Skip to content

Effectiveness of a Combined Pressure and Silicone Intervention for Hypertrophic Scar Treatment

Effectiveness of a Combined Adequate Pressure and Silicone Intervention in Comparison With Conventional Pressure Therapy for Hypertrophic Scar Treatment: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03628495
Enrollment
72
Registered
2018-08-14
Start date
2018-09-30
Completion date
2020-07-31
Last updated
2018-08-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cicatrix, Hypertrophic, Rehabilitation

Keywords

insert, pressure therapy, silicone gel

Brief summary

Pressure therapy (PT) and silicone therapy are recommended as first-line non-invasive treatments HS, yet the effectiveness of the combination of these two treatments through an RCT trial has not been established yet. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of the combination of adequate pressure therapy and silicone gel sheeting implemented by Smart Scar Care Pad (SSCP) + Smart Pressure Monitored Suit (SPMS) versus conventional Pressure Garment (PG in the management of severe HS in adult. It is hypothesized that the combination of adequate pressure therapy and silicone gel sheeting will demonstrate its superiority in improving scar parameters than conventional pressure garment therapy.

Interventions

compression will be delivered using compression garment

DEVICEocclusion

occlusion will be delivered using silicone gel sheeting

Sponsors

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The ultrasound data will be processed and the data will be analysed by analysts who are blinded.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) will be used to screen candidates for the study.10 Isolated scars with a total score of 4 or higher and the score of each item equal to or greater than 1 will be included. * The scar size should also reach 2\*2 cm2 or above to allow adequate area for assessment tool attachement. * Consenting adult's age between 19 to 60 years old who is able to provide written consent, cooperative, and good compliance with treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* the HS area have an open wound or infection; * the HS have been treated with steroid injections or other intervention (such as traditional Chinese medicine or laser therapy) prior to the study; * the patients have a medical condition that might affect wound healing (e.g., diabetes mellitus or another serious medical problem); * the patients with comorbidities that might affect their compliance to treatment: such as severe scar contracture at adjacent area that might be scheduled for reconstructive surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline HS thickness at 6 monthsat baseline, one and six month after treatmentHS thickness measured by the Diagnostic Ultrasound System

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline HS color at 6 monthsat baseline, one and six month after treatmentHS color measured by the DermaLab Combo Color measurement
Change from baseline HS pliability at 6 monthsat baseline, one and six month after treatmentHS pliability measured by the DermaLab Combo elasticity measurement
Change from baseline HS hydration at 6 monthsat baseline, one and six month after treatmentHS hydration measured by the DermaLab Combo hydration measurement
Itchinessat baseline, one and six month after treatmentHS Itchiness measured by the Numerical rating scale
QoLat baseline, one and six month after treatmentSF-36 will be used to measure the Quality of Life.

Contacts

Primary ContactCecilia Li, PhD
cecilia.li@polyu.edu.hk852-27666715

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026