Skip to content

Optical CoherenCe Tomography-gUided Coronary Intervention in Patients With Complex lesIons: a Randomized Controlled Trial (OCCUPI Trial)

Optical CoherenCe Tomography-gUided Coronary Intervention in Patients With Complex lesIons: a Randomized Controlled Trial (OCCUPI Trial)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03625908
Enrollment
1604
Registered
2018-08-10
Start date
2019-01-09
Completion date
2023-10-12
Last updated
2023-11-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

Coronary artery disease, Optical coherence tomography, antiplatelet therapy

Brief summary

There is no definite conclusive work about the benefit of OCT-guided PCI, which should be determined in complex PCI, assuming better stent optimization by OCT. In the study, we will explore the clinical implication of OCT-guided PCI of complex lesions.

Detailed description

Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to either OCT-guided PCI arm and angiography-guided PCI with routine high pressure NC ballooning arm in 1:1 ratio. Within OCT-guided PCI arm, the use of OCT will be also assigned to full OCT-guidance arm and postprocedural OCT only arm. and comparison of stent implantation with and without preprocedural OCT will be evaluated by postprocedural OCT (OCT-defined stent optimization will be assessed). In angiography-guided PCI arm, PCI for complex lesion will be performed without guidance of intravascular imaging, and routine use of high pressure postdilation with NC balloon will be also recommended. Primary endpoint will be evaluated during 12 months after PCI.

Interventions

Patients will receive PCI under OCT-guidance. Predefined criteria for optimization of PCI under OCT-guidance will be recommended to achieve as far as possible.

Stent optimization using high-pressure non-compliance balloon will be highly recommend. Balloon size would not be less than the stent diameter.

Sponsors

Yonsei University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Patients will be assigned by use of OCT-guidance or angiography-guidance for stent implantation.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 19-85 years * Patients with ischemic heart diseases (including stable angina, unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction) presented with typical chest pain or objective evidences of myocardial ischemia (positive invasive or non-invasive studies, electrocardiogram (ECG) consistent with ischemia, or elevated cardiac enzymes) * Complex coronary stenotic lesions (\>50% based on visual estimate) considered for coronary revascularization with DES * Definition of complex lesions (at least one): * Acute myocardial infarction * Chronic total occlusion * Long lesion: expected stent length ≥28mm based on angiographic estimation * Calcified lesion * Bifurcation (including all techniques, one- or two-stent) * Unprotected left main disease * Small vessel diseases with reference vessel diameter less than 2.5 mm * Intracoronary thrombus visible on the angiography * Stent thrombosis * In-stent restenosis * Bypass graft lesion * Patients who provide signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Severe hepatic dysfunction (≥3 times normal reference values) * Significant renal dysfunction (Serum creatinine \>2.0 mg/dL) * Platelet count \<100,000 cells/mm3 or \>700,000 cells/mm3, a white blood cell count of \<3,000 cells/mm3, hemoglobin \<8.0 g/dL, or other known bleeding diathesis * Hemodynamically unstable during procedures or cardiogenic shock * Pregnant women or women who might be pregnant * Life expectancy; less than 1 year * Inability to understand or read the informed content

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs)1 yearComposite of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) - for comparison between OCT-guided PCI vs. angiography-guided PCI

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Any revascularization1 year (except periprocedural MI - within 48 hours)
Target lesion revascularization1 year (except periprocedural MI - within 48 hours)
Periprocedural myocardial infarction1 year (except periprocedural MI - within 48 hours)Periprocedural MI - PCI-related myocardial infarction (\>5x or \>10x ULN)
Each component of MACE1 year (except periprocedural MI - within 48 hours)MACE = composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization
Stroke1 year (except periprocedural MI - within 48 hours)
Stent optimization confirmed by OCT1 year (except periprocedural MI - within 48 hours)The attainment(optimal or acceptable) of criteria regarding stent expansion is strongly recommended. As for the other criteria, further procedures could be decided by the operators' decisions considering the situations. 1. Stent expansion Optimal - meeting of all criteria Acceptable - meeting of any one criteria 1) MSA≥80% of mean reference lumen area 2) ≥100% of distal reference lumen area 3) MSA of \>4.5 mm2 in non-left main lesion 2. Stent apposition Optimal - acute stent malposition\<200μm Acceptable - acute stent malposition\<400μm 3. Edge dissection(Definition of major edge dissection; any one of the followings) 1) ≥60°of the circumference of the vessel at site of dissection 2) Length of dissection ≥3mm 3) Deeper vessel injury(intramural hematoma or penetration to the media or adventitia)
Contrast-induced Nephropathy1 year (except periprocedural MI - within 48 hours)
Bleeding1 year (except periprocedural MI - within 48 hours)Bleeding defined by BARC and TIMI criteria

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026