Skip to content

Bipolar Scissors for Circumcision

Bipolar Scissors Versus Classic Method for Circumcision

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03634358
Enrollment
200
Registered
2018-08-16
Start date
2016-01-01
Completion date
2018-01-10
Last updated
2018-08-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Male Circumcision

Keywords

bipolar, scalpel, foreskin, prepuce

Brief summary

comparing the outcomes of using bipolar scissors for male circumcision to the classic scalpel method

Detailed description

A prospective, randomized study, comparing two different techniques for pediatric male circumcision: the bipolar diathermy scissors technique with that of a classic scalpel technique. Study included male infants from 40 days old up to 18 month old. They were reviewed regarding Operative time, bleeding, complications, postoperative pain and morbidity. Differences in the outcome were compared.

Interventions

PROCEDUREBipolar scissors
PROCEDUREclassic scalpel

Sponsors

Zagazig University
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

Comparing Outcomes of two different surgical techniques between two groups

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
40 Days to 18 Months
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Male infant between 40 days and 18 month old * parents' request and approval of circumcision

Exclusion criteria

* previous attempts of circumcision or revision cases * bleeding tendency * congenital anomalies involving genitalia * age below 40 days (expected Vit. K deficiency) or above 18 month old.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-operative bleedingA weekoccurrence of active bleeding after circumcision

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-operative painA weekpain after operation as assessed and described by parents (through a questionnaire) by the Neonatal/Infant Pain Scale (NIPS): It is composed of six (6) indicators. * facial expression * cry * breathing patterns * arms * legs * state of arousal Each behavioral indicator is scored with 0 or 1 except cry, which has three possible descriptors therefore, being scored with a 0, 1 or 2. Infants should be observed for one minute in order to fully assess each indicator. Total pain scores range from 0-7. Pain Level is determined as: 0-2 = mild to no pain. 3-4 = mild to moderate pain \>4 = severe pain
wound complicationsTwo weeksoccurrence of infection, necrosis or skin loss around wound
Cosmetic outcomeTwo monthPresence or absence of scar
Operative timeOperative timeDuration of procedure of both techniques
Over or under correction2 monthExcessive or insufficient removal of foreskin (presence of redundant skin or compression of penile length)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026