Skip to content

A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Office-based MR-guided Prostate Biopsy Approaches

A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Office-based MR-guided Prostate Biopsy Approaches: Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy Compared With a Transperineal Approach

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03632655
Enrollment
38
Registered
2018-08-15
Start date
2017-12-23
Completion date
2020-10-08
Last updated
2024-05-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Elevated PSA, Prostate Cancer

Brief summary

This randomized trial will compare the safety and efficacy of TPM versus TRUS biopsies performed in the outpatient setting. Primary endpoints will be pain as well as detection of clinically significant disease (defined as Gleason Score \>=7 or cancer core length \>=6 mm). Secondary endpoints will be detection of any prostate cancer, hospital re-admissions within 30 days, aborted procedures due to discomfort, procedure time, adverse events including hematuria, urinary retention, hematospermia, hematochezia, and infection, and patient-reported outcomes as measured on validated instruments such as International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS) and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5). In men who subsequently elect to undergo radical prostatectomy for definitive treatment of their prostate cancer, Gleason scores at final pathology will be correlated to the Gleason scores obtained at time of biopsy.

Detailed description

The feasibility of outpatient TPM has been well demonstrated.(Bianco & Martínez-Salamanca, 2016; Merrick et al., 2016; Smith et al., 2014) New technology now allows for fusion of MRI images with TPM devices, allowing for targeting of cancerous-appearing lesions on MRI. Such technology that fuses MRI-imaging with TRUS biopsy has become routine in U.S. clinical practice, with improved cancer detection rates as compared with standard TRUS.(Ahmed et al., 2017; Robertson, Emberton, & Moore, 2013) This randomized trial will compare the safety and efficacy of TPM versus TRUS biopsies performed in the outpatient setting. Men will be randomized to receiving either TPM or TRUS targeted biopsy. All men will receive a urine culture within 2 weeks of biopsy and will be started on antibiotic prophylaxis prior to biopsy in accordance with AUA antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines. Men with a positive urine culture will be treated with culture-specific antibiotics and must have a documented negative urine culture prior to biopsy.

Interventions

PROCEDUREprostate biopsy

Men will be randomized to receiving either TPM or TRUS targeted biopsy

Sponsors

Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Men will be randomized to receiving either TPM or TRUS targeted biopsy.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men 18 years or older with suspicion for prostate cancer based upon an elevated PSA, abnormal digital rectal examination, abnormal MRI * Men on active surveillance with indication for biopsy

Exclusion criteria

* Men with active urinary tract infection, metastatic prostate cancer, history of colorectal surgery limiting insertion of transrectal probe, evidence of acute or chronic prostatitis, or concern for perineal cellulitis or fistula * Men unfit to undergo prostate biopsy under local anesthesia * Men with prior definitive therapy for prostate cancer, such as radiation therapy or partial gland ablation * Men with contraindication to prostate MRI (claustrophobia, pacemaker, chronic kidney disease)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gleason Grade7 days post-biopsyDetection of clinically significant disease Typical Gleason Scores range from 6-10. The higher the Gleason Score, the more likely that the cancer will grow and spread quickly. * Scores of 6 or less describe cancer cells that look similar to normal cells and suggest that the cancer is likely to grow slowly. * A score of 7 suggests and intermediate risk for aggressive cancer. Scoring a 7 means that the primary score (largest section of the tumor) scored a 3 or 4. Tumors with a primary score of 3 and a secondary score of 4 have a fairly good outlook, whereas cancers with a primary Gleason Score of 4 and a secondary score of 3, are more likely to grow and spread. * Scores of 8 or higher describe cancers that are likely to spread more rapidly, these cancers are often referred to as poorly differentiated or high grade.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient-reported Pain, as Measured on a 0-10 Likert ScaleAt time of local anesthesia administration, initiation of biopsy, immediately following biopsy, 7 days post-biopsy, 3 months post-biopsyPain will be scored on a 0-10 Likert scale. 0 indicates no pain and high scores indicate greater pain.
Patient-reported Symptoms, as Measured by International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS) Questionnairebaseline, 7 days post-biopsy, 30 days post-biopsyIPSS scores range from 1 to 35, with 1-7 indicating mild symptoms, 8-19 indicating moderate symptoms, 20-35 indicating severe symptoms.
Patient-reported Erectile Function, as Measured by International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) Questionnairebaseline, 7 days post-biopsy, 30 days post-biopsyIIEF-5 scores range from 1 to 25, with 1-7 indicating severe erectile dysfunction, 8-11 indicating moderate erectile dysfunction, 12-16 indicating mild-moderate erectile dysfunction, 17-21 indicating mild erectile dysfunction, and 22-25 indicating no erectile dysfunction.
Patient-reported Quality of Life, as Measured by EPIC-CP Questionnairebaseline, 7 days post-biopsy, 30 days post-biopsyEPIC-CP comprises of 10 questions about the patient within the last four weeks. Questions 1,7,8,9 are each graded on a scale from 0-4 for a total of 12 points. Higher scores indicate worse quality of life with regards to urinary and sexual function. Questions 2-4 grade Urinary Incontinence Symptoms on a scale from 0-4 (max 12 points). Higher scores indicate worse urinary incontinence symptoms. Questions 5a-c grade Urinary Irritation/Obstructive Symptoms on a scale from 0-4 (max 12 poitns). Higher scores indicate worse urinary irritation/obstructive symptoms. Questions 6a-c grade Bowel Symptoms on a scale from 0-4 (max 12 points). Higher scores indicate worse bowel symptoms. Questions 10a-c grade Vitality/Hormonal Symptoms on a scale from 0-4 (max 12 points). Higher scores indicate worse vitality/hormonal symptoms. All scores are summed (max 60 points) to calculate the Overall Prostate Cancer QOL score. Higher score indicates worse patient-reported QOL.
Adverse Eventsinitiation of biopsy, immediately following biopsy, 7 days post-biopsy, 30 days post-biopsyAdverse events that have occurred, such as hospital re-admissions, aborted procedures due to discomfort, hematuria, urinary retention, hematospermia, hematochezia, and/or infection.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Biopsy (TRUS)
Patients will receive a transrectal guided prostate biopsy prostate biopsy: Men will be randomized to receiving either TPM or TRUS targeted biopsy
22
Transperineal Prostate Biopsy
Patients will receive a transperineal prostate biopsy prostate biopsy: Men will be randomized to receiving either TPM or TRUS targeted biopsy
16
Total38

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTransrectal Ultrasound Guided Biopsy (TRUS)TotalTransperineal Prostate Biopsy
Age, Continuous63 years64 years69 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants21 Participants9 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
10 Participants16 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
10 Participants14 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
7 Participants15 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
22 participants38 participants16 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
22 Participants38 Participants16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Gleason Grade

Detection of clinically significant disease Typical Gleason Scores range from 6-10. The higher the Gleason Score, the more likely that the cancer will grow and spread quickly. * Scores of 6 or less describe cancer cells that look similar to normal cells and suggest that the cancer is likely to grow slowly. * A score of 7 suggests and intermediate risk for aggressive cancer. Scoring a 7 means that the primary score (largest section of the tumor) scored a 3 or 4. Tumors with a primary score of 3 and a secondary score of 4 have a fairly good outlook, whereas cancers with a primary Gleason Score of 4 and a secondary score of 3, are more likely to grow and spread. * Scores of 8 or higher describe cancers that are likely to spread more rapidly, these cancers are often referred to as poorly differentiated or high grade.

Time frame: 7 days post-biopsy

Population: The data was not collected due to the trial being terminated.

Secondary

Adverse Events

Adverse events that have occurred, such as hospital re-admissions, aborted procedures due to discomfort, hematuria, urinary retention, hematospermia, hematochezia, and/or infection.

Time frame: initiation of biopsy, immediately following biopsy, 7 days post-biopsy, 30 days post-biopsy

Population: The data was not collected due to the trial being terminated.

Secondary

Patient-reported Erectile Function, as Measured by International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) Questionnaire

IIEF-5 scores range from 1 to 25, with 1-7 indicating severe erectile dysfunction, 8-11 indicating moderate erectile dysfunction, 12-16 indicating mild-moderate erectile dysfunction, 17-21 indicating mild erectile dysfunction, and 22-25 indicating no erectile dysfunction.

Time frame: baseline, 7 days post-biopsy, 30 days post-biopsy

Population: The data was not collected due to the trial being terminated.

Secondary

Patient-reported Pain, as Measured on a 0-10 Likert Scale

Pain will be scored on a 0-10 Likert scale. 0 indicates no pain and high scores indicate greater pain.

Time frame: At time of local anesthesia administration, initiation of biopsy, immediately following biopsy, 7 days post-biopsy, 3 months post-biopsy

Population: The data was not collected due to the trial being terminated.

Secondary

Patient-reported Quality of Life, as Measured by EPIC-CP Questionnaire

EPIC-CP comprises of 10 questions about the patient within the last four weeks. Questions 1,7,8,9 are each graded on a scale from 0-4 for a total of 12 points. Higher scores indicate worse quality of life with regards to urinary and sexual function. Questions 2-4 grade Urinary Incontinence Symptoms on a scale from 0-4 (max 12 points). Higher scores indicate worse urinary incontinence symptoms. Questions 5a-c grade Urinary Irritation/Obstructive Symptoms on a scale from 0-4 (max 12 poitns). Higher scores indicate worse urinary irritation/obstructive symptoms. Questions 6a-c grade Bowel Symptoms on a scale from 0-4 (max 12 points). Higher scores indicate worse bowel symptoms. Questions 10a-c grade Vitality/Hormonal Symptoms on a scale from 0-4 (max 12 points). Higher scores indicate worse vitality/hormonal symptoms. All scores are summed (max 60 points) to calculate the Overall Prostate Cancer QOL score. Higher score indicates worse patient-reported QOL.

Time frame: baseline, 7 days post-biopsy, 30 days post-biopsy

Population: The data was not collected due to the trial being terminated.

Secondary

Patient-reported Symptoms, as Measured by International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS) Questionnaire

IPSS scores range from 1 to 35, with 1-7 indicating mild symptoms, 8-19 indicating moderate symptoms, 20-35 indicating severe symptoms.

Time frame: baseline, 7 days post-biopsy, 30 days post-biopsy

Population: The data was not collected due to the trial being terminated.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026