Skip to content

Insomnia Treatment and Problems (the iTAP Study)

Insomnia Treatment and Problems (the iTAP Study)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03627832
Acronym
iTAP
Enrollment
56
Registered
2018-08-13
Start date
2018-08-29
Completion date
2019-09-27
Last updated
2020-06-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alcohol; Harmful Use, Insomnia

Keywords

alcohol, drinking, sleep, insomnia, young adult

Brief summary

This project aims to evaluate the efficacy of insomnia treatment in improving insomnia symptoms and alcohol-related problems among heavy-drinking young adults.

Detailed description

Heavy alcohol use is prevalent among young adults and results in significant physical and psychological burden. Despite wide implementation of alcohol risk reduction efforts on college campuses, rates of heavy alcohol consumption remain high, with 35% of students reporting consumption of 5+ drinks on the same occasion in the past 2 weeks. Thus, additional strategies are needed to reduce the burden of heavy alcohol use among college students. More than half of heavy-drinking college students report symptoms of insomnia. In turn, insomnia symptoms have been associated with increased risk of alcohol-related problems. The proposed project aims to reduce the burden of heavy alcohol use on college campuses by examining the efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) in reducing alcohol use and related problems among heavy-drinking college students. Twenty seven young adults who indicate risk for problem drinking and meet DSM-5 criteria for Insomnia Disorder will participate in a 5-week pilot trial. Participants will complete five individual sessions of CBT-I. Outcomes will be assessed at the end of the active intervention period (6 weeks) and 1 month post-intervention. Outcomes of interest include insomnia severity, total wake time, sleep quality, drinking quantity, and alcohol-related consequences. The proposed research aims to reduce the harms associated with heavy alcohol use among young adults by improving the availability of efficacious treatment. It will impact understanding of the benefits of CBT-I, and it is innovative because it evaluates improvement in insomnia as a mechanism for improvements in alcohol use disorder (AUD). This research is consistent with the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism's initiative to evaluate and promote interventions that prevent the progression of AUD in diverse populations. It will enhance the stature of the university by improving our ability to compete successfully for federal funding to conduct high-quality research.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I)

Participants assigned to the CBT-I condition will attend 1-hour individual sessions of CBT-I once a week for five weeks. Consistent with clinical guidelines (Schutte-Rodin, Broch, Buysse, Dorsey, & Sateia, 2008), treatment will include stimulus control (e.g., limit use of bed to sleep or sexual activity, get out of bed if lying awake for more than 20 minutes), sleep restriction (limit time in bed to amount of time spent sleeping on a typical night), sleep hygiene (e.g., avoid exercise within 2 hours of bedtime, create cool and dark sleep environment), relaxation training, and cognitive restructuring.

BEHAVIORALSleep Hygiene

All participants will receive a one-page handout on sleep hygiene. This is the only intervention that participants assigned to the Sleep Hygiene condition will receive and is consistent with what may be expected as standard care in a doctor's visit with a primary care physician.

Sponsors

University of Missouri-Columbia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

PI Miller will not be blinded to block size or participant assignment because she will inform study therapists of participant assignment to conditions. However, PI Miller and study therapists will be blinded to assessment outcomes, and the assessment RA will be blinded to participant condition. All participants will be told that they will be assigned to one of two insomnia treatment conditions in order to blind them to condition assignment.

Intervention model description

Participants will be assigned to receive either Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) or Sleep Hygiene.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18-30 years * Heavy episodic drinking, defined as 1 heavy drinking episode (4/5+ drinks for women/men) in the past 30 days on the Timeline Followback * DSM-5 criteria for insomnia, with daytime impairment operationalized as ISI scores =\>10

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to provide informed consent * New sleep medication in the past 6 weeks * Contraindications for CBT-I (mania or seizure disorder) * Severe psychiatric disorder that requires clinical attention (PTSD, major depression) * Current treatment for insomnia or alcohol use

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Alcohol-related ConsequencesChange from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12)Assessed using the Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire. Scores range from 0-24, with higher scores indicating more alcohol-related consequences.
Insomnia SeverityChange from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12)Assessed using the Insomnia Severity Index. Scores range from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating higher insomnia severity.
Sleep EfficiencyChange from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12)Assessed using daily sleep diaries and actigraphy -- sleep efficiency is the proportion of time spent in bed (from lights out until out of bed in the morning) that is actually spent sleeping (subtracting how long it took to fall asleep and how much time was spent awake in the middle of the night).
Sleep QualityChange from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12)Assessed using a single question on the daily sleep diary. Sleep quality score ranges from 0-4, where 0=very poor sleep quality and 4=very good sleep quality.
Drinking QuantityChange from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12)Assessed using the Daily Drinking Questionnaire. Participants estimate how many alcoholic drinks they typically consume on each day of the week, averaged over the past 3 months.Responses for drinking quantity range from 0 to infinity, where higher numbers indicate more standard drinks consumed per day. Reports from each day are summed to create a Drinks Per Week score. Participants also report the amount of time they typically spend drinking during each day of the week. Responses range from 0-24 hours per day, where higher numbers indicate more hours drinking.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Negative AffectChange from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12)Assessed using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Participants respond to words that describe negative feelings/emotions and report the extent (1-5) that they feel each emotion presently or during the past week. Higher scores indicate higher negative affect.
Emotion RegulationChange from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12)Assessed using the Difficulties with Emotion Regulation Scale. Scores range from 36-180, with higher scores indicating more difficulty with emotion regulation.
Alcohol CravingChange from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12)Assessed using the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale. Scores range from 0-30, with higher scores indicating greater alcohol craving.
Delay DiscountingChange from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12)Assessed using the Monetary Choice Questionnaire. Responses will be used to calculate discount rate (k), consistency of the discount rate (the inferred k), and the proportion of immediate reward choices (immediate choice ratios).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CBT-I
Individual Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) delivered once a week. Participants will attend 1-hour individual sessions of CBT-I once a week for five weeks. Consistent with clinical guidelines (Schutte-Rodin, Broch, Buysse, Dorsey, & Sateia, 2008), treatment will include stimulus control (e.g., limit use of bed to sleep or sexual activity, get out of bed if lying awake for more than 20 minutes), sleep restriction (limit time in bed to amount of time spent sleeping on a typical night), sleep hygiene (e.g., avoid exercise within 2 hours of bedtime, create cool and dark sleep environment), relaxation training, and cognitive restructuring. Participants will also receive a one-page handout on sleep hygiene that is consistent with what may be expected as standard care in a doctor's visit with a primary care physician.
28
Sleep Hygiene
Participants will receive a one-page handout on sleep hygiene that is consistent with what may be expected as standard care in a doctor's visit with a primary care physician.
28
Total56

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject101

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalCBT-ISleep Hygiene
Age, Continuous22.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7
22.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7
22.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.8
Alcohol Use Disorder47 Participants25 Participants22 Participants
College Enrollment41 Participants21 Participants20 Participants
Comorbid Mental Health Disorder24 Participants14 Participants10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
54 Participants26 Participants28 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Insomnia Severity16.04 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.01
16.43 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.06
15.93 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.92
Region of Enrollment
United States
56 participants28 participants28 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
42 Participants22 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants6 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 280 / 28
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 280 / 28
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 280 / 28

Outcome results

Primary

Alcohol-related Consequences

Assessed using the Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire. Scores range from 0-24, with higher scores indicating more alcohol-related consequences.

Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CBT-IAlcohol-related ConsequencesPost Treatment4.18 units on a scale - BYAACStandard Deviation 5.53
CBT-IAlcohol-related Consequences1-Month Follow-Up5.04 units on a scale - BYAACStandard Deviation 5.15
Sleep HygieneAlcohol-related ConsequencesPost Treatment5.01 units on a scale - BYAACStandard Deviation 4.18
Sleep HygieneAlcohol-related Consequences1-Month Follow-Up3.47 units on a scale - BYAACStandard Deviation 3.17
Primary

Drinking Quantity

Assessed using the Daily Drinking Questionnaire. Participants estimate how many alcoholic drinks they typically consume on each day of the week, averaged over the past 3 months.Responses for drinking quantity range from 0 to infinity, where higher numbers indicate more standard drinks consumed per day. Reports from each day are summed to create a Drinks Per Week score. Participants also report the amount of time they typically spend drinking during each day of the week. Responses range from 0-24 hours per day, where higher numbers indicate more hours drinking.

Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CBT-IDrinking QuantityPost Treatment11.45 Drinks per WeekStandard Deviation 8.25
CBT-IDrinking Quantity1-Month Follow-Up8.7 Drinks per WeekStandard Deviation 7.7
Sleep HygieneDrinking QuantityPost Treatment11.80 Drinks per WeekStandard Deviation 9.2
Sleep HygieneDrinking Quantity1-Month Follow-Up9.33 Drinks per WeekStandard Deviation 8.77
Primary

Insomnia Severity

Assessed using the Insomnia Severity Index. Scores range from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating higher insomnia severity.

Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CBT-IInsomnia SeverityPost Treatment6.86 units on scale, Insomnia Severity IndexStandard Deviation 3.66
CBT-IInsomnia Severity1-Month Follow-Up6.58 units on scale, Insomnia Severity IndexStandard Deviation 3.41
Sleep HygieneInsomnia SeverityPost Treatment10.84 units on scale, Insomnia Severity IndexStandard Deviation 3.5
Sleep HygieneInsomnia Severity1-Month Follow-Up9.32 units on scale, Insomnia Severity IndexStandard Deviation 4.8
Primary

Sleep Efficiency

Assessed using daily sleep diaries and actigraphy -- sleep efficiency is the proportion of time spent in bed (from lights out until out of bed in the morning) that is actually spent sleeping (subtracting how long it took to fall asleep and how much time was spent awake in the middle of the night).

Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CBT-ISleep Efficiency1-Month Follow-Up76.22 % of time spent in bed actually asleepStandard Deviation 9.8
CBT-ISleep EfficiencyPost Treatment79.27 % of time spent in bed actually asleepStandard Deviation 7.95
Sleep HygieneSleep EfficiencyPost Treatment76.48 % of time spent in bed actually asleepStandard Deviation 7.09
Sleep HygieneSleep Efficiency1-Month Follow-Up76.54 % of time spent in bed actually asleepStandard Deviation 7.94
Primary

Sleep Quality

Assessed using a single question on the daily sleep diary. Sleep quality score ranges from 0-4, where 0=very poor sleep quality and 4=very good sleep quality.

Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CBT-ISleep QualityPost Treatment2.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.66
CBT-ISleep Quality1-Month Follow-Up2.49 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
Sleep HygieneSleep QualityPost Treatment2.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
Sleep HygieneSleep Quality1-Month Follow-Up2.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55
Secondary

Alcohol Craving

Assessed using the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale. Scores range from 0-30, with higher scores indicating greater alcohol craving.

Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12)

Population: Secondary data not analyzed yet.

Secondary

Delay Discounting

Assessed using the Monetary Choice Questionnaire. Responses will be used to calculate discount rate (k), consistency of the discount rate (the inferred k), and the proportion of immediate reward choices (immediate choice ratios).

Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12)

Population: Secondary data have not been analyzed yet.

Secondary

Emotion Regulation

Assessed using the Difficulties with Emotion Regulation Scale. Scores range from 36-180, with higher scores indicating more difficulty with emotion regulation.

Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12)

Population: Secondary data not analyzed yet.

Secondary

Negative Affect

Assessed using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Participants respond to words that describe negative feelings/emotions and report the extent (1-5) that they feel each emotion presently or during the past week. Higher scores indicate higher negative affect.

Time frame: Change from baseline to post-treatment (week 8) to 1 month follow-up (week 12)

Population: Secondary data have not been analyzed yet.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026