Neoplasm
Conditions
Keywords
Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody
Brief summary
Primary Objectives: * Phase 1: To characterize the safety and tolerability of isatuximab in combination with atezolizumab in participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), platinum-refractory recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), platinum-resistant/refractory epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), or recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), and to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). * Phase 2: To assess response rate (RR) of isatuximab in combination with atezolizumab in participants with HCC or SCCHN or EOC. * Phase 2: To assess the progression free survival rate at 6 months (PFS-6) of isatuximab in combination with atezolizumab, or as a single agent in participants with GBM. Secondary Objectives: * To evaluate the safety profile of isatuximab monotherapy (GBM only), or in combination with atezolizumab in Phase 2. * To evaluate the immunogenicity of isatuximab and atezolizumab. * To characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of isatuximab single agent (GBM only) and atezolizumab in combination with isatuximab. * To assess the overall efficacy of isatuximab in combination with atezolizumab, or single agent (GBM only).
Detailed description
The total study duration per participant was up to 28 months including up to 28 days screening period, up to 24 months treatment period, and a 3 month safety follow up period.
Interventions
Pharmaceutical form: solution for infusion Route of administration: intravenous
Pharmaceutical form: solution for infusion Route of administration: intravenous
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Participants must have a known diagnosis of either unresectable HCC, platinum-refractory recurrent/metastatic SCCHN, platinum-resistant/refractory EOC with evidence of measurable disease or recurrent GBM. * Greater than or equal to (\>=)18 years of age. * For participants with HCC: Documentation of progressive disease (PD) during or after treatment with either sorafenib or lenvatinib, or intolerance to the therapy. * For participants with SCCHN: Received and failed up to 2 lines of prior systemic anti-cancer therapy with documentation of tumor recurrence or PD within 6 months of last platinum-based therapy in primary, recurrent, or metastatic setting. * For participants with EOC: Received up to 3 lines of prior platinum-containing therapy when the disease was platinum-sensitive, and the participants should not have received any systemic therapy for platinum-resistant/refractory disease. Specific to France only: Documentation of PD on or after 1 line of anti-cancer therapy for platinum resistant/refractory disease (unless participants are ineligible or intolerant to standard of care for platinum-resistant/refractory disease). * For participants with GBM: Documentation of PD or first recurrence during or after temozolomide maintenance therapy for newly diagnosed GBM treated with 1st line radiotherapy plus concurrent temozolomide.
Exclusion criteria
* Prior exposure to agent that blocks CD38 or participation in clinical studies with isatuximab. * For participants with HCC, SCCHN, EOC or GBM prior exposure to any agent (approved or investigational) that blocks the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway. * Evidence of other immune related disease /conditions. * History of non-infectious pneumonitis requiring steroids or current pneumonitis; history of the thoracic radiation. * Received a live-virus vaccination within 28 days of planned treatment start. Seasonal flu vaccines that do not contain live virus are permitted. * Prior solid organ or bone marrow transplantation. * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status \>=2 for participants with HCC, SCCHN or EOC or Karnofsky performance score less than or equal to (\<=) 70 for participants with GBM. * Poor bone marrow reserve. * Poor organ function. The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) | Cycle 1 (21 days) | DLTs: AEs occurring during 1st treatment cycle, unless due to disease progression/obviously unrelated cause which included: hematological abnormalities: Grade(G) 4 neutropenia(N) for 7 or more consecutive days, G3 to G4 N with fever (temperature greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 38.5 degree Celsius on more than 1 occasion) or microbiologically/radiographically documented infection, G3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding/ G4 thrombocytopenia. Non-hematological abnormalities: G \>=2 Aspartate transaminase (AST)/ Alanine transaminase (ALT) elevation simultaneous with G \>=2 total bilirubin elevation without initial findings of cholestasis or any other reason found, G4 non-hematologic AE, G3 to 4 cytokine release syndrome, G3 non-hematological AE lasting greater than (\>)3 days, delay in initiation of Cycle 2 \>14 days due to treatment related laboratory abnormalities/AE. Any other AE that study committee deemed to be dose-limiting, regardless of grade, was also considered DLT. |
| Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) | Cycle 1 (21 days) | RP2D was the starting dose selected for Phase 2 part of the study. RP2D was the selected dose at which no more than 1 out of 6 participants (starting dose or dose level minus -1 \[DL-1\]) or 2 out of 12 participants (starting dose) experienced a DLT related to the investigational medicinal product. DLTs: Adverse Event (AE) occurring during 1st treatment cycle, unless due to disease progression/obviously unrelated cause included: hematological abnormalities: G4 N for 7/ more consecutive days, G3 to G4 N with fever, G3/G4 thrombocytopenia. Non-hematological abnormalities: G\>=2 AST/ALT elevation simultaneous with G \>=2 total bilirubin elevation without cholestasis or any other reason found, G4 non-hematologic AE, G3 to 4 cytokine release syndrome, G3 non-hematological AE lasting \>3 days, delay in initiation of Cycle 2 \>14 days due to treatment related laboratory abnormalities/AE. |
| Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) | Cycle 1 (21 days) | MTD was defined as the highest dose level at which no more than 1 out of 6 participants (starting dose or DL-1) or 2 out of 12 participants (starting dose) experienced a DLT related to the investigational medicinal product. DLTs: AE occurring during 1st treatment cycle, unless due to disease progression/obviously unrelated cause included: hematological abnormalities: G4 N for 7 or more consecutive days, G3 to G4 N with fever, G3 or G4 thrombocytopenia. Non-hematological abnormalities: G\>=2 AST/ ALT elevation simultaneous with G \>=2 total bilirubin elevation without cholestasis or any other reason found, G4 non-hematologic AE, G3 to 4 cytokine release syndrome, G3 non-hematological AE lasting \>3 days, delay in initiation of Cycle 2 \>14 days due to treatment related laboratory abnormalities or AEs. |
| Percentage of Participants With Overall Response (OR): For HCC/SCCHN/EOC Cohorts | From randomization until disease progression, or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks) | OR was defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) as best overall response, assessed per RECIST 1.1 criteria. Best overall response was derived per RECIST 1.1 criteria using disease assessments performed from the first dose of treatment throughout the study excluding any assessments performed after the cut-off date or following the initiation of a further anticancer treatment. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, pathological lymph nodes (target/non-target)- reduction in short axis \<10 mm; PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum, sum with an absolute increase of diameter of at least 5 mm and appearance of \>1 new lesion. |
| Probability of Participants With Progression Free Survival at 6 Months (PFS-6): GBM Cohort | From randomization until 6 months after the last participant's first treatment in the GBM Cohort D-1 | PFS-6 was defined as the probability of participants alive without disease progression at 6 months as assessed by RANO criteria. Participants who didn't experience documented progression or death before analysis cut-off date or date of initiation of new anticancer treatment, PFS was censored at date of last valid disease assessment not showing progression performed prior to initiation of further anticancer treatment or analysis cut-off date, whichever was 1st. Per RANO criteria, progressive disease was defined as \>=25% increase size of T1- gadolinium enhancing disease, or increased T2/FLAIR signal, or presence of new lesion, or worsening clinical status. PFS-6 was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TESAEs) | From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1) | An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the TEAE period (defined as the time from the first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment). |
| Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1) | Hematological parameters assessed were anemia, white blood cell (WBC) decreased, platelet count decreased, lymphocyte count decreased, and neutrophil count decreased. Parameters were assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Experience version 4.03, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs. |
| Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1) | Electrolyte parameters assessed were hyponatremia, hypernatremia, hypokalemia, hyperkalemia, hypocalcemia, hypercalcemia, hypoalbuminemia, hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia. Parameters were assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Experience version 4.03, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs. |
| Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1) | Abnormal renal parameters assessed were creatinine clearance (CrCl), creatinine increased and hyperuricemia. Creatinine clearance was assessed in categories: \>=60 - less than (\<) 90 milliliters per minute per 1.73 square meter (mL/min/1.73m\^2), \>=30 - \<60 mL/min/1.73m\^2, \>=15 - \<30 mL/min/1.73m\^2 and \<15 mL/min/1.73m\^2. Parameters were assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Experience version 4.03, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs. |
| Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1) | Abnormal liver function parameters assessed were AST increased, ALT increased, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) increased, blood bilirubin (BB) increased. Parameters were assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Experience version 4.03, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Plasma Concentration of Atezolizumab | Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 8 Day 1 and Cycle 16 Day 1 | — |
| Best Percent Change From Baseline in Tumor Burden | From randomization until progression or death or study cut-off date whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks) | Best tumor burden change was defined as the best percent-change from baseline in a sum of the diameters (longest for non-nodal lesion, short axis for nodal lesions) for all target lesions. |
| Percentage of Participants With Disease Control (DC) >=6 Months | From the date of first response to disease progression or death, or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks) | DC: percentage of participants with complete response (CR), partial response (PR) & stable disease (SD) rate. RANO criteria, CR: no change in size of T1-gadolinium-enhancing (T1-Gd+) disease, stable/ reduced (red) T2/FLAIR signal, no new lesion (NL), no corticosteroid use (CU) & stable/ red clinical status (CS); PR: \>=50% change in size of T1-Gd+ disease, stable/red T2/FLAIR signal, no NL, stable/ red CU & stable/ improved CS (ICS). SD: \<50% reduction to \<25% increase (inc) size of T1-Gd+ disease, stable/red T2/FLAIR signal, no NL, stable/red CU & stable/ICS. Progressive disease (PD): \>=25% inc size of T1-Gd+ disease/ inc T2/FLAIR signal/ presence of NL/ worsening CS. RECIST criteria: CR: Disappearance of target lesions. Reduction in short axis to \<10 mm of lymph nodes; PR: 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions; PD: 20% inc in sum of diameters of target lesions; SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage from baseline study to qualify for PR nor sufficient inc to qualify for PD. |
| Pharmacokinetics (PK): Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Clast) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 | Clast was defined as the last concentration of isatuximab observed above the lower limit of quantification. |
| Progression-free Survival (PFS) | From date of first study treatment administration until disease progression or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks) | PFS was defined as time (in months) from 1st study treatment administration to date of 1st documented radiographic progression or date of death from any cause, whichever was 1st. Participants who didn't experience progression or death before analysis cut-off date/date of initiation of new anticancer treatment, PFS was censored at date of last valid disease assessment not showing progression performed prior to initiation of further anticancer treatment or analysis cut-off date, whichever was 1st. RECIST 1.1 criteria was used for assessment in HCC/SCCHN/EOC Cohorts and RANO criteria for GBM Cohort. Per RECIST 1.1 criteria, PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum on study. Appearance of 1 or more new lesions was also considered progression. Per RANO criteria, PD: \>=25% increase in product of perpendicular diameters of any target lesion, or worsening neurologic status not explained by causes unrelated to tumor progression. |
| Percentage of Participants With Response as Per Response Assessment for Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Criteria: GBM Cohort | From randomization until progression, or death, or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: 54 weeks for Cohort D-1) | Response rate for participants with GBM was defined as percentage of participants with CR & PR as best overall response (BOR), assessed by Investigators using RANO criteria. BOR was derived per RANO criteria using disease assessments performed from 1st dose of treatment through study excluding any assessments performed after cut-off date or following initiation of further anticancer treatment. Per RANO criteria; CR was defined as no change in size of T1-gadolinium-enhancing (T1-Gd+) disease, stable or reduced T2/FLAIR signal, no new lesion, no corticosteroid use, and stable or improved clinical status; PR was defined as \>=50% change in size of T1-Gd+ disease, stable or reduced T2/FLAIR signal, no new lesion, stable or reduced corticosteroid use, and stable or improved clinical status. Progressive disease was defined as \>=25% increase size of T1-Gd+ disease, or increased T2/FLAIR signal, or presence of new lesion, or worsening clinical status. |
| Duration of Response (DOR) | From the date of first response until disease progression or death, or study cut-off date whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks) | Time from date of 1st response until date of first documented recurrent/progressive disease (PD) or death whichever occurred 1st. In absence of disease progression or death before analysis cut-off date or date of initiation of further anticancer treatment, DOR was censored at date of last valid response. RECIST 1.1 criteria was used for assessment in HCC/SCCHN/EOC Cohorts and RANO criteria for GBM Cohort. Per RECIST 1.1, CR: disappearance of all target lesions; PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions. Per RANO criteria; CR: no change in size of T1-Gd+ disease, stable/reduced T2/FLAIR signal, no new lesion, no corticosteroid use, and stable/improved status; PR: \>=50% change in size of T1-Gd+, stable/reduced T2/FLAIR signal, no new lesion, stable/reduced corticosteroid use, and stable/improved status. PD:\>=25% increase size of T1-Gd+/increased T2/FLAIR signal/presence of new lesion/worsening status. |
| Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against Isatuximab | From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure:106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1) | ADA responses were categorized as treatment boosted ADA and treatment-induced ADA. Treatment boosted ADA was defined as pre-existing ADAs with a significant increase in the ADA titer during the study compared to the Baseline titer. Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA that developed at any time during the ADA on-study observation period in participants without pre-existing ADA (including participants without pretreatment samples). |
| Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against Atezolizumab | From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1) | ADA responses were categorized as treatment boosted ADA and treatment-induced ADA. Treatment boosted ADA was defined as pre-existing ADAs with a significant increase in the ADA titer during the study compared to the Baseline titer. Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA that developed at any time during the ADA on-study observation period in participants without pre-existing ADA (including participants without pretreatment samples). |
| Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration Observed (Cmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | At start of infusion (SOI), end of infusion (EOI), EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 | Cmax was defined as the maximum concentration observed after the first administration calculated using the noncompartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of isatuximab. |
| Pharmacokinetics (PK): Concentration Observed at the End of Intravenous Infusion (Ceoi) of Isatuximab | At end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1 | Ceoi is the plasma concentration observed at the end of intravenous infusion of isatuximab. |
| Pharmacokinetics (PK): Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) After First Infusion of Isatuximab | At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 | Tmax was defined as the time to reach Cmax, calculated using the non-compartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of isatuximab. |
| Pharmacokinetics (PK): Time of Clast (Tlast) After First Infusion of Isatuximab | At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 | Tlast was defined as the time of last concentration observed above the lower limit of quantification, calculated using the non-compartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of isatuximab. |
| Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) After First Infusion of Isatuximab | At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 | AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration versus time curve calculated from time 0 to last quantifiable concentration. AUClast was calculated using the non-compartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of isatuximab. |
| Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-168h) After First Infusion of Isatuximab | At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1 | AUC0-168h was defined as the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to 168 hours post dose calculated using non-compartmental analysis after first infusion of isatuximab. |
| Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Pre-infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 8 and Cycle 1 Day 15 | Ctrough was the plasma concentration of isatuximab observed just before treatment administration during repeated dosing. |
Countries
Belgium, Canada, Czechia, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Taiwan, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Study was conducted at 26 active sites in 8 countries. A total of 107 participants were enrolled between 06 August 2018 and 21 July 2020 and received isatuximab in combination with atezolizumab. Study was planned to be conducted in 2 parts: Phase 1 (safety run-in) and Phase 2 (efficacy with a 2-stage design).
Pre-assignment details
Study was stopped after performance of interim analysis for 4 cohorts (Cohort A \[HCC\], Cohort B \[SCCHN\], Cohort C \[EOC\] & Cohort D-1 \[GBM\]) indicated that efficacy results observed in each cohort did not fulfill the preplanned interim analysis criteria allowing the study to move to Phase 2 Stage 2 in these 4 cohorts. Participant flow, Baseline, outcome measures and safety data were analyzed on combined Phase 1 and 2 populations.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Cohort A: HCC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab Participants with HCC received atezolizumab 1200 mg, Q3W, IV infusion along with isatuximab 10 mg/kg, IV infusion, once weekly for 3 weeks (i.e., on Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15 of Cycle 1) and then Q3W (i.e., on Day 1 of each 21- day treatment cycle) until disease progression, unacceptable AE, participant's decision to stop the treatment, or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks). | 27 |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab Participants with SCCHN received atezolizumab 1200 mg, Q3W, IV infusion along with isatuximab 10 mg/kg, IV infusion, once weekly for 3 weeks (i.e., on Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15 of Cycle 1) and then Q3W (i.e., on Day 1 of each 21- day treatment cycle) until disease progression, unacceptable AE, participant's decision to stop the treatment, or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: 108 weeks). | 29 |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab Participants with EOC received atezolizumab 1200 mg, Q3W, IV infusion along with isatuximab 10 mg/kg, IV infusion, once weekly for 3 weeks (i.e., on Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15 of Cycle 1) and then Q3W (i.e., on Day 1 of each 21- day treatment cycle) until disease progression, unacceptable AE, participant's decision to stop the treatment, or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: 61 weeks). | 18 |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab Participants with GBM received atezolizumab 1200 mg, Q3W, IV infusion along with isatuximab 10 mg/kg, IV infusion, once weekly for 3 weeks (i.e., on Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15 of Cycle 1) and then Q3W (i.e., on Day 1 of each 21- day treatment cycle) until disease progression, unacceptable AE, participant's decision to stop the treatment, or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure:54 weeks). | 33 |
| Total | 107 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Progressive Disease | 23 | 23 | 18 | 31 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Cohort A: HCC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Total | Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 62.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8 | 58.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12 | 53.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3 | 56.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6 | 61.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 11 Participants | 24 Participants | 0 Participants | 4 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 1 Participants | 6 Participants | 4 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 15 Participants | 77 Participants | 29 Participants | 13 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 7 Participants | 38 Participants | 10 Participants | 18 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 20 Participants | 69 Participants | 23 Participants | 0 Participants | 26 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 4 / 27 | 8 / 29 | 3 / 18 | 1 / 33 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 25 / 27 | 24 / 29 | 18 / 18 | 32 / 33 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 12 / 27 | 16 / 29 | 8 / 18 | 9 / 33 |
Outcome results
Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)
MTD was defined as the highest dose level at which no more than 1 out of 6 participants (starting dose or DL-1) or 2 out of 12 participants (starting dose) experienced a DLT related to the investigational medicinal product. DLTs: AE occurring during 1st treatment cycle, unless due to disease progression/obviously unrelated cause included: hematological abnormalities: G4 N for 7 or more consecutive days, G3 to G4 N with fever, G3 or G4 thrombocytopenia. Non-hematological abnormalities: G\>=2 AST/ ALT elevation simultaneous with G \>=2 total bilirubin elevation without cholestasis or any other reason found, G4 non-hematologic AE, G3 to 4 cytokine release syndrome, G3 non-hematological AE lasting \>3 days, delay in initiation of Cycle 2 \>14 days due to treatment related laboratory abnormalities or AEs.
Time frame: Cycle 1 (21 days)
Population: Analysis was performed on DLT evaluable population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) | 10 mg/kg |
Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters
Electrolyte parameters assessed were hyponatremia, hypernatremia, hypokalemia, hyperkalemia, hypocalcemia, hypercalcemia, hypoalbuminemia, hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia. Parameters were assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Experience version 4.03, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs.
Time frame: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Population: Analysis was performed on all-treated population. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants with available data for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyperkalemia: Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyponatremia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyperglycemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyperkalemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypokalemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypernatremia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypoglycemia: Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyperkalemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypokalemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypernatremia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyperglycemia: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypocalcemia: Grade 1 | 9 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyponatremia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypoglycemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypocalcemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 1 | 9 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypokalemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyperglycemia: Grade 2 | 5 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypocalcemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypoglycemia: Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypernatremia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypocalcemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypernatremia: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypercalcemia: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyperglycemia: Grade 1 | 10 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypercalcemia: Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyperkalemia: Grade 1 | 5 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypokalemia: Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypercalcemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypercalcemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyponatremia: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyponatremia: Grade 1 | 9 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypoglycemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypernatremia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypercalcemia: Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypoglycemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypercalcemia: Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 1 | 7 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypokalemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypoglycemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 2 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyponatremia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypoglycemia: Grade 1 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypokalemia: Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyponatremia: Grade 1 | 12 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypernatremia: Grade 1 | 4 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypokalemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypernatremia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyperkalemia: Grade 1 | 6 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyperglycemia: Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyperkalemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyponatremia: Grade 3 | 4 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyperkalemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypernatremia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyperglycemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyperkalemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypocalcemia: Grade 1 | 7 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyperglycemia: Grade 2 | 6 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypocalcemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyponatremia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypocalcemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyperglycemia: Grade 1 | 7 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypocalcemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypercalcemia: Grade 1 | 5 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypoglycemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypercalcemia: Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypokalemia: Grade 1 | 5 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyponatremia: Grade 1 | 8 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyponatremia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyponatremia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyponatremia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypokalemia: Grade 1 | 4 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypokalemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypokalemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypokalemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyperkalemia: Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyperkalemia: Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyperkalemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyperkalemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypocalcemia: Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypocalcemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypocalcemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypocalcemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypercalcemia: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypercalcemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypercalcemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypercalcemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 1 | 7 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypoglycemia: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypoglycemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypoglycemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypoglycemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyperglycemia: Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyperglycemia: Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyperglycemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyperglycemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypernatremia: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypernatremia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypernatremia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypernatremia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypercalcemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypercalcemia: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypernatremia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypoglycemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypocalcemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypocalcemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyponatremia: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyperglycemia: Grade 1 | 8 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypocalcemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypocalcemia: Grade 1 | 9 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyponatremia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyperglycemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyperkalemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyperkalemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypernatremia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyperglycemia: Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyperkalemia: Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyperkalemia: Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypernatremia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyperglycemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypokalemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypokalemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypokalemia: Grade 1 | 4 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypernatremia: Grade 1 | 5 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypokalemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypoglycemia: Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyponatremia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypoglycemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypercalcemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypercalcemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hyponatremia: Grade 1 | 4 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrolyte Parameters | Hypoglycemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
DLTs: AEs occurring during 1st treatment cycle, unless due to disease progression/obviously unrelated cause which included: hematological abnormalities: Grade(G) 4 neutropenia(N) for 7 or more consecutive days, G3 to G4 N with fever (temperature greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 38.5 degree Celsius on more than 1 occasion) or microbiologically/radiographically documented infection, G3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding/ G4 thrombocytopenia. Non-hematological abnormalities: G \>=2 Aspartate transaminase (AST)/ Alanine transaminase (ALT) elevation simultaneous with G \>=2 total bilirubin elevation without initial findings of cholestasis or any other reason found, G4 non-hematologic AE, G3 to 4 cytokine release syndrome, G3 non-hematological AE lasting greater than (\>)3 days, delay in initiation of Cycle 2 \>14 days due to treatment related laboratory abnormalities/AE. Any other AE that study committee deemed to be dose-limiting, regardless of grade, was also considered DLT.
Time frame: Cycle 1 (21 days)
Population: Analysis was performed on DLT evaluable population that included participants who received planned doses of isatuximab and atezolizumab during Cycle 1 and who completed the DLT observation period.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities
Hematological parameters assessed were anemia, white blood cell (WBC) decreased, platelet count decreased, lymphocyte count decreased, and neutrophil count decreased. Parameters were assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Experience version 4.03, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs.
Time frame: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Population: Analysis was performed on all-treated population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants with available data for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet count decreased: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Anemia: Grade 1 | 11 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet count decreased: Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 1 | 4 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 2 | 8 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Anemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | White blood cell decreased: Grade 1 | 9 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Anemia: Grade 2 | 5 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | White blood cell decreased: Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | White blood cell decreased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | White blood cell decreased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet count decreased: Grade 1 | 11 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Anemia: Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 1 | 3 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet count decreased: Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet count decreased: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | White blood cell decreased: Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Anemia: Grade 2 | 12 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet count decreased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 3 | 7 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 4 | 4 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | White blood cell decreased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 2 | 14 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Anemia: Grade 1 | 13 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet count decreased: Grade 1 | 5 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Anemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet count decreased: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | White blood cell decreased: Grade 1 | 5 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | White blood cell decreased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Anemia: Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Anemia: Grade 1 | 6 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Anemia: Grade 2 | 6 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Anemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Anemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | White blood cell decreased: Grade 1 | 4 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | White blood cell decreased: Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | White blood cell decreased: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | White blood cell decreased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet count decreased: Grade 1 | 5 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet count decreased: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet count decreased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet count decreased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 2 | 7 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 3 | 4 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 2 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet count decreased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet count decreased: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet count decreased: Grade 1 | 10 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | White blood cell decreased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Anemia: Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | White blood cell decreased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | White blood cell decreased: Grade 2 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Anemia: Grade 1 | 7 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | White blood cell decreased: Grade 1 | 12 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 1 | 10 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Anemia: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 2 | 12 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Anemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Platelet count decreased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Neutrophil count decreased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Hematological Abnormalities | Lymphocyte count decreased: Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities
Abnormal liver function parameters assessed were AST increased, ALT increased, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) increased, blood bilirubin (BB) increased. Parameters were assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Experience version 4.03, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs.
Time frame: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Population: Analysis was performed on all-treated population. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants with available data for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | AST increased: Grade 1 | 14 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | ALP increased: Grade 1 | 12 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | ALT increased: Grade 1 | 11 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | ALT increased: Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | ALT increased: Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | ALT increased: Grade 2 | 4 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | AST increased: Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | AST increased: Grade 2 | 5 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | BB increased: Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | ALP increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | AST increased: Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | BB increased: Grade 1 | 6 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | BB increased: Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | BB increased: Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | ALP increased: Grade 2 | 8 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | ALP increased: Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | BB increased: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | BB increased: Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | AST increased: Grade 1 | 5 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | BB increased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | AST increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | BB increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | ALT increased: Grade 1 | 8 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | ALT increased: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | ALT increased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | AST increased: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | ALT increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | ALP increased: Grade 1 | 13 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | ALP increased: Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | ALP increased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | AST increased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | ALP increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | AST increased: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | AST increased: Grade 1 | 6 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | ALP increased: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | ALP increased: Grade 1 | 7 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | AST increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | BB increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | ALP increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | ALP increased: Grade 2 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | ALT increased: Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | BB increased: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | BB increased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | ALT increased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | AST increased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | ALT increased: Grade 1 | 6 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | BB increased: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | ALT increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | BB increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | AST increased: Grade 1 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | AST increased: Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | AST increased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | AST increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | ALT increased: Grade 1 | 11 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | ALT increased: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | ALT increased: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | ALT increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | ALP increased: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | ALP increased: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | ALP increased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | ALP increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | BB increased: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | BB increased: Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Liver Abnormalities | BB increased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities
Abnormal renal parameters assessed were creatinine clearance (CrCl), creatinine increased and hyperuricemia. Creatinine clearance was assessed in categories: \>=60 - less than (\<) 90 milliliters per minute per 1.73 square meter (mL/min/1.73m\^2), \>=30 - \<60 mL/min/1.73m\^2, \>=15 - \<30 mL/min/1.73m\^2 and \<15 mL/min/1.73m\^2. Parameters were assessed as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Experience version 4.03, where Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Potentially Life Threatening. Grade refers to the severity of the AEs.
Time frame: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Population: Analysis was performed on all-treated population. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants with available data for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | Hyperuricemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | Hyperuricemia: Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | Creatinine increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | CrCl: >=60 - <90 mL/min/1.73m^2 | 8 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | Hyperuricemia: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | CrCl: >=15 - <30 mL/min/1.73m^2 | 3 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | CrCl: <15 mL/min/1.73m^2 | 0 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | CrCl: >=30 - <60mL/min/1.73m^2 | 5 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | Hyperuricemia: Grade 3 | 5 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | Creatinine increased: Grade 1 | 22 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | Creatinine increased: Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | Creatinine increased: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | CrCl: >=30 - <60mL/min/1.73m^2 | 4 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | Creatinine increased: Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | CrCl: <15 mL/min/1.73m^2 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | Hyperuricemia: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | Hyperuricemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | Creatinine increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | CrCl: >=60 - <90 mL/min/1.73m^2 | 13 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | Creatinine increased: Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | Creatinine increased: Grade 1 | 19 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | CrCl: >=15 - <30 mL/min/1.73m^2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | Hyperuricemia: Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | Hyperuricemia: Grade 3 | 7 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | Creatinine increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | CrCl: >=60 - <90 mL/min/1.73m^2 | 10 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | CrCl: >=30 - <60mL/min/1.73m^2 | 5 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | CrCl: >=15 - <30 mL/min/1.73m^2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | CrCl: <15 mL/min/1.73m^2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | Creatinine increased: Grade 1 | 13 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | Creatinine increased: Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | Creatinine increased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | Hyperuricemia: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | Hyperuricemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | Hyperuricemia: Grade 3 | 5 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | Hyperuricemia: Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | Creatinine increased: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | Creatinine increased: Grade 1 | 24 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | CrCl: >=60 - <90 mL/min/1.73m^2 | 16 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | Hyperuricemia: Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | CrCl: <15 mL/min/1.73m^2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | CrCl: >=15 - <30 mL/min/1.73m^2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | Hyperuricemia: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | Hyperuricemia: Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | Creatinine increased: Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | Creatinine increased: Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | CrCl: >=30 - <60mL/min/1.73m^2 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Renal Function Abnormalities | Hyperuricemia: Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TESAEs)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the TEAE period (defined as the time from the first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment).
Time frame: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Population: Analysis was performed on all-treated population.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TESAEs) | TEAE | 26 Participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TESAEs) | TESAE | 12 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TESAEs) | TESAE | 16 Participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TESAEs) | TEAE | 29 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TESAEs) | TEAE | 18 Participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TESAEs) | TESAE | 8 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TESAEs) | TEAE | 33 Participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TESAEs) | TESAE | 9 Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Overall Response (OR): For HCC/SCCHN/EOC Cohorts
OR was defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) as best overall response, assessed per RECIST 1.1 criteria. Best overall response was derived per RECIST 1.1 criteria using disease assessments performed from the first dose of treatment throughout the study excluding any assessments performed after the cut-off date or following the initiation of a further anticancer treatment. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, pathological lymph nodes (target/non-target)- reduction in short axis \<10 mm; PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum, sum with an absolute increase of diameter of at least 5 mm and appearance of \>1 new lesion.
Time frame: From randomization until disease progression, or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)
Population: Analysis was performed on all-treated population. Data for this outcome measure was not planned to be collected and analyzed for GBM Cohort as pre-specified in protocol.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Percentage of Participants With Overall Response (OR): For HCC/SCCHN/EOC Cohorts | 7.4 percentage of participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Percentage of Participants With Overall Response (OR): For HCC/SCCHN/EOC Cohorts | 13.8 percentage of participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Percentage of Participants With Overall Response (OR): For HCC/SCCHN/EOC Cohorts | 5.6 percentage of participants |
Probability of Participants With Progression Free Survival at 6 Months (PFS-6): GBM Cohort
PFS-6 was defined as the probability of participants alive without disease progression at 6 months as assessed by RANO criteria. Participants who didn't experience documented progression or death before analysis cut-off date or date of initiation of new anticancer treatment, PFS was censored at date of last valid disease assessment not showing progression performed prior to initiation of further anticancer treatment or analysis cut-off date, whichever was 1st. Per RANO criteria, progressive disease was defined as \>=25% increase size of T1- gadolinium enhancing disease, or increased T2/FLAIR signal, or presence of new lesion, or worsening clinical status. PFS-6 was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From randomization until 6 months after the last participant's first treatment in the GBM Cohort D-1
Population: Analysis was performed on all-treated population. Data for this outcome measure was not planned to be collected and analyzed for Cohorts A: HCC, Cohort B: SCCHN and Cohort C: EOC as pre-specified in protocol.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Probability of Participants With Progression Free Survival at 6 Months (PFS-6): GBM Cohort | 0.033 probability of participants |
Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D)
RP2D was the starting dose selected for Phase 2 part of the study. RP2D was the selected dose at which no more than 1 out of 6 participants (starting dose or dose level minus -1 \[DL-1\]) or 2 out of 12 participants (starting dose) experienced a DLT related to the investigational medicinal product. DLTs: Adverse Event (AE) occurring during 1st treatment cycle, unless due to disease progression/obviously unrelated cause included: hematological abnormalities: G4 N for 7/ more consecutive days, G3 to G4 N with fever, G3/G4 thrombocytopenia. Non-hematological abnormalities: G\>=2 AST/ALT elevation simultaneous with G \>=2 total bilirubin elevation without cholestasis or any other reason found, G4 non-hematologic AE, G3 to 4 cytokine release syndrome, G3 non-hematological AE lasting \>3 days, delay in initiation of Cycle 2 \>14 days due to treatment related laboratory abnormalities/AE.
Time frame: Cycle 1 (21 days)
Population: Analysis was performed on DLT evaluable population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) | 10 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) |
Best Percent Change From Baseline in Tumor Burden
Best tumor burden change was defined as the best percent-change from baseline in a sum of the diameters (longest for non-nodal lesion, short axis for nodal lesions) for all target lesions.
Time frame: From randomization until progression or death or study cut-off date whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)
Population: Analysis was performed on all-treated population. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants with available data for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Best Percent Change From Baseline in Tumor Burden | 6.2 percent change | Standard Deviation 31.5 |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Best Percent Change From Baseline in Tumor Burden | -3.4 percent change | Standard Deviation 41.6 |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Best Percent Change From Baseline in Tumor Burden | 16.2 percent change | Standard Deviation 51.1 |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Best Percent Change From Baseline in Tumor Burden | 196.6 percent change | Standard Deviation 347.5 |
Duration of Response (DOR)
Time from date of 1st response until date of first documented recurrent/progressive disease (PD) or death whichever occurred 1st. In absence of disease progression or death before analysis cut-off date or date of initiation of further anticancer treatment, DOR was censored at date of last valid response. RECIST 1.1 criteria was used for assessment in HCC/SCCHN/EOC Cohorts and RANO criteria for GBM Cohort. Per RECIST 1.1, CR: disappearance of all target lesions; PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions. Per RANO criteria; CR: no change in size of T1-Gd+ disease, stable/reduced T2/FLAIR signal, no new lesion, no corticosteroid use, and stable/improved status; PR: \>=50% change in size of T1-Gd+, stable/reduced T2/FLAIR signal, no new lesion, stable/reduced corticosteroid use, and stable/improved status. PD:\>=25% increase size of T1-Gd+/increased T2/FLAIR signal/presence of new lesion/worsening status.
Time frame: From the date of first response until disease progression or death, or study cut-off date whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)
Population: Analysis was performed on all treated population. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants with available data for this outcome measure and '0' in 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies that no participant in the Cohort D-1 achieved any response, and hence, no DOR was analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Duration of Response (DOR) | 7.5 months | Standard Deviation 3 |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Duration of Response (DOR) | 20.6 months | Standard Deviation 7.3 |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Duration of Response (DOR) | 10.4 months | — |
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against Atezolizumab
ADA responses were categorized as treatment boosted ADA and treatment-induced ADA. Treatment boosted ADA was defined as pre-existing ADAs with a significant increase in the ADA titer during the study compared to the Baseline titer. Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA that developed at any time during the ADA on-study observation period in participants without pre-existing ADA (including participants without pretreatment samples).
Time frame: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure: 106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Population: Analysis was performed on ADA evaluable population. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants with available data for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against Atezolizumab | Treatment-induced ADA | 2 count of participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against Atezolizumab | Treatment boosted ADA | 0 count of participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against Atezolizumab | Treatment boosted ADA | 0 count of participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against Atezolizumab | Treatment-induced ADA | 2 count of participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against Atezolizumab | Treatment-induced ADA | 1 count of participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against Atezolizumab | Treatment boosted ADA | 0 count of participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against Atezolizumab | Treatment-induced ADA | 0 count of participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against Atezolizumab | Treatment boosted ADA | 0 count of participants |
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against Isatuximab
ADA responses were categorized as treatment boosted ADA and treatment-induced ADA. Treatment boosted ADA was defined as pre-existing ADAs with a significant increase in the ADA titer during the study compared to the Baseline titer. Treatment-induced ADA was defined as ADA that developed at any time during the ADA on-study observation period in participants without pre-existing ADA (including participants without pretreatment samples).
Time frame: From Baseline up to 30 days after last study treatment administration (maximum duration of exposure:106 weeks for Cohort A, 108 weeks for Cohort B, 61 weeks for Cohort C and 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Population: Analysis was performed on ADA evaluable population which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment with at least 1 non-missing ADA result after the drug administration. Here 'overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants with available data for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against Isatuximab | Treatment-induced ADA | 2 count of participants |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against Isatuximab | Treatment boosted ADA | 0 count of participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against Isatuximab | Treatment boosted ADA | 0 count of participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against Isatuximab | Treatment-induced ADA | 0 count of participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against Isatuximab | Treatment-induced ADA | 1 count of participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against Isatuximab | Treatment boosted ADA | 0 count of participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against Isatuximab | Treatment-induced ADA | 1 count of participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response Against Isatuximab | Treatment boosted ADA | 0 count of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control (DC) >=6 Months
DC: percentage of participants with complete response (CR), partial response (PR) & stable disease (SD) rate. RANO criteria, CR: no change in size of T1-gadolinium-enhancing (T1-Gd+) disease, stable/ reduced (red) T2/FLAIR signal, no new lesion (NL), no corticosteroid use (CU) & stable/ red clinical status (CS); PR: \>=50% change in size of T1-Gd+ disease, stable/red T2/FLAIR signal, no NL, stable/ red CU & stable/ improved CS (ICS). SD: \<50% reduction to \<25% increase (inc) size of T1-Gd+ disease, stable/red T2/FLAIR signal, no NL, stable/red CU & stable/ICS. Progressive disease (PD): \>=25% inc size of T1-Gd+ disease/ inc T2/FLAIR signal/ presence of NL/ worsening CS. RECIST criteria: CR: Disappearance of target lesions. Reduction in short axis to \<10 mm of lymph nodes; PR: 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions; PD: 20% inc in sum of diameters of target lesions; SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage from baseline study to qualify for PR nor sufficient inc to qualify for PD.
Time frame: From the date of first response to disease progression or death, or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)
Population: Analysis was performed on all-treated population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Percentage of Participants With Disease Control (DC) >=6 Months | 37.0 percentage of participants |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Percentage of Participants With Disease Control (DC) >=6 Months | 41.4 percentage of participants |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Percentage of Participants With Disease Control (DC) >=6 Months | 33.3 percentage of participants |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Percentage of Participants With Disease Control (DC) >=6 Months | 3.0 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Response as Per Response Assessment for Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Criteria: GBM Cohort
Response rate for participants with GBM was defined as percentage of participants with CR & PR as best overall response (BOR), assessed by Investigators using RANO criteria. BOR was derived per RANO criteria using disease assessments performed from 1st dose of treatment through study excluding any assessments performed after cut-off date or following initiation of further anticancer treatment. Per RANO criteria; CR was defined as no change in size of T1-gadolinium-enhancing (T1-Gd+) disease, stable or reduced T2/FLAIR signal, no new lesion, no corticosteroid use, and stable or improved clinical status; PR was defined as \>=50% change in size of T1-Gd+ disease, stable or reduced T2/FLAIR signal, no new lesion, stable or reduced corticosteroid use, and stable or improved clinical status. Progressive disease was defined as \>=25% increase size of T1-Gd+ disease, or increased T2/FLAIR signal, or presence of new lesion, or worsening clinical status.
Time frame: From randomization until progression, or death, or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: 54 weeks for Cohort D-1)
Population: Analysis was performed on all-treated population. Data for this outcome measure was not collected and analyzed for Cohort A, B and C because the RANO criteria for the assessment of response could not be used to assess the response for solid tumors such as HCC, SCCHN and EOC.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Percentage of Participants With Response as Per Response Assessment for Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Criteria: GBM Cohort | 0 percentage of participants |
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) After First Infusion of Isatuximab
AUClast was defined as area under the plasma concentration versus time curve calculated from time 0 to last quantifiable concentration. AUClast was calculated using the non-compartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of isatuximab.
Time frame: At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Population: Analysis was performed on PK population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) After First Infusion of Isatuximab | 20000 micrograms*hour/milliliter (mcg*h/mL) | Standard Deviation 4570 |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) After First Infusion of Isatuximab | 19700 micrograms*hour/milliliter (mcg*h/mL) | Standard Deviation 4500 |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) After First Infusion of Isatuximab | 24400 micrograms*hour/milliliter (mcg*h/mL) | Standard Deviation 7120 |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time 0 to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) After First Infusion of Isatuximab | 26300 micrograms*hour/milliliter (mcg*h/mL) | Standard Deviation 6510 |
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-168h) After First Infusion of Isatuximab
AUC0-168h was defined as the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to 168 hours post dose calculated using non-compartmental analysis after first infusion of isatuximab.
Time frame: At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Population: Analysis was performed on PK population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-168h) After First Infusion of Isatuximab | 20200 mcg*h/mL | Standard Deviation 4510 |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-168h) After First Infusion of Isatuximab | 19800 mcg*h/mL | Standard Deviation 4590 |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-168h) After First Infusion of Isatuximab | 24300 mcg*h/mL | Standard Deviation 6500 |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-168h) After First Infusion of Isatuximab | 26400 mcg*h/mL | Standard Deviation 6270 |
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Concentration Observed at the End of Intravenous Infusion (Ceoi) of Isatuximab
Ceoi is the plasma concentration observed at the end of intravenous infusion of isatuximab.
Time frame: At end of infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1
Population: Analysis was performed on PK population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Concentration Observed at the End of Intravenous Infusion (Ceoi) of Isatuximab | 216 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 50.8 |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Concentration Observed at the End of Intravenous Infusion (Ceoi) of Isatuximab | 207 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 54.9 |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Concentration Observed at the End of Intravenous Infusion (Ceoi) of Isatuximab | 251 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 77.3 |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Concentration Observed at the End of Intravenous Infusion (Ceoi) of Isatuximab | 263 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 68.8 |
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Clast) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab
Clast was defined as the last concentration of isatuximab observed above the lower limit of quantification.
Time frame: At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Population: Analysis was performed on PK population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Clast) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 75.9 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 35.3 |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Clast) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 67.8 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 20.4 |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Clast) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 86.0 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 22.2 |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Last Concentration Observed Above the Lower Limit of Quantification (Clast) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 103 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 28.4 |
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration Observed (Cmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab
Cmax was defined as the maximum concentration observed after the first administration calculated using the noncompartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of isatuximab.
Time frame: At start of infusion (SOI), end of infusion (EOI), EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Population: Analysis was performed on PK population which included all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study treatment with at least one reportable concentration after the study drug administration.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration Observed (Cmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 219 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL) | Standard Deviation 50.5 |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration Observed (Cmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 218 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL) | Standard Deviation 48.7 |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration Observed (Cmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 262 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL) | Standard Deviation 69.7 |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Maximum Concentration Observed (Cmax) After the First Infusion of Isatuximab | 266 micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL) | Standard Deviation 66.7 |
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Time of Clast (Tlast) After First Infusion of Isatuximab
Tlast was defined as the time of last concentration observed above the lower limit of quantification, calculated using the non-compartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of isatuximab.
Time frame: At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Population: Analysis was performed on PK population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Time of Clast (Tlast) After First Infusion of Isatuximab | 166 hours |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Time of Clast (Tlast) After First Infusion of Isatuximab | 167 hours |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Time of Clast (Tlast) After First Infusion of Isatuximab | 167 hours |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Time of Clast (Tlast) After First Infusion of Isatuximab | 166 hours |
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) After First Infusion of Isatuximab
Tmax was defined as the time to reach Cmax, calculated using the non-compartmental analysis after the intravenous infusion of isatuximab.
Time frame: At SOI, EOI, EOI+4 hours, 72 hours and 168 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1
Population: Analysis was performed on PK population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) After First Infusion of Isatuximab | 4.00 hours |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) After First Infusion of Isatuximab | 3.37 hours |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) After First Infusion of Isatuximab | 6.83 hours |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) After First Infusion of Isatuximab | 4.13 hours |
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Isatuximab
Ctrough was the plasma concentration of isatuximab observed just before treatment administration during repeated dosing.
Time frame: Pre-infusion on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 1 Day 8 and Cycle 1 Day 15
Population: Analysis was performed on participants who received at least 1 dose of the study treatment with at least one reportable concentration after drug administration; and were ADA negative (i.e., participants without any treatment induced or treatment boosted ADA-positive sample during the treatment or follow-up observation period). Here 'Number analyzed' signifies participants with available data for each specified category.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 1 Day 15 | 153 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 46.8 |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 1 Day 1 | 0 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 1 Day 8 | 67.4 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 20 |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 1 Day 1 | 0 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 1 Day 8 | 71.0 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 25.9 |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 1 Day 15 | 121 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 25.6 |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 1 Day 15 | 176 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 33.6 |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 1 Day 8 | 88.6 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 21.8 |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 1 Day 1 | 0 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 1 Day 15 | 231 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 102 |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 1 Day 8 | 99.9 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 26.9 |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Pharmacokinetics (PK): Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Isatuximab | Cycle 1 Day 1 | 0 mcg/mL | Standard Deviation 0 |
Plasma Concentration of Atezolizumab
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 8 Day 1 and Cycle 16 Day 1
Population: Data for the plasma concentration of atezolizumab is not reported because no sample was collected after study termination and analyzed as the study did not fulfil the predefined criteria for Atezolizumab PK analysis.
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as time (in months) from 1st study treatment administration to date of 1st documented radiographic progression or date of death from any cause, whichever was 1st. Participants who didn't experience progression or death before analysis cut-off date/date of initiation of new anticancer treatment, PFS was censored at date of last valid disease assessment not showing progression performed prior to initiation of further anticancer treatment or analysis cut-off date, whichever was 1st. RECIST 1.1 criteria was used for assessment in HCC/SCCHN/EOC Cohorts and RANO criteria for GBM Cohort. Per RECIST 1.1 criteria, PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum on study. Appearance of 1 or more new lesions was also considered progression. Per RANO criteria, PD: \>=25% increase in product of perpendicular diameters of any target lesion, or worsening neurologic status not explained by causes unrelated to tumor progression.
Time frame: From date of first study treatment administration until disease progression or death or study cut-off whichever occurred first (maximum duration of exposure: up to 108 weeks)
Population: Analysis was performed on all-treated population. Kaplan-Meier method was used for analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Progression-free Survival (PFS) | 2.04 months |
| Cohort B: SCCHN: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Progression-free Survival (PFS) | 2.10 months |
| Cohort C: EOC: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Progression-free Survival (PFS) | 2.04 months |
| Cohort D-1: GBM: Isatuximab + Atezolizumab | Progression-free Survival (PFS) | 1.28 months |