Skip to content

CBPR - BRCA Genetic Testing Among Orthodox Jews

Understanding Social, Cultural, and Religious Factors Influencing BRCA Genetic Testing in the Orthodox Jewish Community

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03624088
Enrollment
50
Registered
2018-08-09
Start date
2018-03-13
Completion date
2019-01-29
Last updated
2019-01-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Keywords

Breast Cancer Prevention, Genetic Testing, Orthodox Jewish, Community-Based Participatory Research, BRCA, Decision Support

Brief summary

This study evaluates a web-based decision aid, named RealRisks, in promoting genetic testing intention among Orthodox Jewish women. 50 Orthodox Jewish women will take a baseline survey, self-administer the decision aid, and then complete two more surveys: one within one month of completing the decision aid and one at 6 months after completing the decision aid.

Detailed description

Breast cancer confers significant morbidity and mortality on women in the U.S. and ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy. Genetic determinants, such as germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, confer the greatest impact on breast and ovarian cancer risk. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC) is an inherited condition that is most commonly associated with mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. An estimated 2-7% of breast cancers and 10-15% of ovarian cancers result from inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Mutation carriers have lifetime risks of breast and ovarian cancer of 40-60% and 20-40%, respectively. The prevalence of three founder mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes is up to 2.5% among Ashkenazi Jews and genetic testing for this 'founder' panel is relatively inexpensive. About 1 in 40 individuals of Ashkenazi (central and eastern European) Jewish descent carry a founder mutation in the BRCA1 (5382insC or 185delAG) or BRCA2 (6174delT) genes. Based upon U.S. PreventiveServices Task Force guidelines, Ashkenazi Jewish women with any first- or second-degree relatives with breast or ovarian cancer should be referred for BRCA genetic counseling. The perceived benefits and risks of genetic testing may vary by demographic, cultural, and religious backgrounds. Orthodox Jews often consult with Rabbinic and communal authorities in medical decision-making, which is consistent with their religious values. The Jewish community is already familiar with genetic testing due to successful testing programs for genetic disorders, such as Tay-Sachs, an autosomal recessive disease. However, there are unique challenges to testing for BRCA genes, which are inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion and predispose to adult-onset diseases, such as breast and ovarian cancer. This study will test the efficacy of a patient-centered, web-based decision aid called RealRisks in a pilot study of 50 Orthodox Jewish women, using a pre-/post-test design. Genetic testing intention will be assessed at baseline, within 1 month after exposure to RealRisks, and at 6 months. This pilot study will allow the investigator to determine an effect size that can be used to design a well-powered randomized controlled trial in the future. The ultimate goal is to understand social, cultural, and religious factors influencing BRCA genetic testing in the Orthodox Jewish community.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALRealRisks

RealRisks is a web-based patient decision aid with modules on risk assessment, family history and breast cancer, genetic testing, and prevention options. Participants enter family history data into RealRisks, and RealRisks calculates 5-year breast cancer risk, lifetime breast cancer risk, and the probability of carrying a BRCA mutation. This information is then interactively presented to the participant. RealRisks facilitates the participant in identifying their intention to undergo BRCA genetic testing and the factors that are important to the participant in making this decision. RealRisks produces a summary of all of this information that the participant can print and take with her to a health care appointment.

Sponsors

Columbia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
25 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* \>= 25 years of age * Completed a previous cross-sectional survey and agreed to future contact * Eligible for BRCA testing based on Six Point Scale

Exclusion criteria

* Personal history of breast or ovarian cancer * Prior genetic counseling or genetic testing for BRCA mutations * Participated in previous RealRisks workshop

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in proportion of participants who intend to undergo or have completed genetic testing compared to baseline1 monthQuestion assessing subject's intention of undergoing genetic testing or completion of genetic testing

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in proportion of participants who make an informed choice about getting BRCA genetic testing.1 month, 6 monthsThe degree to which a decision is based on relevant, good quality information, and reflects the decision-maker's values. Calculated using knowledge and attitude scores: to be an informed choice, a patient needs a sufficient knowledge score and a decision that is consistent with their attitude score

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in BRCA testing knowledge1 month, 6 months11 true/false questions to assess knowledge about HBOC genetic testing
Change in proportion of participants who report positive attitudes towards BRCA genetic testing1 month, 6 months4 items to assess attitudes towards genetic testing
Proportion of patients who experience decision conflictBaseline, 1 month, 6 months10 question scale to assess decision conflict regarding genetic testing
Proportion of patients who experience decisional regret6 months5 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale to assess views about genetic testing decision
Change in proportion of participants who have accurate breast cancer risk perception1 month, 6 months5 questions assessing subject's perceived risk of developing breast cancer on a relative and numeric scale
Change in decision self-efficacy regarding BRCA testing1 month11 questions rated on a 5-point Likert scale to assess decision self-efficacy on genetic testing
Change in Perceived BRCA mutation risk1 month, 6 months5-point Likert scale assessing patient's perceived risk of carrying HBOC mutation
Perception of stigma associated with carrying BRCA mutationBaseline, 1 month, 6 months8 questions rated on a 7-point Likert scale assessing stigma related BRCA genetic testing
Change in decision autonomy regarding BRCA testing1 month15 questions rated on a 7-point Likert scale to assess autonomous self-regulation of health-related behaviors
Change in proportion of participants who describe experiencing significant breast cancer worry1 month, 6 months2 questions on a 7-point Likert scale assessing breast cancer worry

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026