Skip to content

Safety, Tolerability and Long-term Immunogenicity of Different Formulations of a Chikungunya Vaccine (V184-005)

Observer Blinded, Randomised Study to Investigate Safety, Tolerability and Long-term Immunogenicity of Different Dose Regimens and Formulations of MV-CHIK in Healthy Volunteers

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03635086
Enrollment
60
Registered
2018-08-17
Start date
2018-08-22
Completion date
2019-11-16
Last updated
2021-10-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chikungunya Virus Infection

Keywords

Chikungunya fever

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate immunogenicity and safety of Measles Virus-Chikungunya (MV-CHIK) vaccine in different dose regimens, 28 days after one or two vaccinations.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALMV-CHIK lyophilised formulation, low dose

MV-CHIK, a live-attenuated recombinant measles vaccine expressing Chikungunya virus antigens, lyophilized low dose (powder for suspension in water for intramuscular \[IM\] injection): 5x10\^4 ±0.5 log tissue culture infectious dose 50 (TCID50)/dose.

BIOLOGICALMV-CHIK liquid frozen formulation, low dose

MV-CHIK, a live-attenuated recombinant measles vaccine expressing Chikungunya virus antigens, liquid frozen low dose (suspension for IM injection): 1x10\^5 ±0.5 log TCID50/dose.

BIOLOGICALMV-CHIK SPS® formulation, low dose

MV-CHIK, a live-attenuated recombinant measles vaccine expressing Chikungunya virus antigens, liquid SPS® low dose (suspension for IM injection): 1x10\^5 ±0.5 log TCID50/dose.

BIOLOGICALMV-CHIK liquid frozen formulation, high dose

MV-CHIK, a live-attenuated recombinant measles vaccine expressing Chikungunya virus antigens, liquid frozen high dose (suspension for IM injection): 1x10\^6 ±0.5 log TCID50/dose.

OTHERPlacebo

Sterile physiological saline solution (0.9% sodium chloride \[NaCl\]), administered by IM injection.

Sponsors

Themis Bioscience GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Is able to comprehend the full nature and purpose of the study, including possible risks and side effects; ability to cooperate with the investigator and to comply with the requirements of the entire study * Has a negative serum pregnancy test at screening (for female participants) * Has a willingness not to become pregnant or to father a child during the entire study period by practicing reliable methods of contraception * Has availability during the duration of the trial

Exclusion criteria

* Has participated in another clinical study (including exposure to an investigational medicinal product or device) within one month before the screening visit or planned concurrent participation in another clinical study before completion of the treatment period * Has a history of immunodeficiency, known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or current hepatitis B/C infection * Has a history of drug addiction including alcohol dependence within the last 2 years * Has an inability or unwillingness to avoid intake of more than around 20 grams alcohol per day during 48 hours after each vaccination (equals roughly 0.5 liter beer or 0.25 liter of wine) * Has had a vaccination within 4 weeks prior to first vaccination or planning to receive any non-study vaccine until end of treatment period * Has had a prior receipt of any Chikungunya vaccine * Has a history of moderate or severe arthritis or arthralgia within the past 3 months prior to screening * Has had a recent infection within 1 week prior to screening * Has made blood donations including plasma donations, 90 days prior to screening visit and anticipated blood, plasma, tissue, sperm or organ donation, throughout the study until end of treatment period * Has clinically relevant history of renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, respiratory, skin, hematological, endocrine, inflammatory, autoimmune or neurological diseases or clinically relevant abnormal laboratory values, that in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with the aim of the study * Has a history of neoplastic disease (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer that was successfully treated) within the past 5 years or a history of any hematological malignancy * Has behavioral, cognitive, or psychiatric condition that in the opinion of the investigator affects the ability of the participant to understand and cooperate with the study protocol * Has a history of severe adverse reactions to vaccine administration, including anaphylaxis and related symptoms, such as urticaria, respiratory difficulty, angioedema and abdominal pain to vaccines, or history of allergic reaction likely to be exacerbated by any component of the vaccine * Has a history of anaphylaxis to drugs or other allergic reactions, which the investigator considers compromising the safety of the participant. * Use of medication during 2 weeks before the first vaccination and throughout the study, which the investigator considers affecting the validity of the study, except hormonal contraception or hormonal replacement therapy in female participants. * Use of immunosuppressive drugs like corticosteroids (excluding topical preparations) within 30 days prior to the first vaccination or anticipated use before completion of the treatment period * Has receipt of blood products or immunoglobulins within 120 days prior to the screening visit or anticipated receipt of any blood product or immunoglobulin before completion of the treatment period * Has pregnancy (positive pregnancy test at screening or during the treatment period) or lactation at screening, or planning to become pregnant during the treatment period * Has unreliable contraception methods * Is a person in a direct relationship with the sponsor, an investigator or other study team members. Direct dependent relationships include close relatives (i.e. children, parents, partner/spouse, siblings) as well as employees of the study site or the sponsor

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by 50% Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test 28 Days After Last MV-CHIK Vaccination28 days after last vaccination (Up to Day 56)Participant serum was collected for determination of antibody responses by 50% plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT50). Geometric Mean Titer (GMT) of functional antibodies as measured by PRNT50 were assessed. Geometric mean titers and GMT ratios were estimated by applying an analysis of variance (ANOVA) including the factor treatment group. This was done using log10 transformed data and taking the anti-log of the resulting point estimates for the least squares means, least squares means differences and the corresponding 2 sided 95% confidence intervals (CI). P-values were also provided to compare GMTs between treatment groups adjusted for multiple comparisons according to Tukey Kramer.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse EventUp to Day 56A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, and consists of a congenital anomaly, birth defect or other important medical events. As per the protocol, adverse events were analyzed per treatment group but were not assessed with respect to individual vaccinations.
Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by PRNT50Up to Day 365Participant serum was collected at each visit (Day 0, 28, 56, 182, and 365) for determination of antibody response by PRNT50. These results represent geometric mean titers (titers \<10 were set to 5 for protocol-specified analysis).
Percentage of CD4+CD69+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsUp to Day 56Cellular immunogenicity was determined by the evaluation of T cell immune response. Blood was collected for the isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). PBMCs were isolated from whole blood to determine functional Interleukin 2 (IL-2)-producing T cells on day 0, 14, 28, 42, and 56 and in a subset of participants.
Percentage of CD4+CD69+CD137+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsUp to Day 56Cellular immunogenicity was determined by the evaluation of T cell immune response. Blood was collected for the isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). PBMCs were isolated from whole blood to determine functional Interleukin 2 (IL-2)-producing T cells on day 0, 14, 28, 42, and 56 and in a subset of participants.
Percentage of CD4+CD137+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsUp to Day 56Cellular immunogenicity was determined by the evaluation of T cell immune response. Blood was collected for the isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). PBMCs were isolated from whole blood to determine functional Interleukin 2 (IL-2)-producing T cells on day 0, 14, 28, 42, and 56 and in a subset of participants.
Percentage of CD4+CD69+OX40+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsUp to Day 56Cellular immunogenicity was determined by the evaluation of T cell immune response. Blood was collected for the isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). PBMCs were isolated from whole blood to determine functional Interleukin 2 (IL-2)-producing T cells on day 0, 14, 28, 42, and 56 and in a subset of participants.
Percentage of CD4+OX40+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsUp to Day 56Cellular immunogenicity will be determined by the evaluation of T cell immune response. Blood was collected for the isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). PBMCs were isolated from whole blood to determine functional Interleukin 2 (IL-2)-producing T cells on day 0, 14, 28, 42, and 56 and in a subset of subjects.
Percentage of Participants With Solicited and Unsolicited Adverse EventsUp to Day 56An adverse event (AE) includes any untoward medical occurrence in a participant to whom an IMP has been administered, not necessarily caused by or related to that product. An AE can therefore be any unfavourable or unintended sign, abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease temporally associated with the use of an IMP whether or not considered related to the IMP. The percentage of participants with solicited and unsolicited AEs was assessed.
Percentage of CD8+CD69+CD137+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsUp to Day 56Cellular immunogenicity was determined by the evaluation of T cell immune response. Blood was collected for the isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). PBMCs were isolated from whole blood to determine functional Interleukin 2 (IL-2)-producing T cells on day 0, 14, 28, 42, and 56 and in a subset of participants.
Percentage of CD8+CD137+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsUp to Day 56Cellular immunogenicity was determined by the evaluation of T cell immune response. Blood was collected for the isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). PBMCs were isolated from whole blood to determine functional Interleukin 2 (IL-2)-producing T cells on day 0, 14, 28, 42, and 56 and in a subset of participants.
Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies Determined by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent AssayUp to Day 365Participant serum was collected at each visit (Day 0, 28, 56, 182, and 365) for determination of Chikungunya antibody response by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The analysis of variance GMT of Chikungunya-ELISA antibodies between treatment groups is summarized.
Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-Measles Antibodies Determined by ELISAUp to Day 56Participant serum was collected at each visit (Day 0, 28, and 56) for determination of antibody responses by ELISA.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Hematology Values Reported as an AEUp to Day 56An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study. Abnormal laboratory hematology value was any AE reported under the System Organ Class of Investigations that was related to an abnormal laboratory hematology value.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Chemistry Values Reported as an AEUp to Day 56An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study. Abnormal laboratory chemistry value was any AE reported under the System Organ Class of Investigations that was related to an abnormal laboratory chemistry value.
Percentage of CD8+CD69+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsUp to Day 56Cellular immunogenicity was determined by the evaluation of T cell immune response. Blood was collected for the isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). PBMCs were isolated from whole blood to determine functional Interleukin 2 (IL-2)-producing T cells on day 0, 14, 28, 42, and 56 and in a subset of participants.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

After completion of screening procedures, participants will be randomized to one of five treatment groups (A, B, C, D or E).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low Dose
Participants received two vaccinations (Day 0 and Day 28) with MV-CHIK, a live-attenuated recombinant measles vaccine expressing Chikungunya virus antigens, lyophilized low dose (powder for suspension in water for intramuscular \[IM\] injection): 5x10\^4 ±0.5 log tissue culture infectious dose 50 (TCID50)/dose.
12
Group B: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen Low Dose
Participants received two vaccinations (Day 0 and Day 28) with MV-CHIK, a live-attenuated recombinant measles vaccine expressing Chikungunya virus antigens, liquid frozen low dose (suspension for IM injection): 1x10\^5 ±0.5 log TCID50/dose.
12
Group C: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Low Dose Stabilizing and Protecting Solution (SPS®)
Participants received two vaccinations (Day 0 and Day 28) with MV-CHIK, a live-attenuated recombinant measles vaccine expressing Chikungunya virus antigens, liquid SPS® low dose (suspension for IM injection): 1x10\^5 ±0.5 log TCID50/dose.
12
Group D: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High Dose
Participants received two vaccinations (Day 0 and Day 28) with MV-CHIK, a live-attenuated recombinant measles vaccine expressing Chikungunya virus antigens, liquid frozen high dose (suspension for IM injection): 1x10\^6 ±0.5 log TCID50/dose.
12
Group E: One MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High Dose
Participants received one vaccination (Day 0) with MV-CHIK a live-attenuated recombinant measles vaccine expressing Chikungunya virus antigens, liquid frozen high dose (suspension for IM injection): 1x10\^6 ±0.5 log TCID50/dose and placebo (Day 28), a sterile physiological saline solution (0.9% sodium chloride \[NaCl\]), administered by IM injection.
12
Total60

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Overall StudyAdverse Event01000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10000
Overall StudyWithdrawal of consent00100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DoseTotalGroup E: One MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseGroup D: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseGroup B: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen Low DoseGroup C: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Low Dose Stabilizing and Protecting Solution (SPS®)
Age, Continuous37.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.52
36.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
36.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.52
36.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.62
34.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.79
39.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
12 Participants60 Participants12 Participants12 Participants12 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants23 Participants6 Participants6 Participants4 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants37 Participants6 Participants6 Participants8 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 120 / 120 / 120 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 1211 / 127 / 1210 / 1211 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 120 / 120 / 120 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by 50% Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test 28 Days After Last MV-CHIK Vaccination

Participant serum was collected for determination of antibody responses by 50% plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT50). Geometric Mean Titer (GMT) of functional antibodies as measured by PRNT50 were assessed. Geometric mean titers and GMT ratios were estimated by applying an analysis of variance (ANOVA) including the factor treatment group. This was done using log10 transformed data and taking the anti-log of the resulting point estimates for the least squares means, least squares means differences and the corresponding 2 sided 95% confidence intervals (CI). P-values were also provided to compare GMTs between treatment groups adjusted for multiple comparisons according to Tukey Kramer.

Time frame: 28 days after last vaccination (Up to Day 56)

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration and had no major protocol deviation that could have had an impact on their immune response.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by 50% Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test 28 Days After Last MV-CHIK Vaccination21.0 Titer
Group B: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen Low DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by 50% Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test 28 Days After Last MV-CHIK Vaccination19.1 Titer
Group C: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Low Dose Stabilizing and Protecting Solution (SPS®)Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by 50% Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test 28 Days After Last MV-CHIK Vaccination13.6 Titer
Group D: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by 50% Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test 28 Days After Last MV-CHIK Vaccination45.7 Titer
Group E: One MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by 50% Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test 28 Days After Last MV-CHIK Vaccination8.9 Titer
Comparison: GMT ratios were estimated by applying an analysis of variance (ANOVA) including the factor treatment group. This was done using log10 transformed data and taking the anti-log of the resulting point estimates for the least squares means, least squares means differences and the corresponding 2-sided 95% confidence intervals (CI). P-values were also provided to compare GMTs between treatment groups adjusted for multiple comparisons according to Tukey-Kramer.p-value: 0.999895% CI: [0.2, 4.9]Tukey-Kramer
Comparison: GMT ratios were estimated by applying an analysis of variance (ANOVA) including the factor treatment group. This was done using log10 transformed data and taking the anti-log of the resulting point estimates for the least squares means, least squares means differences and the corresponding 2-sided 95% confidence intervals (CI). P values were also provided to compare GMTs between treatment groups adjusted for multiple comparisons according to Tukey-Kramer.p-value: 0.934595% CI: [0.3, 7.5]Tukey-Kramer
Comparison: GMT ratios were estimated by applying an analysis of variance (ANOVA) including the factor treatment group. This was done using log10 transformed data and taking the anti-log of the resulting point estimates for the least squares means, least squares means differences and the corresponding 2-sided 95% confidence intervals (CI). P-values were also provided to compare GMTs between treatment groups adjusted for multiple comparisons according to Tukey-Kramer.p-value: 0.583695% CI: [0.1, 2.1]Tukey-Kramer
Comparison: GMT ratios were estimated by applying an analysis of variance (ANOVA) including the factor treatment group. This was done using log10 transformed data and taking the anti-log of the resulting point estimates for the least squares means, least squares means differences and the corresponding 2-sided 95% confidence intervals (CI). P-values were also provided to compare GMTs between treatment groups adjusted for multiple comparisons according to Tukey-Kramer.p-value: 0.484495% CI: [0.5, 10.6]Tukey-Kramer
Comparison: GMT ratios were estimated by applying an analysis of variance (ANOVA) including the factor treatment group. This was done using log10 transformed data and taking the anti-log of the resulting point estimates for the least squares means, least squares means differences and the corresponding 2-sided 95% confidence intervals (CI). P-values were also provided to compare GMTs between treatment groups adjusted for multiple comparisons according to Tukey-Kramer.p-value: 0.972595% CI: [0.3, 6.8]Tukey-Kramer
Comparison: GMT ratios were estimated by applying an analysis of variance (ANOVA) including the factor treatment group. This was done using log10 transformed data and taking the anti-log of the resulting point estimates for the least squares means, least squares means differences and the corresponding 2-sided 95% confidence intervals (CI). P values were also provided to compare GMTs between treatment groups adjusted for multiple comparisons according to Tukey-Kramer.p-value: 0.471595% CI: [0.1, 1.9]Tukey-Kramer
Comparison: GMT ratios were estimated by applying an analysis of variance (ANOVA) including the factor treatment group. This was done using log10 transformed data and taking the anti-log of the resulting point estimates for the least squares means, least squares means differences and the corresponding 2-sided 95% confidence intervals (CI). P-values were also provided to compare GMTs between treatment groups adjusted for multiple comparisons according to Tukey-Kramer.p-value: 0.596995% CI: [0.5, 9.6]Tukey-Kramer
Comparison: GMT ratios were estimated by applying an analysis of variance (ANOVA) including the factor treatment group. This was done using log10 transformed data and taking the anti-log of the resulting point estimates for the least squares means, least squares means differences and the corresponding 2-sided 95% confidence intervals (CI). P-values were also provided to compare GMTs between treatment groups adjusted for multiple comparisons according to Tukey-Kramer.p-value: 0.204395% CI: [0.1, 1.4]Tukey-Kramer
Comparison: GMT ratios were estimated by applying an analysis of variance (ANOVA) including the factor treatment group. This was done using log10 transformed data and taking the anti-log of the resulting point estimates for the least squares means, least squares means differences and the corresponding 2-sided 95% confidence intervals (CI). P-values were also provided to compare GMTs between treatment groups adjusted for multiple comparisons according to Tukey-Kramer.p-value: 0.938895% CI: [0.3, 7.4]Tukey-Kramer
Comparison: GMT ratios were estimated by applying an analysis of variance (ANOVA) including the factor treatment group. This was done using log10 transformed data and taking the anti-log of the resulting point estimates for the least squares means, least squares means differences and the corresponding 2-sided 95% confidence intervals (CI). P-values were also provided to compare GMTs between treatment groups adjusted for multiple comparisons according to Tukey-Kramer.p-value: 0.025195% CI: [1.2, 23.1]Tukey-Kramer
Secondary

Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by PRNT50

Participant serum was collected at each visit (Day 0, 28, 56, 182, and 365) for determination of antibody response by PRNT50. These results represent geometric mean titers (titers \<10 were set to 5 for protocol-specified analysis).

Time frame: Up to Day 365

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration and had no major protocol deviation that could have had an impact on their immune response.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by PRNT50Day 18213.8 Titer
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by PRNT50Day 05.0 Titer
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by PRNT50Day 3657.2 Titer
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by PRNT50Day 287.2 Titer
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by PRNT50Day 5621.0 Titer
Group B: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen Low DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by PRNT50Day 18218.2 Titer
Group B: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen Low DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by PRNT50Day 5619.1 Titer
Group B: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen Low DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by PRNT50Day 2814.0 Titer
Group B: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen Low DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by PRNT50Day 36511.8 Titer
Group B: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen Low DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by PRNT50Day 08.6 Titer
Group C: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Low Dose Stabilizing and Protecting Solution (SPS®)Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by PRNT50Day 5613.6 Titer
Group C: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Low Dose Stabilizing and Protecting Solution (SPS®)Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by PRNT50Day 05.0 Titer
Group C: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Low Dose Stabilizing and Protecting Solution (SPS®)Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by PRNT50Day 286.3 Titer
Group C: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Low Dose Stabilizing and Protecting Solution (SPS®)Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by PRNT50Day 18210.5 Titer
Group C: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Low Dose Stabilizing and Protecting Solution (SPS®)Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by PRNT50Day 3658.9 Titer
Group D: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by PRNT50Day 3658.3 Titer
Group D: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by PRNT50Day 05.0 Titer
Group D: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by PRNT50Day 18211.8 Titer
Group D: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by PRNT50Day 5645.7 Titer
Group D: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by PRNT50Day 2811.3 Titer
Group E: One MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by PRNT50Day 566.9 Titer
Group E: One MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by PRNT50Day 1826.8 Titer
Group E: One MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by PRNT50Day 05.0 Titer
Group E: One MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by PRNT50Day 3655.0 Titer
Group E: One MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies as Measured by PRNT50Day 288.9 Titer
Comparison: Day 0p-value: 0.526395% CI: [0.2, 1.6]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 0p-value: 195% CI: [0.4, 2.8]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 0p-value: 195% CI: [0.4, 2.7]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 0p-value: 195% CI: [0.4, 2.7]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 0p-value: 0.5595% CI: [0.6, 4.7]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 0p-value: 0.526395% CI: [0.6, 4.6]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 0p-value: 0.526395% CI: [0.6, 4.6]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 0p-value: 195% CI: [0.4, 2.8]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 0p-value: 195% CI: [0.4, 2.8]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 0p-value: 195% CI: [0.4, 2.7]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 28p-value: 0.532195% CI: [0.2, 1.7]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 28p-value: 0.998395% CI: [0.3, 3.9]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 28p-value: 0.823495% CI: [0.2, 2.1]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 28p-value: 0.988295% CI: [0.2, 2.7]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 28p-value: 0.377895% CI: [0.6, 7.6]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 28p-value: 0.987895% CI: [0.4, 4.1]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 28p-value: 0.821395% CI: [0.5, 5.3]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 28p-value: 0.671695% CI: [0.2, 1.9]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 28p-value: 0.93895% CI: [0.2, 2.5]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 28p-value: 0.977795% CI: [0.4, 4.3]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 56p-value: 0.999795% CI: [0.3, 4.7]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 56p-value: 0.928795% CI: [0.3, 7.2]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 56p-value: 0.559895% CI: [0.1, 2]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 56p-value: 0.211795% CI: [0.7, 13.1]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 56p-value: 0.969995% CI: [0.3, 6.6]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 56p-value: 0.44695% CI: [0.1, 1.8]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 56p-value: 0.29295% CI: [0.6, 11.9]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 56p-value: 0.18495% CI: [0.1, 1.4]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 56p-value: 0.722995% CI: [0.4, 9.2]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 56p-value: 0.005295% CI: [1.5, 28.6]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 182p-value: 0.977795% CI: [0.2, 3]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 182p-value: 0.981295% CI: [0.3, 5.3]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 182p-value: 0.997995% CI: [0.3, 4.5]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 182p-value: 0.58895% CI: [0.5, 7.9]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 182p-value: 0.797395% CI: [0.4, 7]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 182p-value: 0.899295% CI: [0.4, 6]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 182p-value: 0.260295% CI: [0.7, 10.4]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 182p-value: 0.999195% CI: [0.2, 3.6]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 182p-value: 0.902895% CI: [0.4, 6.2]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 182p-value: 0.776195% CI: [0.4, 6.8]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 365p-value: 0.783395% CI: [0.2, 2.1]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 365p-value: 0.991595% CI: [0.2, 2.9]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 365p-value: 0.99895% CI: [0.3, 3]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 365p-value: 0.90995% CI: [0.4, 4.9]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 365p-value: 0.965195% CI: [0.4, 4.7]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 365p-value: 0.911295% CI: [0.4, 4.7]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 365p-value: 0.25795% CI: [0.7, 7.8]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 365p-value: 0.999995% CI: [0.3, 3.8]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 365p-value: 0.695395% CI: [0.5, 6.2]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 365p-value: 0.752395% CI: [0.5, 5.4]ANOVA
Secondary

Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies Determined by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay

Participant serum was collected at each visit (Day 0, 28, 56, 182, and 365) for determination of Chikungunya antibody response by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The analysis of variance GMT of Chikungunya-ELISA antibodies between treatment groups is summarized.

Time frame: Up to Day 365

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration and had no major protocol deviation that could have had an impact on their immune response.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies Determined by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent AssayDay 18215.6 TiterStandard Deviation 112.9
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies Determined by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent AssayDay 07.4 TiterStandard Deviation 0
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies Determined by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent AssayDay 36511.9 TiterStandard Deviation 112.8
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies Determined by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent AssayDay 289.7 TiterStandard Deviation 46.83
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies Determined by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent AssayDay 5654.3 TiterStandard Deviation 306.39
Group B: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen Low DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies Determined by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent AssayDay 18226.9 TiterStandard Deviation 3304.35
Group B: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen Low DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies Determined by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent AssayDay 5690.0 TiterStandard Deviation 4369.43
Group B: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen Low DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies Determined by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent AssayDay 2817.8 TiterStandard Deviation 4009.38
Group B: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen Low DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies Determined by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent AssayDay 36523.8 TiterStandard Deviation 3087.93
Group B: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen Low DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies Determined by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent AssayDay 014.5 TiterStandard Deviation 3907.5
Group C: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Low Dose Stabilizing and Protecting Solution (SPS®)Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies Determined by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent AssayDay 5654.7 TiterStandard Deviation 112.29
Group C: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Low Dose Stabilizing and Protecting Solution (SPS®)Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies Determined by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent AssayDay 07.4 TiterStandard Deviation 0
Group C: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Low Dose Stabilizing and Protecting Solution (SPS®)Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies Determined by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent AssayDay 288.1 TiterStandard Deviation 3.69
Group C: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Low Dose Stabilizing and Protecting Solution (SPS®)Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies Determined by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent AssayDay 18216.3 TiterStandard Deviation 92.58
Group C: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Low Dose Stabilizing and Protecting Solution (SPS®)Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies Determined by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent AssayDay 36515.8 TiterStandard Deviation 75.39
Group D: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies Determined by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent AssayDay 36518.9 TiterStandard Deviation 18.52
Group D: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies Determined by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent AssayDay 07.4 TiterStandard Deviation 0
Group D: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies Determined by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent AssayDay 18226.5 TiterStandard Deviation 17.36
Group D: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies Determined by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent AssayDay 56171.4 TiterStandard Deviation 307.41
Group D: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies Determined by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent AssayDay 2814.1 TiterStandard Deviation 28.47
Group E: One MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies Determined by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent AssayDay 569.8 TiterStandard Deviation 7.69
Group E: One MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies Determined by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent AssayDay 1828.1 TiterStandard Deviation 4.66
Group E: One MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies Determined by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent AssayDay 07.4 TiterStandard Deviation 0
Group E: One MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies Determined by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent AssayDay 3659.4 TiterStandard Deviation 10.01
Group E: One MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Chikungunya Antibodies Determined by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent AssayDay 2813.1 TiterStandard Deviation 8.74
Comparison: Day 0p-value: 0.526395% CI: [0.1, 1.7]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 0p-value: 195% CI: [0.3, 3.5]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 0p-value: 195% CI: [0.3, 3.4]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 0p-value: 195% CI: [0.3, 3.4]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 0p-value: 0.5595% CI: [0.6, 7]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 0p-value: 0.526395% CI: [0.6, 6.7]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 0p-value: 0.526395% CI: [0.6, 6.7]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 0p-value: 195% CI: [0.3, 3.5]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 0p-value: 195% CI: [0.3, 3.5]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 0p-value: 195% CI: [0.3, 3.4]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 28p-value: 0.770895% CI: [0.1, 2.4]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 28p-value: 0.996695% CI: [0.3, 5.4]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 28p-value: 0.950395% CI: [0.2, 3]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 28p-value: 0.979195% CI: [0.2, 3.2]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 28p-value: 0.573995% CI: [0.5, 9.8]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 28p-value: 0.991895% CI: [0.3, 5.4]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 28p-value: 0.974895% CI: [0.3, 5.9]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 28p-value: 0.82795% CI: [0.1, 2.6]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 28p-value: 0.89395% CI: [0.1, 2.8]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 28p-value: 0.999995% CI: [0.3, 4.7]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 56p-value: 0.910595% CI: [0.1, 3.2]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 56p-value: 195% CI: [0.2, 5.5]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 56p-value: 0.304795% CI: [0.1, 1.7]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 56p-value: 0.042395% CI: [1, 29.2]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 56p-value: 0.921395% CI: [0.3, 9.1]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 56p-value: 0.809295% CI: [0.1, 2.8]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 56p-value: 0.00495% CI: [1.7, 48.5]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 56p-value: 0.334795% CI: [0.1, 1.8]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 56p-value: 0.048895% CI: [1, 30.7]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 56p-value: 0.000195% CI: [3.3, 92.2]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 182p-value: 0.883195% CI: [0.1, 3]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 182p-value: 195% CI: [0.2, 5.2]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 182p-value: 0.891695% CI: [0.1, 3.1]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 182p-value: 0.79495% CI: [0.4, 9.9]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 182p-value: 0.916995% CI: [0.3, 8.9]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 182p-value: 195% CI: [0.2, 5.2]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 182p-value: 0.256395% CI: [0.6, 17.1]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 182p-value: 0.923795% CI: [0.1, 3.3]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 182p-value: 0.770895% CI: [0.4, 10.8]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 182p-value: 0.266195% CI: [0.6, 16.9]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 365p-value: 0.761495% CI: [0.1, 2.6]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 365p-value: 0.990595% CI: [0.1, 4.3]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 365p-value: 0.93395% CI: [0.1, 3.3]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 365p-value: 0.994595% CI: [0.2, 6.7]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 365p-value: 0.959995% CI: [0.3, 8.4]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 365p-value: 0.994295% CI: [0.2, 6.4]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 365p-value: 0.493295% CI: [0.5, 12.9]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 365p-value: 0.998395% CI: [0.2, 4.6]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 365p-value: 0.911295% CI: [0.3, 9.3]ANOVA
Comparison: Day 365p-value: 0.743195% CI: [0.4, 10.2]ANOVA
Secondary

Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-Measles Antibodies Determined by ELISA

Participant serum was collected at each visit (Day 0, 28, and 56) for determination of antibody responses by ELISA.

Time frame: Up to Day 56

Population: The analysis population included all randomized participants who received at least one investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration and had no major protocol deviation that could have had an impact on their immune response.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Measles Antibodies Determined by ELISADay 281250.8 TiterStandard Deviation 1629.35
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Measles Antibodies Determined by ELISADay 0711.6 TiterStandard Deviation 1764.77
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Measles Antibodies Determined by ELISADay 561476.8 TiterStandard Deviation 1672.1
Group B: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen Low DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Measles Antibodies Determined by ELISADay 0482.1 TiterStandard Deviation 1009.4
Group B: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen Low DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Measles Antibodies Determined by ELISADay 561158.6 TiterStandard Deviation 1019.59
Group B: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen Low DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Measles Antibodies Determined by ELISADay 281120.3 TiterStandard Deviation 849.01
Group C: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Low Dose Stabilizing and Protecting Solution (SPS®)Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-Measles Antibodies Determined by ELISADay 0750.2 TiterStandard Deviation 1580.9
Group C: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Low Dose Stabilizing and Protecting Solution (SPS®)Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-Measles Antibodies Determined by ELISADay 281207.7 TiterStandard Deviation 1642.33
Group C: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Low Dose Stabilizing and Protecting Solution (SPS®)Geometric Mean Titer of Anti-Measles Antibodies Determined by ELISADay 561355.4 TiterStandard Deviation 1818.08
Group D: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Measles Antibodies Determined by ELISADay 563009.80 TiterStandard Deviation 1355.67
Group D: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Measles Antibodies Determined by ELISADay 0731.0 TiterStandard Deviation 1612.98
Group D: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Measles Antibodies Determined by ELISADay 282246.4 TiterStandard Deviation 1515.4
Group E: One MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Measles Antibodies Determined by ELISADay 282116.2 TiterStandard Deviation 1527.25
Group E: One MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Measles Antibodies Determined by ELISADay 0888.4 TiterStandard Deviation 1560.14
Group E: One MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseGeometric Mean Titer of Anti-Measles Antibodies Determined by ELISADay 562011.8 TiterStandard Deviation 1852.26
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Chemistry Values Reported as an AE

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study. Abnormal laboratory chemistry value was any AE reported under the System Organ Class of Investigations that was related to an abnormal laboratory chemistry value.

Time frame: Up to Day 56

Population: The analysis population included all participants who entered in the study and received at least one IMP administration. All analyses based on the safety population were carried out using the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Chemistry Values Reported as an AE0 Participants
Group B: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen Low DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Chemistry Values Reported as an AE1 Participants
Group C: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Low Dose Stabilizing and Protecting Solution (SPS®)Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Chemistry Values Reported as an AE0 Participants
Group D: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Chemistry Values Reported as an AE1 Participants
Group E: One MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Chemistry Values Reported as an AE0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Hematology Values Reported as an AE

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study. Abnormal laboratory hematology value was any AE reported under the System Organ Class of Investigations that was related to an abnormal laboratory hematology value.

Time frame: Up to Day 56

Population: The analysis population included all participants who entered in the study and received at least one IMP administration. All analyses based on the safety population were carried out using the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Hematology Values Reported as an AE1 Participants
Group B: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen Low DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Hematology Values Reported as an AE0 Participants
Group C: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Low Dose Stabilizing and Protecting Solution (SPS®)Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Hematology Values Reported as an AE0 Participants
Group D: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Hematology Values Reported as an AE0 Participants
Group E: One MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DoseNumber of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Hematology Values Reported as an AE4 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of CD4+CD137+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-Cells

Cellular immunogenicity was determined by the evaluation of T cell immune response. Blood was collected for the isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). PBMCs were isolated from whole blood to determine functional Interleukin 2 (IL-2)-producing T cells on day 0, 14, 28, 42, and 56 and in a subset of participants.

Time frame: Up to Day 56

Population: The analysis population included a subset of all randomized participants who received at least one investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration and had no major protocol deviation that could have had an impact on their immune response. Based on the protocol, only participants in subset Treatment Group D (MV-CHIK liquid frozen high dose formulation) were analyzed for t-cell response.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD4+CD137+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD4+CD137+ (Day 0)0.0528 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.0509
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD4+CD137+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD4+CD137+ (Day 14)0.1595 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.2105
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD4+CD137+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD4+CD137+ (Day 28)0.1492 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.0932
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD4+CD137+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD4+CD137+ (Day 42)0.3484 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.3428
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD4+CD137+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD4+CD137+ (Day 56)0.3994 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.2713
Secondary

Percentage of CD4+CD69+CD137+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-Cells

Cellular immunogenicity was determined by the evaluation of T cell immune response. Blood was collected for the isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). PBMCs were isolated from whole blood to determine functional Interleukin 2 (IL-2)-producing T cells on day 0, 14, 28, 42, and 56 and in a subset of participants.

Time frame: Up to Day 56

Population: The analysis population included a subset of all randomized participants who received at least one investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration and had no major protocol deviation that could have had an impact on their immune response. Based on the protocol, a subset of the participants in treatment group D (MV-CHIK liquid frozen high dose formulation) were analyzed for t-cell response.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD4+CD69+CD137+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD4+CD69+CD137+ (Day 0)0.0061 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.0112
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD4+CD69+CD137+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD4+CD69+CD137+ (Day 14)0.0174 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.0313
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD4+CD69+CD137+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD4+CD69+CD137+ (Day 28)0.0120 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.0168
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD4+CD69+CD137+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD4+CD69+CD137+ (Day 42)0.0317 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.0438
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD4+CD69+CD137+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD4+CD69+CD137+ (Day 56)0.0393 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.0476
Secondary

Percentage of CD4+CD69+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-Cells

Cellular immunogenicity was determined by the evaluation of T cell immune response. Blood was collected for the isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). PBMCs were isolated from whole blood to determine functional Interleukin 2 (IL-2)-producing T cells on day 0, 14, 28, 42, and 56 and in a subset of participants.

Time frame: Up to Day 56

Population: The analysis population included a subset of all randomized participants who received at least one investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration and had no major protocol deviation that could have had an impact on their immune response. Based on the protocol, only participants in subset Treatment Group D (MV-CHIK liquid frozen high dose formulation) were analyzed for t-cell response.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD4+CD69+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD4+CD69+ (Day 0)0.0194 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.0446
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD4+CD69+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD4+CD69+ (Day 14)0.1430 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.1589
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD4+CD69+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD4+CD69+ (Day 28)0.1077 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.206
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD4+CD69+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD4+CD69+ (Day 42)0.2050 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.2316
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD4+CD69+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD4+CD69+ (Day 56)0.1935 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.2036
Secondary

Percentage of CD4+CD69+OX40+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-Cells

Cellular immunogenicity was determined by the evaluation of T cell immune response. Blood was collected for the isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). PBMCs were isolated from whole blood to determine functional Interleukin 2 (IL-2)-producing T cells on day 0, 14, 28, 42, and 56 and in a subset of participants.

Time frame: Up to Day 56

Population: The analysis population included a subset of all randomized participants who received at least one investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration and had no major protocol deviation that could have had an impact on their immune response. Based on the protocol, only participants in subset Treatment Group D (MV-CHIK liquid frozen high dose formulation) were analyzed for t-cell response.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD4+CD69+OX40+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD4+CD69+OX40+ (Day 0)0.0033 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.0048
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD4+CD69+OX40+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD4+CD69+OX40+ (Day 14)0.0265 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.0522
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD4+CD69+OX40+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD4+CD69+OX40+ (Day 28)0.0095 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.007
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD4+CD69+OX40+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD4+CD69+OX40+ (Day 42)0.0267 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.0408
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD4+CD69+OX40+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD4+CD69+OX40+ (Day 56)0.0337 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.0386
Secondary

Percentage of CD4+OX40+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-Cells

Cellular immunogenicity will be determined by the evaluation of T cell immune response. Blood was collected for the isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). PBMCs were isolated from whole blood to determine functional Interleukin 2 (IL-2)-producing T cells on day 0, 14, 28, 42, and 56 and in a subset of subjects.

Time frame: Up to Day 56

Population: The analysis population included a subset of all randomized participants who received at least one investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration and had no major protocol deviation that could have had an impact on their immune response. Based on the protocol, only participants in subset Treatment Group D (MV-CHIK liquid frozen high dose formulation) were analyzed for t-cell response.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD4+OX40+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD4+OX40+ (Day 0)0.0062 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.0158
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD4+OX40+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD4+OX40+ (Day 14)0.0745 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.1007
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD4+OX40+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD4+OX40+ (Day 28)0.0269 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.028
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD4+OX40+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD4+OX40+ (Day 42)0.0492 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.1012
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD4+OX40+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD4+OX40+ (Day 56)0.0698 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.0997
Secondary

Percentage of CD8+CD137+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-Cells

Cellular immunogenicity was determined by the evaluation of T cell immune response. Blood was collected for the isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). PBMCs were isolated from whole blood to determine functional Interleukin 2 (IL-2)-producing T cells on day 0, 14, 28, 42, and 56 and in a subset of participants.

Time frame: Up to Day 56

Population: The analysis population included a subset of all randomized participants who received at least one investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration and had no major protocol deviation that could have had an impact on their immune response. Based on the protocol, only participants in subset Treatment Group D (MV-CHIK liquid frozen high dose formulation) were analyzed for t-cell response.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD8+CD137+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD8+CD137+ (Day 0)0.0194 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.0334
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD8+CD137+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD8+CD137+ (Day 14)0.0294 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.0366
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD8+CD137+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD8+CD137+ (Day 28)0.0224 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.0377
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD8+CD137+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD8+CD137+ (Day 42)0.0341 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.0595
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD8+CD137+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD8+CD137+ (Day 56)0.0607 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.0557
Secondary

Percentage of CD8+CD69+CD137+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-Cells

Cellular immunogenicity was determined by the evaluation of T cell immune response. Blood was collected for the isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). PBMCs were isolated from whole blood to determine functional Interleukin 2 (IL-2)-producing T cells on day 0, 14, 28, 42, and 56 and in a subset of participants.

Time frame: Up to Day 56

Population: The analysis population included a subset of all randomized participants who received at least one investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration and had no major protocol deviation that could have had an impact on their immune response. Based on the protocol, only participants in subset Treatment Group D (MV-CHIK liquid frozen high dose formulation) were analyzed for t-cell response.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD8+CD69+CD137+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD8+CD69+CD137+ (Day 0)0.0005 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.0018
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD8+CD69+CD137+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD8+CD69+CD137+ (Day 14)0.0139 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.0229
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD8+CD69+CD137+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD8+CD69+CD137+ (Day 28)0.0184 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.0454
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD8+CD69+CD137+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD8+CD69+CD137+ (Day 42)0.0148 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.0171
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD8+CD69+CD137+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD8+CD69+CD137+ (Day 56)0.0380 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.0392
Secondary

Percentage of CD8+CD69+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-Cells

Cellular immunogenicity was determined by the evaluation of T cell immune response. Blood was collected for the isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). PBMCs were isolated from whole blood to determine functional Interleukin 2 (IL-2)-producing T cells on day 0, 14, 28, 42, and 56 and in a subset of participants.

Time frame: Up to Day 56

Population: The analysis population included a subset of all randomized participants who received at least one investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration and had no major protocol deviation that could have had an impact on their immune response. Based on the protocol, only participants in subset Treatment Group D (MV-CHIK liquid frozen high dose formulation) were analyzed for t-cell response.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD8+CD69+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD8+CD69+ (Day 0)0.1919 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.2329
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD8+CD69+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD8+CD69+ (Day 14)0.3319 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.6046
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD8+CD69+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD8+CD69+ (Day 28)0.4242 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.633
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD8+CD69+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD8+CD69+ (Day 42)0.1961 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.2496
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of CD8+CD69+ Chikungunya Virus Specific T-CellsCD8+CD69+ (Day 56)0.2375 Percentage of t-cellsStandard Deviation 0.2902
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event

A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, and consists of a congenital anomaly, birth defect or other important medical events. As per the protocol, adverse events were analyzed per treatment group but were not assessed with respect to individual vaccinations.

Time frame: Up to Day 56

Population: The analysis population included all participants who entered in the study and received at least one IMP administration. All analyses based on the safety population were carried out using the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event0.0 Percentage of Participants
Group B: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen Low DosePercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event0.0 Percentage of Participants
Group C: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Low Dose Stabilizing and Protecting Solution (SPS®)Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event0.0 Percentage of Participants
Group D: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DosePercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event0.0 Percentage of Participants
Group E: One MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DosePercentage of Participants With at Least 1 Serious Adverse Event0.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Solicited and Unsolicited Adverse Events

An adverse event (AE) includes any untoward medical occurrence in a participant to whom an IMP has been administered, not necessarily caused by or related to that product. An AE can therefore be any unfavourable or unintended sign, abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease temporally associated with the use of an IMP whether or not considered related to the IMP. The percentage of participants with solicited and unsolicited AEs was assessed.

Time frame: Up to Day 56

Population: The analysis population included all participants who entered in the study and received at least one IMP administration. All analyses based on the safety population were carried out using the actual treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group A: Two MV-CHIK Lyophilized Low DosePercentage of Participants With Solicited and Unsolicited Adverse Events83.3 Percentage of Participants
Group B: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen Low DosePercentage of Participants With Solicited and Unsolicited Adverse Events91.7 Percentage of Participants
Group C: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Low Dose Stabilizing and Protecting Solution (SPS®)Percentage of Participants With Solicited and Unsolicited Adverse Events58.3 Percentage of Participants
Group D: Two MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DosePercentage of Participants With Solicited and Unsolicited Adverse Events83.3 Percentage of Participants
Group E: One MV-CHIK Liquid Frozen High DosePercentage of Participants With Solicited and Unsolicited Adverse Events91.7 Percentage of Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026