Bicuspid Aortic Valve
Conditions
Brief summary
The objective of the trial is to evaluate the procedural safety and efficacy of the Medtronic TAVR system in patients with bicuspid aortic anatomy and severe aortic stenosis at low risk for SAVR
Detailed description
Multi-center, prospective, single arm All subjects will be treated with a Medtronic TAVR system. Subject follow-ups will be conducted at pre and post-procedure, discharge, 30 days, 1 year, and annually through 10 years
Interventions
DEVICEMedtronic TAVR Systems
Treatment of patients with bicuspid aortic anatomy and severe aortic stenosis at low risk for SAVR with Medtronic Evolut PRO and Evolut R systems
Sponsors
Medtronic Cardiovascular
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Severe aortic stenosis, defined as follows: 1. For symptomatic patients: Aortic valve area ≤1.0 cm2 (or aortic valve area index of ≤0.6 cm2/m2), OR mean gradient ≥40 mmHg, OR Maximal aortic valve velocity ≥4.0 m/sec by transthoracic echocardiography at rest 2. For asymptomatic patients: Very severe aortic stenosis with an aortic valve area of ≤1.0 cm2 (or aortic valve area index of ≤0.6 cm2/m2), AND maximal aortic velocity ≥5.0 m/sec, or mean gradient ≥60 mmHg by transthoracic echocardiography at rest, OR Aortic valve area of ≤1.0 cm2 (or aortic valve area index of ≤0.6 cm2/m2), AND a mean gradient ≥40 mmHg or maximal aortic valve velocity ≥4.0 m/sec by transthoracic echocardiography at rest, AND an exercise tolerance test that demonstrates a limited exercise capacity, abnormal BP response, or arrhythmia OR Aortic valve area of ≤1.0 cm2 (or aortic valve area index of ≤0.6 cm2/m2), AND mean gradient ≥40 mmHg, or maximal aortic valve velocity ≥4.0 m/sec by transthoracic echocardiography at rest, AND a left ventricular ejection fraction \<50%. 2. Patient is considered low risk for SAVR, where low risk is defined as predicted risk of mortality for SAVR \<3% at 30 days per multidisciplinary local heart team assessment. 3. Bicuspid aortic valve anatomy (all sub-types) confirmed by MDCT. 4. The subject and the treating physician agree that the subject will return for all required post-procedure follow-up visits.
Exclusion criteria
1. Any condition considered a contraindication for placement of a bioprosthetic valve (eg, subject is indicated for mechanical prosthetic valve). 2. Age less than 60 years 3. A known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following that cannot be adequately pre-medicated: 1. aspirin or heparin (HIT/HITTS) and bivalirudin 2. ticlopidine and clopidogrel 3. Nitinol (titanium or nickel) 4. contrast media 4. Blood dyscrasias as defined: leukopenia (WBC \<1000 mm3), thrombocytopenia (platelet count \<50,000 cells/mm3), history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy, or hypercoagulable states. 5. Ongoing sepsis, including active endocarditis. 6. Any percutaneous coronary or peripheral interventional procedure with a bare metal stent or drug eluting stent performed within 30 days prior to screening committee approval. 7. Multivessel coronary artery disease with a Syntax score \>22 and/or unprotected left main coronary artery. 8. Symptomatic carotid or vertebral artery disease or successful treatment of carotid stenosis within 10 weeks of Heart Team assessment. 9. Cardiogenic shock manifested by low cardiac output, vasopressor dependence, or mechanical hemodynamic support. 10. Recent (within 2 months of Heart Team assessment) cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack (TIA). 11. Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding that would preclude anticoagulation. 12. Subject refuses a blood transfusion. 13. Severe dementia (resulting in either inability to provide informed consent for the study/procedure, prevents independent lifestyle outside of a chronic care facility, or will fundamentally complicate rehabilitation from the procedure or compliance with follow-up visits). 14. Estimated life expectancy of less than 24 months due to associated non-cardiac co-morbid conditions. 15. Other medical, social, or psychological conditions that in the opinion of the investigator precludes the subject from appropriate consent or adherence to the protocol required follow-up exams. 16. Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study (excluding registries). 17. Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤30 days before the study procedure due to unstable coronary artery disease (WHO criteria). 18. Need for emergency surgery for any reason. 19. Subject is pregnant or breast feeding. 20. Subject is legally incompetent, or otherwise vulnerable Anatomical
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Safety: Percent of Participants With All-Cause Mortality or Disabling Stroke Rate at 30 Days Post-procedure. | 30 days | Rate of of all-cause mortality or disabling stroke rate at 30 days |
| Efficacy: Percent of Participants Who Meet All Device Success Criteria at 30 Days Post-procedure. | 7 days | Device success rate, defined as: * Absence of procedural mortality, AND * Correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location, AND * Absence of moderate or severe total prosthetic valve regurgitation (at 18 hours to 7 days) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| All-Cause Mortality Rate | 1 year and annually through 10 years | Rate of all cause mortality |
| All Stroke (Disabling and Non-Disabling) Rate | 1 year and annually through 10 years | Rate of disabling and non-disabling strokes |
| Percent of Participants With New Permanent Pacemaker Implantation at 30 Days Post-procedure. | 30 days | Rate of new permanent pacemaker implantation at 30 days post-procedure (excludes patients with pre-existing pacemaker at baseline) |
| Percent of Participants Who Experience a Myocardial Infarction at 30 Days Post-procedure. | 30 days | The rate of myocardial infarction at 30 days |
| Percent of Participants With a Life-Threatening Bleeding Event at 30 Days Post-procedure. | 30 days | Rate of life-threatening (or disabling) bleeding at 30 days |
| Percent of Participants With Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis at 30 Days Post-procedure. | 30 days | Rate of prosthetic valve endocarditis at 30 days |
| Percent of Participant With Prosthetic Valve Thrombosis at 30 Days Post-procedure. | 30 days | Rate of prosthetic valve thrombosis at 30 days |
| Percent pf Participants With Valve-Related Dysfunction Requiring Repeat Procedure at 30 Days Post-procedure. | 30 days | Rate of valve-related dysfunction requiring repeat procedure at 30 days |
| Percent of Participants With a Repeat Hospitalization for Aortic Valve Disease at 30 Days Post-procedure. | 30 days | Rate of repeat hospitalization for aortic valve disease at 30 days |
| Percent of Participants With a Repeat Hospitalization for Ascending Aorta Disease at 30 Days Post-procedure. | 30 days | Rate of repeat hospitalization for ascending aorta disease at 30 days |
| Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Mean Aortic Gradient Reported as Mean Average at Baseline and 30 Days | 30 days | Reporting of prosthetic valve hemodynamic performance by transvalvular mean aortic gradient |
| Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Effective Orifice Area Reported as Mean Average at Baseline and 30 Days. | 30 days | Change in hemodynamic performance metrics by Doppler echocardiography measured by effective orifice area. |
| Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Percent of Participants With Degrees of Total Prosthetic Valve Regurgitation at Baseline and 30 Days | 30 days | Reporting of prosthetic valve hemodynamic performance by degree of total prosthetic valve regurgitation at 30 days post-procedure |
| Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Percent of Participants With Degrees of Paravalvular Prosthetic Regurgitation at 30 Days | 30 days | Reporting of prosthetic valve hemodynamic performance by degree of paravalvular regurgitation at 30 days post-procedure |
| Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Percent of Participants With Degrees of Transvalvular Prosthetic Regurgitation at 30 Days | 30 days | Reporting of prosthetic valve hemodynamic performance by degree of transvalvular regurgitation at 30 days post-procedure |
| New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification at Baseline and 30 Days | 30 days | Reporting of NYHA classification change from baseline to 30 days NYHA Classification criteria: Class I: Subjects with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity. Class I: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Class III: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Class IV: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. |
| Change in Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy (KCCQ) Instrument at Baseline and 30 Days | 30 days | QoL overall summary (all domains below) and clinical summary (physical function and symptoms only) scores and change in summary scores from baseline using the following measures: • KCCQ: Quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. |
| Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by European QoL (EQ-5D) at Baseline and 30 Days. | 30 days | QoL summary scores and change from baseline using the following measures: • EQ-5D: Measures 5 domains (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) that can be converted to utilities using an algorithm. Utilities range from 0 to 1, with 1 representing perfect health, and 0 corresponding to the worst imaginable health state |
Countries
United States
Contacts
STUDY_CHAIRMichael Reardon, MD
The Methodist Hospital Research Institute
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJohn Forrest, MD
Yale University
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORBasel Ramlawi, MD
Paramount Heart
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Medtronic TAVR Systems Treatment with Medtronic Evolut PRO and Evolut R systems | 150 |
| Total | 150 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Medtronic TAVR Systems |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 70.3 Years of age STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5 |
| Body Surface Area (BSA) | 1.9 m^2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2 |
| New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification NYHA Class I | 3 Participants |
| New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification NYHA Class II | 106 Participants |
| New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification NYHA Class III | 40 Participants |
| New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification NYHA Class IV | 1 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 150 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 72 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 78 Participants |
| Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Score | 1.4 % risk of mortality STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 1 / 150 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 120 / 150 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 57 / 150 |
Outcome results
Primary
Efficacy: Percent of Participants Who Meet All Device Success Criteria at 30 Days Post-procedure.
Device success rate, defined as: * Absence of procedural mortality, AND * Correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location, AND * Absence of moderate or severe total prosthetic valve regurgitation (at 18 hours to 7 days)
Time frame: 7 days
Population: Implanted Set
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Efficacy: Percent of Participants Who Meet All Device Success Criteria at 30 Days Post-procedure. | 95.9 Percent of participants |
Primary
Safety: Percent of Participants With All-Cause Mortality or Disabling Stroke Rate at 30 Days Post-procedure.
Rate of of all-cause mortality or disabling stroke rate at 30 days
Time frame: 30 days
Population: Attempted Implant Set
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Safety: Percent of Participants With All-Cause Mortality or Disabling Stroke Rate at 30 Days Post-procedure. | 1.3 Percent of participants (K-M rate) |
Secondary
All-Cause Mortality Rate
Rate of all cause mortality
Time frame: 1 year and annually through 10 years
Secondary
All Stroke (Disabling and Non-Disabling) Rate
Rate of disabling and non-disabling strokes
Time frame: 1 year and annually through 10 years
Secondary
Change in Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy (KCCQ) Instrument at Baseline and 30 Days
QoL overall summary (all domains below) and clinical summary (physical function and symptoms only) scores and change in summary scores from baseline using the following measures: • KCCQ: Quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
Time frame: 30 days
Population: Attempted Implant set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Change in Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy (KCCQ) Instrument at Baseline and 30 Days | Baseline KCCQ - Overall | 68.5 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.6 |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Change in Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy (KCCQ) Instrument at Baseline and 30 Days | Baseline KCCQ - Clinical | 73.7 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.3 |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Change in Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy (KCCQ) Instrument at Baseline and 30 Days | 30 day KCCQ - Overall | 90.3 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.8 |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Change in Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy (KCCQ) Instrument at Baseline and 30 Days | 30 day KCCQ - Clinical | 91.3 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.5 |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Change in Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy (KCCQ) Instrument at Baseline and 30 Days | 30 day change from baseline KCCQ - Overall | 21.6 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.6 |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Change in Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy (KCCQ) Instrument at Baseline and 30 Days | 30 day change from baseline KCCQ - Clinical | 17.6 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.7 |
Secondary
Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by European QoL (EQ-5D) at Baseline and 30 Days.
QoL summary scores and change from baseline using the following measures: • EQ-5D: Measures 5 domains (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) that can be converted to utilities using an algorithm. Utilities range from 0 to 1, with 1 representing perfect health, and 0 corresponding to the worst imaginable health state
Time frame: 30 days
Population: Attempted Implant set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by European QoL (EQ-5D) at Baseline and 30 Days. | 30 day change from baseline EQ-5D Index Score | 0.1 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1 |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by European QoL (EQ-5D) at Baseline and 30 Days. | Baseline EQ-5D Index Score | 0.8 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1 |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Health-related Quality of Life (QoL) as Assessed by European QoL (EQ-5D) at Baseline and 30 Days. | 30 day EQ-5D Index Score | 0.9 Score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.1 |
Secondary
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Effective Orifice Area Reported as Mean Average at Baseline and 30 Days.
Change in hemodynamic performance metrics by Doppler echocardiography measured by effective orifice area.
Time frame: 30 days
Population: Implanted set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Effective Orifice Area Reported as Mean Average at Baseline and 30 Days. | Baseline | 0.81 cm^2 | Standard Deviation 0.23 |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Effective Orifice Area Reported as Mean Average at Baseline and 30 Days. | 30 Day | 2.28 cm^2 | Standard Deviation 0.73 |
Secondary
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Mean Aortic Gradient Reported as Mean Average at Baseline and 30 Days
Reporting of prosthetic valve hemodynamic performance by transvalvular mean aortic gradient
Time frame: 30 days
Population: Implanted set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Mean Aortic Gradient Reported as Mean Average at Baseline and 30 Days | Baseline | 48.01 mmHg | Standard Deviation 16.09 |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Mean Aortic Gradient Reported as Mean Average at Baseline and 30 Days | 30 Day | 7.58 mmHg | Standard Deviation 3.69 |
Secondary
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Percent of Participants With Degrees of Paravalvular Prosthetic Regurgitation at 30 Days
Reporting of prosthetic valve hemodynamic performance by degree of paravalvular regurgitation at 30 days post-procedure
Time frame: 30 days
Population: Implanted set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Percent of Participants With Degrees of Paravalvular Prosthetic Regurgitation at 30 Days | 30 Day: Trace | 23.6 Percentage of participants |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Percent of Participants With Degrees of Paravalvular Prosthetic Regurgitation at 30 Days | 30 Day: Severe | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Percent of Participants With Degrees of Paravalvular Prosthetic Regurgitation at 30 Days | 30 Day: None | 36.1 Percentage of participants |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Percent of Participants With Degrees of Paravalvular Prosthetic Regurgitation at 30 Days | 30 Day: Mild/Mild to Moderate | 40.3 Percentage of participants |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Percent of Participants With Degrees of Paravalvular Prosthetic Regurgitation at 30 Days | 30 Day: Moderate/Moderate to Severe | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Percent of Participants With Degrees of Paravalvular Prosthetic Regurgitation at 30 Days | 30 Day: >=Moderate | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Secondary
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Percent of Participants With Degrees of Total Prosthetic Valve Regurgitation at Baseline and 30 Days
Reporting of prosthetic valve hemodynamic performance by degree of total prosthetic valve regurgitation at 30 days post-procedure
Time frame: 30 days
Population: Implanted set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Percent of Participants With Degrees of Total Prosthetic Valve Regurgitation at Baseline and 30 Days | Baseline: None | 30.4 Percentage of participants |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Percent of Participants With Degrees of Total Prosthetic Valve Regurgitation at Baseline and 30 Days | Baseline: Trace | 24.3 Percentage of participants |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Percent of Participants With Degrees of Total Prosthetic Valve Regurgitation at Baseline and 30 Days | Baseline: Mild/Mild to Moderate | 42.6 Percentage of participants |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Percent of Participants With Degrees of Total Prosthetic Valve Regurgitation at Baseline and 30 Days | Baseline: Moderate/Moderate to Severe | 2.7 Percentage of participants |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Percent of Participants With Degrees of Total Prosthetic Valve Regurgitation at Baseline and 30 Days | Baseline: Severe | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Percent of Participants With Degrees of Total Prosthetic Valve Regurgitation at Baseline and 30 Days | Baseline: >=Moderate | 2.7 Percentage of participants |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Percent of Participants With Degrees of Total Prosthetic Valve Regurgitation at Baseline and 30 Days | 30 Day: None | 34.2 Percentage of participants |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Percent of Participants With Degrees of Total Prosthetic Valve Regurgitation at Baseline and 30 Days | 30 Day: Trace | 25.3 Percentage of participants |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Percent of Participants With Degrees of Total Prosthetic Valve Regurgitation at Baseline and 30 Days | 30 Day: Mild/Mild to Moderate | 40.4 Percentage of participants |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Percent of Participants With Degrees of Total Prosthetic Valve Regurgitation at Baseline and 30 Days | 30 Day: Moderate/Moderate to Severe | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Percent of Participants With Degrees of Total Prosthetic Valve Regurgitation at Baseline and 30 Days | 30 Day: Severe | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Percent of Participants With Degrees of Total Prosthetic Valve Regurgitation at Baseline and 30 Days | 30 Day: >=Moderate | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Secondary
Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Percent of Participants With Degrees of Transvalvular Prosthetic Regurgitation at 30 Days
Reporting of prosthetic valve hemodynamic performance by degree of transvalvular regurgitation at 30 days post-procedure
Time frame: 30 days
Population: Implanted set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Percent of Participants With Degrees of Transvalvular Prosthetic Regurgitation at 30 Days | 30 Day: None | 95.1 Percentage of participants |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Percent of Participants With Degrees of Transvalvular Prosthetic Regurgitation at 30 Days | 30 Day: Trace | 4.9 Percentage of participants |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Percent of Participants With Degrees of Transvalvular Prosthetic Regurgitation at 30 Days | 30 Day: Mild/Mild to Moderate | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Percent of Participants With Degrees of Transvalvular Prosthetic Regurgitation at 30 Days | 30 Day: Moderate/Moderate to Severe | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Percent of Participants With Degrees of Transvalvular Prosthetic Regurgitation at 30 Days | 30 Day: Severe | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Hemodynamic Performance Metrics by Doppler Echocardiography: Percent of Participants With Degrees of Transvalvular Prosthetic Regurgitation at 30 Days | 30 Day: >=Moderate | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Secondary
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification at Baseline and 30 Days
Reporting of NYHA classification change from baseline to 30 days NYHA Classification criteria: Class I: Subjects with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity. Class I: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Class III: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Class IV: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort.
Time frame: 30 days
Population: Attempted Implant set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification at Baseline and 30 Days | 30 day - Improved | 121 Participants |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification at Baseline and 30 Days | 30 day - No Change | 23 Participants |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification at Baseline and 30 Days | 30 day - Worsened | 2 Participants |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification at Baseline and 30 Days | 30 day - Died | 1 Participants |
Secondary
Percent of Participants Who Experience a Myocardial Infarction at 30 Days Post-procedure.
The rate of myocardial infarction at 30 days
Time frame: 30 days
Population: Attempted Implant set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Percent of Participants Who Experience a Myocardial Infarction at 30 Days Post-procedure. | Myocardial infarction | 0.7 Percent of participants (K-M rate) |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Percent of Participants Who Experience a Myocardial Infarction at 30 Days Post-procedure. | Peri-procedural myocarial infarction | 0.0 Percent of participants (K-M rate) |
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Percent of Participants Who Experience a Myocardial Infarction at 30 Days Post-procedure. | Spontaneous myocardial infarction | 0.7 Percent of participants (K-M rate) |
Secondary
Percent of Participants With a Life-Threatening Bleeding Event at 30 Days Post-procedure.
Rate of life-threatening (or disabling) bleeding at 30 days
Time frame: 30 days
Population: Attempted Implant set
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Percent of Participants With a Life-Threatening Bleeding Event at 30 Days Post-procedure. | 4.0 Percent of participants (K-M rate) |
Secondary
Percent of Participants With a Repeat Hospitalization for Aortic Valve Disease at 30 Days Post-procedure.
Rate of repeat hospitalization for aortic valve disease at 30 days
Time frame: 30 days
Population: Attempted Implant set
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Percent of Participants With a Repeat Hospitalization for Aortic Valve Disease at 30 Days Post-procedure. | 4.0 Percent of participants (K-M rate) |
Secondary
Percent of Participants With a Repeat Hospitalization for Ascending Aorta Disease at 30 Days Post-procedure.
Rate of repeat hospitalization for ascending aorta disease at 30 days
Time frame: 30 days
Population: Attempted Implant set
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Percent of Participants With a Repeat Hospitalization for Ascending Aorta Disease at 30 Days Post-procedure. | 0.0 Percent of participants (K-M rate) |
Secondary
Percent of Participants With New Permanent Pacemaker Implantation at 30 Days Post-procedure.
Rate of new permanent pacemaker implantation at 30 days post-procedure (excludes patients with pre-existing pacemaker at baseline)
Time frame: 30 days
Population: Attempted Implant set
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Percent of Participants With New Permanent Pacemaker Implantation at 30 Days Post-procedure. | 15.1 Percent of participants (K-M rate) |
Secondary
Percent of Participants With Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis at 30 Days Post-procedure.
Rate of prosthetic valve endocarditis at 30 days
Time frame: 30 days
Population: Attempted Implant set
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Percent of Participants With Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis at 30 Days Post-procedure. | 0.0 Percent of participants (K-M rate) |
Secondary
Percent of Participant With Prosthetic Valve Thrombosis at 30 Days Post-procedure.
Rate of prosthetic valve thrombosis at 30 days
Time frame: 30 days
Population: Attempted Implant set
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Percent of Participant With Prosthetic Valve Thrombosis at 30 Days Post-procedure. | 0.7 Percent of participants (K-M rate) |
Secondary
Percent pf Participants With Valve-Related Dysfunction Requiring Repeat Procedure at 30 Days Post-procedure.
Rate of valve-related dysfunction requiring repeat procedure at 30 days
Time frame: 30 days
Population: Attempted Implant set
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Medtronic TAVR Systems | Percent pf Participants With Valve-Related Dysfunction Requiring Repeat Procedure at 30 Days Post-procedure. | 0.0 Percent of participants (K-M rate) |