Skip to content

Rivaroxaban Post-Transradial Access for the Prevention of Radial Artery Occlusion

Rivaroxaban Post-Transradial Access for the Prevention of Radial Artery Occlusion

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03630055
Acronym
CAPITAL-RAPTOR
Enrollment
930
Registered
2018-08-14
Start date
2018-10-03
Completion date
2025-06-26
Last updated
2026-05-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Radial Artery Occlusion

Keywords

Direct oral anticoagulants, Transradial access, Percutaneous coronary intervention

Brief summary

Coronary angiography is performed to evaluate for obstructive coronary artery disease. This is commonly performed via the transfemoral or transradial approach with the latter increasing in frequency. One of the most common complications of transradial access is radial artery occlusion occurring in \ 5% of patients which prohibits the use of the radial artery in the future. There is evidence to support the use of intraprocedural anticoagulation to mitigate the risk of radial artery occlusion however the role of post-procedural anticoagulation has not been previously evaluated. Rivaroxaban is a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) with a safety profile superior to that of vitamin K antagonists. Given the safety profile, ease of use, and feasibility of DOAC therapy, our study will endeavor to evaluate the use of rivaroxaban 15mg orally once daily for 7 days after transradial access and the impact this has on the rate of radial artery occlusion.

Detailed description

Assessment of the coronary artery anatomy is commonly performed by coronary angiography (CA), which is the gold standard for evaluation of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Coronary revascularization, opening of obstructed vessels, is most commonly performed by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with obstructive CAD. Traditionally, PCI is performed with implantation of one or more permanent metallic stents which act as a scaffold for arterial recoil and, in the case of drug eluting stents (DES), provide a platform for delivery of anti-proliferative agents. The transradial access (TRA) has rapidly emerged as the preferred vascular access site for CA and PCI with more than 50% of all coronary angiograms being performed via this approach. There are several advantages to TRA for angiography including rapid hemostasis, early ambulation after the procedure thereby improving patient comfort and experience, and a decrease in the length of hospital stay. There is also a reported reduction in all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, major bleeding, and vascular complications with TRA as compared to transfemoral access. However, radial artery occlusion (RAO) remains an important complication of this procedure as it precludes the reuse of this artery for future transradial approaches as well as the use of the vessel as a conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting. Reports of RAO post-TRA has varied in the literature from \ 4-10% in observational and randomized trials. In the largest systematic review published to date, the overall rate of RAO was 5.2% amongst the 46,631 subjects across 92 studies between 1989 and 2016. This systematic review also noted that the rate of early (i.e. \<7 days) vs. late (i.e. \>7 days) RAO was significantly higher which is suggestive of late recanalization in some patients. The factors which affect recanalization are not clear however standard of care involves administration of heparin during the procedure and patent hemostasis following the procedure. Patent hemostasis is performed by applying a delicate balance of pressure to prevent bleeding but not to the point of completely occlude the blood vessel and cessation of blood flow distally. Numerous trials have explored the role of anticoagulation during angiography to reduce RAO and a recently published systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated more intensive anticoagulation is protective. Indeed, this remains an active area of research with numerous ongoing trials evaluating the effect of intensive or higher dose anticoagulation during the procedure for prevention of RAO. Additionally, there were higher rates of RAO with diagnostic angiography as opposed to PCI purportedly as the latter involves higher doses of anticoagulation. Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy has provided a safer alternative with an improved bleeding profile over vitamin K antagonist anticoagulation therapy. The use of DOACs in cardiovascular medicine ranges from various conditions including stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation7-12 to venous thromboembolism13-16 to stable cardiovascular disease. While intraprocedural anticoagulation has been studied extensively, a course of anticoagulation therapy post-TRA has not been studied. Given the safety profile, ease of use, and feasibility of DOAC therapy, our study will endeavor to evaluate the use of rivaroxaban 15mg orally once daily for 7 days after transradial access and the impact this has on the rate of RAO. Should this study prove to be positive, this could impact our routine standard of care with respect to having a strategy which could reduce the rate of this complication thereby preserving the radial artery for future access and/or as a conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting.

Interventions

DRUGRivaroxaban 15 MG Oral Tablet [Xarelto]

Patients will receive rivaroxaban 15mg orally daily for 7 days following transradial access.

Sponsors

Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Eligible patients will undergo a 1:1 randomization using a computer-generated randomization sequence to either receive a direct oral anticoagulant (i.e. rivaroxaban 15mg oral daily) for 7 days or to the standard of care arm (i.e. no rivaroxaban)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Willing and able to provide written informed consent 2. Age ≥ 18 years 3. Diagnostic coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention via the transradial approach

Exclusion criteria

1. Presence of a palpable hematoma or clinical concern of hemostasis at the transradial access site 2. Access or attempted access at a second site - including contralateral radial artery, brachial, or femoral artery or vein 3. Planned staged procedure, CABG or noncardiac surgery within 30 days 4. Contraindication or high risk of bleeding with anticoagulation 1. bleeding requiring medical attention in the previous 6 months 2. thrombocytopenia (platelets\<50 x 109/L) 3. prior intracranial hemorrhage 4. use of IIb/IIIa during percutaneous coronary intervention 5. administration of thrombolytic therapy in the preceding 24 hours 6. use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications 7. ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack diagnosed in the last 3 months 5. Cardiogenic shock 6. Ventricular arrhythmias refractory to treatment 7. Liver dysfunction (Child-Pugh class B or C) 8. Unexplained anemia with a Hgb below 100 g/L 9. History of medication noncompliance or risk factor for noncompliance 10. Active malignancy 11. Allergy to rivaroxaban 12. Another indication for anticoagulation 13. CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein inhibitor use 14. Life expectancy \<30 days 15. Women capable of pregnancy not on birth control 16. Chronic kidney disease with creatinine clearance of less than 30mL/min 17. History of antiphosphopholipid antibody syndrome

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary efficacy outcome - rate of radial artery occlusion30 daysPresence of radial artery occlusion at 30 days post-transradial access as determined by Doppler ultrasound assessment of the participant's radial artery in the wrist.
Primary safety outcome - International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis definition of major bleeding30 daysBleeding as defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis at 30 days.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
All cause mortality30 daysDeath from any cause as determined by the treating physician
Stroke (ischemic or uncertain)30 daysStroke (ischemic or uncertain) as defined by a treating neurologist
Stroke (hemorrhagic)30 daysStroke (hemorrhagic) as defined by a treating neurologist
Fatal bleeding30 daysBleeding resulting in death as defined by treating physician
Symptomatic bleeding in a critical area or organ30 daysIntracranial, intraspinal, intraocular, retroperitoneal, intra-articular or pericardial bleeding or intramuscular bleeding with compartment syndrome
Bleeding requiring medical attention30 daysAny bleeding that requires participant to seek medical attention
GUSTO bleeding criteria30 daysBleeding as defined by the Global Utilization Of Streptokinase And Tpa For Occluded Arteries (GUSTO) criteria
TIMI bleeding criteria30 daysBleeding as defined by the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) criteria
BARC bleeding criteria30 daysBleeding as defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria
Myocardial infarction30 daysMyocardial infarction as defined by the third universal definition of myocardial infarction.
Stent thrombosis30 daysStent thrombosis as determined by the academic research consortium criteria.

Countries

Canada, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 6, 2026