Skip to content

Soft Tissue Profile Following Socket Preservation With Platelet Rich Fibrin Versus Free Gingival Graft

Evaluation of the Soft Tissue Profile Following Socket Preservation With Platelet Rich Fibrin Versus Free Gingival Graft: A Randomized Controlled Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03628170
Enrollment
26
Registered
2018-08-14
Start date
2018-06-07
Completion date
2019-02-28
Last updated
2018-08-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Soft Tissue Mass

Brief summary

Comparing socket preservation with Platelet -Rich Fibrin versus Free gingival graft.

Detailed description

Extraction of the non restorable tooth, then socket preservation is applied in experimental group using platelet rich fibrin, while in comparative group free gingival graft is applied with socket preservation.

Interventions

OTHERplatelet rich fibrin

platelet rich fibrin will be prepared from patient's venous blood and inserted in the centrifuge at 2000 r.p.m. for 12 minutes Then, the Platelet rich fibrin plug will be placed in the socket after extraction for socket preservation covered by platelet rich fibrin membrane.

OTHERFree gingival graft

Free gingival graft will be taken from the palate to cover the socket after extraction of the tooth for socket preservation.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age range 25-50 years. * Non- restorable teeth indicated for extraction. * Good oral hygiene. * Intact facial and lingual plates of bone, without infection or pathosis. * Adequate apiacl bone for primaru stability

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of uncontrolled Systemic disease eg: diabetes, bone disease or the use of medicines that interfere with bone metabolism, history of head and neck radiotherapy. * Presence of periodontal and/or periapical infection. * Smokers. * Non-compliant patients. * Pregnancy or lactation in females. * History of head and neck radiotherapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Soft tissue profile change6 monthsOptical scanning by optical scanner at baseline to the preoperative cast of the related area, then optical scanning to postoperative cast of the surgical area after 6 months. Then, superimposition between the two scans of the casts will be performed to measure the difference or change in the amount of soft tissue profile measured in millimeters between baseline and at 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Crestal bone level change6 monthsmeasured by Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) taking the neighboring teeth as reference points, with superimposition between readings at baseline and at 6 months. Superimposition will identify the difference or change in crestal bone level measured in millimeters between baseline and at 6 months.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactHaya Hesham, Masters
shaimaanasr@live.com01272789994
Backup ContactShaimaa Nasr, PhD
dr.shaimaanasr@gmail.com01272789994

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026