Skip to content

An Improvement Project Around Staffs' Influenza Vaccine Uptake

An Improvement Project to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Different Reminders Designed to Increase the University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust's Staff Uptake of the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03637036
Enrollment
8438
Registered
2018-08-17
Start date
2018-09-24
Completion date
2019-01-04
Last updated
2019-01-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Influenza Vaccination

Brief summary

To reach seasonal vaccination against influenza targets, University Hospitals Birmingham (UHB) already invites staff to take up the vaccination, and every November reminds staff that have not yet vaccinated to do so. The current protocol describes a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in which staff will be sent different reminders, and the investigators will compare the proportion of staff that go on to vaccinate after receiving each reminder.

Detailed description

Seasonal vaccination against influenza is recommended for NHS staff. , To increase vaccination rates, NHS England put forth a Commissioning for Quality and Innovation goal for the 2018/2019 season of 75%. University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (UHB) wants its vaccination rate to surpass this target. Since staff get infected outside of the hospital and from patients staff vaccination does not provide significant 'herd immunity' To reach past targets, every September UHB already invites staff to take up the vaccination, and regularly reminds staff that have not yet vaccinated to do so. The current protocol describes a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in which staff will be sent a different letter when first invited to receive vaccination, and we will compare the proportion of staff that go on to vaccinate after receiving each type of letter.. To conduct the RCT the research team will design four letter styles. One factor will emphasize an authority figure inviting staff to vaccinate (the Chief Executive, who is also a doctor). The other factor will emphasize a competitive social norm describing vaccination rates in peer hospitals, including Addenbrooke's, Cambridge University Hospitals (which has exemplary rates) see appendix A and across American hospitals (which also have high rates). Letters will be sent to staff in the first week in October by UHB's communications team and they will be disseminated in a randomized fashion. The UoW's role in this study is to advise the study's design and write-up the project for publication. UHB will approve the reminders, send the reminders, retrieve the data, and analyse the data. No individual-level data will be transferred across organizations. All individual-level data will be managed by authorized UHB employees, e.g., a UHB statistician will randomize staff to receive different reminders and analyze the data, and UHB's communication team to disseminate the reminders.

Interventions

OTHERCommunication intervention

The intervention is a communication inviting staff to take up the influenza vaccination. Different versions of the communication are created, and the investigators will compare uptake rates between staff that received different letters.

Sponsors

University Hospital Birmingham
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Warwick
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participants receive one of four types of communications inviting them to take up the influenza vaccination in a randomized fashion. Participants will not be explicitly told that alternative versions of the communications are being sent.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* All UHB staff eligible for the seasonal influenza vaccination are eligible for this study. (no patients are included)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vaccination uptake3 monthsWhether participants vaccinated (Yes, No)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vaccination uptake date3 monthsThe date participants received vaccination (DD-MM-YYYY or blank if not vaccinated)
Vaccination uptake reflusal3 monthsWhether participants formally indicated refusal to vaccinate (Yes, No)
Vaccination uptake alternative location3Whether participants formally indicated being vaccinated at another location (Yes, No)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Group number3 monthsThis data describes what communication participants received
Worksite3 monthsThis data describes what location within the organization participants work
Job Role3 monthsThis data describes participants' job roles
Gender3 monthsThis data describes participants' gender

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026