Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Namilumab for Moderate-to-severe Axial Spondyloarthritis

A Phase 2a Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Namilumab in Subjects With Moderate-to-severely Active Axial Spondyloarthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03622658
Acronym
NAMASTE
Enrollment
42
Registered
2018-08-09
Start date
2018-09-06
Completion date
2020-02-04
Last updated
2022-03-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Axial Spondyloarthritis

Brief summary

The study will assess the effect of namilumab, a GM-CSF inhibitor, on the clinical response in subjects with axial spondyloarthritis. Subjects will receive treatment with either namilumab or placebo.

Detailed description

A phase 2a proof-of-concept, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety/tolerability and efficacy of 4 subcutaneous injections of namilumab (150 mg) given over 10 weeks in subjects with moderate-to-severely active axial spondyloarthritis including those previously exposed to anti- TNF therapy (NAMASTE study).

Interventions

BIOLOGICALPlacebo

Placebo solution for subcutaneous injection.

BIOLOGICALNamilumab

Namilumab solution for subcutaneous injection

Sponsors

Iqvia Pty Ltd
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Innovate UK
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Izana Bioscience Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 75 years of age. * Diagnosis of axSpA by an appropriately qualified physician and classified using ASAS criteria ≥ 3 months prior to Baseline. * Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index score ≥ 4 and spinal pain score ≥ 40, at screening and Baseline. * MRI evidence of active axSpA ≤ 6 (ideally ≤ 3) months prior to randomisation using ASAS criteria. * Stable NSAID use prior to study entry. * Stable use of MTX, sulfasalazine or leflunomide prior to study entry. * Stable oral corticosteroid dose prior to study entry. * Capable of giving signed informed consent. * Inadequately responded to or experienced intolerance to previous treatment with an anti-TNF agent (some subjects).

Exclusion criteria

* Current diagnosis of axSpA with a BASDAI \> 4 but no evidence of inflammation on MRI. * Discontinued biologic therapy \< 8 weeks prior to Baseline. * Previous or current use of oral corticosteroid as defined in protocol. * Received intra-articular or i.v. corticosteroids prior to or during Screening. * Received anti-IL-17A or anti-IL-12/23 therapy. * Received cyclosporine, tacrolimus or mycophenolate mofetil prior to Baseline. * Previously received stem cell transplantation. * Infection(s) requiring treatment with i.v. anti-infectives or oral anti-infectives prior to Baseline. * Abnormal screening laboratory and other analyses. * Receipt of any live vaccine within 2 weeks prior to randomisation, or will require live vaccination during study participation. * Evidence of current or prior dysplasia or history of malignancy. * Has had any uncontrolled and/or clinically significant illness, hospitalisation, or any surgical procedure requiring general anaesthesia prior to Screening, or any planned surgical procedure within 6 months after randomisation. * Known current or previous interstitial lung disease. * Positive pregnancy test at Screening (serum) or Baseline (urine). * Female subjects who are breastfeeding or considering becoming pregnant during the study. * Considered by the Investigator to be an unsuitable candidate for the study. * Received any investigational agent or procedure within 30 days or 5 half-lives prior to Baseline. * Related to or a dependent of the site staff, or a member of the site staff.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Proportion of Subjects Who Achieved ASAS20 Clinical ResponseWeeks 12The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects who achieved an Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis with 20% improvement (ASAS20) clinical response at Week 12. An ASAS20 clinical response was defined as an improvement of at least 20% and an absolute improvement of at least 10 units on a 0 to 100 scale in at least three of the following four domains collected in the electronic case report form (eCRF) and no worsening in the fourth domain: Subject's Global Assessment of Disease Status, Subject's Assessment of Spinal Pain, function (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index \[BASFI\]) and inflammation (last two questions of the BASDAI). Lower values within the individual domains represent less severe symptoms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Subjects Who Achieved ASAS40 Clinical Response at Week 12Week 12Proportion of subjects who achieved Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis with 40% improvement (ASAS40) response at Week 12
Proportion of Subjects Who Achieved an ASAS20 Clinical Response at Week 6Week 6Proportion of subjects who achieved an ASAS20 clinical response at Week 6
Proportion of Subjects Who Achieved Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score C-reactive Protein (ASDAS-CRP) Response at Weeks 6Week 6Proportion (percentage) of subjects who achieved Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score C-reactive Protein (ASDAS-CRP) response at Week 6, Clinically Important Improvement
Proportion of Subjects Who Achieved Clinically Important ASDAS-CRP Score at Week 12Week 12Proportion of Subjects Who Achieved Clinically Important ASDAS-CRP Score at Week 12, Clinically Important Improvement

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo solution administered by subcutaneous injection on 4 occasions over 10 weeks Placebo: Placebo solution for subcutaneous injection.
6
Namilumab
Namilumab (150 mg) administered by subcutaneous injection on 4 occasions over 10 weeks Namilumab: Namilumab solution for subcutaneous injection
36
Total42

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboNamilumabTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
6 Participants35 Participants41 Participants
BMI27.85 kg/m^227.6 kg/m^227.65 kg/m^2
Duration of disease <2years4 participants16 participants20 participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants33 Participants38 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Height175.5 cm173.5 cm174.5 cm
Prior use of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) treatment1 participants6 participants7 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
5 Participants34 Participants39 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
6 Participants36 Participants42 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants15 Participants17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants21 Participants25 Participants
Weight86.5 kg80.5 kg82.15 kg

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 60 / 36
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 631 / 36
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 61 / 36

Outcome results

Primary

The Proportion of Subjects Who Achieved ASAS20 Clinical Response

The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects who achieved an Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis with 20% improvement (ASAS20) clinical response at Week 12. An ASAS20 clinical response was defined as an improvement of at least 20% and an absolute improvement of at least 10 units on a 0 to 100 scale in at least three of the following four domains collected in the electronic case report form (eCRF) and no worsening in the fourth domain: Subject's Global Assessment of Disease Status, Subject's Assessment of Spinal Pain, function (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index \[BASFI\]) and inflammation (last two questions of the BASDAI). Lower values within the individual domains represent less severe symptoms.

Time frame: Weeks 12

Population: Full Analysis Set.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboThe Proportion of Subjects Who Achieved ASAS20 Clinical Response3 Participants
NamilumabThe Proportion of Subjects Who Achieved ASAS20 Clinical Response14 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects Who Achieved an ASAS20 Clinical Response at Week 6

Proportion of subjects who achieved an ASAS20 clinical response at Week 6

Time frame: Week 6

Population: Full Analysis Set.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboProportion of Subjects Who Achieved an ASAS20 Clinical Response at Week 60 Participants
NamilumabProportion of Subjects Who Achieved an ASAS20 Clinical Response at Week 612 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects Who Achieved Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score C-reactive Protein (ASDAS-CRP) Response at Weeks 6

Proportion (percentage) of subjects who achieved Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score C-reactive Protein (ASDAS-CRP) response at Week 6, Clinically Important Improvement

Time frame: Week 6

Population: Full Analysis Set. Overall number of participants analyzed reflect those with available ASDAS-CRP Scores as reported in the final clinical study report.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboProportion of Subjects Who Achieved Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score C-reactive Protein (ASDAS-CRP) Response at Weeks 60 Participants
NamilumabProportion of Subjects Who Achieved Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score C-reactive Protein (ASDAS-CRP) Response at Weeks 610 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects Who Achieved ASAS40 Clinical Response at Week 12

Proportion of subjects who achieved Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis with 40% improvement (ASAS40) response at Week 12

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboProportion of Subjects Who Achieved ASAS40 Clinical Response at Week 123 Participants
NamilumabProportion of Subjects Who Achieved ASAS40 Clinical Response at Week 129 Participants
Secondary

Proportion of Subjects Who Achieved Clinically Important ASDAS-CRP Score at Week 12

Proportion of Subjects Who Achieved Clinically Important ASDAS-CRP Score at Week 12, Clinically Important Improvement

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set. Overall number of participants analyzed reflect those with available ASDAS-CRP Scores as reported in the final clinical study report.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboProportion of Subjects Who Achieved Clinically Important ASDAS-CRP Score at Week 121 Participants
NamilumabProportion of Subjects Who Achieved Clinically Important ASDAS-CRP Score at Week 1210 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026