Alcohol; Harmful Use, Insomnia
Conditions
Keywords
alcohol, drinking, sleep, insomnia, young adult
Brief summary
This project aims to evaluate the efficacy of insomnia treatment in improving insomnia symptoms and alcohol-related problems among heavy-drinking young adults.
Detailed description
Heavy alcohol use is prevalent among young adults and results in significant physical and psychological burden. Despite wide implementation of alcohol risk reduction efforts on college campuses, rates of heavy alcohol consumption remain high, with 35% of students reporting consumption of 5+ drinks on the same occasion in the past 2 weeks. Thus, additional strategies are needed to reduce the burden of heavy alcohol use among college students. More than half of heavy-drinking college students report symptoms of insomnia. In turn, insomnia symptoms have been associated with increased risk of alcohol-related problems. The proposed project aims to reduce the burden of heavy alcohol use on college campuses by examining the efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) in reducing alcohol use and related problems among heavy-drinking college students. Twenty seven young adults who indicate risk for problem drinking and meet DSM-5 criteria for Insomnia Disorder will participate in a 5-week pilot trial. Participants will complete five individual sessions of CBT-I. Outcomes will be assessed at the end of the active intervention period (6 weeks) and 1 month post-intervention. Outcomes of interest include insomnia severity, total wake time, sleep quality, drinking quantity, and alcohol-related consequences. The proposed research aims to reduce the harms associated with heavy alcohol use among young adults by improving the availability of efficacious treatment. It will impact understanding of the benefits of CBT-I, and it is innovative because it evaluates improvement in insomnia as a mechanism for improvements in alcohol use disorder (AUD). This research is consistent with the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism's initiative to evaluate and promote interventions that prevent the progression of AUD in diverse populations. It will enhance the stature of the university by improving our ability to compete successfully for federal funding to conduct high-quality research.
Interventions
Participants assigned to the CBT-I condition will attend 1-hour individual sessions of CBT-I once a week for five weeks. Consistent with clinical guidelines (Schutte-Rodin, Broch, Buysse, Dorsey, & Sateia, 2008), treatment will include stimulus control (e.g., limit use of bed to sleep or sexual activity, get out of bed if lying awake for more than 20 minutes), sleep restriction (limit time in bed to amount of time spent sleeping on a typical night), sleep hygiene (e.g., avoid exercise within 2 hours of bedtime, create cool and dark sleep environment), relaxation training, and cognitive restructuring.
All participants will receive a one-page handout on sleep hygiene. This is the only intervention that participants assigned to the Sleep Hygiene condition will receive and is consistent with what may be expected as standard care in a doctor's visit with a primary care physician.
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
PI Miller will not be blinded to block size or participant assignment because she will inform study therapists of participant assignment to conditions. However, PI Miller and study therapists will be blinded to assessment outcomes, and the assessment RA will be blinded to participant condition. All participants will be told that they will be assigned to one of two insomnia treatment conditions in order to blind them to condition assignment.
Intervention model description
Participants will be assigned to receive either Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) or Sleep Hygiene.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Age 18-30 years * Heavy episodic drinking, defined as 1 heavy drinking episode (4/5+ drinks for women/men) in the past 30 days on the Timeline Followback * DSM-5 criteria for insomnia, with daytime impairment operationalized as ISI scores =\>10
Exclusion criteria
* Unable to provide informed consent * New sleep medication in the past 6 weeks * Contraindications for CBT-I (mania or seizure disorder) * Severe psychiatric disorder that requires clinical attention (PTSD, major depression) * Current treatment for insomnia or alcohol use
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Alcohol-related Consequences | Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12) | Assessed using the Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire. Scores range from 0-24, with higher scores indicating more alcohol-related consequences. |
| Insomnia Severity | Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12) | Assessed using the Insomnia Severity Index. Scores range from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating higher insomnia severity. |
| Sleep Efficiency | Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12) | Assessed using daily sleep diaries and actigraphy -- sleep efficiency is the proportion of time spent in bed (from lights out until out of bed in the morning) that is actually spent sleeping (subtracting how long it took to fall asleep and how much time was spent awake in the middle of the night). |
| Sleep Quality | Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12) | Assessed using a single question on the daily sleep diary. Sleep quality score ranges from 0-4, where 0=very poor sleep quality and 4=very good sleep quality. |
| Drinking Quantity | Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12) | Assessed using the Daily Drinking Questionnaire. Participants estimate how many alcoholic drinks they typically consume on each day of the week, averaged over the past 3 months.Responses for drinking quantity range from 0 to infinity, where higher numbers indicate more standard drinks consumed per day. Reports from each day are summed to create a Drinks Per Week score. Participants also report the amount of time they typically spend drinking during each day of the week. Responses range from 0-24 hours per day, where higher numbers indicate more hours drinking. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Negative Affect | Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12) | Assessed using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Participants respond to words that describe negative feelings/emotions and report the extent (1-5) that they feel each emotion presently or during the past week. Higher scores indicate higher negative affect. |
| Emotion Regulation | Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12) | Assessed using the Difficulties with Emotion Regulation Scale. Scores range from 36-180, with higher scores indicating more difficulty with emotion regulation. |
| Alcohol Craving | Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12) | Assessed using the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale. Scores range from 0-30, with higher scores indicating greater alcohol craving. |
| Delay Discounting | Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12) | Assessed using the Monetary Choice Questionnaire. Responses will be used to calculate discount rate (k), consistency of the discount rate (the inferred k), and the proportion of immediate reward choices (immediate choice ratios). |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| CBT-I Individual Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) delivered once a week.
Participants will attend 1-hour individual sessions of CBT-I once a week for five weeks. Consistent with clinical guidelines (Schutte-Rodin, Broch, Buysse, Dorsey, & Sateia, 2008), treatment will include stimulus control (e.g., limit use of bed to sleep or sexual activity, get out of bed if lying awake for more than 20 minutes), sleep restriction (limit time in bed to amount of time spent sleeping on a typical night), sleep hygiene (e.g., avoid exercise within 2 hours of bedtime, create cool and dark sleep environment), relaxation training, and cognitive restructuring.
Participants will also receive a one-page handout on sleep hygiene that is consistent with what may be expected as standard care in a doctor's visit with a primary care physician. | 28 |
| Sleep Hygiene Participants will receive a one-page handout on sleep hygiene that is consistent with what may be expected as standard care in a doctor's visit with a primary care physician. | 28 |
| Total | 56 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 10 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | CBT-I | Sleep Hygiene |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 22.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7 | 22.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7 | 22.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8 |
| Alcohol Use Disorder | 47 Participants | 25 Participants | 22 Participants |
| College Enrollment | 41 Participants | 21 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Comorbid Mental Health Disorder | 24 Participants | 14 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 54 Participants | 26 Participants | 28 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Insomnia Severity | 16.04 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.01 | 16.43 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.06 | 15.93 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.92 |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 56 participants | 28 participants | 28 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 42 Participants | 22 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 14 Participants | 6 Participants | 8 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 28 | 0 / 28 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 28 | 0 / 28 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 28 | 0 / 28 |
Outcome results
Alcohol-related Consequences
Assessed using the Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire. Scores range from 0-24, with higher scores indicating more alcohol-related consequences.
Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBT-I | Alcohol-related Consequences | Post Treatment | 4.18 units on a scale - BYAAC | Standard Deviation 5.53 |
| CBT-I | Alcohol-related Consequences | 1-Month Follow-Up | 5.04 units on a scale - BYAAC | Standard Deviation 5.15 |
| Sleep Hygiene | Alcohol-related Consequences | Post Treatment | 5.01 units on a scale - BYAAC | Standard Deviation 4.18 |
| Sleep Hygiene | Alcohol-related Consequences | 1-Month Follow-Up | 3.47 units on a scale - BYAAC | Standard Deviation 3.17 |
Drinking Quantity
Assessed using the Daily Drinking Questionnaire. Participants estimate how many alcoholic drinks they typically consume on each day of the week, averaged over the past 3 months.Responses for drinking quantity range from 0 to infinity, where higher numbers indicate more standard drinks consumed per day. Reports from each day are summed to create a Drinks Per Week score. Participants also report the amount of time they typically spend drinking during each day of the week. Responses range from 0-24 hours per day, where higher numbers indicate more hours drinking.
Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBT-I | Drinking Quantity | Post Treatment | 11.45 Drinks per Week | Standard Deviation 8.25 |
| CBT-I | Drinking Quantity | 1-Month Follow-Up | 8.7 Drinks per Week | Standard Deviation 7.7 |
| Sleep Hygiene | Drinking Quantity | Post Treatment | 11.80 Drinks per Week | Standard Deviation 9.2 |
| Sleep Hygiene | Drinking Quantity | 1-Month Follow-Up | 9.33 Drinks per Week | Standard Deviation 8.77 |
Insomnia Severity
Assessed using the Insomnia Severity Index. Scores range from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating higher insomnia severity.
Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBT-I | Insomnia Severity | Post Treatment | 6.86 units on scale, Insomnia Severity Index | Standard Deviation 3.66 |
| CBT-I | Insomnia Severity | 1-Month Follow-Up | 6.58 units on scale, Insomnia Severity Index | Standard Deviation 3.41 |
| Sleep Hygiene | Insomnia Severity | Post Treatment | 10.84 units on scale, Insomnia Severity Index | Standard Deviation 3.5 |
| Sleep Hygiene | Insomnia Severity | 1-Month Follow-Up | 9.32 units on scale, Insomnia Severity Index | Standard Deviation 4.8 |
Sleep Efficiency
Assessed using daily sleep diaries and actigraphy -- sleep efficiency is the proportion of time spent in bed (from lights out until out of bed in the morning) that is actually spent sleeping (subtracting how long it took to fall asleep and how much time was spent awake in the middle of the night).
Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBT-I | Sleep Efficiency | 1-Month Follow-Up | 76.22 % of time spent in bed actually asleep | Standard Deviation 9.8 |
| CBT-I | Sleep Efficiency | Post Treatment | 79.27 % of time spent in bed actually asleep | Standard Deviation 7.95 |
| Sleep Hygiene | Sleep Efficiency | Post Treatment | 76.48 % of time spent in bed actually asleep | Standard Deviation 7.09 |
| Sleep Hygiene | Sleep Efficiency | 1-Month Follow-Up | 76.54 % of time spent in bed actually asleep | Standard Deviation 7.94 |
Sleep Quality
Assessed using a single question on the daily sleep diary. Sleep quality score ranges from 0-4, where 0=very poor sleep quality and 4=very good sleep quality.
Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBT-I | Sleep Quality | Post Treatment | 2.25 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.66 |
| CBT-I | Sleep Quality | 1-Month Follow-Up | 2.49 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.62 |
| Sleep Hygiene | Sleep Quality | Post Treatment | 2.32 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.62 |
| Sleep Hygiene | Sleep Quality | 1-Month Follow-Up | 2.29 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.55 |
Alcohol Craving
Assessed using the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale. Scores range from 0-30, with higher scores indicating greater alcohol craving.
Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12)
Population: Secondary data not analyzed yet.
Delay Discounting
Assessed using the Monetary Choice Questionnaire. Responses will be used to calculate discount rate (k), consistency of the discount rate (the inferred k), and the proportion of immediate reward choices (immediate choice ratios).
Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12)
Population: Secondary data have not been analyzed yet.
Emotion Regulation
Assessed using the Difficulties with Emotion Regulation Scale. Scores range from 36-180, with higher scores indicating more difficulty with emotion regulation.
Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12)
Population: Secondary data not analyzed yet.
Negative Affect
Assessed using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Participants respond to words that describe negative feelings/emotions and report the extent (1-5) that they feel each emotion presently or during the past week. Higher scores indicate higher negative affect.
Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12)
Population: Secondary data have not been analyzed yet.