FindTrial
Sign In

Ascending Ramus Versus Chin Cortical Plates for Reconstruction of Atrophic Maxilla

Assessment of Mandibular Ascending Ramus Cortical Plates for Reconstruction of Atrophic Maxillary Ridges Versus Chin Cortical Plates(Randomized Clinical Tial)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03629860
Enrollment
12
Registered
2018-08-14
Start date
2018-05-01
Completion date
2019-04-09
Last updated
2018-08-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrophy of Edentulous Maxillary Alveolar Ridge

Keywords

Atrophic, augmetation, bone regeneration

Brief summary

Assessment of ascending ramus cortical plate for reconstruction of atrophic maxillary ridges versus chin cortical plates (Randomized clinical trial)

Detailed description

Assessment of ascending ramus cortical plate for reconstruction of atrophic maxillary ridges versus chin cortical plates (Randomized clinical trial) To know what is better and more efficient chin or ascending ramus cortical plates.

Interventions

PROCEDUREAtrophic maxillary alveolar ridge augmentation

Autogenous bone blocks from chin and ascending ramus are obtained and used for reconstruction of atrophic maxillary ridges

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Assessment of ascending ramus cortical plate for reconstruction of atrophic maxillary ridges versus chin cortical plates (Randomized clinical trial)

Intervention model description

Assessment of ascending ramus cortical plate for reconstruction of atrophic maxillary ridges versus chin cortical plates (Randomized clinical trial)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with atrophic maxilla with residual bone height from 3 to 4mm. * Both sexes

Exclusion criteria

* Intraoral soft and hard tissue pathology. * Systemic condition that contraindicate implant basement. * Psychiatric problems

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
width and height of the bone gained by the procedure and the new measures from a physiologic vital structures e.g( nasal floor, maxillary sinus or even occlusal plan)6 monthsnew bone formation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Histomorphometric analysis bone area percent6 monthsNature and quality of new bone histology

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactAhmed Y Zayed, BSD
ahmed.zayed@dentistry.cu.edu.eg00201111634311
Backup ContactAhmed Y Usry, BSD
ahmed.zayed.imlantology@gmail.com00201140425144

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026