Skip to content

Effective Connectivity in Patients Receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation: an fMRI and EEG Dynamic Causal Modeling Study

Effective Connectivity in Patients Receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation: an fMRI and EEG Dynamic Causal Modeling Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03626428
Acronym
CRIME
Enrollment
14
Registered
2018-08-13
Start date
2016-03-31
Completion date
2017-10-31
Last updated
2018-08-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

Keywords

EEG, fMRI, correlation clinical data, effective connectivity

Brief summary

In this study, a retrospective analysis will be performed on collected data of 14 patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome, treated with Spinal cord stimulation. In separate studies, fMRI and EEG recordings were made in resting state conditions on two time points. The fMRI assessments and EEG recordings were performed before the SCS implantation (baseline) and repeated around 3 months after the definitive SCS implantation. During both assessments, patients were asked to fill in a VAS diary for their leg and back pain (scores from 0 to 10). The aim of the current retrospective study is to correlate the clinical data obtained from the VAS scores, with estimates of effective connectivity (obtained from fMRI and EEG). Effective connectivity will be calculated by using dynamic causal modeling (DCM) on the baseline data and the data obtained 3 months after SCS. The aim is to evaluate whether DCM data of EEG is equally/worse/better correlating with the clinical data as DCM data of fMRI.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Moens Maarten
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject is at least 18 years old. 2. Diagnosis of FBSS with predominant leg pain (VAS) \> 5) and non-dominant back pain. 3. Cognitive and language functioning enabling coherent communication between the examiner and the subject; 4. Failed conservative treatments for pain including but not limited to pharmacological therapy and physical therapy 5. Stable neurologic function in the past 30 days 6. Subject is included in the previous studies and both EEG and fMRI data are available.

Exclusion criteria

1. Female subject of childbearing potential is pregnant/nursing, or plans to become pregnant during the course of the trial 2. Subjects currently has an active infection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Correlation pain intensity scores with estimates of effective connectivityThe change between baseline and 3 months after the definitive implantation of the neurostimulatorThe investigators will evaluate the degree of correlation between pain intensity ratings and effective connectivity based on fMRI data and between pain intensity ratings and effective connectivity based on EEG data.

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026