of isatuximab monotherapy (GBM only), or in combination with atezolizumab in Phase 2. * To evaluate the immunogenicity of isatuximab and atezolizumab. * To characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of isatuximab single agent (GBM only) and atezolizumab in combination with isatuximab. * To assess the overall efficacy of isatuximab in combination with atezolizumab, or single agent (GBM only).

Detailed description

The total study duration per participant was up to 28 months including up to 28 days screening period, up to 24 months treatment period, and a 3 month safety follow up period.

Interventions

Pharmaceutical form: solution for infusion Route of administration: intravenous

DRUGAtezolizumab

Pharmaceutical form: solution for infusion Route of administration: intravenous

Sponsors

Sanofi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants must have a known diagnosis of either unresectable HCC, platinum-refractory recurrent/metastatic SCCHN, platinum-resistant/refractory EOC with evidence of measurable disease or recurrent GBM. * Greater than or equal to (\>=)18 years of age. * For participants with HCC: Documentation of progressive disease (PD) during or after treatment with either sorafenib or lenvatinib, or intolerance to the therapy. * For participants with SCCHN: Received and failed up to 2 lines of prior systemic anti-cancer therapy with documentation of tumor recurrence or PD within 6 months of last platinum-based therapy in primary, recurrent, or metastatic setting. * For participants with EOC: Received up to 3 lines of prior platinum-containing therapy when the disease was platinum-sensitive, and the participants should not have received any systemic therapy for platinum-resistant/refractory disease. Specific to France only: Documentation of PD on or after 1 line of anti-cancer therapy for platinum resistant/refractory disease (unless participants are ineligible or intolerant to standard of care for platinum-resistant/refractory disease). * For participants with GBM: Documentation of PD or first recurrence during or after temozolomide maintenance therapy for newly diagnosed GBM treated with 1st line radiotherapy plus concurrent temozolomide.

Exclusion criteria

* Prior exposure to agent that blocks CD38 or participation in clinical studies with isatuximab. * For participants with HCC, SCCHN, EOC or GBM prior exposure to any agent (approved or investigational) that blocks the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway. * Evidence of other immune related disease /conditions. * History of non-infectious pneumonitis requiring steroids or current pneumonitis; history of the thoracic radiation. * Received a live-virus vaccination within 28 days of planned treatment start. Seasonal flu vaccines that do not contain live virus are permitted. * Prior solid organ or bone marrow transplantation. * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status \>=2 for participants with HCC, SCCHN or EOC or Karnofsky performance score less than or equal to (\<=) 70 for participants with GBM. * Poor bone marrow reserve. * Poor organ function. The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)Cycle 1 (21 days)DLTs: AEs occurring during 1st treatment cycle, unless due to disease progression/obviously unrelated cause which included: hematological abnormalities: Grade(G) 4 neutropenia(N) for 7 or more consecutive days, G3 to G4 N with fever (temperature greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 38.5 degree Celsius on more than 1 occasion) or microbiologically/radiographically documented infection, G3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding/ G4 thrombocytopenia. Non-hematological abnormalities: G \>=2 Aspartate transaminase (AST)/ Alanine transaminase (ALT) elevation simultaneous with G \>=2 total bilirubin elevation without initial findings of cholestasis or any other reason found, G4 non-hematologic AE, G3 to 4 cytokine release syndrome, G3 non-hematological AE lasting greater than (\>)3 days, delay in initiation of Cycle 2 \>14 days due to treatment related laboratory abnormalities/AE. Any other AE that study committee deemed to be dose-limiting, regardless of grade, was also considered DLT.
Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D)Cycle 1 (21 days)RP2D was the starting dose selected for Phase 2 part of the study. RP2D was the selected dose at which no more than 1 out of 6 participants (starting dose or dose level minus -1 \[DL-1\]) or 2 out of 12 participants (starting dose) experienced a DLT related to the investigational medicinal product. DLTs: Adverse Event (AE) occurring during 1st treatment cycle, unless due to disease progression/obviously unrelated cause included: hematological abnormalities: G4 N for 7/ more consecutive days, G3 to G4 N with fever, G3/G4 thrombocytopenia. Non-hematological abnormalities: G\>=2 AST/ALT elevation simultaneous with G \>=2 total bilirubin elevation without cholestasis or any other reason found, G4 non-hematologic AE, G3 to 4 cytokine release syndrome, G3 non-hematological AE lasting \>3 days, delay in initiation of Cycle 2 \>14 days due to treatment related laboratory abnormalities/AE.
Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)Cycle 1 (21 days)MTD was defined as the highest dose level at which no more than 1 out of 6 participants (starting dose or DL-1) or 2 out of 12 participants (starting dose) experienced a DLT related to the investigational medicinal product. DLTs: AE occurring during 1st treatment cycle, unless due to disease progression/obviously unrelated cause included: hematological abnormalities: G4 N for 7 or more consecutive days, G3 to G4 N with fever, G3 or G4 thrombocytopenia. Non-hematological abnormalities: G\>=2 AST/ ALT elevation simultaneous with G \>=2 total bilirubin elevation without cholestasis or any other reason found, G4 non-hematologic AE, G3 to 4 cytokine release syndrome, G3 non-hematological AE lasting \>3 days, delay in initiation of Cycle 2 \>14 days due to treatment related laboratory abnormalities or AEs.
Percentage of Participants With Overall Response (OR): For HCC/SCCHN/EOC CohortsFrom randomization until disease progression, or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)OR was defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) as best overall response, assessed per RECIST 1.1 criteria. Best overall response was derived per RECIST 1.1 criteria using disease assessments performed from the first dose of treatment throughout the study excluding any assessments performed after the cut-off date or following the initiation of a further anticancer treatment. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, pathological lymph nodes (target/non-target)- reduction in short axis \<10 mm; PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum, sum with an absolute increase of diameter of at least 5 mm and appearance of \>1 new lesion.
Probability of Participants With Progression Free Survival at 6 Months (PFS-6): GBM CohortFrom randomization until 6 months after the last participant's first treatment in the GBM Cohort D-1PFS-6 was defined as the probability of participants alive without disease progression at 6 months as assessed by RANO criteria. Participants who didn't experience documented progression or death before analysis cut-off date or date of initiation of new anticancer treatment, PFS was censored at date of last valid disease assessment not showing progression performed prior to initiation of further anticancer treatment or analysis cut-off date, whichever was 1st. Per RANO criteria, progressive disease was defined as \>=25% increase size of T1- gadolinium enhancing disease, or increased T2/FLAIR signal, or presence of new lesion, or worsening clinical status. PFS-6 was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TESAEs)From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the TEAE period (defined as the time from the first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment).
Number of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesFrom Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)Hematological parameters assessed were anemia, white blood cell (WBC) decreased, platelet count decreased, lymphocyte count decreased, and neutrophil count decreased. Parameters were assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Experience version 4.03, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersFrom Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)Electrolyte parameters assessed were hyponatremia, hypernatremia, hypokalemia, hyperkalemia, hypocalcemia, hypercalcemia, hypoalbuminemia, hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia. Parameters were assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Experience version 4.03, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs.
Number of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesFrom Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)Abnormal renal parameters assessed were creatinine clearance (CrCl), creatinine increased and hyperuricemia. Creatinine clearance was assessed in categories: \>=60 - less than (\<) 90 milliliters per minute per 1.73 square meter (mL/min/1.73m\^2), \>=30 - \<60 mL/min/1.73m\^2, \>=15 - \<30 mL/min/1.73m\^2 and \<15 mL/min/1.73m\^2. Parameters were assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Experience version 4.03, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs.
Number of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesFrom Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)Abnormal liver function parameters assessed were AST increased, ALT increased, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) increased, blood bilirubin (BB) increased. Parameters were assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Experience version 4.03, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Plasma Concentration of AtezolizumabCycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 8 Day 1 and Cycle 16 Day 1
Best Percent Change From Baseline in Tumor BurdenFrom randomization until progression or death or study cut-off date whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)Best tumor burden change was defined as the best percent-change from baseline in a sum of the diameters (longest for non-nodal lesion, short axis for nodal lesions) for all target lesions.
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control (DC) >=6 MonthsFrom the date of first response to disease progression or death, or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)DC: percentage of participants with complete response (CR), partial response (PR) & stable disease (SD) rate. RANO criteria, CR: no change in size of T1-gadolinium-enhancing (T1-Gd+) disease, stable/ reduced (red) T2/FLAIR signal, no new lesion (NL), no corticosteroid use (CU) & stable/ red clinical status (CS); PR: \>=50% change in size of T1-Gd+ disease, stable/red T2/FLAIR signal, no NL, stable/ red CU & stable/ improved CS (ICS). SD: \<50% reduction to \<25% increase (inc) size of T1-Gd+ disease, stable/red T2/FLAIR signal, no NL, stable/red CU & stable/ICS. Progressive disease (PD): \>=25% inc size of T1-Gd+ disease/ inc T2/FLAIR signal/ presence of NL/ worsening CS. RECIST criteria: CR: Disappearance of target lesions. Reduction in short axis to \<10 mm of lymph nodes; PR: 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions; PD: 20% inc in sum of diameters of target lesions; SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage from baseline study to qualify for PR nor sufficient inc to qualify for PD.
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Clast) After the First Infusion of IsatuximabAt SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1Clast was defined as the last concentration of isatuximab observed above the lower limit of quantification.
Progression-free Survival (PFS)From date of first study treatment administration until disease progression or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)PFS was defined as time (in months) from 1st study treatment administration to date of 1st documented radiographic progression or date of death from any cause, whichever was 1st. Participants who didn't experience progression or death before analysis cut-off date/date of initiation of new anticancer treatment, PFS was censored at date of last valid disease assessment not showing progression performed prior to initiation of further anticancer treatment or analysis cut-off date, whichever was 1st. RECIST 1.1 criteria was used for assessment in HCC/SCCHN/EOC Cohorts and RANO criteria for GBM Cohort. Per RECIST 1.1 criteria, PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum on study. Appearance of 1 or more new lesions was also considered progression. Per RANO criteria, PD: \>=25% increase in product of perpendicular diameters of any target lesion, or worsening neurologic status not explained by causes unrelated to tumor progression.
Percentage of Participants With Response as Per Response Assessment for Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Criteria: GBM CohortFrom randomization until progression, or death, or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)Response rate for participants with GBM was defined as percentage of participants with CR & PR as best overall response (BOR), assessed by Investigators using RANO criteria. BOR was derived per RANO criteria using disease assessments performed from 1st dose of treatment through study excluding any assessments performed after cut-off date or following initiation of further anticancer treatment. Per RANO criteria; CR was defined as no change in size of T1-gadolinium-enhancing (T1-Gd+) disease, stable or reduced T2/FLAIR signal, no new lesion, no corticosteroid use, and stable or improved clinical status; PR was defined as \>=50% change in size of T1-Gd+ disease, stable or reduced T2/FLAIR signal, no new lesion, stable or reduced corticosteroid use, and stable or improved clinical status. Progressive disease was defined as \>=25% increase size of T1-Gd+ disease, or increased T2/FLAIR signal, or presence of new lesion, or worsening clinical status.
Duration of Response (DOR)From the date of first response until disease progression or death, or study cut-off date whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)Time from date of 1st response until date of first documented recurrent/progressive disease (PD) or death whichever occurred 1st. In absence of disease progression or death before analysis cut-off date or date of initiation of further anticancer treatment, DOR was censored at date of last valid response. RECIST 1.1 criteria was used for assessment in HCC/SCCHN/EOC Cohorts and RANO criteria for GBM Cohort. Per RECIST 1.1, CR: disappearance of all target lesions; PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions. Per RANO criteria; CR: no change in size of T1-Gd+ disease, stable/reduced T2/FLAIR signal, no new lesion, no corticosteroid use, and stable/improved status; PR: \>=50% change in size of T1-Gd+, stable/reduced T2/FLAIR signal, no new lesion, stable/reduced corticosteroid use, and stable/improved status. PD:\>=25% increase size of T1-Gd+/increased T2/FLAIR signal/presence of new lesion/worsening status.
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against IsatuximabFrom Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure:106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)ADA responses were categorized as treatment boosted ADA and treatment-induced ADA. Treatment boosted ADA was defined as pre-existing ADAs with a significant increase in the ADA titer during the study compared to the Baseline titer. Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA that developed at any time during the ADA on-study observation period in participants without pre-existing ADA (including participants without pretreatment samples).
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against AtezolizumabFrom Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)ADA responses were categorized as treatment boosted ADA and treatment-induced ADA. Treatment boosted ADA was defined as pre-existing ADAs with a significant increase in the ADA titer during the study compared to the Baseline titer. Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA that developed at any time during the ADA on-study observation period in participants without pre-existing ADA (including participants without pretreatment samples).
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration Observed (Cmax) After the First Infusion of IsatuximabAt start of infusion (SOI), end of infusion (EOI), EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1Cmax was defined as the maximum concentration observed after the first administration calculated using the noncompartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of isatuximab.
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Concentration Observed at the End of Intravenous Infusion (Ceoi) of IsatuximabAt end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1Ceoi is the plasma concentration observed at the end of intravenous infusion of isatuximab.
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) After First Infusion of IsatuximabAt SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1Tmax was defined as the time to reach Cmax, calculated using the non-compartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of isatuximab.
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Time of Clast (Tlast) After First Infusion of IsatuximabAt SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1Tlast was defined as the time of last concentration observed above the lower limit of quantification, calculated using the non-compartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of isatuximab.
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) After First Infusion of IsatuximabAt SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration versus time curve calculated from time 0 to last quantifiable concentration. AUClast was calculated using the non-compartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of isatuximab.
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-168h) After First Infusion of IsatuximabAt SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1AUC0-168h was defined as the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to 168 hours post dose calculated using non-compartmental analysis after first infusion of isatuximab.
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of IsatuximabPre-infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 8 and Cycle 1 Day 15Ctrough was the plasma concentration of isatuximab observed just before treatment administration during repeated dosing.

Countries

Belgium, Canada, Czechia, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Taiwan, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Study was conducted at 26 active sites in 8 countries. A total of 107 participants were enrolled between 06 August 2018 and 21 July 2020 and received isatuximab in combination with atezolizumab. Study was planned to be conducted in 2 parts: Phase 1 (safety run-in) and Phase 2 (efficacy with a 2-stage design).

Pre-assignment details

Study was stopped after performance of interim analysis for 4 cohorts (Cohort A \[HCC\], Cohort B \[SCCHN\], Cohort C \[EOC\] & Cohort D-1 \[GBM\]) indicated that efficacy results observed in each cohort did not fulfill the preplanned interim analysis criteria allowing the study to move to Phase 2 Stage 2 in these 4 cohorts. Participant flow, Baseline, outcome measures and safety data were analyzed on combined Phase 1 and 2 populations.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort A: HCC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab
Participants with HCC received atezolizumab 1200 mg, Q3W, IV infusion along with isatuximab 10 mg/kg, IV infusion, once weekly for 3 weeks (i.e., on Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15 of Cycle 1) and then Q3W (i.e., on Day 1 of each 21- day treatment cycle) until disease progression, unacceptable AE, participant's decision to stop the treatment, or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks).
27
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab
Participants with SCCHN received atezolizumab 1200 mg, Q3W, IV infusion along with isatuximab 10 mg/kg, IV infusion, once weekly for 3 weeks (i.e., on Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15 of Cycle 1) and then Q3W (i.e., on Day 1 of each 21- day treatment cycle) until disease progression, unacceptable AE, participant's decision to stop the treatment, or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: 108 weeks).
29
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab
Participants with EOC received atezolizumab 1200 mg, Q3W, IV infusion along with isatuximab 10 mg/kg, IV infusion, once weekly for 3 weeks (i.e., on Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15 of Cycle 1) and then Q3W (i.e., on Day 1 of each 21- day treatment cycle) until disease progression, unacceptable AE, participant's decision to stop the treatment, or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: 61 weeks).
18
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab
Participants with GBM received atezolizumab 1200 mg, Q3W, IV infusion along with isatuximab 10 mg/kg, IV infusion, once weekly for 3 weeks (i.e., on Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15 of Cycle 1) and then Q3W (i.e., on Day 1 of each 21- day treatment cycle) until disease progression, unacceptable AE, participant's decision to stop the treatment, or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure:54 weeks).
33
Total107

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event2001
Overall StudyProgressive Disease23231831
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1301

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort A: HCC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabTotalCohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabCohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabCohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab
Age, Continuous62.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
58.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
53.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
56.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
61.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
11 Participants24 Participants0 Participants4 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants6 Participants4 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
15 Participants77 Participants29 Participants13 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants38 Participants10 Participants18 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants69 Participants23 Participants0 Participants26 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
4 / 278 / 293 / 181 / 33
other
Total, other adverse events
25 / 2724 / 2918 / 1832 / 33
serious
Total, serious adverse events
12 / 2716 / 298 / 189 / 33

Outcome results

Primary

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)

MTD was defined as the highest dose level at which no more than 1 out of 6 participants (starting dose or DL-1) or 2 out of 12 participants (starting dose) experienced a DLT related to the investigational medicinal product. DLTs: AE occurring during 1st treatment cycle, unless due to disease progression/obviously unrelated cause included: hematological abnormalities: G4 N for 7 or more consecutive days, G3 to G4 N with fever, G3 or G4 thrombocytopenia. Non-hematological abnormalities: G\>=2 AST/ ALT elevation simultaneous with G \>=2 total bilirubin elevation without cholestasis or any other reason found, G4 non-hematologic AE, G3 to 4 cytokine release syndrome, G3 non-hematological AE lasting \>3 days, delay in initiation of Cycle 2 \>14 days due to treatment related laboratory abnormalities or AEs.

Time frame: Cycle 1 (21 days)

Population: Analysis was performed on DLT evaluable population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabMaximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)10 mg/kg
Primary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters

Electrolyte parameters assessed were hyponatremia, hypernatremia, hypokalemia, hyperkalemia, hypocalcemia, hypercalcemia, hypoalbuminemia, hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia. Parameters were assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Experience version 4.03, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs.

Time frame: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)

Population: Analysis was performed on all-treated population. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants with available data for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyperkalemia: Grade 21 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyponatremia: Grade 20 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypoalbuminemia: Grade 40 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyperglycemia: Grade 40 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyperkalemia: Grade 30 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypokalemia: Grade 20 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypernatremia: Grade 20 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypoglycemia: Grade 11 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyperkalemia: Grade 40 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypokalemia: Grade 30 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypernatremia: Grade 30 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyperglycemia: Grade 31 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypocalcemia: Grade 19 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypoalbuminemia: Grade 21 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyponatremia: Grade 40 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypoglycemia: Grade 30 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypocalcemia: Grade 20 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypoalbuminemia: Grade 19 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypokalemia: Grade 40 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyperglycemia: Grade 25 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypocalcemia: Grade 30 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypoglycemia: Grade 21 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypernatremia: Grade 40 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypoalbuminemia: Grade 30 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypocalcemia: Grade 40 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypernatremia: Grade 10 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypercalcemia: Grade 31 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyperglycemia: Grade 110 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypercalcemia: Grade 11 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyperkalemia: Grade 15 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypokalemia: Grade 12 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypercalcemia: Grade 40 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypercalcemia: Grade 20 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyponatremia: Grade 31 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyponatremia: Grade 19 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypoglycemia: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypernatremia: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypercalcemia: Grade 32 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypoglycemia: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypercalcemia: Grade 41 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypoalbuminemia: Grade 17 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypokalemia: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypoglycemia: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypoalbuminemia: Grade 23 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyponatremia: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypoalbuminemia: Grade 32 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypoglycemia: Grade 13 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypoalbuminemia: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypokalemia: Grade 32 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyponatremia: Grade 112 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypernatremia: Grade 14 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypokalemia: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypernatremia: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyperkalemia: Grade 16 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyperglycemia: Grade 41 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyperkalemia: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyponatremia: Grade 34 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyperkalemia: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypernatremia: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyperglycemia: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyperkalemia: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypocalcemia: Grade 17 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyperglycemia: Grade 26 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypocalcemia: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyponatremia: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypocalcemia: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyperglycemia: Grade 17 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypocalcemia: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypercalcemia: Grade 15 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypoglycemia: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypercalcemia: Grade 22 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypokalemia: Grade 15 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypoalbuminemia: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyponatremia: Grade 18 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyponatremia: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyponatremia: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyponatremia: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypokalemia: Grade 14 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypokalemia: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypokalemia: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypokalemia: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyperkalemia: Grade 12 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyperkalemia: Grade 21 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyperkalemia: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyperkalemia: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypocalcemia: Grade 12 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypocalcemia: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypocalcemia: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypocalcemia: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypercalcemia: Grade 10 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypercalcemia: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypercalcemia: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypercalcemia: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypoalbuminemia: Grade 17 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypoalbuminemia: Grade 21 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypoalbuminemia: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypoglycemia: Grade 10 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypoglycemia: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypoglycemia: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypoglycemia: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyperglycemia: Grade 12 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyperglycemia: Grade 22 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyperglycemia: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyperglycemia: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypernatremia: Grade 10 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypernatremia: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypernatremia: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypernatremia: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypercalcemia: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypercalcemia: Grade 10 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypernatremia: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypoglycemia: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypocalcemia: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypocalcemia: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyponatremia: Grade 31 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyperglycemia: Grade 18 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypocalcemia: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypocalcemia: Grade 19 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyponatremia: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyperglycemia: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyperkalemia: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyperkalemia: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypernatremia: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyperglycemia: Grade 32 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyperkalemia: Grade 21 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyperkalemia: Grade 12 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypernatremia: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyperglycemia: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypokalemia: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypokalemia: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypokalemia: Grade 14 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypernatremia: Grade 15 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypoalbuminemia: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypoalbuminemia: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypokalemia: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypoglycemia: Grade 12 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypoalbuminemia: Grade 21 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypoalbuminemia: Grade 12 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyponatremia: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypoglycemia: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypercalcemia: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypercalcemia: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHyponatremia: Grade 14 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte ParametersHypoglycemia: Grade 30 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

DLTs: AEs occurring during 1st treatment cycle, unless due to disease progression/obviously unrelated cause which included: hematological abnormalities: Grade(G) 4 neutropenia(N) for 7 or more consecutive days, G3 to G4 N with fever (temperature greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 38.5 degree Celsius on more than 1 occasion) or microbiologically/radiographically documented infection, G3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding/ G4 thrombocytopenia. Non-hematological abnormalities: G \>=2 Aspartate transaminase (AST)/ Alanine transaminase (ALT) elevation simultaneous with G \>=2 total bilirubin elevation without initial findings of cholestasis or any other reason found, G4 non-hematologic AE, G3 to 4 cytokine release syndrome, G3 non-hematological AE lasting greater than (\>)3 days, delay in initiation of Cycle 2 \>14 days due to treatment related laboratory abnormalities/AE. Any other AE that study committee deemed to be dose-limiting, regardless of grade, was also considered DLT.

Time frame: Cycle 1 (21 days)

Population: Analysis was performed on DLT evaluable population that included participants who received planned doses of isatuximab and atezolizumab during Cycle 1 and who completed the DLT observation period.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)0 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities

Hematological parameters assessed were anemia, white blood cell (WBC) decreased, platelet count decreased, lymphocyte count decreased, and neutrophil count decreased. Parameters were assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Experience version 4.03, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs.

Time frame: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)

Population: Analysis was performed on all-treated population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants with available data for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesPlatelet count decreased: Grade 31 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesAnemia: Grade 111 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesLymphocyte count decreased: Grade 40 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesPlatelet count decreased: Grade 41 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesLymphocyte count decreased: Grade 14 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesLymphocyte count decreased: Grade 33 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesLymphocyte count decreased: Grade 28 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesAnemia: Grade 40 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesWhite blood cell decreased: Grade 19 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesAnemia: Grade 25 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesNeutrophil count decreased: Grade 30 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesWhite blood cell decreased: Grade 22 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesWhite blood cell decreased: Grade 30 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesNeutrophil count decreased: Grade 20 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesWhite blood cell decreased: Grade 40 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesNeutrophil count decreased: Grade 40 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesPlatelet count decreased: Grade 111 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesAnemia: Grade 32 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesNeutrophil count decreased: Grade 13 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesPlatelet count decreased: Grade 21 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesNeutrophil count decreased: Grade 11 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesPlatelet count decreased: Grade 31 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesWhite blood cell decreased: Grade 21 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesAnemia: Grade 212 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesNeutrophil count decreased: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesPlatelet count decreased: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesNeutrophil count decreased: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesLymphocyte count decreased: Grade 37 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesLymphocyte count decreased: Grade 44 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesLymphocyte count decreased: Grade 12 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesWhite blood cell decreased: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesLymphocyte count decreased: Grade 214 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesAnemia: Grade 113 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesPlatelet count decreased: Grade 15 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesAnemia: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesNeutrophil count decreased: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesPlatelet count decreased: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesWhite blood cell decreased: Grade 15 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesWhite blood cell decreased: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesAnemia: Grade 33 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesLymphocyte count decreased: Grade 12 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesAnemia: Grade 16 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesAnemia: Grade 26 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesAnemia: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesAnemia: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesWhite blood cell decreased: Grade 14 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesWhite blood cell decreased: Grade 22 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesWhite blood cell decreased: Grade 31 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesWhite blood cell decreased: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesPlatelet count decreased: Grade 15 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesPlatelet count decreased: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesPlatelet count decreased: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesPlatelet count decreased: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesLymphocyte count decreased: Grade 27 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesLymphocyte count decreased: Grade 34 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesLymphocyte count decreased: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesNeutrophil count decreased: Grade 10 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesNeutrophil count decreased: Grade 23 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesNeutrophil count decreased: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesNeutrophil count decreased: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesPlatelet count decreased: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesPlatelet count decreased: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesNeutrophil count decreased: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesLymphocyte count decreased: Grade 41 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesPlatelet count decreased: Grade 110 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesWhite blood cell decreased: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesAnemia: Grade 22 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesNeutrophil count decreased: Grade 11 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesWhite blood cell decreased: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesWhite blood cell decreased: Grade 23 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesAnemia: Grade 17 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesNeutrophil count decreased: Grade 22 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesWhite blood cell decreased: Grade 112 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesLymphocyte count decreased: Grade 110 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesAnemia: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesLymphocyte count decreased: Grade 212 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesAnemia: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesPlatelet count decreased: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesNeutrophil count decreased: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Hematological AbnormalitiesLymphocyte count decreased: Grade 33 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities

Abnormal liver function parameters assessed were AST increased, ALT increased, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) increased, blood bilirubin (BB) increased. Parameters were assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Experience version 4.03, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs.

Time frame: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)

Population: Analysis was performed on all-treated population. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants with available data for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesAST increased: Grade 114 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesALP increased: Grade 112 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesALT increased: Grade 111 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesALT increased: Grade 41 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesALT increased: Grade 32 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesALT increased: Grade 24 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesAST increased: Grade 41 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesAST increased: Grade 25 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesBB increased: Grade 33 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesALP increased: Grade 40 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesAST increased: Grade 33 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesBB increased: Grade 16 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesBB increased: Grade 41 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesBB increased: Grade 22 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesALP increased: Grade 28 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesALP increased: Grade 32 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesBB increased: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesBB increased: Grade 11 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesAST increased: Grade 15 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesBB increased: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesAST increased: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesBB increased: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesALT increased: Grade 18 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesALT increased: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesALT increased: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesAST increased: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesALT increased: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesALP increased: Grade 113 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesALP increased: Grade 22 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesALP increased: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesAST increased: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesALP increased: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesAST increased: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesAST increased: Grade 16 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesALP increased: Grade 31 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesALP increased: Grade 17 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesAST increased: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesBB increased: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesALP increased: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesALP increased: Grade 23 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesALT increased: Grade 21 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesBB increased: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesBB increased: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesALT increased: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesAST increased: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesALT increased: Grade 16 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesBB increased: Grade 10 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesALT increased: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesBB increased: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesAST increased: Grade 13 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesAST increased: Grade 21 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesAST increased: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesAST increased: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesALT increased: Grade 111 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesALT increased: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesALT increased: Grade 31 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesALT increased: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesALP increased: Grade 10 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesALP increased: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesALP increased: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesALP increased: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesBB increased: Grade 10 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesBB increased: Grade 22 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Liver AbnormalitiesBB increased: Grade 30 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities

Abnormal renal parameters assessed were creatinine clearance (CrCl), creatinine increased and hyperuricemia. Creatinine clearance was assessed in categories: \>=60 - less than (\<) 90 milliliters per minute per 1.73 square meter (mL/min/1.73m\^2), \>=30 - \<60 mL/min/1.73m\^2, \>=15 - \<30 mL/min/1.73m\^2 and \<15 mL/min/1.73m\^2. Parameters were assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Experience version 4.03, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs.

Time frame: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)

Population: Analysis was performed on all-treated population. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants with available data for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesHyperuricemia: Grade 20 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesHyperuricemia: Grade 41 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesCreatinine increased: Grade 40 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesCrCl: >=60 - <90 mL/min/1.73m^28 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesHyperuricemia: Grade 10 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesCrCl: >=15 - <30 mL/min/1.73m^23 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesCrCl: <15 mL/min/1.73m^20 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesCrCl: >=30 - <60mL/min/1.73m^25 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesHyperuricemia: Grade 35 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesCreatinine increased: Grade 122 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesCreatinine increased: Grade 22 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesCreatinine increased: Grade 31 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesCrCl: >=30 - <60mL/min/1.73m^24 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesCreatinine increased: Grade 31 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesCrCl: <15 mL/min/1.73m^21 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesHyperuricemia: Grade 10 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesHyperuricemia: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesCreatinine increased: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesCrCl: >=60 - <90 mL/min/1.73m^213 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesCreatinine increased: Grade 22 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesCreatinine increased: Grade 119 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesCrCl: >=15 - <30 mL/min/1.73m^20 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesHyperuricemia: Grade 41 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesHyperuricemia: Grade 37 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesCreatinine increased: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesCrCl: >=60 - <90 mL/min/1.73m^210 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesCrCl: >=30 - <60mL/min/1.73m^25 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesCrCl: >=15 - <30 mL/min/1.73m^20 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesCrCl: <15 mL/min/1.73m^20 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesCreatinine increased: Grade 113 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesCreatinine increased: Grade 22 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesCreatinine increased: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesHyperuricemia: Grade 10 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesHyperuricemia: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesHyperuricemia: Grade 35 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesHyperuricemia: Grade 41 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesCreatinine increased: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesCreatinine increased: Grade 124 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesCrCl: >=60 - <90 mL/min/1.73m^216 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesHyperuricemia: Grade 20 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesCrCl: <15 mL/min/1.73m^20 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesCrCl: >=15 - <30 mL/min/1.73m^20 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesHyperuricemia: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesHyperuricemia: Grade 33 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesCreatinine increased: Grade 40 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesCreatinine increased: Grade 30 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesCrCl: >=30 - <60mL/min/1.73m^21 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Renal Function AbnormalitiesHyperuricemia: Grade 10 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TESAEs)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the TEAE period (defined as the time from the first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment).

Time frame: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)

Population: Analysis was performed on all-treated population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TESAEs)TEAE26 Participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TESAEs)TESAE12 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TESAEs)TESAE16 Participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TESAEs)TEAE29 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TESAEs)TEAE18 Participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TESAEs)TESAE8 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TESAEs)TEAE33 Participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TESAEs)TESAE9 Participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Overall Response (OR): For HCC/SCCHN/EOC Cohorts

OR was defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) as best overall response, assessed per RECIST 1.1 criteria. Best overall response was derived per RECIST 1.1 criteria using disease assessments performed from the first dose of treatment throughout the study excluding any assessments performed after the cut-off date or following the initiation of a further anticancer treatment. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, pathological lymph nodes (target/non-target)- reduction in short axis \<10 mm; PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum, sum with an absolute increase of diameter of at least 5 mm and appearance of \>1 new lesion.

Time frame: From randomization until disease progression, or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)

Population: Analysis was performed on all-treated population. Data for this outcome measure was not planned to be collected and analyzed for GBM Cohort as pre-specified in protocol.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPercentage of Participants With Overall Response (OR): For HCC/SCCHN/EOC Cohorts7.4 percentage of participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPercentage of Participants With Overall Response (OR): For HCC/SCCHN/EOC Cohorts13.8 percentage of participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPercentage of Participants With Overall Response (OR): For HCC/SCCHN/EOC Cohorts5.6 percentage of participants
Primary

Probability of Participants With Progression Free Survival at 6 Months (PFS-6): GBM Cohort

PFS-6 was defined as the probability of participants alive without disease progression at 6 months as assessed by RANO criteria. Participants who didn't experience documented progression or death before analysis cut-off date or date of initiation of new anticancer treatment, PFS was censored at date of last valid disease assessment not showing progression performed prior to initiation of further anticancer treatment or analysis cut-off date, whichever was 1st. Per RANO criteria, progressive disease was defined as \>=25% increase size of T1- gadolinium enhancing disease, or increased T2/FLAIR signal, or presence of new lesion, or worsening clinical status. PFS-6 was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: From randomization until 6 months after the last participant's first treatment in the GBM Cohort D-1

Population: Analysis was performed on all-treated population. Data for this outcome measure was not planned to be collected and analyzed for Cohorts A: HCC, Cohort B: SCCHN and Cohort C: EOC as pre-specified in protocol.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabProbability of Participants With Progression Free Survival at 6 Months (PFS-6): GBM Cohort0.033 probability of participants
Primary

Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D)

RP2D was the starting dose selected for Phase 2 part of the study. RP2D was the selected dose at which no more than 1 out of 6 participants (starting dose or dose level minus -1 \[DL-1\]) or 2 out of 12 participants (starting dose) experienced a DLT related to the investigational medicinal product. DLTs: Adverse Event (AE) occurring during 1st treatment cycle, unless due to disease progression/obviously unrelated cause included: hematological abnormalities: G4 N for 7/ more consecutive days, G3 to G4 N with fever, G3/G4 thrombocytopenia. Non-hematological abnormalities: G\>=2 AST/ALT elevation simultaneous with G \>=2 total bilirubin elevation without cholestasis or any other reason found, G4 non-hematologic AE, G3 to 4 cytokine release syndrome, G3 non-hematological AE lasting \>3 days, delay in initiation of Cycle 2 \>14 days due to treatment related laboratory abnormalities/AE.

Time frame: Cycle 1 (21 days)

Population: Analysis was performed on DLT evaluable population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabRecommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D)10 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)
Secondary

Best Percent Change From Baseline in Tumor Burden

Best tumor burden change was defined as the best percent-change from baseline in a sum of the diameters (longest for non-nodal lesion, short axis for nodal lesions) for all target lesions.

Time frame: From randomization until progression or death or study cut-off date whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)

Population: Analysis was performed on all-treated population. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants with available data for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabBest Percent Change From Baseline in Tumor Burden6.2 percent changeStandard Deviation 31.5
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabBest Percent Change From Baseline in Tumor Burden-3.4 percent changeStandard Deviation 41.6
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabBest Percent Change From Baseline in Tumor Burden16.2 percent changeStandard Deviation 51.1
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabBest Percent Change From Baseline in Tumor Burden196.6 percent changeStandard Deviation 347.5
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR)

Time from date of 1st response until date of first documented recurrent/progressive disease (PD) or death whichever occurred 1st. In absence of disease progression or death before analysis cut-off date or date of initiation of further anticancer treatment, DOR was censored at date of last valid response. RECIST 1.1 criteria was used for assessment in HCC/SCCHN/EOC Cohorts and RANO criteria for GBM Cohort. Per RECIST 1.1, CR: disappearance of all target lesions; PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions. Per RANO criteria; CR: no change in size of T1-Gd+ disease, stable/reduced T2/FLAIR signal, no new lesion, no corticosteroid use, and stable/improved status; PR: \>=50% change in size of T1-Gd+, stable/reduced T2/FLAIR signal, no new lesion, stable/reduced corticosteroid use, and stable/improved status. PD:\>=25% increase size of T1-Gd+/increased T2/FLAIR signal/presence of new lesion/worsening status.

Time frame: From the date of first response until disease progression or death, or study cut-off date whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)

Population: Analysis was performed on all treated population. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants with available data for this outcome measure and '0' in 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies that no participant in the Cohort D-1 achieved any response, and hence, no DOR was analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabDuration of Response (DOR)7.5 monthsStandard Deviation 3
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabDuration of Response (DOR)20.6 monthsStandard Deviation 7.3
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabDuration of Response (DOR)10.4 months
Secondary

Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against Atezolizumab

ADA responses were categorized as treatment boosted ADA and treatment-induced ADA. Treatment boosted ADA was defined as pre-existing ADAs with a significant increase in the ADA titer during the study compared to the Baseline titer. Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA that developed at any time during the ADA on-study observation period in participants without pre-existing ADA (including participants without pretreatment samples).

Time frame: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)

Population: Analysis was performed on ADA evaluable population. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants with available data for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against AtezolizumabTreatment-induced ADA2 count of participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against AtezolizumabTreatment boosted ADA0 count of participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against AtezolizumabTreatment boosted ADA0 count of participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against AtezolizumabTreatment-induced ADA2 count of participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against AtezolizumabTreatment-induced ADA1 count of participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against AtezolizumabTreatment boosted ADA0 count of participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against AtezolizumabTreatment-induced ADA0 count of participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against AtezolizumabTreatment boosted ADA0 count of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against Isatuximab

ADA responses were categorized as treatment boosted ADA and treatment-induced ADA. Treatment boosted ADA was defined as pre-existing ADAs with a significant increase in the ADA titer during the study compared to the Baseline titer. Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA that developed at any time during the ADA on-study observation period in participants without pre-existing ADA (including participants without pretreatment samples).

Time frame: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure:106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)

Population: Analysis was performed on ADA evaluable population which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment with at least 1 non-missing ADA result after the drug administration. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants with available data for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against IsatuximabTreatment-induced ADA2 count of participants
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against IsatuximabTreatment boosted ADA0 count of participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against IsatuximabTreatment boosted ADA0 count of participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against IsatuximabTreatment-induced ADA0 count of participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against IsatuximabTreatment-induced ADA1 count of participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against IsatuximabTreatment boosted ADA0 count of participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against IsatuximabTreatment-induced ADA1 count of participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against IsatuximabTreatment boosted ADA0 count of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Disease Control (DC) >=6 Months

DC: percentage of participants with complete response (CR), partial response (PR) & stable disease (SD) rate. RANO criteria, CR: no change in size of T1-gadolinium-enhancing (T1-Gd+) disease, stable/ reduced (red) T2/FLAIR signal, no new lesion (NL), no corticosteroid use (CU) & stable/ red clinical status (CS); PR: \>=50% change in size of T1-Gd+ disease, stable/red T2/FLAIR signal, no NL, stable/ red CU & stable/ improved CS (ICS). SD: \<50% reduction to \<25% increase (inc) size of T1-Gd+ disease, stable/red T2/FLAIR signal, no NL, stable/red CU & stable/ICS. Progressive disease (PD): \>=25% inc size of T1-Gd+ disease/ inc T2/FLAIR signal/ presence of NL/ worsening CS. RECIST criteria: CR: Disappearance of target lesions. Reduction in short axis to \<10 mm of lymph nodes; PR: 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions; PD: 20% inc in sum of diameters of target lesions; SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage from baseline study to qualify for PR nor sufficient inc to qualify for PD.

Time frame: From the date of first response to disease progression or death, or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)

Population: Analysis was performed on all-treated population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPercentage of Participants With Disease Control (DC) >=6 Months37.0 percentage of participants
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPercentage of Participants With Disease Control (DC) >=6 Months41.4 percentage of participants
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPercentage of Participants With Disease Control (DC) >=6 Months33.3 percentage of participants
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPercentage of Participants With Disease Control (DC) >=6 Months3.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Response as Per Response Assessment for Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Criteria: GBM Cohort

Response rate for participants with GBM was defined as percentage of participants with CR & PR as best overall response (BOR), assessed by Investigators using RANO criteria. BOR was derived per RANO criteria using disease assessments performed from 1st dose of treatment through study excluding any assessments performed after cut-off date or following initiation of further anticancer treatment. Per RANO criteria; CR was defined as no change in size of T1-gadolinium-enhancing (T1-Gd+) disease, stable or reduced T2/FLAIR signal, no new lesion, no corticosteroid use, and stable or improved clinical status; PR was defined as \>=50% change in size of T1-Gd+ disease, stable or reduced T2/FLAIR signal, no new lesion, stable or reduced corticosteroid use, and stable or improved clinical status. Progressive disease was defined as \>=25% increase size of T1-Gd+ disease, or increased T2/FLAIR signal, or presence of new lesion, or worsening clinical status.

Time frame: From randomization until progression, or death, or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)

Population: Analysis was performed on all-treated population. Data for this outcome measure was not collected and analyzed for Cohort A, B and C because the RANO criteria for the assessment of response could not be used to assess the response for solid tumors such as HCC, SCCHN and EOC.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPercentage of Participants With Response as Per Response Assessment for Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Criteria: GBM Cohort0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) After First Infusion of Isatuximab

AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration versus time curve calculated from time 0 to last quantifiable concentration. AUClast was calculated using the non-compartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of isatuximab.

Time frame: At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Population: Analysis was performed on PK population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) After First Infusion of Isatuximab20000 micrograms*hour/milliliter (mcg*h/mL)Standard Deviation 4570
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) After First Infusion of Isatuximab19700 micrograms*hour/milliliter (mcg*h/mL)Standard Deviation 4500
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) After First Infusion of Isatuximab24400 micrograms*hour/milliliter (mcg*h/mL)Standard Deviation 7120
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) After First Infusion of Isatuximab26300 micrograms*hour/milliliter (mcg*h/mL)Standard Deviation 6510
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-168h) After First Infusion of Isatuximab

AUC0-168h was defined as the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to 168 hours post dose calculated using non-compartmental analysis after first infusion of isatuximab.

Time frame: At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Population: Analysis was performed on PK population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-168h) After First Infusion of Isatuximab20200 mcg*h/mLStandard Deviation 4510
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-168h) After First Infusion of Isatuximab19800 mcg*h/mLStandard Deviation 4590
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-168h) After First Infusion of Isatuximab24300 mcg*h/mLStandard Deviation 6500
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-168h) After First Infusion of Isatuximab26400 mcg*h/mLStandard Deviation 6270
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Concentration Observed at the End of Intravenous Infusion (Ceoi) of Isatuximab

Ceoi is the plasma concentration observed at the end of intravenous infusion of isatuximab.

Time frame: At end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1

Population: Analysis was performed on PK population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Concentration Observed at the End of Intravenous Infusion (Ceoi) of Isatuximab216 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 50.8
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Concentration Observed at the End of Intravenous Infusion (Ceoi) of Isatuximab207 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 54.9
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Concentration Observed at the End of Intravenous Infusion (Ceoi) of Isatuximab251 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 77.3
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Concentration Observed at the End of Intravenous Infusion (Ceoi) of Isatuximab263 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 68.8
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Clast) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab

Clast was defined as the last concentration of isatuximab observed above the lower limit of quantification.

Time frame: At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Population: Analysis was performed on PK population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Clast) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab75.9 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 35.3
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Clast) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab67.8 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 20.4
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Clast) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab86.0 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 22.2
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Clast) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab103 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 28.4
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration Observed (Cmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab

Cmax was defined as the maximum concentration observed after the first administration calculated using the noncompartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of isatuximab.

Time frame: At start of infusion (SOI), end of infusion (EOI), EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Population: Analysis was performed on PK population which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study treatment with at least one reportable concentration after the study drug administration.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration Observed (Cmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab219 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 50.5
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration Observed (Cmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab218 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 48.7
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration Observed (Cmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab262 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 69.7
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration Observed (Cmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab266 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL)Standard Deviation 66.7
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Time of Clast (Tlast) After First Infusion of Isatuximab

Tlast was defined as the time of last concentration observed above the lower limit of quantification, calculated using the non-compartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of isatuximab.

Time frame: At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Population: Analysis was performed on PK population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Time of Clast (Tlast) After First Infusion of Isatuximab166 hours
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Time of Clast (Tlast) After First Infusion of Isatuximab167 hours
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Time of Clast (Tlast) After First Infusion of Isatuximab167 hours
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Time of Clast (Tlast) After First Infusion of Isatuximab166 hours
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) After First Infusion of Isatuximab

Tmax was defined as the time to reach Cmax, calculated using the non-compartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of isatuximab.

Time frame: At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1

Population: Analysis was performed on PK population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) After First Infusion of Isatuximab4.00 hours
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) After First Infusion of Isatuximab3.37 hours
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) After First Infusion of Isatuximab6.83 hours
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) After First Infusion of Isatuximab4.13 hours
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Isatuximab

Ctrough was the plasma concentration of isatuximab observed just before treatment administration during repeated dosing.

Time frame: Pre-infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 8 and Cycle 1 Day 15

Population: Analysis was performed on participants who received at least 1 dose of the study treatment with at least one reportable concentration after drug administration; and were ADA negative (i.e., participants without any treatment induced or treatment boosted ADA-positive sample during the treatment or follow-up observation period). Here 'Number analyzed' signifies participants with available data for each specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of IsatuximabCycle 1 Day 15153 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 46.8
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of IsatuximabCycle 1 Day 10 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 0
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of IsatuximabCycle 1 Day 867.4 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 20
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of IsatuximabCycle 1 Day 10 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 0
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of IsatuximabCycle 1 Day 871.0 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 25.9
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of IsatuximabCycle 1 Day 15121 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 25.6
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of IsatuximabCycle 1 Day 15176 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 33.6
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of IsatuximabCycle 1 Day 888.6 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 21.8
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of IsatuximabCycle 1 Day 10 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 0
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of IsatuximabCycle 1 Day 15231 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 102
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of IsatuximabCycle 1 Day 899.9 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 26.9
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabPharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of IsatuximabCycle 1 Day 10 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Plasma Concentration of Atezolizumab

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 8 Day 1 and Cycle 16 Day 1

Population: Data for the plasma concentration of atezolizumab is not reported because no sample was collected after study termination and analyzed as the study did not fulfil the predefined criteria for Atezolizumab PK analysis.

Secondary

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as time (in months) from 1st study treatment administration to date of 1st documented radiographic progression or date of death from any cause, whichever was 1st. Participants who didn't experience progression or death before analysis cut-off date/date of initiation of new anticancer treatment, PFS was censored at date of last valid disease assessment not showing progression performed prior to initiation of further anticancer treatment or analysis cut-off date, whichever was 1st. RECIST 1.1 criteria was used for assessment in HCC/SCCHN/EOC Cohorts and RANO criteria for GBM Cohort. Per RECIST 1.1 criteria, PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum on study. Appearance of 1 or more new lesions was also considered progression. Per RANO criteria, PD: \>=25% increase in product of perpendicular diameters of any target lesion, or worsening neurologic status not explained by causes unrelated to tumor progression.

Time frame: From date of first study treatment administration until disease progression or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)

Population: Analysis was performed on all-treated population. Kaplan-Meier method was used for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Isatuximab + AtezolizumabProgression-free Survival (PFS)2.04 months
Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabProgression-free Survival (PFS)2.10 months
Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabProgression-free Survival (PFS)2.04 months
Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + AtezolizumabProgression-free Survival (PFS)1.28 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026