Breast Cancer, Kidney Cancer
Conditions
Keywords
kidney cancer, breast cancer, oral therapy, managment
Brief summary
Oral anticancer treatments account a quarter of cancer treatments. These oral treatments are allowed at home, avoid hospitalization and limit the use of central venous routes. Oral treatments cause many side effects and patients are reluctant to report them because they are afraid that their treatment will be changed. But when these side effects are poorly managed, they can reduce adherence to treatment. The main hypothesis of this randomized study is that the combination of an initial consultation with a trio (nurse, doctor, pharmacist) and a weekly telephone nurse follow-up during the administration of oral anticancer treatments decreases the rate and duration of side effects. The main objective is to evaluate the impact at 3 months of a optimized management by an initial consultation with a trio nurse, doctor, pharmacist and a weekly nurse telephone follow-up versus a standard management on the level of digestive, skin and mucosal side effects of grade 3 in patients with oral chemotherapy. This randomized study is realized in patients with kidney or breast cancer.
Detailed description
Oral anticancer treatments account a quarter of cancer treatments. These oral treatments are allowed at home, avoid hospitalization and limit the use of central venous routes. Oral treatments cause many adverse effects (nausea, vomiting, digestive disorders, skin and mucous ...) that can significantly impact the quality of life. Patients are reluctant to report side effects because they are afraid that their treatment will be changed. But if these side effects are poorly managed, they can reduce adherence to treatment. The majority of devices are evaluated post-treatment and none relates to the treatment administration period. The main hypothesis of this randomized study is that the combination of an initial consultation with a trio (nurse, doctor, pharmacist) and a weekly telephone nurse follow-up during the administration of treatments decreases the rate and duration of digestive, cutaneous and mucosal side effects. The main objective is to evaluate the impact at 3 months of a optimized management by an initial consultation with a trio nurse, doctor, pharmacist and a weekly nurse telephone follow-up versus a standard management on the level of digestive, skin and mucosal side effects of grade 3 in patients with oral chemotherapy (Xeloda® or Sutent®).
Interventions
OTHERmanagment of oral therapy
Initial consultation with a trio oncologist / pharmacist / nurse
Sponsors
Centre Georges Francois Leclerc
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Patient over 18 years old. 2. Men or women with kidney cancer treated with Sutent® chemotherapy (Cohort 1) according to the following schedule: 42-day course: 28 days of treatment + 14 days of break therapeutic) 3. Women with breast cancer treated with Xeloda® (Cohort 2) chemotherapy according to the following schedule: 21-day course: 14 days of treatment + 7 days of therapeutic break). 4. Patient (e) able to understand French read, write, speak. 5. Patient who received information about the study. 6. Written and signed consent. 7. Affiliation to a social security scheme. 8. Patient reachable by phone.
Exclusion criteria
1. Patient under guardianship, curatorship or safeguard of justice. 2. Patient with severe mental retardation impairing comprehension abilities. 3. Impossibility of submitting to the medical follow-up of the test. 4. If hospitalized at the time of inclusion: hospitalization forecast greater than 1 week.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of side effects | 6 months | Side effects evaluated: digestive, cutaneous and mucosal grade 3 and 4 |
Countries
France
Outcome results
None listed