Skip to content

RCT of Mobile Apps & FitBit v. Usual Care

Randomized Clinical Trial of FitBit and Mobile Apps Versus Usual Care to Improve Post-Operative Outcomes After GI Cancer Surgery

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03623464
Enrollment
107
Registered
2018-08-09
Start date
2017-05-31
Completion date
2026-06-30
Last updated
2025-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colon Cancer, Gastric Cancer, Hepatic Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer, Rectal Cancer, Small Bowel Cancer

Brief summary

This is a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the use of mobile devices in preventing readmission in patients undergoing major GI cancer operations.

Detailed description

Patients will be randomized to 1) standard of care or 2) to use our mobile app with standard care. The mobile app will collect information on patients' daily physical activity patterns and health status data for clinicians using smartphone mobile technology applications. The investigators believe that by tracking information on patients, the investigators may be able to intervene sooner and prevent a delay in care.

Interventions

OTHERMobile health application and Fitbit + standard of care

Mobility data will be generated using a mobile health tracker designed for smartphone devices, which allows the phone to automatically and passively (no patient input needed) capture information on the patient's activity; i.e. if the person is walking, remaining stationary, or moving at a rapid speed (eg. in a car). The app will prompt patients once daily to answer a series of questions that will collect patient reported symptoms and health status data. Physicians will be alerted to abnormal values within 24-48 hours and patients will be triggered to call their physicians immediately if the values are outside of normal parameters.

OTHERStandard of care

Post-operative standard of care information

Sponsors

Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject is 18 years or older 2. Subject speaks English 3. Subject owns a smart phone 4. Subject is scheduled to undergo surgery for a GI cancer (pancreatic, hepatic, gastric, small bowel, colon, or rectal cancers)

Exclusion criteria

1. Physician deems the subject is unable to complete the study due to documented dementia 2. Subject is undergoing emergent surgery 3. Subject has sepsis from another source 4. Physician deems the subject is unable to complete the study due to documented alcohol and/or drug abuse

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Readmission rate30 daysInvestigators will track readmission rates after surgery for those on the trial

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Healthcare utilization rates30 daysInvestigators will track patients' healthcare resource utilization and the cost of this utilization by assessing how often the patients contact their providers via phone or the app, access the emergency room, and through readmission data.
Patient Satisfaction with Device30 daysInvestigators will assess patients' satisfaction with their care experience and device. This will be done with an internal questionnaire asking if patients were satisfied and if they found it easy to use.
Quality of life: Return to Baseline Function-Walking30 daysInvestigators will monitor patients' return to baseline health after surgery by tracking progress via step counts, as monitored by a FitBit tracker.
Quality of life: Return to Baseline Function-Activities of Daily Living (ADLs)30 daysInvestigators will monitor patients' return to baseline health after surgery by tracking progress using a questionnaire, modified from the Katz Activities of Daily Living scale. For this scale, a score of 6 is high, indicating that the patient is independent and a score of 0 is low, indicating that the patient very dependent in performing their ADLs.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026