Skip to content

Sedation Of Adult Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Network Meta-analysis

SEDATION OF ADULT PATIENTS UNDERGOING GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY: A NETWORK META-ANALYSIS

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03632330
Enrollment
6963
Registered
2018-08-15
Start date
2018-02-05
Completion date
2018-03-07
Last updated
2023-04-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dexmedetomidine, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Sedation

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine with other sedatives in sedation during endoscopy by analyzing the most recently published interventional trials and observational studies.

Detailed description

A variety of sedatives are available in procedural sedation and the efficacy & safety have been compared in several trials for procedural sedation. However, none of clinical trial has enough number of patients to clarify the conclusive differences among sedatives. Thus, pooling all available studies together systematically by network meta-analysis for GI endoscopic procedure may provide a better understanding of efficacy and safety of sedatives. Therefore we would like to conduct a network meta-analysis to analyze the outcomes of GI endoscopy by using the most recently-published interventional trials.

Interventions

DRUGDexmedetomidine

Dexmedetomidine group

DRUGMidazolam

Midazolam group

DRUGPropofol

Propofol group

DRUGMidazolam/Propofol

Midazolam/Propofol group

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Inclusion criteria We will include studies if they (1) the setting was using any sedative for endoscopy for an procedural sedation (2) the study compared dexmedetomidine with other sedative for sedative therapy and (3) the outcomes included satisfaction score and adverse events. *

Exclusion criteria

We excluded studies if they (1) the number of sedative was different in two arms (2) did not report the specific results comparing dexmedetomidine with other sedatives.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of subjects who experience desaturationFrom first infusion of the sedative agent until awakening approximately up to 2 hours after the procedure.SaO2 \< 94% for more than 10 seconds, RR\<8, apneic episodes, face mask

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of subjects who experience HypotensionFrom first infusion of the sedative agent until awakening approximately up to 2 hours after the procedureBP\<90/50, decrease\>20% or 10mmHg, MAP\<60mmHg or MAP decrease\>20%
Number of subjects who experience BradycardiaFrom first infusion of the sedative agent until awakening approximately up to 2 hours after the procedureA heart rate of \<50 beats per min, decrease \> 15%

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026