Aging, Chronic Disease
Conditions
Keywords
disability
Brief summary
This study will evaluate a Compassionate Communities-based intervention aimed at reducing social isolation by mobilizing individuals to act on their health and social needs individually, and in collaboration with fellow members of their community. The intervention program includes facilitated building of neighbourhood networks (member benefits include access to practical help, the opportunity to develop meaningful relationships, and community mobilization), and coaching support to work on individualized goal setting and more detailed navigation support and planning.
Detailed description
The Compassionate Communities intervention is catalyzed by professional facilitators who visit communities with high concentrations of elderly and vulnerable residents, and recruit those who are interested in a project to identify their own health and social needs, assets and priorities; to collectively work to support each other in achieving these; and to implement a neighbourhood exchange to more easily match offers of help to people who need help. The mobilization work starts with the facilitator, who is employed by a community or social service organization, but increasingly draws on the energies of the mobilized initial participants as volunteers who conduct further community outreach in their community, attracting and mobilizing other residents, peers, and neighbouring resources in the work. Participants also plan and implement a broad range of activities identified by the residents as their priorities for neighbourhood building. Participants and their caregivers have the option of receiving more in-depth 1:1 coaching support to work on individualized goal setting, more detailed navigation support or advanced care planning following the sessions.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALNeighbourhood exchange
Facilitated coaching support to identify needs and priorities and link with resources - personal, community, friend and family, or from professional service providers; plan and implement a personalized care pathway through community exchange
BEHAVIORALQuality of Life Assessment
Completion of baseline measures
Sponsors
Windsor-Essex Compassionate Care Community
University of Windsor
Hospice of Windsor and Essex County
Erie St. Clair Local Health Integration Network (LHIN)
Ontario Trillium Foundation
McMaster University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
Cluster randomization with stepped wedge
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Seniors (65 years of age and older) * people with disabilities * caregivers of seniors or people with disabilities * residing in identified buildings/ neighbourhoods where the WECCC Compassionate Communities Neighbourhood program is being launched * able to communicate in English or interpreter can be arranged
Exclusion criteria
* not able to communicate in English and interpreter cannot be arranged
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Perception of social disconnectedness | change from baseline at 7 months | Social disconnectedness scale; 8-item validated scale (Cornwell and Waite, 2008), higher scores indicate greater social disconnectedness |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Perception of personal well-being | change from baseline at 7 months | Assessed by Personal Well-Being Index (PWI); 8-item scale (Personal well-being index 5th edition, 2013). Higher scores indicate greater well-being |
| Perceived loneliness scale | change from baseline at 7 months | Assessed by Perceived loneliness scale; 9-item validated scale (Cornwell and Waite, 2009). Higher scores indicated greater perceived isolation |
| Attainment of personal goals | Change from baseline at 7 months | Assessed by Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) instrument, measured on 5-point scale for each goal identified (Hurn et al, 2006), higher score indicates greater goal attainment |
| Perceived provisions of social relationships | change from baseline at 7 months | Social provisions scale; 10-item validated scale consisting of 5 subscales (Caron, 2013). The SPS 10 measures the perception of social support and consists of 10 items expressed as statements with responses coded on a 4-point scale from strongly disagree (= 1) to strongly agree (= 4). The total SPS-10 score is formed by the summation of raw scores, with high score indicating a higher degree of social provisions (maximum score of 40) |
| Number of emergency department visits | 7 months | Number of emergency department visits measured from health administrative data |
| Number of hospital admissions | 7 months | Number of hospital admissions measured from health administrative data |
| Health related quality of life | change from baseline at 7 months | Assessed by Euroqol 5 dimension 5 level (5D-5L) scale; 5 levels of response for each of 5 items, score is converted to a single index, standardized to scale of 0 to 1, 1 being perfect health |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-effectiveness | 7 months | Cost-effectiveness ratio measured as difference between groups in total health care utilization costs (measured from administrative data) divided by quality adjusted life years gained from the intervention |
Countries
Canada
Contacts
Primary ContactMichelle Howard, PhD
Backup ContactDeborah Sattler
Outcome results
None listed