Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Faricimab (RO6867461) in Participants With Diabetic Macular Edema

A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked, Active Comparator-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Faricimab (RO6867461) in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema (RHINE)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03622593
Acronym
RHINE
Enrollment
951
Registered
2018-08-09
Start date
2018-10-09
Completion date
2023-05-31
Last updated
2025-07-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Macular Edema

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of faricimab administered at 8-week intervals or as specified in the protocol following treatment initiation, compared with aflibercept once every 8 weeks (Q8W), in participants with diabetic macular edema (DME).

Interventions

DRUGAflibercept

Aflibercept 2 mg was administered by intravitreal (IVT) injection into the study eye once every 8 weeks (Q8W).

DRUGFaricimab

Faricimab 6 mg was administered by IVT injection into the study eye either once every 8 weeks (Q8W) in arm A or according to a personalized treatment interval (PTI) in arm B.

PROCEDURESham Procedure

The sham is a procedure that mimics an IVT injection and involves the blunt end of an empty syringe (without a needle) being pressed against the anesthetized eye. It was administered to participants in all three treatments arms at applicable visits to maintain masking among treatment arms.

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (Type 1 or Type 2) * Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of less than or equal to (≤)10% within 2 months prior to Day 1 * Macular thickening secondary to diabetic macular edema (DME) involving the center of the fovea * Decreased visual acuity attributable primarily to DME * Ability and willingness to undertake all scheduled visits and assessments * For women of childbearing potential: agreement to remain abstinent or use acceptable contraceptive methods that result in a failure rate of \<1% per year during the treatment period and for at least 3 months after the final dose of study treatment

Exclusion criteria

* Currently untreated diabetes mellitus or previously untreated patients who initiated oral or injectable anti-diabetic medication within 3 months prior to Day 1 * Uncontrolled blood pressure, defined as a systolic value greater than (\>)180 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and/or a diastolic value \>100 mmHg while a patient is at rest * Currently pregnant or breastfeeding, or intend to become pregnant during the study * Treatment with panretinal photocoagulation or macular laser within 3 months prior to Day 1 to the study eye * Any intraocular or periocular corticosteroid treatment within 6 months prior to Day 1 to the study eye * Prior administration of IVT faricimab in either eye * Active intraocular or periocular infection or active intraocular inflammation in the study eye * Any current or history of ocular disease other than DME that may confound assessment of the macula or affect central vision in the study eye * Any current ocular condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, is currently causing or could be expected to contribute to irreversible vision loss due to a cause other than DME in the study eye * Other protocol-specified inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsFrom Baseline through Week 56Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For the Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis, the model adjusted for treatment arm, visit, visit-by-treatment arm interaction, baseline BCVA (continuous), baseline BCVA (\<64 vs. ≥64 letters), prior intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region of enrollment. An unstructured covariance structure was used. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 97.5% CI is a rounding of 97.52% CI.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For the Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis, the model adjusted for treatment arm, visit, visit-by-treatment arm interaction, baseline BCVA (continuous), baseline BCVA (\<64 vs. ≥64 letters), prior intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region of enrollment. An unstructured covariance structure was used. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score attainable), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For the Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis, the model adjusted for treatment group, visit, visit-by-treatment group interaction, baseline BCVA (continuous), baseline BCVA (\<64 vs. ≥64 letters), and region of enrollment. An unstructured covariance structure was used. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Gaining Greater Than or Equal to (≥)15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationBaseline, average of Weeks 48, 52, and 56BCVA was measured on the ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For each participant, an average BCVA value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was then used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants per treatment arm who met the endpoint. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world). Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationBaseline, average of Weeks 48, 52, and 56BCVA was measured on the ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For each participant, an average BCVA value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was then used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants per treatment arm who met the endpoint. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world). Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants avoiding a loss of letters in BCVA from baseline were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationBaseline, average of Weeks 48, 52, and 56Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. For each participant, an average BCVA value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was then used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants per treatment arm who met the endpoint. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants avoiding a loss of letters in BCVA from baseline were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants avoiding a loss of letters in BCVA from baseline were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants avoiding a loss of letters in BCVA from baseline were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationBaseline, average of Weeks 48, 52, and 56Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. For each participant, an average BCVA value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was then used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants per treatment arm who met the endpoint. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants avoiding a loss of letters in BCVA from baseline were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants avoiding a loss of letters in BCVA from baseline were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsBaseline, average of Weeks 48, 52, and 56BCVA was measured on the ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For each participant, an average BCVA value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was then used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants per treatment arm who met the endpoint. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world). Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsBaseline, average of Weeks 48, 52, and 56BCVA was measured on the ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For each participant, an average BCVA value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was then used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants per treatment arm who met the endpoint. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥69 vs. \<69 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world). Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥69 vs. \<69 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥69 vs. \<69 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsBaseline, average of Weeks 48, 52, and 56BCVA was measured on the ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For each participant, an average BCVA value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was then used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants per treatment arm who met the endpoint. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world). Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement invisual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score attainable), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 16, 52, and 96The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ocular imaging assessments were made independently by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationBaseline, Weeks 16, 52, and 96The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ocular imaging assessments were made independently by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 16, 52, and 96The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ocular imaging assessments were made independently by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationBaseline, Weeks 16, 52, and 96The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ocular imaging assessments were made independently by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 16, 52, and 96The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ocular imaging assessments were made independently by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationBaseline, Weeks 16, 52, and 96The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ocular imaging assessments were made independently by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Without Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Baseline Who Developed New PDR at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsBaseline and Week 52The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). PDR was defined as an ETDRS DRSS score of ≥61 on the 7-field/4-wide field color fundus photographs assessment by a central reading center. The weighted percentages of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Without High-Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Baseline Who Developed High-Risk PDR at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsBaseline and Week 52The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced PDR. High-risk PDR was defined as an ETDRS DRSS score of ≥71 on the 7-field/4-wide field color fundus photographs assessment by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 52, ITT PopulationWeek 52
Percentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 52, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 52
Percentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 96, ITT PopulationWeek 96
Percentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 96, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 96
Percentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm at Week 52 Who Achieved a Once Every 12-Weeks or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval Without an Interval Decrease Below Once Every 12 Weeks, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsFrom start of PTI (Week 12 or later) until Week 52
Percentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm at Week 96 Who Achieved a Once Every 12-Weeks or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval Without an Interval Decrease Below Once Every 12 Weeks, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsFrom start of PTI (Week 12 or later) until Week 96
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsFrom Baseline through Week 56Central subfield thickness (CST) was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and Bruch's membrane (BM) as assessed by a central reading center. For the Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis, the model adjusted for treatment group, visit, visit-by-treatment group interaction, baseline CST (continuous), baseline BCVA (\<64 vs. ≥64 letters), prior intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region of enrollment (U.S. and Canada vs. the rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). An unstructured covariance structure was used. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Central subfield thickness (CST) was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and Bruch's membrane (BM) as assessed by a central reading center. For the Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis, the model adjusted for treatment group, visit, visit-by-treatment group interaction, baseline CST (continuous), baseline BCVA (\<64 vs. ≥64 letters), prior intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region of enrollment (U.S. and Canada vs. the rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). An unstructured covariance structure was used. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Central subfield thickness (CST) was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and Bruch's membrane (BM) as assessed by a central reading center. For the Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis, the model adjusted for treatment group, visit, visit-by-treatment group interaction, baseline CST (continuous), baseline BCVA (\<64 vs. ≥64 letters), and region of enrollment (U.S. and Canada vs. the rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). An unstructured covariance structure was used. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsAverage of Weeks 48, 52, and 56Absence of diabetic macular edema was defined as achieving a central subfield thickness (CST) of \<325 microns in the study eye. CST was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane and Bruch's membrane. For each participant, an average CST value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was then used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants per treatment arm who met the endpoint. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world). Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Absence of diabetic macular edema was defined as achieving a central subfield thickness of \<325 microns in the study eye. Central subfield thickness was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and Bruch's membrane (BM) as assessed by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Retinal dryness was defined as achieving a central subfield thickness (ILM-BM) of \<280 microns. Central subfield thickness was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and Bruch's membrane (BM) as assessed by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants was based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 16, 48, 52, 56, 92, 96, and 100Intraretinal fluid was measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the central subfield (center 1 mm). The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world); Asia and rest of the world regions were combined due to a small number of enrolled participants. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 16, 48, 52, 56, 92, 96, and 100Subretinal fluid was measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the central subfield (center 1 mm). The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world); Asia and rest of the world regions were combined due to a small number of enrolled participants. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsBaseline and Week 52The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ocular imaging assessments were made independently by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 97.5% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 97.52% CI.
Change From Baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) Composite Score Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 24, 52, and 100The NEI VFQ-25 captures a patient's perception of vision-related functioning and quality of life. The core measure includes 25 items that comprise 11 vision-related subscales and one item on general health. The composite score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores, or a positive change from baseline, indicating better vision-related functioning. For the Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis, the model adjusted for treatment arm, visit, visit-by-treatment arm interaction, baseline NEI VFQ-25 Composite Score (continuous), baseline BCVA (\<64 vs. ≥64 letters), prior intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region of enrollment. An unstructured covariance structure was used. Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventFrom first dose of study drug through end of study (up to 2 years)This analysis of adverse events (AEs) includes both ocular and non-ocular (systemic) AEs. Investigators sought information on AEs at each contact with the participants. All AEs were recorded and the investigator made an assessment of seriousness, severity, and causality of each AE. AEs of special interest included the following: Cases of potential drug-induced liver injury that include an elevated ALT or AST in combination with either an elevated bilirubin or clinical jaundice, as defined by Hy's Law; Suspected transmission of an infectious agent by the study drug; Sight-threatening AEs that cause a drop in visual acuity (VA) score ≥30 letters lasting more than 1 hour, require surgical or medical intervention to prevent permanent loss of sight, or are associated with severe intraocular inflammation.
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFrom first dose of study drug through end of study (up to 2 years)This analysis of adverse events (AEs) only includes ocular AEs, which are categorized as having occurred either in the study eye or the fellow eye. Investigators sought information on AEs at each contact with the participants. All AEs were recorded and the investigator made an assessment of seriousness, severity, and causality of each AE. Ocular AEs of special interest included the following: Suspected transmission of an infectious agent by the study drug; Sight-threatening AEs that cause a drop in visual acuity (VA) score ≥30 letters lasting more than 1 hour, require surgical or medical intervention to prevent permanent loss of sight, or are associated with severe intraocular inflammation (IOI).
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Non-Ocular Adverse EventFrom first dose of study drug through end of study (up to 2 years)This analysis of adverse events (AEs) only includes non-ocular (systemic) AEs. Investigators sought information on adverse events (AEs) at each contact with the participants. All AEs were recorded and the investigator made an assessment of seriousness, severity, and causality of each AE. The non-ocular AE of special interest was: Cases of potential drug-induced liver injury that include an elevated ALT or AST in combination with either an elevated bilirubin or clinical jaundice, as defined by Hy's Law.
Plasma Concentration of Faricimab Over TimePre-dose on Day 1 (Baseline); Weeks 4, 28, 52, 76, and 100Faricimab concentration in plasma was determined using a validated immunoassay method.
Percentage of Participants Who Test Positive for Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies Against Faricimab During the StudyBaseline, Weeks 4, 28, 52, 76, and 100Anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) against fariciamb were detected in plasma using a validated bridging enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The percentage of participants with treatment-emergent ADA-positive samples includes post-baseline evaluable participants with at least one treatment-induced (defined as having an ADA-negative sample or missing sample at baseline and any positive post-baseline sample) or treatment-boosted (defined as having an ADA-positive sample at baseline and any positive post-baseline sample with a titer that is equal to or greater than 4-fold baseline titer) ADA-positive sample during the study treatment period.
Percentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 16, 48, 52, 56, 92, 96, and 100Intraretinal fluid and subretinal fluid were measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the central subfield (center 1 mm). The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world); Asia and rest of the world regions were combined due to a small number of enrolled participants. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Czechia, Denmark, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W
Participants randomized to Arm A received 6 milligrams (mg) faricimab intravitreal (IVT) injections once every 4 weeks (Q4W) to Week 20, followed by 6 mg faricimab IVT injections once every 8 weeks (Q8W) to Week 96, followed by the final study visit at Week 100.
317
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI
Participants randomized to Arm B received 6 milligrams (mg) faricimab intravitreal (IVT) injections Q4W to at least Week 12, followed by a personalized treatment interval (PTI) dosing of 6 mg faricimab IVT injections up to once every 16 weeks (Q16W) through Week 96, followed by the final study visit at Week 100.
319
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W
Participants randomized to Arm C received 2 milligrams (mg) aflibercept intravitreal (IVT) injections Q4W to Week 16, followed by 2 mg aflibercept IVT injections Q8W to Week 96, followed by the final study visit at Week 100.
315
Total951

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event456
Overall StudyDeath12910
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1158
Overall StudyOther223
Overall StudyPhysician Decision216
Overall StudyPregnancy001
Overall StudyProtocol Violation001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11913

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalA: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WB: Faricimab 6 mg PTIC: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W
Age, Continuous
ITT Population
62.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
62.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
61.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
62.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
Age, Continuous
Treatment-Naive Population
62.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
62.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
61.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
62.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Baseline Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Letter Score in the Study Eye
ITT Population
62.1 ETDRS Letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
61.9 ETDRS Letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
62.5 ETDRS Letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
62.1 ETDRS Letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
Baseline Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Letter Score in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
62.5 ETDRS Letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
62.1 ETDRS Letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
62.8 ETDRS Letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
62.6 ETDRS Letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
Baseline Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye
ITT Population
471.6 microns
STANDARD_DEVIATION 125.3
466.2 microns
STANDARD_DEVIATION 119.4
471.3 microns
STANDARD_DEVIATION 127
477.3 microns
STANDARD_DEVIATION 129.4
Baseline Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
470.6 microns
STANDARD_DEVIATION 126
464.6 microns
STANDARD_DEVIATION 117.9
473.0 microns
STANDARD_DEVIATION 130.5
474.3 microns
STANDARD_DEVIATION 129.5
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
ITT Population
Hispanic or Latino
201 Participants56 Participants78 Participants67 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
ITT Population
Not Hispanic or Latino
724 Participants252 Participants232 Participants240 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
ITT Population
Unknown or Not Reported
26 Participants9 Participants9 Participants8 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Treatment-Naive Population
Hispanic or Latino
153 Participants42 Participants57 Participants54 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Treatment-Naive Population
Not Hispanic or Latino
582 Participants204 Participants190 Participants188 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Treatment-Naive Population
Unknown or Not Reported
22 Participants8 Participants8 Participants6 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
ITT Population
10 - High Risk PDR (DRS Level 75)
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
ITT Population
11 - Advanced PDR (DRS Level 81)
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
ITT Population
12 - Advanced PDR (DRS Level 85)
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
ITT Population
1 - Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) Absent
7 Participants2 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
ITT Population
2 - DR Questionable / Microaneurysms Only
19 Participants3 Participants10 Participants6 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
ITT Population
3 - Mild Non-Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (NPDR)
276 Participants90 Participants92 Participants94 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
ITT Population
4 - Moderate NPDR
239 Participants88 Participants72 Participants79 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
ITT Population
5 - Moderately Severe NPDR
176 Participants59 Participants63 Participants54 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
ITT Population
6 - Severe NPDR
137 Participants50 Participants36 Participants51 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
ITT Population
7 - Mild Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR)
49 Participants12 Participants26 Participants11 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
ITT Population
8 - Moderate PDR
22 Participants6 Participants10 Participants6 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
ITT Population
9 - High Risk PDR (DRS Level 71)
6 Participants2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
ITT Population
Cannot Grade
12 Participants2 Participants5 Participants5 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
ITT Population
Missing
8 Participants3 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
10 - High Risk PDR (DRS Level 75)
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
11 - Advanced PDR (DRS Level 81)
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
12 - Advanced PDR (DRS Level 85)
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
1 - Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) Absent
6 Participants2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
2 - DR Questionable / Microaneurysms Only
15 Participants1 Participants8 Participants6 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
3 - Mild Non-Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (NPDR)
200 Participants63 Participants66 Participants71 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
4 - Moderate NPDR
189 Participants74 Participants59 Participants56 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
5 - Moderately Severe NPDR
147 Participants48 Participants56 Participants43 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
6 - Severe NPDR
123 Participants44 Participants32 Participants47 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
7 - Mild Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR)
35 Participants11 Participants17 Participants7 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
8 - Moderate PDR
19 Participants5 Participants9 Participants5 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
9 - High Risk PDR (DRS Level 71)
6 Participants2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
Cannot Grade
9 Participants1 Participants4 Participants4 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
Missing
8 Participants3 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Number of Participants by Previous Treatment Status with Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Agents
Previously Treated
194 Participants63 Participants64 Participants67 Participants
Number of Participants by Previous Treatment Status with Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Agents
Treatment-Naive
757 Participants254 Participants255 Participants248 Participants
Number of Participants by the Baseline BCVA Letter Score Categories in the Study Eye
ITT Population
≤38 Letters
34 Participants14 Participants11 Participants9 Participants
Number of Participants by the Baseline BCVA Letter Score Categories in the Study Eye
ITT Population
39 to 63 Letters
392 Participants128 Participants132 Participants132 Participants
Number of Participants by the Baseline BCVA Letter Score Categories in the Study Eye
ITT Population
≥64 Letters
522 Participants174 Participants174 Participants174 Participants
Number of Participants by the Baseline BCVA Letter Score Categories in the Study Eye
ITT Population
Missing/Invalid BCVA
3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Number of Participants by the Baseline BCVA Letter Score Categories in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
≤38 Letters
23 Participants10 Participants8 Participants5 Participants
Number of Participants by the Baseline BCVA Letter Score Categories in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
39 to 63 Letters
303 Participants100 Participants103 Participants100 Participants
Number of Participants by the Baseline BCVA Letter Score Categories in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
≥64 Letters
428 Participants143 Participants142 Participants143 Participants
Number of Participants by the Baseline BCVA Letter Score Categories in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
Missing/Invalid BCVA
3 Participants1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Number of Participants by the Eye Chosen as the Study Eye (Left or Right)
ITT Population
Left Eye
470 Participants156 Participants168 Participants146 Participants
Number of Participants by the Eye Chosen as the Study Eye (Left or Right)
ITT Population
Right Eye
481 Participants161 Participants151 Participants169 Participants
Number of Participants by the Eye Chosen as the Study Eye (Left or Right)
Treatment-Naive Population
Left Eye
381 Participants128 Participants136 Participants117 Participants
Number of Participants by the Eye Chosen as the Study Eye (Left or Right)
Treatment-Naive Population
Right Eye
376 Participants126 Participants119 Participants131 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
ITT Population
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
ITT Population
Asian
102 Participants34 Participants36 Participants32 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
ITT Population
Black or African American
65 Participants18 Participants23 Participants24 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
ITT Population
More than one race
3 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
ITT Population
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
ITT Population
Unknown or Not Reported
26 Participants11 Participants10 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
ITT Population
White
752 Participants250 Participants249 Participants253 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Treatment-Naive Population
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Treatment-Naive Population
Asian
80 Participants26 Participants29 Participants25 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Treatment-Naive Population
Black or African American
53 Participants16 Participants20 Participants17 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Treatment-Naive Population
More than one race
3 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Treatment-Naive Population
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Treatment-Naive Population
Unknown or Not Reported
24 Participants11 Participants8 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Treatment-Naive Population
White
595 Participants197 Participants197 Participants201 Participants
Region of Enrollment
ITT Population
Asia
84 Participants29 Participants29 Participants26 Participants
Region of Enrollment
ITT Population
Rest of the World
537 Participants178 Participants179 Participants180 Participants
Region of Enrollment
ITT Population
United States and Canada
330 Participants110 Participants111 Participants109 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Treatment-Naive Population
Asia
68 Participants23 Participants24 Participants21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Treatment-Naive Population
Rest of the World
430 Participants144 Participants143 Participants143 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Treatment-Naive Population
United States and Canada
259 Participants87 Participants88 Participants84 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
ITT Population
Female
372 Participants123 Participants120 Participants129 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
ITT Population
Male
579 Participants194 Participants199 Participants186 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Treatment-Naive Population
Female
291 Participants100 Participants94 Participants97 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Treatment-Naive Population
Male
466 Participants154 Participants161 Participants151 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
12 / 3179 / 31910 / 314
other
Total, other adverse events
195 / 317169 / 319178 / 314
serious
Total, serious adverse events
97 / 31782 / 319100 / 314

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive Populations

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For the Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis, the model adjusted for treatment arm, visit, visit-by-treatment arm interaction, baseline BCVA (continuous), baseline BCVA (\<64 vs. ≥64 letters), prior intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region of enrollment. An unstructured covariance structure was used. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 97.5% CI is a rounding of 97.52% CI.

Time frame: From Baseline through Week 56

Population: ITT Population and Treatment-Naive Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population11.8 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population11.7 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population10.8 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population11.2 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population10.3 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population10.5 ETDRS Letters
Comparison: Three hypotheses were tested in order for each faricimab arm (Q8W or PTI) separately against the aflibercept arm using a graph-based testing procedure. The analysis presented here is for the non-inferiority of Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W compared with Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W in the ITT Population.97.5% CI: [-0.1, 3.2]
Comparison: Three hypotheses were tested in order for each faricimab arm (Q8W or PTI) separately against the aflibercept arm using a graph-based testing procedure. The analysis presented here is for the non-inferiority of Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI compared with Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W in the ITT Population.97.5% CI: [-1.1, 2.1]
Comparison: Three hypotheses were tested in order for each faricimab arm (Q8W or PTI) separately against the aflibercept arm using a graph-based testing procedure. The analysis presented here is for the superiority of Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W compared with Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W in the Treatment-Naive Population.p-value: 0.171897.5% CI: [-0.7, 3]Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comparison: Three hypotheses were tested in order for each faricimab arm (Q8W or PTI) separately against the aflibercept arm using a graph-based testing procedure. The analysis presented here is for the superiority of Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI compared with Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W in the Treatment-Naive Population.p-value: 0.460297.5% CI: [-1.2, 2.4]Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comparison: Three hypotheses were tested in order for each faricimab arm (Q8W or PTI) separately against the aflibercept arm using a graph-based testing procedure. The analysis presented here is for the superiority of Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W compared with Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W in the ITT Population.p-value: 0.036197.5% CI: [-0.1, 3.2]Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comparison: Three hypotheses were tested in order for each faricimab arm (Q8W or PTI) separately against the aflibercept arm using a graph-based testing procedure. The analysis presented here is for the superiority of Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI compared with Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W in the ITT Population.p-value: 0.49397.5% CI: [-1.1, 2.1]Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For the Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis, the model adjusted for treatment arm, visit, visit-by-treatment arm interaction, baseline BCVA (continuous), baseline BCVA (\<64 vs. ≥64 letters), prior intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region of enrollment. An unstructured covariance structure was used. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9611.3 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6011.4 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3611.0 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 169.9 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5611.6 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4011.4 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 889.8 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5211.6 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4411.7 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 128.7 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4811.8 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6411.6 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 849.8 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 46.1 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8010.6 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2010.1 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10010.7 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7610.6 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2410.6 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9210.8 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7211.2 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2810.7 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 87.8 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6811.2 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3211.3 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3610.6 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 46.6 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 88.1 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 129.1 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 169.8 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 209.5 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 249.9 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2810.5 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3210.2 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4010.7 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4410.9 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4810.6 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5210.7 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5610.6 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6010.1 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6410.3 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6810.1 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 729.9 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 769.4 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 809.5 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8410.3 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8810.0 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9210.2 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9610.5 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1009.5 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 46.4 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6810.0 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 249.3 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5210.4 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 208.8 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 929.3 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 769.5 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 168.8 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 729.4 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 809.1 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 128.5 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4410.5 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1009.8 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4810.1 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4010.3 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 849.6 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3610.4 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 87.5 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 569.9 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 329.4 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 969.0 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6010.1 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 889.2 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 649.4 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 289.6 ETDRS Letters
Secondary

Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive Population

Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score attainable), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For the Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis, the model adjusted for treatment group, visit, visit-by-treatment group interaction, baseline BCVA (continuous), baseline BCVA (\<64 vs. ≥64 letters), and region of enrollment. An unstructured covariance structure was used. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: Treatment-Naive (TN) Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization. Participants were grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. One participant in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI was excluded from the TN Population for the final analysis due to a late report of prior anti-VEGF treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3211.2 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10010.4 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6411.6 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3610.8 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 889.6 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6011.4 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4011.3 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 128.7 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5611.4 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4411.5 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2810.8 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5211.7 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4811.4 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 849.9 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 169.7 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 46.0 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8010.9 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2010.0 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9210.4 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7610.6 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2410.6 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9610.6 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7211.1 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 87.5 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6811.2 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 209.8 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10010.0 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 46.7 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 88.2 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 129.2 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1610.0 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 769.7 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2410.2 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2810.8 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3210.3 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3610.9 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4011.2 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4411.2 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4810.9 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5211.1 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5611.0 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6010.5 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6410.5 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6810.3 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7210.1 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8010.0 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8410.8 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8810.2 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9210.6 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9610.9 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 969.0 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 649.5 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 289.9 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 889.4 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6810.0 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 249.4 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 929.6 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 729.6 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 209.0 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 769.5 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 168.7 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 46.3 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 809.3 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 128.5 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4810.5 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4411.1 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1009.8 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5210.7 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4010.6 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 849.6 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5610.0 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3610.5 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 87.3 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6010.1 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 329.9 ETDRS Letters
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive Populations

Central subfield thickness (CST) was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and Bruch's membrane (BM) as assessed by a central reading center. For the Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis, the model adjusted for treatment group, visit, visit-by-treatment group interaction, baseline CST (continuous), baseline BCVA (\<64 vs. ≥64 letters), prior intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region of enrollment (U.S. and Canada vs. the rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). An unstructured covariance structure was used. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: From Baseline through Week 56

Population: ITT Population and Treatment-Naive Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population-195.8 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population-195.0 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population-187.6 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population-189.4 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population-170.1 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population-175.1 microns
Comparison: This is the adjusted mean difference for Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W in the ITT Population.95% CI: [-37.4, -14]
Comparison: This is the adjusted mean difference for Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W in the ITT Population.95% CI: [-29.2, -6]
Comparison: This is the adjusted mean difference for Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W in the Treatment-Naive Population.95% CI: [-32.9, -7]
Comparison: This is the adjusted mean difference for Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W in the Treatment-Naive Population.95% CI: [-27.1, -1.5]
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Central subfield thickness (CST) was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and Bruch's membrane (BM) as assessed by a central reading center. For the Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis, the model adjusted for treatment group, visit, visit-by-treatment group interaction, baseline CST (continuous), baseline BCVA (\<64 vs. ≥64 letters), prior intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region of enrollment (U.S. and Canada vs. the rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). An unstructured covariance structure was used. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 72-202.8 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 36-170.9 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 92-200.5 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 68-196.2 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 40-191.6 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 64-197.2 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 44-181.7 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 16-162.2 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 60-194.1 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 48-195.6 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8-132.0 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 56-199.0 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 52-188.6 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 88-201.5 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 20-166.8 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4-106.1 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 84-198.2 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 24-179.9 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 96-206.3 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 80-204.0 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 28-164.8 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 12-146.0 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 76-198.8 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 32-181.9 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 100-201.1 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 76-191.3 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 40-183.8 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4-113.9 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8-139.6 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 12-155.0 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 16-167.1 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 20-157.2 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 24-181.4 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 28-184.0 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 32-169.4 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 36-189.2 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 44-185.9 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 48-184.9 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 52-186.1 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 56-188.5 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 60-186.1 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 64-189.8 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 68-190.3 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 72-191.9 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 92-195.4 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 80-189.7 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 84-197.9 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 88-194.9 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 96-199.0 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 100-196.9 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 12-143.1 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 68-181.4 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 32-154.8 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 92-184.0 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 72-172.5 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 28-165.0 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8-129.6 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 76-185.4 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 24-146.6 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 100-192.8 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 80-176.7 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 20-154.6 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 96-180.0 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 84-185.5 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 52-176.6 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 48-162.7 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 16-151.4 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 56-168.2 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 44-172.3 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4-107.3 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 60-179.0 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 40-160.0 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 88-177.1 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 64-172.1 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 36-168.6 microns
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive Population

Central subfield thickness (CST) was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and Bruch's membrane (BM) as assessed by a central reading center. For the Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis, the model adjusted for treatment group, visit, visit-by-treatment group interaction, baseline CST (continuous), baseline BCVA (\<64 vs. ≥64 letters), and region of enrollment (U.S. and Canada vs. the rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). An unstructured covariance structure was used. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: Treatment-Naive (TN) Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. One participant in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI was excluded from the TN Population for the final analysis due to a late report of prior anti-VEGF treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4-106.3 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 32-183.7 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 88-200.3 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 60-194.3 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 36-173.8 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8-131.8 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 40-191.6 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 96-204.5 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 56-196.7 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 44-181.4 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 84-199.3 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 48-194.5 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 12-148.8 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 52-188.7 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 80-202.6 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 16-163.0 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 72-200.9 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 76-200.2 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 20-170.5 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 92-199.3 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 68-194.6 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 24-182.4 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 100-200.9 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 64-196.5 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 28-166.8 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 60-185.2 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 84-196.0 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8-140.6 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 12-156.6 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 16-168.8 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 20-162.3 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 24-182.9 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 28-183.9 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 32-168.0 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 36-191.5 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 40-186.9 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 44-188.9 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 48-186.8 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 52-186.6 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 56-189.9 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4-112.9 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 64-191.2 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 68-192.7 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 72-193.4 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 76-192.0 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 80-190.0 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 88-195.6 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 92-196.0 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 96-200.8 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 100-198.7 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 64-175.6 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 20-160.6 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 28-174.2 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 68-186.3 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 92-187.2 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 16-157.0 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 36-175.6 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 76-190.2 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 12-145.3 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 100-193.5 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 80-182.6 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8-130.4 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 44-177.6 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 84-189.5 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 48-165.8 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4-106.3 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 52-181.3 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 40-165.6 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 96-182.9 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 56-174.0 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 32-161.0 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 88-181.9 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 60-184.1 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 24-154.6 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 72-178.0 microns
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) Composite Score Over Time, ITT Population

The NEI VFQ-25 captures a patient's perception of vision-related functioning and quality of life. The core measure includes 25 items that comprise 11 vision-related subscales and one item on general health. The composite score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores, or a positive change from baseline, indicating better vision-related functioning. For the Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis, the model adjusted for treatment arm, visit, visit-by-treatment arm interaction, baseline NEI VFQ-25 Composite Score (continuous), baseline BCVA (\<64 vs. ≥64 letters), prior intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region of enrollment. An unstructured covariance structure was used. Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24, 52, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) Composite Score Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 526.8 score on a scale
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) Composite Score Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 245.7 score on a scale
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) Composite Score Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1008.8 score on a scale
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) Composite Score Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 526.6 score on a scale
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) Composite Score Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 246.5 score on a scale
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) Composite Score Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1007.3 score on a scale
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) Composite Score Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 247.0 score on a scale
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) Composite Score Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1006.9 score on a scale
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) Composite Score Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 527.6 score on a scale
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants avoiding a loss of letters in BCVA from baseline were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7296.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4098.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 499.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6896.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4498.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9293.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6497.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4898.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2098.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6098.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5297.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10094.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5698.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8893.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2498.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1298.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8494.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2899.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 899.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8095.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3298.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9693.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7695.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3698.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1699.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2899.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 899.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1299.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1699.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2099.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2499.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 499.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3298.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3698.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4097.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4498.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4896.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5298.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5698.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6097.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6497.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6896.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7298.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7697.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8096.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8498.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8897.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9294.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9695.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10094.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3698.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9295.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7297.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3297.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1299.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7696.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2899.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10094.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8095.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2498.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9695.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8495.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2099.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5298.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 899.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5697.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4898.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8895.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6096.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4498.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1699.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6496.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4098.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 499.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6896.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants avoiding a loss of letters in BCVA from baseline were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: Treatment-Naive (TN) Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis. One participant in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI was excluded from the TN Population for the final analysis due to a late report of prior anti-VEGF treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6098.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3298.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 499.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5698.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3698.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8893.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5298.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4098.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 899.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4899.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4498.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1299.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10094.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8095.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1699.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9692.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7696.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2098.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7297.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6897.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2497.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8495.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6498.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2899.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9293.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 499.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9294.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 899.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1299.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1699.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2098.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2499.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2899.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3299.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3698.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4098.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4498.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4896.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5297.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5698.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6096.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6496.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6895.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7298.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7697.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8096.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8498.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8896.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9696.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10094.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2499.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 499.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6497.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2099.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8895.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6895.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7297.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1699.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10096.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7696.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1299.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9695.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4498.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4098.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8096.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4899.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3698.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 898.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5299.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3298.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8495.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5696.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2899.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9295.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6097.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. For each participant, an average BCVA value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was then used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants per treatment arm who met the endpoint. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, average of Weeks 48, 52, and 56

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Only participants with at least one non-missing, valid assessment at Weeks 48, 52, or 56 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters98.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters98.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters96.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters98.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters98.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters97.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters98.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters95.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters98.2 Percentage of participants
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants avoiding a loss of ≥15 letters in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-1.6, 2.1]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants avoiding a loss of ≥15 letters in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-1.8, 1.9]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants avoiding a loss of ≥10 letters in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-2.3, 2.1]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants avoiding a loss of ≥10 letters in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-2.4, 1.9]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants avoiding a loss of ≥5 letters in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-1.9, 4.5]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants avoiding a loss of ≥5 letters in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-1.5, 4.6]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. For each participant, an average BCVA value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was then used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants per treatment arm who met the endpoint. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, average of Weeks 48, 52, and 56

Population: Treatment-Naive Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization. Participants were grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Only participants with at least one non-missing, valid assessment at Weeks 48, 52, or 56 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters98.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters98.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters97.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters97.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters98.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters97.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters98.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters96.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters98.1 Percentage of participants
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants avoiding a loss of ≥15 letters in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-2.3, 2.2]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants avoiding a loss of ≥15 letters in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-2, 2.2]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants avoiding a loss of ≥10 letters in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-2.7, 2.6]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants avoiding a loss of ≥10 letters in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-2.9, 2.3]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants avoiding a loss of ≥5 letters in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-2, 4.7]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants avoiding a loss of ≥5 letters in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-2.1, 4.4]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants avoiding a loss of letters in BCVA from baseline were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7696.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3699.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5298.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7298.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4098.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9296.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6898.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4499.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 16100.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6498.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4899.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10096.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6098.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8894.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5698.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2099.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 499.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8496.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2499.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8096.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2899.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9695.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 899.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3298.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1299.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7698.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2499.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9697.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4100.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8100.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1299.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 16100.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2099.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2899.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3298.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3699.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4098.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4499.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4898.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5298.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5699.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6098.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6498.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6898.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7298.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8098.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8499.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8898.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9297.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10096.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10096.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6897.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3698.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9297.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7297.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3298.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2899.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7697.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2499.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 899.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8097.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2099.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9698.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8497.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1699.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5299.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4100.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5698.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4899.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8897.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6098.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4498.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1299.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6496.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4099.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants avoiding a loss of letters in BCVA from baseline were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: Treatment-Naive (TN) Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis. One participant in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI was excluded from the TN Population for the final analysis due to a late report of prior anti-VEGF treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6899.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3699.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7697.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6499.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4099.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9296.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6099.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4499.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 16100.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5698.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4899.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10095.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5299.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8894.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 20100.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8100.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8496.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2499.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 499.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7299.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2899.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9695.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8096.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3298.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 12100.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2499.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4100.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8100.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1299.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 16100.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2099.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6897.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2899.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3299.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3699.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4099.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4499.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4898.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5298.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5699.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6098.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6498.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7697.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8098.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8499.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8898.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9297.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7298.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9697.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10096.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3299.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7297.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7697.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2899.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6897.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2499.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9297.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8097.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2099.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 899.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8497.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1699.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10096.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4899.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8897.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 52100.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4499.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1299.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5698.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4099.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9698.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6098.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3699.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4100.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6497.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants avoiding a loss of letters in BCVA from baseline were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1697.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6894.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4096.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10091.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 495.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4496.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8889.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6495.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4896.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2096.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6095.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5296.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9690.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5695.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8492.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2496.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1297.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8092.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2896.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 896.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7693.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3296.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9291.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7294.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3697.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6492.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 497.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 897.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1296.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1697.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2096.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2496.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2897.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3296.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3696.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4095.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4495.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4895.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5294.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5696.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6094.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6893.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7294.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7692.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8093.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8493.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8891.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9290.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9691.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10090.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6894.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3295.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 497.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7292.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2897.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9292.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7694.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2496.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 897.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8093.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2097.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10093.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8492.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1696.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5296.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9692.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5696.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4896.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8893.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6095.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4496.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4096.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6493.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3697.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1297.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants avoiding a loss of letters in BCVA from baseline were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: Treatment-Naive (TN) Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis. One participant in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI was excluded from the TN Population for the final analysis due to a late report of prior anti-VEGF treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9688.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6095.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3296.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 495.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5696.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3697.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9291.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5297.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4096.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6496.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4896.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4496.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8890.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1297.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10090.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8092.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1697.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 896.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7694.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2096.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8493.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7294.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2496.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6895.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2896.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 497.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2497.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4496.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7693.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 897.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1297.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1698.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2096.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2897.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3296.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3696.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4096.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4895.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5294.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5697.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6094.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6492.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6893.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7294.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8094.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8493.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8892.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9290.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9692.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10091.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8893.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6494.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2497.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 497.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6894.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2097.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9693.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1697.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7693.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1297.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9293.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8094.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4497.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4097.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10094.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4896.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3698.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8493.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5298.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3295.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 896.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5696.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2898.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7292.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6095.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1692.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7289.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4092.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 485.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6889.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4491.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9286.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6491.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4893.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2092.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6089.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5293.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10086.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5692.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8884.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2491.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1290.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8487.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2892.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 890.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8086.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3291.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9686.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7689.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3692.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6489.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 489.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 891.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1292.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1691.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2091.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2491.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2894.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3290.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3690.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4092.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4491.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4891.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5290.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5691.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6088.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6890.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7290.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7686.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8088.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8490.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8889.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9286.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9687.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10087.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6891.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3695.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 890.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7288.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3292.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9287.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7690.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2894.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1290.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8088.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2491.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10091.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8487.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2093.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5291.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9689.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5690.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4891.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8888.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6092.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4492.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 489.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6487.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4093.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1690.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: Treatment-Naive (TN) Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis. One participant in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI was excluded from the TN Population for the final analysis due to a late report of prior anti-VEGF treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4491.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 889.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10085.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1290.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6490.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1691.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2091.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4893.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2490.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2891.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6889.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3291.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4091.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7289.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3691.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7689.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5294.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8086.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8487.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8884.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5693.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9285.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9684.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6088.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 484.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4891.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6087.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10089.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 890.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7289.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8890.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9687.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7688.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1690.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6489.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4491.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2092.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9286.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8089.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2492.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1292.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5291.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2895.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5692.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8491.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3290.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6890.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3690.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 488.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4092.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2492.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3696.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4094.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4495.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4892.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5293.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5691.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6093.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6488.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6890.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7287.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7689.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8088.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8488.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8890.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9288.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9689.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10091.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 488.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 890.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1290.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1691.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2093.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2894.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3293.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3260.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9259.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6058.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5261.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8858.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6459.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1652.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8456.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6860.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3658.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8059.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7259.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5660.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7658.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1244.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4061.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2858.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 839.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4462.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 429.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4858.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2457.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10063.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2054.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9665.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8453.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 841.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4455.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2851.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3250.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3657.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4056.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4856.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5258.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5655.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6053.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6454.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6854.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7255.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7652.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8055.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8853.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9255.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9658.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10054.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 426.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1246.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1651.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2050.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2452.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8857.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5656.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3252.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9258.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5257.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1641.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9658.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4856.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2851.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10065.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4457.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2448.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4055.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 834.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7256.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3658.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7657.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6860.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2045.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8056.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6451.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 428.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8455.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6057.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1243.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: Treatment-Naive (TN) Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis. One participant in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI was excluded from the TN Population for the final analysis due to a late report of prior anti-VEGF treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8455.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2457.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3261.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7658.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3658.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1652.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10063.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4061.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8857.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7258.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4461.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2053.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2859.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4857.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9258.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 838.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5260.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9664.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8060.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5661.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6858.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1245.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6057.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6458.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 429.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1246.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6854.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1651.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7257.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7654.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8058.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2051.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8456.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8853.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2453.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9658.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9257.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10055.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2853.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3250.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3657.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4056.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 428.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4456.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4858.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5261.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 842.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5658.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6057.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6456.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10066.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 833.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3255.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6453.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9260.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 426.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1243.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1641.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2045.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2449.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2855.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3659.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4058.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4461.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4858.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5260.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5658.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6056.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6860.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7259.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7657.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8057.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8457.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8858.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9659.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive Population

BCVA was measured on the ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For each participant, an average BCVA value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was then used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants per treatment arm who met the endpoint. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world). Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, average of Weeks 48, 52, and 56

Population: Treatment-Naive Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization. Participants were grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Only participants with at least one non-missing, valid assessment at Weeks 48, 52, or 56 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationGaining ≥15 Letters32.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationGaining ≥10 Letters58.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationGaining ≥5 Letters81.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationGaining ≥0 Letters93.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationGaining ≥0 Letters92.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationGaining ≥15 Letters29.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationGaining ≥5 Letters79.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationGaining ≥10 Letters55.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationGaining ≥0 Letters92.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationGaining ≥10 Letters56.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationGaining ≥5 Letters80.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationGaining ≥15 Letters32.7 Percentage of participants
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants gaining ≥15 letters in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-8.5, 8.9]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants gaining ≥15 letters in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-11.8, 4.8]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants gaining ≥10 letters in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-6.9, 11.4]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants gaining ≥10 letters in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-9.8, 8.1]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants gaining ≥5 letters in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-6.2, 8.5]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants gaining ≥5 letters in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-8.3, 6.2]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants gaining ≥0 letters in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-3.8, 6.2]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants gaining ≥0 letters in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-4.8, 5.2]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9644.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6440.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2830.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 413.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6038.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3235.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5638.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3633.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5235.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4833.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4437.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9242.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 815.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10043.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8840.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1624.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1220.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8039.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7637.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4037.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7236.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2026.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8438.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6836.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2429.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3227.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4030.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8030.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 410.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 816.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1222.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1624.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2021.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2424.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2826.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3632.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4430.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4829.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5231.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5629.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6030.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6429.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6831.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7230.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7631.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8430.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8829.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9234.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9634.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10031.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2424.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8838.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6431.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2022.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 410.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6835.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1623.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9636.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1219.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9242.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7635.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8035.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4433.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4029.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10040.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4829.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3628.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8438.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5233.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3223.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 815.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5636.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2825.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7232.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6036.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: Treatment-Naive (TN) Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis. One participant in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI was excluded from the TN Population for the final analysis due to a late report of prior anti-VEGF treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 814.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3234.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6836.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8440.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3634.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7637.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8839.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4037.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6439.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1219.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4436.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2430.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9242.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4832.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2829.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9642.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5234.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8040.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1623.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5639.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2025.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7235.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10043.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6037.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 413.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6032.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6431.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6833.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2022.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 410.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7632.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8033.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2424.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7233.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8829.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9238.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9635.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2828.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3227.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 817.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3634.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10033.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4032.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4430.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1223.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4831.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8432.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5232.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5630.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1626.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8439.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10040.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 410.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 815.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1219.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1623.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2022.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2424.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2826.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3225.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3628.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4028.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4435.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4831.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5233.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5637.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6036.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6431.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6836.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7234.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7634.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8037.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8838.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9242.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9635.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive Populations

BCVA was measured on the ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For each participant, an average BCVA value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was then used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants per treatment arm who met the endpoint. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world). Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, average of Weeks 48, 52, and 56

Population: ITT Population and Treatment-Naive Population. Only participants with at least one non-missing, valid assessment at Weeks 48, 52, or 56 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population38.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population38.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population32.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population34.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population33.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population35.5 Percentage of participants
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the ITT Population.95% CI: [-3.1, 12.7]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the ITT Population.95% CI: [-8.8, 6.2]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the Treatment-Naive Population.95% CI: [-6.5, 11.6]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the Treatment-Naive Population.95% CI: [-10, 7.4]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1627.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6840.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4041.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10044.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 414.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4440.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8842.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6444.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4836.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2028.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6041.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5239.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9646.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5643.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8441.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2433.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1223.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8043.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2834.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 817.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7639.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3239.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9245.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7241.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3636.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6431.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 413.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 820.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1225.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1628.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2024.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2429.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2830.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3230.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3635.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4034.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4433.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4832.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5234.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5633.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6034.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6833.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7234.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7635.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8032.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8433.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8832.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9238.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9637.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10034.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6839.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3227.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 413.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7236.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2828.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9245.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7639.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2427.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 818.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8038.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2026.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10044.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8440.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1625.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5238.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9640.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5640.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4833.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8841.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6039.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4438.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4034.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6435.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3633.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1222.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: Treatment-Naive (TN) Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis. One participant in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI was excluded from the TN Population for the final analysis due to a late report of prior anti-VEGF treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3238.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8443.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6444.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3637.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1222.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6040.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4041.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 415.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5644.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4440.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8044.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5239.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4836.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1626.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10045.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7640.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2028.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8842.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9247.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2434.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 817.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7240.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2835.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9644.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6839.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7237.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10036.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 413.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 822.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1226.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1630.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2026.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2430.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2832.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3231.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3638.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4036.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4434.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4834.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5237.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5635.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6036.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6433.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6835.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7637.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8037.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8436.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8833.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9242.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9639.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 412.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6435.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2829.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10044.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6840.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2427.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2025.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7238.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1626.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8841.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7639.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1222.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9641.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8040.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4836.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4440.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 817.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5239.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4034.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9245.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5641.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3634.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8441.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6039.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3228.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 457.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6877.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4079.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1675.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6477.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4484.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10080.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6075.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4881.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8874.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5678.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5281.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2076.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9680.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8473.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2478.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 867.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8074.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2876.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9276.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7675.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3280.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1270.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7279.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3679.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6477.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 461.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1274.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1674.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2079.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2476.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2879.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3278.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3680.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4078.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4477.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4881.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5278.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5679.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6075.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 868.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6876.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7276.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7673.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8075.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8479.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8874.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9276.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9676.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10075.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6878.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3275.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1272.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7276.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2877.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9277.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7672.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2472.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 459.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8077.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2071.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10081.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8475.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5277.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4877.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1669.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5680.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4481.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9676.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6080.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4079.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8877.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6472.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3678.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 866.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: Treatment-Naive (TN) Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis. One participant in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI was excluded from the TN Population for the final analysis due to a late report of prior anti-VEGF treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3281.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 865.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6476.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3677.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4483.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6075.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4078.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8873.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5678.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1271.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5281.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4879.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9678.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8472.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1676.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 457.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8075.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2076.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10079.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7675.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2478.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7278.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2877.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9273.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6875.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2080.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5678.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 462.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 868.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1274.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1675.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2477.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2879.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3280.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3681.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4079.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4479.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4884.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5280.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6077.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6479.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6877.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7277.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7676.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8078.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8480.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8875.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9277.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9677.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10078.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 458.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6878.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2472.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4879.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2072.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9280.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7673.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1669.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7277.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8078.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1272.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10081.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8476.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4485.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 865.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5279.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4081.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5682.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3679.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9676.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6080.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3277.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8880.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6473.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2876.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Gaining Greater Than or Equal to (≥)15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT Population

BCVA was measured on the ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For each participant, an average BCVA value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was then used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants per treatment arm who met the endpoint. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world). Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, average of Weeks 48, 52, and 56

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Only participants with at least one non-missing, valid assessment at Weeks 48, 52, or 56 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining Greater Than or Equal to (≥)15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationGaining ≥5 Letters81.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining Greater Than or Equal to (≥)15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationGaining ≥0 Letters92.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining Greater Than or Equal to (≥)15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationGaining ≥10 Letters59.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining Greater Than or Equal to (≥)15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationGaining ≥15 Letters33.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining Greater Than or Equal to (≥)15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationGaining ≥15 Letters28.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining Greater Than or Equal to (≥)15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationGaining ≥10 Letters53.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining Greater Than or Equal to (≥)15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationGaining ≥0 Letters91.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining Greater Than or Equal to (≥)15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationGaining ≥5 Letters77.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining Greater Than or Equal to (≥)15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationGaining ≥0 Letters91.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining Greater Than or Equal to (≥)15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationGaining ≥15 Letters30.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining Greater Than or Equal to (≥)15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationGaining ≥10 Letters53.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining Greater Than or Equal to (≥)15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationGaining ≥5 Letters78.0 Percentage of participants
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants gaining ≥15 letters in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-4, 11.1]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants gaining ≥15 letters in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-9.1, 5.2]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants gaining ≥10 letters in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-2.5, 13.4]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants gaining ≥10 letters in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-8.9, 6.8]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants gaining ≥5 letters in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-2.7, 10.3]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants gaining ≥5 letters in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-7.3, 5.9]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants gaining ≥0 letters in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-3.8, 5.2]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants gaining ≥0 letters in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-4.9, 4.2]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm at Week 52 Who Achieved a Once Every 12-Weeks or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval Without an Interval Decrease Below Once Every 12 Weeks, ITT and Treatment-Naive Populations

Time frame: From start of PTI (Week 12 or later) until Week 52

Population: ITT Population and Treatment-Naive Population. The number analyzed includes all participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI who had not discontinued the study prior to Week 52.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm at Week 52 Who Achieved a Once Every 12-Weeks or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval Without an Interval Decrease Below Once Every 12 Weeks, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population64.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm at Week 52 Who Achieved a Once Every 12-Weeks or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval Without an Interval Decrease Below Once Every 12 Weeks, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population66.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm at Week 96 Who Achieved a Once Every 12-Weeks or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval Without an Interval Decrease Below Once Every 12 Weeks, ITT and Treatment-Naive Populations

Time frame: From start of PTI (Week 12 or later) until Week 96

Population: ITT Population and Treatment-Naive Population. The number analyzed includes all participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI who had not discontinued the study prior to Week 96.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm at Week 96 Who Achieved a Once Every 12-Weeks or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval Without an Interval Decrease Below Once Every 12 Weeks, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population63.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm at Week 96 Who Achieved a Once Every 12-Weeks or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval Without an Interval Decrease Below Once Every 12 Weeks, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population65.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 52, ITT Population

Time frame: Week 52

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. The number analyzed includes all participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI who had not discontinued the study prior to Week 52.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 52, ITT PopulationOnce Every 4 Weeks13.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 52, ITT PopulationOnce Every 8 Weeks15.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 52, ITT PopulationOnce Every 12 Weeks20.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 52, ITT PopulationOnce Every 16 Weeks51.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 52, Treatment-Naive Population

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Treatment-Naive Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization. Participants were grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. The number analyzed includes all participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI who had not discontinued the study prior to Week 52.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 52, Treatment-Naive PopulationOnce Every 4 Weeks11.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 52, Treatment-Naive PopulationOnce Every 8 Weeks13.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 52, Treatment-Naive PopulationOnce Every 12 Weeks20.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 52, Treatment-Naive PopulationOnce Every 16 Weeks54.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 96, ITT Population

Time frame: Week 96

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. The number analyzed includes all participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI who had not discontinued the study prior to Week 96.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 96, ITT PopulationOnce Every 4 Weeks10.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 96, ITT PopulationOnce Every 8 Weeks11.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 96, ITT PopulationOnce Every 12 Weeks13.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 96, ITT PopulationOnce Every 16 Weeks64.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 96, Treatment-Naive Population

Time frame: Week 96

Population: Treatment-Naive Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization. Participants were grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. The number analyzed includes all participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI who had not discontinued the study prior to Week 96.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 96, Treatment-Naive PopulationOnce Every 4 Weeks9.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 96, Treatment-Naive PopulationOnce Every 8 Weeks9.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 96, Treatment-Naive PopulationOnce Every 12 Weeks12.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 96, Treatment-Naive PopulationOnce Every 16 Weeks68.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Test Positive for Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies Against Faricimab During the Study

Anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) against fariciamb were detected in plasma using a validated bridging enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The percentage of participants with treatment-emergent ADA-positive samples includes post-baseline evaluable participants with at least one treatment-induced (defined as having an ADA-negative sample or missing sample at baseline and any positive post-baseline sample) or treatment-boosted (defined as having an ADA-positive sample at baseline and any positive post-baseline sample with a titer that is equal to or greater than 4-fold baseline titer) ADA-positive sample during the study treatment period.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 28, 52, 76, and 100

Population: The analysis population consisted of all participants receiving faricimab with at least one determinant post-baseline ADA assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Who Test Positive for Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies Against Faricimab During the StudyTotal Treatment-Emergent ADA-Positive7.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Who Test Positive for Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies Against Faricimab During the StudyTreatment-Induced ADA-Positive7.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Who Test Positive for Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies Against Faricimab During the StudyTreatment-Boosted ADA-Positive0.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Who Test Positive for Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies Against Faricimab During the StudyTotal Treatment-Emergent ADA-Positive8.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Who Test Positive for Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies Against Faricimab During the StudyTreatment-Induced ADA-Positive8.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Who Test Positive for Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies Against Faricimab During the StudyTreatment-Boosted ADA-Positive0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive Populations

The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ocular imaging assessments were made independently by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 97.5% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 97.52% CI.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: ITT Population and Treatment-Naive Population. Only participants with non-missing, valid assessments at Baseline and Week 52 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population44.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population46.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population43.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population45.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population46.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population52.3 Percentage of participants
Comparison: This analysis is for the non-inferiority of Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W compared with Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W in the ITT Population.97.5% CI: [-12.6, 7.4]
Comparison: This analysis is for the non-inferiority of Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI compared with Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W in the ITT Population.97.5% CI: [-13.4, 6.3]
Comparison: This analysis is for the superiority of Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W compared with Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W in the Treatment-Naive Population.p-value: 0.300997.5% CI: [-16.9, 6.1]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: This analysis is for the superiority of Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI compared with Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W in the Treatment-Naive Population.p-value: 0.173597.5% CI: [-18.3, 4.4]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: This analysis is for the superiority of Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W compared with Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W in the ITT Population.p-value: 0.575797.5% CI: [-12.6, 7.4]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: This analysis is for the superiority of Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI compared with Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W in the ITT Population.p-value: 0.429397.5% CI: [-13.4, 6.3]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ocular imaging assessments were made independently by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 16, 52, and 96

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Only participants with non-missing, valid assessments at Baseline and each timepoint were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5243.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1634.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9653.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5243.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1638.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9644.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1634.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9643.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5246.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive Population

The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ocular imaging assessments were made independently by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 16, 52, and 96

Population: Treatment-Naive (TN) Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis. One participant in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI was excluded from the TN Population for the final analysis due to a late report of prior anti-VEGF treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5246.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1637.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9655.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5246.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1639.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9644.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1637.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9648.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5251.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ocular imaging assessments were made independently by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 16, 52, and 96

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Only participants with non-missing, valid assessments at Baseline and each timepoint were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5216.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1612.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9625.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5219.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1617.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9619.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1613.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9621.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5219.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive Population

The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ocular imaging assessments were made independently by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 16, 52, and 96

Population: Treatment-Naive (TN) Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis. One participant in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI was excluded from the TN Population for the final analysis due to a late report of prior anti-VEGF treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5218.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1614.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9627.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5219.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1616.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9619.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1614.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9625.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5221.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ocular imaging assessments were made independently by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 16, 52, and 96

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Only participants with non-missing, valid assessments at Baseline and each timepoint were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 524.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 163.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 967.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 527.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 168.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 967.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 163.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 965.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 524.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive Population

The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ocular imaging assessments were made independently by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 16, 52, and 96

Population: Treatment-Naive (TN) Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis. One participant in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI was excluded from the TN Population for the final analysis due to a late report of prior anti-VEGF treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 525.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 163.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 969.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 526.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 166.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 965.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 163.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 966.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 524.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive Populations

Absence of diabetic macular edema was defined as achieving a central subfield thickness (CST) of \<325 microns in the study eye. CST was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane and Bruch's membrane. For each participant, an average CST value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was then used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants per treatment arm who met the endpoint. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world). Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Average of Weeks 48, 52, and 56

Population: ITT Population and Treatment-Naive Population. Only participants with at least one non-missing, valid assessment at Weeks 48, 52, or 56 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population85.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population86.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population81.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population83.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population73.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population77.0 Percentage of participants
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the ITT Population.95% CI: [5.7, 18.9]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the ITT Population.95% CI: [1.5, 14.9]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the Treatment-Naive Population.95% CI: [1.6, 16.3]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the Treatment-Naive Population.95% CI: [-1.2, 13.6]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Absence of diabetic macular edema was defined as achieving a central subfield thickness of \<325 microns in the study eye. Central subfield thickness was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and Bruch's membrane (BM) as assessed by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5283.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3673.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 853.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6885.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3280.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1261.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4887.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2872.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1669.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7288.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2477.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2073.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6085.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4481.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7688.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4086.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8090.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10090.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8488.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6487.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8889.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9288.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9692.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5689.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 438.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3272.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3683.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6086.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6482.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7282.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8083.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8485.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9688.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 443.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 857.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1264.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1669.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2067.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2477.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2881.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4081.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4480.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4882.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5282.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5685.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6883.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7682.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8885.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9284.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10085.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8076.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4072.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7274.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8480.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4476.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6878.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5276.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4871.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6473.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8878.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10084.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5672.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6078.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2067.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1662.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9280.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2462.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1256.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9680.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2871.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 847.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3267.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 438.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3674.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7679.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Intraretinal fluid and subretinal fluid were measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the central subfield (center 1 mm). The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world); Asia and rest of the world regions were combined due to a small number of enrolled participants. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 16, 48, 52, 56, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4840.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9255.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5642.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1619.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10054.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9661.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5239.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5639.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1619.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4831.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5234.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9244.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9646.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10051.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9238.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4822.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10044.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9638.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5626.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5228.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1613.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Intraretinal fluid was measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the central subfield (center 1 mm). The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world); Asia and rest of the world regions were combined due to a small number of enrolled participants. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 16, 48, 52, 56, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10056.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9662.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5239.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9256.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1619.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5642.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4840.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5639.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9245.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9647.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4832.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10052.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5235.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1619.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10045.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1613.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4822.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5228.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5627.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9239.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9639.1 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Subretinal fluid was measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the central subfield (center 1 mm). The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world); Asia and rest of the world regions were combined due to a small number of enrolled participants. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 16, 48, 52, 56, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9295.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4897.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9696.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10096.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1699.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5294.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5697.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10096.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9296.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5695.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5295.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9696.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4895.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1696.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10095.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1695.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4895.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5297.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5695.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9296.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9696.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event

This analysis of adverse events (AEs) includes both ocular and non-ocular (systemic) AEs. Investigators sought information on AEs at each contact with the participants. All AEs were recorded and the investigator made an assessment of seriousness, severity, and causality of each AE. AEs of special interest included the following: Cases of potential drug-induced liver injury that include an elevated ALT or AST in combination with either an elevated bilirubin or clinical jaundice, as defined by Hy's Law; Suspected transmission of an infectious agent by the study drug; Sight-threatening AEs that cause a drop in visual acuity (VA) score ≥30 letters lasting more than 1 hour, require surgical or medical intervention to prevent permanent loss of sight, or are associated with severe intraocular inflammation.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug through end of study (up to 2 years)

Population: The safety-evaluable population comprised all participants who received at least one injection of active study drug (faricimab or aflibercept) in the study eye.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventAE of Special Interest (AESI)7.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventAdverse Event (AE)89.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventSerious AE (SAE)30.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventAE Leading to Withdrawal from Study Treatment2.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventAE Leading to Withdrawal from Study Treatment2.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventAE of Special Interest (AESI)7.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventSerious AE (SAE)25.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventAdverse Event (AE)85.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventAE Leading to Withdrawal from Study Treatment1.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventAdverse Event (AE)87.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventSerious AE (SAE)31.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventAE of Special Interest (AESI)6.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least One Non-Ocular Adverse Event

This analysis of adverse events (AEs) only includes non-ocular (systemic) AEs. Investigators sought information on adverse events (AEs) at each contact with the participants. All AEs were recorded and the investigator made an assessment of seriousness, severity, and causality of each AE. The non-ocular AE of special interest was: Cases of potential drug-induced liver injury that include an elevated ALT or AST in combination with either an elevated bilirubin or clinical jaundice, as defined by Hy's Law.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug through end of study (up to 2 years)

Population: The safety-evaluable population comprised all participants who received at least one injection of active study drug (faricimab or aflibercept) in the study eye.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Non-Ocular Adverse EventAE Leading to Withdrawal from Study Treatment1.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Non-Ocular Adverse EventAE of Special Interest (AESI)0.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Non-Ocular Adverse EventAdverse Event (AE)69.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Non-Ocular Adverse EventSerious AE (SAE)24.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Non-Ocular Adverse EventAE Leading to Withdrawal from Study Treatment0.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Non-Ocular Adverse EventSerious AE (SAE)20.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Non-Ocular Adverse EventAE of Special Interest (AESI)0.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Non-Ocular Adverse EventAdverse Event (AE)68.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Non-Ocular Adverse EventAE of Special Interest (AESI)0.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Non-Ocular Adverse EventAdverse Event (AE)73.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Non-Ocular Adverse EventSerious AE (SAE)28.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Non-Ocular Adverse EventAE Leading to Withdrawal from Study Treatment1.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow Eye

This analysis of adverse events (AEs) only includes ocular AEs, which are categorized as having occurred either in the study eye or the fellow eye. Investigators sought information on AEs at each contact with the participants. All AEs were recorded and the investigator made an assessment of seriousness, severity, and causality of each AE. Ocular AEs of special interest included the following: Suspected transmission of an infectious agent by the study drug; Sight-threatening AEs that cause a drop in visual acuity (VA) score ≥30 letters lasting more than 1 hour, require surgical or medical intervention to prevent permanent loss of sight, or are associated with severe intraocular inflammation (IOI).

Time frame: From first dose of study drug through end of study (up to 2 years)

Population: The safety-evaluable population comprised all participants who received at least one injection of active study drug (faricimab or aflibercept) in the study eye.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: Treatment-related SAE0.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: Serious AE (SAE)4.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: AE50.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: AE of Special Interest (AESI)4.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: Adverse Event (AE)52.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: AESI, Intervention Req. to Prevent Permanent Vision Loss0.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: AESI, Drop in Visual Acuity (VA) Score ≥30 Letters3.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: AESI, Drop in VA Score ≥30 Letters3.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: AESI, Associated with Severe Intraocular Inflammation (IOI)0.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: AE Leading to Withdrawal from Treatment0.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: AESI, Intervention Req. to Prevent Permanent Vision Loss0.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: AESI3.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: Treatment-related AE3.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: AESI, Associated with Severe IOI0.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: SAE3.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: AESI0.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: SAE1.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: Adverse Event (AE)51.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: Serious AE (SAE)6.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: AE Leading to Withdrawal from Treatment1.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: Treatment-related AE4.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: Treatment-related SAE0.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: AE of Special Interest (AESI)6.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: AESI, Drop in Visual Acuity (VA) Score ≥30 Letters5.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: AESI, Intervention Req. to Prevent Permanent Vision Loss1.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: AE43.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: AESI, Associated with Severe Intraocular Inflammation (IOI)0.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: AESI, Drop in VA Score ≥30 Letters0.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: AESI, Associated with Severe IOI0.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: AESI, Intervention Req. to Prevent Permanent Vision Loss0.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: AESI, Intervention Req. to Prevent Permanent Vision Loss0.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: AE44.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: Treatment-related AE4.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: AE Leading to Withdrawal from Treatment0.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: AESI, Associated with Severe IOI0.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: AESI2.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: Serious AE (SAE)4.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: SAE3.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: AESI, Drop in VA Score ≥30 Letters2.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: AESI, Drop in Visual Acuity (VA) Score ≥30 Letters2.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: AESI, Associated with Severe Intraocular Inflammation (IOI)0.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: AE of Special Interest (AESI)3.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: Adverse Event (AE)44.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: AESI, Intervention Req. to Prevent Permanent Vision Loss1.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: Treatment-related SAE0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive Populations

BCVA was measured on the ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For each participant, an average BCVA value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was then used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants per treatment arm who met the endpoint. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world). Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, average of Weeks 48, 52, and 56

Population: ITT Population and Treatment-Naive Population. Only participants with at least one non-missing, valid assessment at Weeks 48, 52, or 56 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population0.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population1.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population0.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population0.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population0.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population0.5 Percentage of participants
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the ITT Population.95% CI: [-1.4, 1.5]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the ITT Population.95% CI: [-1.6, 0.2]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the Treatment-Naive Population.95% CI: [-1.1, 2.1]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the Treatment-Naive Population.95% CI: [-1.4, 0.4]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement invisual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 160.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 681.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 401.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1002.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 41.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 440.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 882.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 641.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 480.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 201.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 601.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 520.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 962.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 561.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 842.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 240.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 121.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 802.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 281.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 81.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 762.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 320.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 923.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 721.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 360.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 640.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 41.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 80.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 120.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 160.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 200.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 240.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 280.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 321.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 361.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 401.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 441.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 480.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 520.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 561.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 600.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 681.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 721.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 761.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 802.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 841.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 881.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 920.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 962.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1003.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 680.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 321.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 40.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 721.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 280.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 921.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 762.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 241.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 80.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 801.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 201.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1002.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 841.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 160.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 521.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 962.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 560.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 481.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 881.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 601.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 441.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 401.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 642.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 360.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 120.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score attainable), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: Treatment-Naive (TN) Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis. One participant in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI was excluded from the TN Population for the final analysis due to a late report of prior anti-VEGF treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 680.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 361.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 121.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 640.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 401.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 520.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 600.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 440.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 923.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 481.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 160.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 561.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1003.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 881.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 200.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 81.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 842.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 240.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 801.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 762.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 281.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 42.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 721.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 320.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 962.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 240.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 41.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 80.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 120.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 160.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 200.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 280.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 321.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 361.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 401.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 441.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 480.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 520.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 560.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 600.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 640.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 681.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 721.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 761.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 802.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 841.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 881.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 920.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 962.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1003.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 680.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 280.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 40.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 722.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 240.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 922.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 762.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 440.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 80.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 801.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 200.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1002.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 842.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 520.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 480.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 160.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 561.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 400.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 962.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 601.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 360.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 881.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 642.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 320.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 120.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive Populations

BCVA was measured on the ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For each participant, an average BCVA value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was then used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants per treatment arm who met the endpoint. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥69 vs. \<69 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world). Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, average of Weeks 48, 52, and 56

Population: ITT Population and Treatment-Naive Population. Only participants with at least one non-missing, valid assessment at Weeks 48, 52, or 56 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population73.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population73.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population71.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population74.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population68.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population72.1 Percentage of participants
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the ITT Population.95% CI: [-2.4, 11.8]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the ITT Population.95% CI: [-4.1, 9.8]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the Treatment-Naive Population.95% CI: [-6.5, 9.4]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the Treatment-Naive Population.95% CI: [-6, 9.3]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥69 vs. \<69 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6871.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7268.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7670.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2872.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8072.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8472.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8868.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1268.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9271.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3272.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9674.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10073.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3671.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 456.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4073.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1666.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4473.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4873.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 861.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5274.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2069.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5674.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6070.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6474.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2470.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6067.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2469.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3669.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7272.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 457.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5269.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7669.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 865.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4070.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8070.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2869.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6868.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8471.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5673.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8870.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4471.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1669.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9273.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2067.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4873.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9673.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3271.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6468.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10070.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1267.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10076.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 454.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 859.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1265.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1664.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2066.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2465.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2867.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3267.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3670.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4070.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4469.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4867.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5271.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5671.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6069.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6468.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6872.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7266.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7670.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8069.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8871.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9269.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9673.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8471.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥69 vs. \<69 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: Treatment-Naive (TN) Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis. One participant in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI was excluded from the TN Population for the final analysis due to a late report of prior anti-VEGF treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9270.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6871.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4074.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1666.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2070.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4473.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 862.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6473.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4873.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8868.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6069.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5273.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 457.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5675.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8473.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2471.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9672.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8073.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2873.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1268.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7670.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3274.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10071.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7267.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3671.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6470.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 459.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 867.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1270.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1670.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2069.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2471.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2871.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3274.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3671.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4073.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4474.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4876.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5273.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5675.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6070.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6868.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7273.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7672.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8072.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8472.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8870.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9274.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9674.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10070.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6873.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3270.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 456.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7268.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2869.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9273.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7671.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2466.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 859.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8072.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2067.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10077.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8472.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1665.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5275.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9673.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5674.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4870.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8875.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6071.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4473.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4072.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6470.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3672.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1267.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Without High-Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Baseline Who Developed High-Risk PDR at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive Populations

The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced PDR. High-risk PDR was defined as an ETDRS DRSS score of ≥71 on the 7-field/4-wide field color fundus photographs assessment by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: ITT Population and Treatment-Naive Population. Only participants with non-missing, valid assessments at Baseline and Week 52 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Without High-Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Baseline Who Developed High-Risk PDR at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population0.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Without High-Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Baseline Who Developed High-Risk PDR at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population0.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Without High-Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Baseline Who Developed High-Risk PDR at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population0.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Without High-Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Baseline Who Developed High-Risk PDR at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population0.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Without High-Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Baseline Who Developed High-Risk PDR at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population0.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Without High-Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Baseline Who Developed High-Risk PDR at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population0.0 Percentage of participants
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the ITT Population.95% CI: [0, 0]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the ITT Population.95% CI: [0, 0]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the Treatment-Naive Population.95% CI: [0, 0]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the Treatment-Naive Population.95% CI: [0, 0]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Without Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Baseline Who Developed New PDR at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive Populations

The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). PDR was defined as an ETDRS DRSS score of ≥61 on the 7-field/4-wide field color fundus photographs assessment by a central reading center. The weighted percentages of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: ITT Population and Treatment-Naive Population. Only participants with non-missing, valid assessments at Baseline and Week 52 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Without Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Baseline Who Developed New PDR at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population0.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Without Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Baseline Who Developed New PDR at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population0.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Without Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Baseline Who Developed New PDR at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population0.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Without Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Baseline Who Developed New PDR at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population1.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Without Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Baseline Who Developed New PDR at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population0.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Without Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Baseline Who Developed New PDR at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population0.0 Percentage of participants
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the ITT Population.95% CI: [-1, 1.8]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the ITT Population.95% CI: [-1, 2]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the Treatment-Naive Population.95% CI: [-0.6, 1.8]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the Treatment-Naive Population.95% CI: [-0.4, 2.8]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Retinal dryness was defined as achieving a central subfield thickness (ILM-BM) of \<280 microns. Central subfield thickness was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and Bruch's membrane (BM) as assessed by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants was based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1638.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7271.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7668.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 412.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8072.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2044.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8468.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8871.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9272.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2450.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9675.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10072.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2845.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3252.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3650.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 826.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4061.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4459.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5264.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4867.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5670.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1233.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6065.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6471.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6866.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2851.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4458.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7265.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1645.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5260.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7662.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3246.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6860.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8064.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3659.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5663.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8467.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2041.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6458.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8863.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 418.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4057.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9264.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 825.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4858.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9667.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2452.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6065.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10069.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1236.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10064.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3242.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4850.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5254.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 415.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 822.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1228.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1633.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2038.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2846.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3648.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4049.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4453.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5651.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6059.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6452.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6859.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7258.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7658.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8060.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8460.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8860.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9264.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9663.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2437.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Plasma Concentration of Faricimab Over Time

Faricimab concentration in plasma was determined using a validated immunoassay method.

Time frame: Pre-dose on Day 1 (Baseline); Weeks 4, 28, 52, 76, and 100

Population: This analysis only included participants in Arms A and B who received treatment with faricimab and with at least one plasma sample, provided sufficient dosing information (dose and dosing time) was available. The number of participants analyzed at a given timepoint includes those with an available plasma sample and dosing information at that timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPlasma Concentration of Faricimab Over TimeWeek 40.0192 micrograms per millilitre (μg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.0163
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPlasma Concentration of Faricimab Over TimeWeek 520.0042 micrograms per millilitre (μg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.0078
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPlasma Concentration of Faricimab Over TimeBaseline0.0001 micrograms per millilitre (μg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.002
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPlasma Concentration of Faricimab Over TimeWeek 760.0060 micrograms per millilitre (μg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.0093
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPlasma Concentration of Faricimab Over TimeWeek 280.0030 micrograms per millilitre (μg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.005
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPlasma Concentration of Faricimab Over TimeWeek 1000.0058 micrograms per millilitre (μg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.0106
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPlasma Concentration of Faricimab Over TimeWeek 280.0115 micrograms per millilitre (μg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.0189
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPlasma Concentration of Faricimab Over TimeBaseline0.0000 micrograms per millilitre (μg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.0004
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPlasma Concentration of Faricimab Over TimeWeek 40.0196 micrograms per millilitre (μg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.0151
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPlasma Concentration of Faricimab Over TimeWeek 1000.0071 micrograms per millilitre (μg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.011
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPlasma Concentration of Faricimab Over TimeWeek 520.0113 micrograms per millilitre (μg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.014
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPlasma Concentration of Faricimab Over TimeWeek 760.0060 micrograms per millilitre (μg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.0103

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 17, 2026