Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Faricimab (RO6867461) in Participants With Diabetic Macular Edema (YOSEMITE)

A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked, Active Comparator-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Faricimab (RO6867461) in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema (YOSEMITE)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03622580
Enrollment
940
Registered
2018-08-09
Start date
2018-09-05
Completion date
2021-09-03
Last updated
2025-07-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Macular Edema

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of faricimab administered at 8-week intervals or as specified in the protocol following treatment initiation, compared with aflibercept once every 8 weeks (Q8W), in participants with diabetic macular edema (DME).

Interventions

DRUGAflibercept

Aflibercept 2 mg was administered by intravitreal (IVT) injection into the study eye once every 8 weeks (Q8W).

DRUGFaricimab

Faricimab 6 mg was administered by IVT injection into the study eye either once every 8 weeks (Q8W) in arm A or according to a personalized treatment interval (PTI) in arm B.

PROCEDURESham Procedure

The sham is a procedure that mimics an IVT injection and involves the blunt end of an empty syringe (without a needle) being pressed against the anesthetized eye. It was administered to participants in all three treatments arms at applicable clinic visits to maintain masking among treatment arms.

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (Type 1 or Type 2) * Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of less than or equal to (≤) 10% within 2 months prior to Day 1 * Macular thickening secondary to diabetic macular edema (DME) involving the center of the fovea * Decreased visual acuity attributable primarily to DME * Ability and willingness to undertake all scheduled visits and assessments * For women of childbearing potential: agreement to remain abstinent or use acceptable contraceptive methods that result in a failure rate of \<1% per year during the treatment period and for at least 3 months after the final dose of study treatment

Exclusion criteria

* Currently untreated diabetes mellitus or previously untreated patients who initiated oral or injectable anti-diabetic medication within 3 months prior to Day 1 * Uncontrolled blood pressure, defined as a systolic value greater than (\>)180 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and/or a diastolic value \>100 mmHg while a patient is at rest * Currently pregnant or breastfeeding, or intend to become pregnant during the study * Treatment with panretinal photocoagulation or macular laser within 3 months prior to Day 1 to the study eye * Any intraocular or periocular corticosteroid treatment within the past 6 months prior to Day 1 to the study eye * Prior administration of IVT faricimab in either eye * Active intraocular or periocular infection or active intraocular inflammation in the study eye * Any current or history of ocular disease other than DME that may confound assessment of the macula or affect central vision in the study eye * Any current ocular condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, is currently causing or could be expected to contribute to irreversible vision loss due to a cause other than DME in the study eye * Other protocol-specified inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsFrom Baseline through Week 56Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For the Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis, the model adjusted for treatment arm, visit, visit-by-treatment arm interaction, baseline BCVA (continuous), baseline BCVA (\<64 vs. ≥64 letters), prior intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region of enrollment. An unstructured covariance structure was used. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 97.5% CI is a rounding of 97.52% CI.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For the Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis, the model adjusted for treatment arm, visit, visit-by-treatment arm interaction, baseline BCVA (continuous), baseline BCVA (\<64 vs. ≥64 letters), prior intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region of enrollment. An unstructured covariance structure was used. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score attainable), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For the Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis, the model adjusted for treatment group, visit, visit-by-treatment group interaction, baseline BCVA (continuous), baseline BCVA (\<64 vs. ≥64 letters), and region of enrollment. An unstructured covariance structure was used. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Gaining Greater Than or Equal to (≥)15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationBaseline, average of Weeks 48, 52, and 56BCVA was measured on the ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For each participant, an average BCVA value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was then used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants per treatment arm who met the endpoint. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world). Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationBaseline, average of Weeks 48, 52, and 56BCVA was measured on the ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For each participant, an average BCVA value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was then used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants per treatment arm who met the endpoint. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world). Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationBaseline, average of Weeks 48, 52, and 56Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. For each participant, an average BCVA value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was then used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants per treatment arm who met the endpoint. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants avoiding a loss of letters in BCVA from baseline were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants avoiding a loss of letters in BCVA from baseline were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants avoiding a loss of letters in BCVA from baseline were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationBaseline, average of Weeks 48, 52, and 56Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. For each participant, an average BCVA value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was then used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants per treatment arm who met the endpoint. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants avoiding a loss of letters in BCVA from baseline were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants avoiding a loss of letters in BCVA from baseline were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants avoiding a loss of letters in BCVA from baseline were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsBaseline, average of Weeks 48, 52, and 56BCVA was measured on the ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For each participant, an average BCVA value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was then used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants per treatment arm who met the endpoint. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world). Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsBaseline, average of Weeks 48, 52, and 56BCVA was measured on the ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For each participant, an average BCVA value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was then used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants per treatment arm who met the endpoint. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥69 vs. \<69 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world). Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥69 vs. \<69 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥69 vs. \<69 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsBaseline, average of Weeks 48, 52, and 56BCVA was measured on the ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For each participant, an average BCVA value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was then used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants per treatment arm who met the endpoint. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world). Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement invisual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score attainable), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 16, 52, and 96The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ocular imaging assessments were made independently by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationBaseline, Weeks 16, 52, and 96The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ocular imaging assessments were made independently by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 16, 52, and 96The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ocular imaging assessments were made independently by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationBaseline, Weeks 16, 52, and 96The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ocular imaging assessments were made independently by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 16, 52, and 96The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ocular imaging assessments were made independently by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationBaseline, Weeks 16, 52, and 96The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ocular imaging assessments were made independently by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Without Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Baseline Who Developed New PDR at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsBaseline and Week 52The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). PDR was defined as an ETDRS DRSS score of ≥61 on the 7-field/4-wide field color fundus photographs assessment by a central reading center. The weighted percentages of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants Without High-Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Baseline Who Developed High-Risk PDR at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsBaseline and Week 52The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced PDR. High-risk PDR was defined as an ETDRS DRSS score of ≥71 on the 7-field/4-wide field color fundus photographs assessment by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 52, ITT PopulationWeek 52
Percentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 52, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 52
Percentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 96, ITT PopulationWeek 96
Percentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 96, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 96
Percentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm at Week 52 Who Achieved a Once Every 12-Weeks or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval Without an Interval Decrease Below Once Every 12 Weeks, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsFrom start of PTI (Week 12 or later) until Week 52
Percentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm at Week 96 Who Achieved a Once Every 12-Weeks or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval Without an Interval Decrease Below Once Every 12 Weeks, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsFrom start of PTI (Week 12 or later) until Week 96
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsFrom Baseline through Week 56Central subfield thickness (CST) was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and Bruch's membrane (BM) as assessed by a central reading center. For the Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis, the model adjusted for treatment group, visit, visit-by-treatment group interaction, baseline CST (continuous), baseline BCVA (\<64 vs. ≥64 letters), prior intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region of enrollment (U.S. and Canada vs. the rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). An unstructured covariance structure was used. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Central subfield thickness (CST) was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and Bruch's membrane (BM) as assessed by a central reading center. For the Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis, the model adjusted for treatment group, visit, visit-by-treatment group interaction, baseline CST (continuous), baseline BCVA (\<64 vs. ≥64 letters), prior intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region of enrollment (U.S. and Canada vs. the rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). An unstructured covariance structure was used. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Central subfield thickness (CST) was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and Bruch's membrane (BM) as assessed by a central reading center. For the Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis, the model adjusted for treatment group, visit, visit-by-treatment group interaction, baseline CST (continuous), baseline BCVA (\<64 vs. ≥64 letters), and region of enrollment (U.S. and Canada vs. the rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). An unstructured covariance structure was used. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsAverage of Weeks 48, 52, and 56Absence of diabetic macular edema was defined as achieving a central subfield thickness (CST) of \<325 microns in the study eye. CST was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane and Bruch's membrane. For each participant, an average CST value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was then used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants per treatment arm who met the endpoint. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world). Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Absence of diabetic macular edema was defined as achieving a central subfield thickness of \<325 microns in the study eye. Central subfield thickness was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and Bruch's membrane (BM) as assessed by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100Retinal dryness was defined as achieving a central subfield thickness (ILM-BM) of \<280 microns. Central subfield thickness was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and Bruch's membrane (BM) as assessed by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants was based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 16, 48, 52, 56, 92, 96, and 100Intraretinal fluid was measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the central subfield (center 1 mm). The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world); Asia and rest of the world regions were combined due to a small number of enrolled participants. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 16, 48, 52, 56, 92, 96, and 100Subretinal fluid was measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the central subfield (center 1 mm). The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world); Asia and rest of the world regions were combined due to a small number of enrolled participants. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsBaseline and Week 52The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ocular imaging assessments were made independently by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 97.5% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 97.52% CI.
Change From Baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) Composite Score Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 24, 52, and 100The NEI VFQ-25 captures a patient's perception of vision-related functioning and quality of life. The core measure includes 25 items that comprise 11 vision-related subscales and one item on general health. The composite score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores, or a positive change from baseline, indicating better vision-related functioning. For the Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis, the model adjusted for treatment arm, visit, visit-by-treatment arm interaction, baseline NEI VFQ-25 Composite Score (continuous), baseline BCVA (\<64 vs. ≥64 letters), prior intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region of enrollment. An unstructured covariance structure was used. Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.04% CI.
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventFrom first dose of study drug through end of study (up to 2 years)This analysis of adverse events (AEs) includes both ocular and non-ocular (systemic) AEs. Investigators sought information on AEs at each contact with the participants. All AEs were recorded and the investigator made an assessment of seriousness, severity, and causality of each AE. AEs of special interest included the following: Cases of potential drug-induced liver injury that include an elevated ALT or AST in combination with either an elevated bilirubin or clinical jaundice, as defined by Hy's Law; Suspected transmission of an infectious agent by the study drug; Sight-threatening AEs that cause a drop in visual acuity (VA) score ≥30 letters lasting more than 1 hour, require surgical or medical intervention to prevent permanent loss of sight, or are associated with severe intraocular inflammation.
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFrom first dose of study drug through end of study (up to 2 years)This analysis of adverse events (AEs) only includes ocular AEs, which are categorized as having occurred either in the study eye or the fellow eye. Investigators sought information on AEs at each contact with the participants. All AEs were recorded and the investigator made an assessment of seriousness, severity, and causality of each AE. Ocular AEs of special interest included the following: Suspected transmission of an infectious agent by the study drug; Sight-threatening AEs that cause a drop in visual acuity (VA) score ≥30 letters lasting more than 1 hour, require surgical or medical intervention to prevent permanent loss of sight, or are associated with severe intraocular inflammation.
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Non-Ocular Adverse EventFrom first dose of study drug through end of study (up to 2 years)This analysis of adverse events (AEs) only includes non-ocular (systemic) AEs. Investigators sought information on adverse events (AEs) at each contact with the participants. All AEs were recorded and the investigator made an assessment of seriousness, severity, and causality of each AE. The non-ocular AE of special interest was: Cases of potential drug-induced liver injury that include an elevated ALT or AST in combination with either an elevated bilirubin or clinical jaundice, as defined by Hy's Law.
Plasma Concentration of Faricimab Over TimePre-dose on Day 1 (Baseline); Weeks 4, 28, 52, 76, and 100Faricimab concentration in plasma was determined using a validated immunoassay method.
Percentage of Participants Who Test Positive for Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies Against Faricimab During the StudyBaseline, Weeks 4, 28, 52, 76, and 100Anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) against fariciamb were detected in plasma using a validated bridging enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The percentage of participants with treatment-emergent ADA-positive samples includes post-baseline evaluable participants with at least one treatment-induced (defined as having an ADA-negative sample or missing sample at baseline and any positive post-baseline sample) or treatment-boosted (defined as having an ADA-positive sample at baseline and any positive post-baseline sample with a titer that is equal to or greater than 4-fold baseline titer) ADA-positive sample during the study treatment period.
Percentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationBaseline, Weeks 16, 48, 52, 56, 92, 96, and 100Intraretinal fluid and subretinal fluid were measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the central subfield (center 1 mm). The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world); Asia and rest of the world regions were combined due to a small number of enrolled participants. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Countries

Austria, Bulgaria, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Russia, Slovakia, Spain, Turkey (Türkiye), United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W
Participants randomized to Arm A received 6 milligrams (mg) faricimab intravitreal (IVT) injections once every 4 weeks (Q4W) to Week 20, followed by 6 mg faricimab IVT injections once every 8 weeks (Q8W) to Week 96, followed by the final study visit at Week 100.
315
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI
Participants randomized to Arm B received 6 milligrams (mg) faricimab intravitreal (IVT) injections Q4W to at least Week 12, followed by a personalized treatment interval (PTI) dosing of 6 mg faricimab IVT injections up to once every 16 weeks (Q16W) through Week 96, followed by the final study visit at Week 100.
313
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W
Participants randomized to Arm C received 2 milligrams (mg) aflibercept intravitreal (IVT) injections Q4W to Week 16, followed by 2 mg aflibercept IVT injections Q8W to Week 96, followed by the final study visit at Week 100.
312
Total940

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event665
Overall StudyDeath162113
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1299
Overall StudyOther203
Overall StudyPhysician Decision301
Overall StudyPregnancy010
Overall StudyProtocol Violation101
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject12719

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicA: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WB: Faricimab 6 mg PTIC: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WTotal
Age, Continuous
ITT Population
61.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
62.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
62.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
62.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
Age, Continuous
Treatment-Naive Population
61.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
62.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
62.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
61.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Baseline Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Letter Score in the Study Eye
ITT Population
62.0 ETDRS Letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
61.9 ETDRS Letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
62.2 ETDRS Letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
62.0 ETDRS Letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
Baseline Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Letter Score in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
62.3 ETDRS Letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
61.8 ETDRS Letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
62.6 ETDRS Letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
62.2 ETDRS Letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
Baseline Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye
ITT Population
492.3 microns
STANDARD_DEVIATION 135.8
485.8 microns
STANDARD_DEVIATION 130.8
484.5 microns
STANDARD_DEVIATION 131.1
487.5 microns
STANDARD_DEVIATION 132.5
Baseline Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
488.8 microns
STANDARD_DEVIATION 136.8
483.5 microns
STANDARD_DEVIATION 127.3
486.8 microns
STANDARD_DEVIATION 130.4
486.3 microns
STANDARD_DEVIATION 131.3
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
ITT Population
Hispanic or Latino
37 Participants40 Participants37 Participants114 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
ITT Population
Not Hispanic or Latino
273 Participants268 Participants272 Participants813 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
ITT Population
Unknown or Not Reported
5 Participants5 Participants3 Participants13 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Treatment-Naive Population
Hispanic or Latino
31 Participants32 Participants31 Participants94 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Treatment-Naive Population
Not Hispanic or Latino
202 Participants210 Participants208 Participants620 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Treatment-Naive Population
Unknown or Not Reported
5 Participants3 Participants3 Participants11 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
ITT Population
10 - High Risk PDR (DRS Level 75)
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
ITT Population
11 - Advanced PDR (DRS Level 81)
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
ITT Population
12 - Advanced PDR (DRS Level 85)
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
ITT Population
1 - Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) Absent
2 Participants3 Participants4 Participants9 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
ITT Population
2 - DR Questionable / Microaneurysms Only
4 Participants6 Participants10 Participants20 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
ITT Population
3 - Mild Non-Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (NPDR)
84 Participants92 Participants83 Participants259 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
ITT Population
4 - Moderate NPDR
84 Participants86 Participants85 Participants255 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
ITT Population
5 - Moderately Severe NPDR
67 Participants59 Participants54 Participants180 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
ITT Population
6 - Severe NPDR
46 Participants40 Participants49 Participants135 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
ITT Population
7 - Mild Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR)
16 Participants11 Participants9 Participants36 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
ITT Population
8 - Moderate PDR
6 Participants9 Participants7 Participants22 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
ITT Population
9 - High Risk PDR (DRS Level 71)
0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
ITT Population
Cannot Grade
4 Participants5 Participants7 Participants16 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
ITT Population
Missing
2 Participants1 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
10 - High Risk PDR (DRS Level 75)
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
11 - Advanced PDR (DRS Level 81)
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
12 - Advanced PDR (DRS Level 85)
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
1 - Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) Absent
2 Participants3 Participants2 Participants7 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
2 - DR Questionable / Microaneurysms Only
1 Participants4 Participants4 Participants9 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
3 - Mild Non-Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (NPDR)
65 Participants66 Participants57 Participants188 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
4 - Moderate NPDR
56 Participants58 Participants65 Participants179 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
5 - Moderately Severe NPDR
50 Participants52 Participants48 Participants150 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
6 - Severe NPDR
40 Participants38 Participants46 Participants124 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
7 - Mild Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR)
13 Participants9 Participants6 Participants28 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
8 - Moderate PDR
6 Participants9 Participants6 Participants21 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
9 - High Risk PDR (DRS Level 71)
0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
Cannot Grade
4 Participants5 Participants5 Participants14 Participants
Number of Participants by Baseline Diabetic Retinopathy Severity (DRS) Status in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
Missing
1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Number of Participants by Previous Treatment Status with Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Agents
Previously Treated
77 Participants68 Participants70 Participants215 Participants
Number of Participants by Previous Treatment Status with Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Agents
Treatment-Naive
238 Participants245 Participants242 Participants725 Participants
Number of Participants by the Baseline BCVA Letter Score Categories in the Study Eye
ITT Population
≤38 Letters
15 Participants12 Participants12 Participants39 Participants
Number of Participants by the Baseline BCVA Letter Score Categories in the Study Eye
ITT Population
39 to 63 Letters
132 Participants126 Participants132 Participants390 Participants
Number of Participants by the Baseline BCVA Letter Score Categories in the Study Eye
ITT Population
≥64 Letters
168 Participants175 Participants168 Participants511 Participants
Number of Participants by the Baseline BCVA Letter Score Categories in the Study Eye
ITT Population
Missing/Invalid BCVA
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Number of Participants by the Baseline BCVA Letter Score Categories in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
≤38 Letters
10 Participants11 Participants8 Participants29 Participants
Number of Participants by the Baseline BCVA Letter Score Categories in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
39 to 63 Letters
98 Participants95 Participants100 Participants293 Participants
Number of Participants by the Baseline BCVA Letter Score Categories in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
≥64 Letters
130 Participants139 Participants134 Participants403 Participants
Number of Participants by the Baseline BCVA Letter Score Categories in the Study Eye
Treatment-Naive Population
Missing/Invalid BCVA
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Number of Participants by the Eye Chosen as the Study Eye (Left or Right)
ITT Population
Left Eye
150 Participants172 Participants151 Participants473 Participants
Number of Participants by the Eye Chosen as the Study Eye (Left or Right)
ITT Population
Right Eye
165 Participants141 Participants161 Participants467 Participants
Number of Participants by the Eye Chosen as the Study Eye (Left or Right)
Treatment-Naive Population
Left Eye
117 Participants130 Participants117 Participants364 Participants
Number of Participants by the Eye Chosen as the Study Eye (Left or Right)
Treatment-Naive Population
Right Eye
121 Participants115 Participants125 Participants361 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
ITT Population
American Indian or Alaska Native
6 Participants5 Participants7 Participants18 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
ITT Population
Asian
31 Participants26 Participants27 Participants84 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
ITT Population
Black or African American
22 Participants25 Participants12 Participants59 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
ITT Population
More than one race
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
ITT Population
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
2 Participants0 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
ITT Population
Unknown or Not Reported
13 Participants16 Participants10 Participants39 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
ITT Population
White
241 Participants240 Participants253 Participants734 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Treatment-Naive Population
American Indian or Alaska Native
4 Participants3 Participants6 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Treatment-Naive Population
Asian
21 Participants18 Participants20 Participants59 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Treatment-Naive Population
Black or African American
17 Participants24 Participants9 Participants50 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Treatment-Naive Population
More than one race
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Treatment-Naive Population
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Treatment-Naive Population
Unknown or Not Reported
13 Participants13 Participants9 Participants35 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Treatment-Naive Population
White
181 Participants186 Participants196 Participants563 Participants
Region of Enrollment
ITT Population
Asia
21 Participants19 Participants20 Participants60 Participants
Region of Enrollment
ITT Population
Rest of the World
127 Participants126 Participants124 Participants377 Participants
Region of Enrollment
ITT Population
United States and Canada
167 Participants168 Participants168 Participants503 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Treatment-Naive Population
Asia
14 Participants14 Participants15 Participants43 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Treatment-Naive Population
Rest of the World
94 Participants97 Participants92 Participants283 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Treatment-Naive Population
United States and Canada
130 Participants134 Participants135 Participants399 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
ITT Population
Female
128 Participants116 Participants134 Participants378 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
ITT Population
Male
187 Participants197 Participants178 Participants562 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Treatment-Naive Population
Female
93 Participants91 Participants108 Participants292 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Treatment-Naive Population
Male
145 Participants154 Participants134 Participants433 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
16 / 31321 / 31313 / 311
other
Total, other adverse events
161 / 313163 / 313163 / 311
serious
Total, serious adverse events
111 / 313117 / 31393 / 311

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive Populations

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For the Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis, the model adjusted for treatment arm, visit, visit-by-treatment arm interaction, baseline BCVA (continuous), baseline BCVA (\<64 vs. ≥64 letters), prior intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region of enrollment. An unstructured covariance structure was used. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 97.5% CI is a rounding of 97.52% CI.

Time frame: From Baseline through Week 56

Population: ITT Population and Treatment-Naive Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population10.7 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population10.6 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population11.6 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population11.4 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population10.9 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population11.3 ETDRS Letters
Comparison: Three hypotheses were tested in order for each faricimab arm (Q8W or PTI) separately against the aflibercept arm using a graph-based testing procedure. The analysis presented here is for the non-inferiority of Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W compared with Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W in the ITT Population.97.5% CI: [-2, 1.6]
Comparison: Three hypotheses were tested in order for each faricimab arm (Q8W or PTI) separately against the aflibercept arm using a graph-based testing procedure. The analysis presented here is for the non-inferiority of Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI compared with Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W in the ITT Population.97.5% CI: [-1.1, 2.5]
Comparison: Three hypotheses were tested in order for each faricimab arm (Q8W or PTI) separately against the aflibercept arm using a graph-based testing procedure. The analysis presented here is for the superiority of Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W compared with Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W in the Treatment-Naive Population.p-value: 0.469997.5% CI: [-2.8, 1.4]Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comparison: Three hypotheses were tested in order for each faricimab arm (Q8W or PTI) separately against the aflibercept arm using a graph-based testing procedure. The analysis presented here is for the superiority of Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI compared with Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W in the Treatment-Naive Population.p-value: 0.96597.5% CI: [-2.1, 2.2]Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comparison: Three hypotheses were tested in order for each faricimab arm (Q8W or PTI) separately against the aflibercept arm using a graph-based testing procedure. The analysis presented here is for the superiority of Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W compared with Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W in the ITT Population.p-value: 0.796797.5% CI: [-2, 1.6]Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Comparison: Three hypotheses were tested in order for each faricimab arm (Q8W or PTI) separately against the aflibercept arm using a graph-based testing procedure. The analysis presented here is for the superiority of Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI compared with Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W in the ITT Population.p-value: 0.377297.5% CI: [-1.1, 2.5]Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For the Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis, the model adjusted for treatment arm, visit, visit-by-treatment arm interaction, baseline BCVA (continuous), baseline BCVA (\<64 vs. ≥64 letters), prior intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region of enrollment. An unstructured covariance structure was used. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6410.7 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3610.1 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 87.2 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6010.3 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4010.2 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2410.2 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5610.8 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 449.9 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 889.8 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4810.5 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 128.2 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 529.9 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 849.9 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10010.5 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8010.9 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 209.6 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9611.1 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7610.2 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 45.5 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7210.4 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 289.5 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 169.1 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6810.2 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3210.2 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9210.5 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10010.4 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 46.7 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 88.2 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1610.0 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 209.9 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2411.3 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2811.0 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3210.9 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3611.7 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4011.4 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4411.4 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4811.4 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5211.0 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5611.6 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6012.0 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6411.5 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6811.4 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7211.3 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7611.5 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8011.1 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8411.5 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8810.9 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9211.2 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9610.6 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 129.2 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8811.0 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6811.3 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 249.4 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 46.5 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7210.7 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 209.8 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9611.1 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7611.0 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 169.7 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9211.5 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8010.9 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 129.1 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4810.8 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10011.6 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5210.9 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4010.3 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8411.8 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5610.6 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3610.4 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 88.1 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6011.3 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3210.2 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4410.7 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6410.8 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2810.5 ETDRS Letters
Secondary

Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive Population

Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score attainable), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For the Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis, the model adjusted for treatment group, visit, visit-by-treatment group interaction, baseline BCVA (continuous), baseline BCVA (\<64 vs. ≥64 letters), and region of enrollment. An unstructured covariance structure was used. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: Treatment-Naive Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization. Participants were grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6810.3 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3210.3 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 849.6 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3610.3 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 87.2 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4010.0 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10010.5 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6410.6 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4410.1 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 128.5 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6010.1 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4810.3 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 889.4 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5610.9 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 529.6 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8010.6 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 169.3 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9611.1 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 769.9 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 209.7 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2410.5 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 45.8 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7210.2 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 289.6 ETDRS Letters
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9210.1 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7611.4 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 209.7 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5210.7 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9211.2 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 46.8 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 88.3 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 129.3 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1610.0 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2411.2 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2811.0 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3210.9 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3611.9 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4011.4 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4411.4 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4811.0 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5611.5 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6012.0 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6411.5 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6811.3 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7211.3 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8011.0 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8411.6 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8810.8 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9610.5 ETDRS Letters
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10010.5 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9211.6 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6811.4 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 249.8 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3210.6 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7210.8 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1610.1 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 88.7 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7610.8 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 129.6 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10011.7 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8011.1 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 46.9 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9611.4 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8411.9 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5611.0 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5211.3 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4811.2 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2010.3 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4411.3 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8810.9 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6011.6 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4010.7 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3610.6 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6411.0 ETDRS Letters
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2811.0 ETDRS Letters
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive Populations

Central subfield thickness (CST) was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and Bruch's membrane (BM) as assessed by a central reading center. For the Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis, the model adjusted for treatment group, visit, visit-by-treatment group interaction, baseline CST (continuous), baseline BCVA (\<64 vs. ≥64 letters), prior intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region of enrollment (U.S. and Canada vs. the rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). An unstructured covariance structure was used. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: From Baseline through Week 56

Population: ITT Population and Treatment-Naive Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population-206.6 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population-204.6 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population-196.5 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population-197.5 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population-170.3 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population-173.6 microns
Comparison: This is the adjusted mean difference for Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W in the ITT Population.95% CI: [-47.8, -24.7]
Comparison: This is the adjusted mean difference for Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W in the ITT Population.95% CI: [-37.7, -14.7]
Comparison: This is the adjusted mean difference for Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W in the Treatment-Naive Population.95% CI: [-43.6, -18.6]
Comparison: This is the adjusted mean difference for Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W in the Treatment-Naive Population.95% CI: [-36.2, -11.6]
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Central subfield thickness (CST) was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and Bruch's membrane (BM) as assessed by a central reading center. For the Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis, the model adjusted for treatment group, visit, visit-by-treatment group interaction, baseline CST (continuous), baseline BCVA (\<64 vs. ≥64 letters), prior intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region of enrollment (U.S. and Canada vs. the rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). An unstructured covariance structure was used. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 72-216.2 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 32-200.2 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8-145.9 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 56-212.4 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 36-179.4 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 92-210.9 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 12-165.6 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 40-205.1 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 24-196.4 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 28-174.6 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 44-187.5 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 96-224.0 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4-118.4 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 48-209.7 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 84-211.8 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 16-177.6 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 52-191.0 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 60-197.8 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 76-206.0 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 100-213.1 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 64-214.9 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 80-219.1 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 88-218.6 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 68-201.1 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 20-184.6 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 68-200.9 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 72-201.6 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 20-174.6 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 76-200.7 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 56-200.3 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 80-203.2 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 84-204.9 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 24-192.8 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 88-204.1 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 92-202.4 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 96-203.8 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 28-193.7 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 100-207.3 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 52-193.0 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8-149.6 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 32-181.6 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 36-201.0 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 40-193.5 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 12-168.4 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 44-189.2 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 48-194.8 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 60-196.3 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 16-182.1 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 64-199.9 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4-124.9 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 100-200.2 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 52-179.2 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 56-164.4 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4-111.0 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8-130.9 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 12-144.7 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 16-152.7 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 20-159.0 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 24-146.3 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 28-163.8 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 32-147.2 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 36-166.0 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 40-153.9 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 44-172.6 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 48-163.2 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 60-182.0 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 64-171.5 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 68-186.8 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 72-182.3 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 76-188.4 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 80-184.5 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 84-186.2 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 88-183.7 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 92-193.9 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 96-194.7 microns
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive Population

Central subfield thickness (CST) was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and Bruch's membrane (BM) as assessed by a central reading center. For the Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis, the model adjusted for treatment group, visit, visit-by-treatment group interaction, baseline CST (continuous), baseline BCVA (\<64 vs. ≥64 letters), and region of enrollment (U.S. and Canada vs. the rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). An unstructured covariance structure was used. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: Treatment-Naive Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization. Participants were grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 16-175.1 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 68-201.5 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 40-198.9 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 100-213.4 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4-116.1 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 44-187.3 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 88-215.9 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 60-195.0 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 48-207.3 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 20-182.9 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 64-213.7 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 52-191.1 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 96-221.0 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 56-210.4 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 84-211.0 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 24-194.2 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 12-162.8 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 80-217.3 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 28-177.4 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8-142.9 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 76-204.8 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 32-196.4 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 92-208.8 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 72-215.9 microns
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 36-181.9 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 64-199.2 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4-121.5 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8-147.4 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 12-166.7 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 16-181.7 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 20-178.1 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 24-191.1 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 28-194.0 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 32-183.7 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 36-203.6 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 40-192.1 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 44-189.3 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 48-194.9 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 52-196.2 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 56-200.9 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 60-198.0 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 68-201.7 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 72-203.2 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 76-202.1 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 80-202.2 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 84-202.9 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 88-205.2 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 92-202.2 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 96-199.0 microns
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 100-206.7 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 68-189.1 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 32-150.2 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4-110.1 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 72-184.1 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 28-167.5 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 92-195.9 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 76-189.8 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 24-149.7 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8-131.5 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 80-186.2 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 20-161.6 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 100-201.3 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 84-185.7 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 16-155.9 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 52-181.1 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 96-196.7 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 48-165.0 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 56-171.0 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 44-172.9 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 88-186.4 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 60-185.1 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 40-157.4 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 64-175.3 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 36-168.7 microns
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 12-147.4 microns
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) Composite Score Over Time, ITT Population

The NEI VFQ-25 captures a patient's perception of vision-related functioning and quality of life. The core measure includes 25 items that comprise 11 vision-related subscales and one item on general health. The composite score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores, or a positive change from baseline, indicating better vision-related functioning. For the Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) analysis, the model adjusted for treatment arm, visit, visit-by-treatment arm interaction, baseline NEI VFQ-25 Composite Score (continuous), baseline BCVA (\<64 vs. ≥64 letters), prior intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region of enrollment. An unstructured covariance structure was used. Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were implicitly imputed by MMRM. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24, 52, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) Composite Score Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 527.3 score on a scale
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) Composite Score Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 246.0 score on a scale
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) Composite Score Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1008.0 score on a scale
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) Composite Score Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 527.9 score on a scale
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) Composite Score Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 246.9 score on a scale
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIChange From Baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) Composite Score Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1007.4 score on a scale
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) Composite Score Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 246.0 score on a scale
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) Composite Score Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1007.6 score on a scale
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WChange From Baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) Composite Score Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 527.5 score on a scale
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants avoiding a loss of letters in BCVA from baseline were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3299.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6896.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8895.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2498.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9696.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4097.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2897.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1298.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4497.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9295.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8096.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4898.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7296.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10094.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5295.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8495.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1699.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5697.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 898.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7695.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6096.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3698.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 498.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6498.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2099.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6496.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6897.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2098.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7298.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4100.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7695.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2499.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8497.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8096.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8895.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9296.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2899.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9694.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10094.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3298.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8100.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3698.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4099.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4498.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 12100.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4897.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5297.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5698.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1699.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6097.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10097.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 499.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 899.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1299.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1699.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2099.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2499.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2898.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3298.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3699.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4098.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4499.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4898.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5296.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5696.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6098.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6498.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6898.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7297.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7697.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8097.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8499.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8896.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9297.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9696.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants avoiding a loss of letters in BCVA from baseline were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: Treatment-Naive Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization. Participants were grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7295.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8095.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1699.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4897.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7694.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9295.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10093.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8494.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4497.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2898.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 898.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8893.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5295.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1299.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6497.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3697.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4096.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2099.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6896.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9696.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2499.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6096.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5697.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 499.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3299.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5697.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3298.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3698.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4099.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6496.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6096.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6896.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8895.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7298.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9296.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7694.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9693.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4497.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8095.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8497.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10094.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4897.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8100.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 12100.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1699.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5296.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2098.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4100.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2499.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2898.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9697.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1299.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3298.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4097.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4898.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5296.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5696.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6097.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6897.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7697.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8097.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10097.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 499.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 899.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 16100.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 20100.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2499.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2898.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3699.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4499.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6497.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7297.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8499.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8896.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9297.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. For each participant, an average BCVA value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was then used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants per treatment arm who met the endpoint. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, average of Weeks 48, 52, and 56

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Only participants with at least one non-missing, valid assessment at Weeks 48, 52, or 56 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters95.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters96.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters98.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters96.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters98.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters98.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters98.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters98.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters96.3 Percentage of participants
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants avoiding a loss of ≥15 letters in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-2.8, 1.3]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants avoiding a loss of ≥15 letters in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-2.2, 1.5]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants avoiding a loss of ≥10 letters in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-4.6, 0.9]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants avoiding a loss of ≥10 letters in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-2.2, 2.2]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants avoiding a loss of ≥5 letters in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-4.5, 2.2]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants avoiding a loss of ≥5 letters in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-2.6, 3.4]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. For each participant, an average BCVA value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was then used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants per treatment arm who met the endpoint. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, average of Weeks 48, 52, and 56

Population: Treatment-Naive Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization. Participants were grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Only participants with at least one non-missing, valid assessment at Weeks 48, 52, or 56 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters96.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters97.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters95.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters98.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters97.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters95.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters99.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters96.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationAvoiding a Loss of ≥10 Letters98.6 Percentage of participants
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants avoiding a loss of ≥15 letters in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-3.5, 1.3]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants avoiding a loss of ≥15 letters in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-3.1, 1.3]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants avoiding a loss of ≥10 letters in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-5.1, 0.9]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants avoiding a loss of ≥10 letters in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-3.5, 1.6]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants avoiding a loss of ≥5 letters in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-5.2, 2.8]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants avoiding a loss of ≥5 letters in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-4.1, 3.3]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants avoiding a loss of letters in BCVA from baseline were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6899.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7297.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2499.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7696.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8097.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8497.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2899.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8897.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9297.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9697.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3299.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10096.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4100.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3699.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 899.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4098.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1299.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4498.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4898.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5297.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5698.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1699.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6098.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2099.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6498.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 32100.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4100.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6098.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7298.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3699.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 16100.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7698.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 24100.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2099.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8096.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5298.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4099.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5698.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6898.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8897.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2899.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4498.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9297.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8498.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 12100.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9696.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6497.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4898.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10097.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8100.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10098.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4100.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3299.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 899.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1299.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 16100.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2099.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 24100.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2899.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3699.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4099.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 44100.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4899.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5298.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5698.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6099.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6498.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6898.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7298.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7698.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8099.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8499.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8897.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9298.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9697.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants avoiding a loss of letters in BCVA from baseline were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: Treatment-Naive Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization. Participants were grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4498.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2499.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8096.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 899.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2099.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8496.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4098.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1699.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8896.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7296.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1299.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9296.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4100.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3299.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7695.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5296.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9697.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10096.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4898.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5698.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2899.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6498.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6898.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3698.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6097.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8096.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 24100.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3699.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5698.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6497.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9297.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10097.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6098.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6897.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7298.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7697.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8498.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8897.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9696.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4100.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8100.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 12100.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 16100.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2099.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2899.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 32100.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4099.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4498.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4897.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5297.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 44100.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 16100.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8098.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4899.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7697.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 24100.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6099.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5698.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2899.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7298.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3699.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3299.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6898.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 20100.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9698.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10098.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9298.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4099.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4100.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6498.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 899.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8897.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5298.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1299.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8499.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants avoiding a loss of letters in BCVA from baseline were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8094.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8889.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3696.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6894.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2896.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4095.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9293.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1298.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4495.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7293.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2496.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4896.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9694.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 497.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5294.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8492.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1697.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5696.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 896.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10091.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6094.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7692.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3296.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6495.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2096.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6496.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6896.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2097.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7694.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2496.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8093.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8495.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8892.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9292.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2897.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9692.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10088.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3297.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 898.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3697.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7295.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4095.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4496.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1298.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4896.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5295.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5696.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1698.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6096.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 497.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10096.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8094.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 496.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 897.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1298.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1698.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2496.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2896.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3297.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3697.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4097.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4495.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4896.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5294.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5695.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6097.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6496.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6896.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7294.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7695.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8497.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8894.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9296.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9695.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2097.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants avoiding a loss of letters in BCVA from baseline were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: Treatment-Naive Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization. Participants were grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9694.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6094.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4495.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1298.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4094.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2497.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2896.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10090.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3297.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9292.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3696.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8888.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8491.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4896.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2097.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5294.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8092.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5695.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 896.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6495.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1697.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7691.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7292.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6894.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 498.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6096.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 899.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1298.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2096.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2496.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4895.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6895.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 497.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1698.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2897.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3296.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3697.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4095.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4495.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5294.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5695.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6496.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7295.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7693.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8092.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8496.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8891.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9292.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9691.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10088.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9695.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6495.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9296.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6896.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8893.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2496.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7294.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1698.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7694.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5294.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2097.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3297.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8094.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3698.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1298.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4496.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4096.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 898.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10096.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4897.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8496.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2896.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5694.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 497.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6096.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9289.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2493.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3692.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7288.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2890.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6892.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10088.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8887.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6491.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4090.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4491.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4895.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6089.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5289.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1691.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5691.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8487.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 486.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9690.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8089.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1292.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 889.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3292.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7687.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2093.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7691.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1294.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2894.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4094.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5291.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 490.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 891.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1694.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2093.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2493.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3295.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3693.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4494.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4893.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5693.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6093.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6492.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6892.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7291.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8091.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8492.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8890.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9291.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9688.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10086.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3291.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6891.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2489.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1292.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7290.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1693.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 891.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7692.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 488.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9290.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8089.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9690.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2092.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8493.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4891.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5291.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4093.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5690.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4491.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10092.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6092.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3690.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8889.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6492.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2891.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: Treatment-Naive Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization. Participants were grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 486.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1691.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2094.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2494.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3292.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3693.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4091.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4491.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4895.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5289.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5691.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6089.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6492.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6892.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7288.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7686.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8089.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8487.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8885.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9288.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9690.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10087.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 891.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1293.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2890.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8090.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 490.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9687.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 893.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6492.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1296.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9290.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5692.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1694.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6893.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5289.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2092.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3294.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8492.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2493.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7292.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2894.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10086.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3693.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8888.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4093.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7690.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6093.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4493.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4891.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4491.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4893.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5290.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9291.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5690.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6091.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6492.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9690.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6891.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7289.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7691.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10092.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 490.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 893.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1292.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8090.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1694.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3291.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2092.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2489.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2892.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8492.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4092.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8889.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3689.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7660.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6860.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2455.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1643.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8064.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2855.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10063.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3256.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6059.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7261.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3655.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8461.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1235.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4055.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9660.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 423.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4455.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8859.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5663.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4857.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6464.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2045.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5259.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9263.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 830.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 431.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5662.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 837.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6062.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1247.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7261.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6460.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7667.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8061.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1648.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8464.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8859.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2053.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9659.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2458.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2857.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3258.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10060.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3665.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6858.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4060.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4460.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4860.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9263.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5259.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4861.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6459.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9264.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9662.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10066.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 427.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1246.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1649.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2050.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2448.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2857.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3253.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3655.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4053.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4457.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 841.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5260.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5659.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6060.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6859.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7256.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7664.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8060.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8464.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8862.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: Treatment-Naive Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization. Participants were grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9263.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6061.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6467.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3659.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 831.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6864.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1236.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8860.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7262.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4055.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8463.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7661.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2457.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8066.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 425.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4455.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2855.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10064.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4857.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2044.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5260.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3259.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9658.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5665.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1643.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8860.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1246.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1647.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2053.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2457.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4059.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4459.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4858.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5258.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5662.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6459.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6860.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7262.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7666.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8062.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8465.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9265.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10062.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 432.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 837.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2856.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3259.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3666.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6063.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9660.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5261.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9663.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4458.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6061.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4054.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8861.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 429.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4862.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 843.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3655.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3253.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1649.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2857.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2051.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7666.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2449.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8062.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7256.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1248.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8467.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6860.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6459.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5660.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10064.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9265.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive Population

BCVA was measured on the ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For each participant, an average BCVA value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was then used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants per treatment arm who met the endpoint. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world). Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, average of Weeks 48, 52, and 56

Population: Treatment-Naive Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization. Participants were grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Only participants with at least one non-missing, valid assessment at Weeks 48, 52, or 56 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationGaining ≥15 Letters28.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationGaining ≥0 Letters91.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationGaining ≥5 Letters80.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationGaining ≥10 Letters57.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationGaining ≥0 Letters93.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationGaining ≥15 Letters35.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationGaining ≥10 Letters59.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationGaining ≥5 Letters77.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationGaining ≥15 Letters33.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationGaining ≥5 Letters84.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationGaining ≥0 Letters91.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, Treatment-Naive PopulationGaining ≥10 Letters57.5 Percentage of participants
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants gaining ≥15 letters in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-14, 3.5]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants gaining ≥15 letters in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-7, 10.3]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants gaining ≥10 letters in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-9.5, 9.5]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants gaining ≥10 letters in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-7.1, 11.3]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants gaining ≥5 letters in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-11.9, 2.9]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants gaining ≥5 letters in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-14.6, 0.2]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants gaining ≥0 letters in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-5.5, 5.2]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants gaining ≥0 letters in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-3, 7]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1620.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6837.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4029.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10040.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 47.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4429.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8839.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6437.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4831.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2025.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6034.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5231.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9641.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5638.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8440.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2426.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1214.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8039.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2823.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 813.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7636.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3228.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9239.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7234.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3624.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6441.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 413.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 818.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1223.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1627.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2028.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2434.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2831.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3236.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3640.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4037.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4437.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4839.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5237.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5638.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6041.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6843.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7238.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7644.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8042.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8441.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8839.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9241.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9640.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10040.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6837.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3225.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 411.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7235.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2829.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9238.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7637.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2425.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 816.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8036.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2024.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10040.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8438.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1622.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5236.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9638.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5631.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4834.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8835.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6035.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4434.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4030.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6434.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3632.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1222.1 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: Treatment-Naive Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization. Participants were grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4832.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1621.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8839.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4427.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6033.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4027.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2427.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8440.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3623.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2821.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3227.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7637.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7235.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 814.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8039.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2026.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6837.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9642.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 48.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9240.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6437.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5230.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5637.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1215.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10041.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6845.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2830.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4037.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5235.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8443.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 414.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 819.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1222.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1628.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2027.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2434.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3237.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3641.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4439.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4839.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5638.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6042.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6443.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7239.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7645.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8043.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8840.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9242.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9641.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10042.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5634.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8838.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6038.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 412.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4033.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8441.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7236.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2832.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6839.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9240.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7637.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10041.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3229.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2427.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8040.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3634.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2026.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1624.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6436.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4437.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1224.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5237.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4836.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 817.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9640.1 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive Populations

BCVA was measured on the ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For each participant, an average BCVA value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was then used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants per treatment arm who met the endpoint. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world). Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, average of Weeks 48, 52, and 56

Population: ITT Population and Treatment-Naive Population. Only participants with at least one non-missing, valid assessment at Weeks 48, 52, or 56 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population32.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population31.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population39.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population39.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population37.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population40.2 Percentage of participants
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the ITT Population.95% CI: [-12.6, 2.9]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the ITT Population.95% CI: [-5.9, 9.8]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the Treatment-Naive Population.95% CI: [-17.8, 0.5]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the Treatment-Naive Population.95% CI: [-9.9, 8.2]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2828.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8442.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4835.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3233.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9242.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4432.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3629.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8042.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4032.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 48.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7239.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 815.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6842.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1217.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10043.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6442.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1624.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9644.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6039.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2030.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7642.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5643.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2431.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8841.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5235.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6845.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 820.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1225.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1629.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2030.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2437.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2832.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3238.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3642.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4040.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4439.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4841.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5240.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5642.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6045.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6444.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 414.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7240.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7647.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8044.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8443.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8841.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9243.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9642.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10041.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8840.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6040.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1225.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7237.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6437.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 819.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8442.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 413.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10044.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3635.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6840.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4033.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3231.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7642.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4439.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2835.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9642.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4841.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2430.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9242.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5241.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2027.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8041.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5635.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1625.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: Treatment-Naive Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization. Participants were grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1624.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2031.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2432.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5235.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2826.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7240.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3233.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3629.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7644.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4031.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4431.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8044.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4837.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5643.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8442.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8841.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6039.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9243.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9646.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10044.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6443.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 49.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 816.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1219.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6843.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10044.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9643.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2030.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6847.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8445.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2438.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7242.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1629.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2832.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8842.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 417.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3240.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5239.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6446.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3644.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9245.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6046.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4041.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5643.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1225.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4442.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7649.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 820.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4841.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8046.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4844.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5243.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5638.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6043.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6438.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6842.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7239.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7643.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8046.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8445.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8842.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9243.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9644.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10045.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 415.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 822.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1228.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2030.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2433.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2838.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3235.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3638.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4037.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4442.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/20 or Better (BCVA ≥84 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1627.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3279.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1271.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6480.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2078.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 864.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6879.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3679.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 453.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9682.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7679.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8081.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9281.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4076.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8879.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7279.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4480.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4879.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2877.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5278.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10081.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2480.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5683.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8477.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1674.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6080.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7278.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1681.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2078.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2483.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2881.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3277.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4882.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5278.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5681.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6081.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6480.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6878.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7678.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8482.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8880.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9677.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 462.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 871.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1274.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3682.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4084.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4481.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8080.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9282.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10077.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3678.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6081.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2076.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1275.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5681.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1677.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5281.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2471.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3281.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2879.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10085.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9681.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4477.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4879.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8482.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4077.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8880.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8078.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9283.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7280.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 867.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6879.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7682.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 461.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6479.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: Treatment-Naive Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization. Participants were grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8478.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4481.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4879.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 863.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8082.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5278.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6882.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7679.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5684.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2481.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7281.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6081.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6480.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 453.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10080.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2876.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1675.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9280.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3280.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1272.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3680.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9682.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8877.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4077.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2079.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9676.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 870.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1275.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1681.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2079.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2482.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2881.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3277.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3682.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4085.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4880.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5275.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5681.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7277.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7678.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8080.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8483.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9282.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10078.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 463.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4482.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6080.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6480.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6878.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8880.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4480.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8481.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3679.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8880.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2880.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1679.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9282.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9682.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2471.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1277.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10085.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6480.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 462.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6080.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6879.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5681.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 870.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7280.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5282.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3283.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7683.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4880.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2078.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8080.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining ≥5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4080.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Gaining Greater Than or Equal to (≥)15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT Population

BCVA was measured on the ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For each participant, an average BCVA value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was then used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants per treatment arm who met the endpoint. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world). Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, average of Weeks 48, 52, and 56

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Only participants with at least one non-missing, valid assessment at Weeks 48, 52, or 56 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining Greater Than or Equal to (≥)15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationGaining ≥10 Letters57.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining Greater Than or Equal to (≥)15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationGaining ≥0 Letters91.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining Greater Than or Equal to (≥)15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationGaining ≥5 Letters78.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining Greater Than or Equal to (≥)15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationGaining ≥15 Letters29.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining Greater Than or Equal to (≥)15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationGaining ≥5 Letters79.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining Greater Than or Equal to (≥)15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationGaining ≥0 Letters94.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining Greater Than or Equal to (≥)15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationGaining ≥10 Letters58.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Gaining Greater Than or Equal to (≥)15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationGaining ≥15 Letters35.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining Greater Than or Equal to (≥)15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationGaining ≥0 Letters91.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining Greater Than or Equal to (≥)15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationGaining ≥15 Letters31.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining Greater Than or Equal to (≥)15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationGaining ≥5 Letters81.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Gaining Greater Than or Equal to (≥)15, ≥10, ≥5, or ≥0 Letters in BCVA From Baseline in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT PopulationGaining ≥10 Letters57.6 Percentage of participants
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants gaining ≥15 letters in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-10, 4.9]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants gaining ≥15 letters in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-4, 11.1]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants gaining ≥10 letters in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-8.6, 7.9]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants gaining ≥10 letters in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-7.4, 8.8]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants gaining ≥5 letters in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-9.1, 4.1]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants gaining ≥5 letters in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-8.5, 4.5]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants gaining ≥0 letters in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-4.6, 4.8]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants gaining ≥0 letters in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W.95% CI: [-1, 7.5]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm at Week 52 Who Achieved a Once Every 12-Weeks or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval Without an Interval Decrease Below Once Every 12 Weeks, ITT and Treatment-Naive Populations

Time frame: From start of PTI (Week 12 or later) until Week 52

Population: ITT Population and Treatment-Naive Population. The number analyzed includes all participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI who had not discontinued the study prior to Week 52.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm at Week 52 Who Achieved a Once Every 12-Weeks or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval Without an Interval Decrease Below Once Every 12 Weeks, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population67.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm at Week 52 Who Achieved a Once Every 12-Weeks or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval Without an Interval Decrease Below Once Every 12 Weeks, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population71.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm at Week 96 Who Achieved a Once Every 12-Weeks or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval Without an Interval Decrease Below Once Every 12 Weeks, ITT and Treatment-Naive Populations

Time frame: From start of PTI (Week 12 or later) until Week 96

Population: ITT Population and Treatment-Naive Population. The number analyzed includes all participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI who had not discontinued the study prior to Week 96.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm at Week 96 Who Achieved a Once Every 12-Weeks or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval Without an Interval Decrease Below Once Every 12 Weeks, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population60.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm at Week 96 Who Achieved a Once Every 12-Weeks or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval Without an Interval Decrease Below Once Every 12 Weeks, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population64.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 52, ITT Population

Time frame: Week 52

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. The number analyzed includes all participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI who had not discontinued the study prior to Week 52.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 52, ITT PopulationOnce Every 4 Weeks10.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 52, ITT PopulationOnce Every 8 Weeks15.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 52, ITT PopulationOnce Every 12 Weeks21.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 52, ITT PopulationOnce Every 16 Weeks52.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 52, Treatment-Naive Population

Time frame: Week 52

Population: Treatment-Naive Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization. Participants were grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. The number analyzed includes all participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI who had not discontinued the study prior to Week 52.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 52, Treatment-Naive PopulationOnce Every 4 Weeks9.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 52, Treatment-Naive PopulationOnce Every 8 Weeks14.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 52, Treatment-Naive PopulationOnce Every 12 Weeks22.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 52, Treatment-Naive PopulationOnce Every 16 Weeks54.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 96, ITT Population

Time frame: Week 96

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. The number analyzed includes all participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI who had not discontinued the study prior to Week 96.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 96, ITT PopulationOnce Every 4 Weeks7.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 96, ITT PopulationOnce Every 8 Weeks14.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 96, ITT PopulationOnce Every 12 Weeks18.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 96, ITT PopulationOnce Every 16 Weeks60.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 96, Treatment-Naive Population

Time frame: Week 96

Population: Treatment-Naive Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization. Participants were grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. The number analyzed includes all participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI who had not discontinued the study prior to Week 96.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 96, Treatment-Naive PopulationOnce Every 4 Weeks7.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 96, Treatment-Naive PopulationOnce Every 8 Weeks11.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 96, Treatment-Naive PopulationOnce Every 12 Weeks16.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants in the Faricimab 6 mg PTI Arm on a Once Every 4-Weeks, 8-Weeks, 12-Weeks, or 16-Weeks Treatment Interval at Week 96, Treatment-Naive PopulationOnce Every 16 Weeks64.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Test Positive for Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies Against Faricimab During the Study

Anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) against fariciamb were detected in plasma using a validated bridging enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The percentage of participants with treatment-emergent ADA-positive samples includes post-baseline evaluable participants with at least one treatment-induced (defined as having an ADA-negative sample or missing sample at baseline and any positive post-baseline sample) or treatment-boosted (defined as having an ADA-positive sample at baseline and any positive post-baseline sample with a titer that is equal to or greater than 4-fold baseline titer) ADA-positive sample during the study treatment period.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 28, 52, 76, and 100

Population: The analysis population consisted of all participants receiving faricimab with at least one determinant post-baseline ADA assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Who Test Positive for Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies Against Faricimab During the StudyTotal Treatment-Emergent ADA-Positive12.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Who Test Positive for Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies Against Faricimab During the StudyTreatment-Induced ADA-Positive12.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Who Test Positive for Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies Against Faricimab During the StudyTreatment-Boosted ADA-Positive0.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Who Test Positive for Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies Against Faricimab During the StudyTotal Treatment-Emergent ADA-Positive10.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Who Test Positive for Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies Against Faricimab During the StudyTreatment-Induced ADA-Positive10.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Who Test Positive for Treatment-Emergent Anti-Drug Antibodies Against Faricimab During the StudyTreatment-Boosted ADA-Positive0.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive Populations

The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ocular imaging assessments were made independently by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 97.5% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 97.52% CI.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: ITT Population and Treatment-Naive Population. Only participants with non-missing, valid assessments at Baseline and Week 52 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population46.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population49.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population42.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population47.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population35.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population42.5 Percentage of participants
Comparison: The analysis presented here is for the non-inferiority of Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W compared with Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W in the ITT Population.97.5% CI: [0.3, 20]
Comparison: The analysis presented here is for the non-inferiority of Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI compared with Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W in the ITT Population.97.5% CI: [-3.6, 15.8]
Comparison: The analysis presented here is for the superiority of Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W compared with Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W in the Treatment-Naive Population.p-value: 0.176197.5% CI: [-4.6, 18.9]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: The analysis presented here is for the superiority of Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI compared with Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W in the Treatment-Naive Population.p-value: 0.353997.5% CI: [-6.7, 16.3]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: The analysis presented here is for the superiority of Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W compared with Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W in the ITT Population.p-value: 0.023797.5% CI: [0.3, 20]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: The analysis presented here is for the superiority of Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI compared with Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W in the ITT Population.p-value: 0.167797.5% CI: [-3.6, 15.8]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ocular imaging assessments were made independently by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 16, 52, and 96

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Only participants with non-missing, valid assessments at Baseline and each timepoint were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5246.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1636.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9651.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5242.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1635.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9642.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1628.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9642.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5235.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive Population

The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ocular imaging assessments were made independently by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 16, 52, and 96

Population: Treatment-Naive Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization. Participants were grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Only participants with non-missing, valid assessments at Baseline and each timepoint were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5249.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1639.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9652.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5247.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1639.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9647.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1633.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9649.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5242.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ocular imaging assessments were made independently by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 16, 52, and 96

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Only participants with non-missing, valid assessments at Baseline and each timepoint were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1612.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5217.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9622.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9614.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5215.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1612.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1610.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5214.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9620.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive Population

The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ocular imaging assessments were made independently by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 16, 52, and 96

Population: Treatment-Naive Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization. Participants were grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Only participants with non-missing, valid assessments at Baseline and each timepoint were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5219.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1614.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9623.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5217.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1615.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9617.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1610.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9625.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥3-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5216.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ocular imaging assessments were made independently by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 16, 52, and 96

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Only participants with non-missing, valid assessments at Baseline and each timepoint were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 525.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 163.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 965.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 524.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 163.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 965.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 163.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 966.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 524.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive Population

The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ocular imaging assessments were made independently by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 16, 52, and 96

Population: Treatment-Naive Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization. Participants were grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Only participants with non-missing, valid assessments at Baseline and each timepoint were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 526.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 163.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 967.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 525.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 163.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 966.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 163.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 966.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With a ≥4-Step Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 524.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive Populations

Absence of diabetic macular edema was defined as achieving a central subfield thickness (CST) of \<325 microns in the study eye. CST was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane and Bruch's membrane. For each participant, an average CST value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was then used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants per treatment arm who met the endpoint. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world). Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Average of Weeks 48, 52, and 56

Population: ITT Population and Treatment-Naive Population. Only participants with at least one non-missing, valid assessment at Weeks 48, 52, or 56 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population81.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population83.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population78.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population80.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population65.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population68.3 Percentage of participants
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the ITT Population.95% CI: [8.9, 23.1]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the ITT Population.95% CI: [5.4, 20]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the Treatment-Naive Population.95% CI: [7.3, 23.2]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the Treatment-Naive Population.95% CI: [4.4, 20.6]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Absence of diabetic macular edema was defined as achieving a central subfield thickness of \<325 microns in the study eye. Central subfield thickness was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and Bruch's membrane (BM) as assessed by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1667.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6883.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4082.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10089.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 436.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4474.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8890.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6488.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4886.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2071.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6078.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5277.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9691.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5686.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8485.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2476.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1260.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8088.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2871.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 848.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7685.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3279.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9286.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7288.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3670.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6480.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 441.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 852.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1267.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1672.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2070.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2481.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2879.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3272.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3681.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4080.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4479.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4881.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5278.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5681.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6079.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6884.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7285.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7684.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8081.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8486.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8883.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9278.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9683.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10085.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6874.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3255.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 435.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7270.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2862.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9278.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7676.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2453.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 842.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8073.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2058.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10081.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8474.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1658.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5271.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9677.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5665.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4864.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8874.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6072.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4467.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4058.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6467.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3663.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Edema in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1249.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Intraretinal fluid and subretinal fluid were measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the central subfield (center 1 mm). The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world); Asia and rest of the world regions were combined due to a small number of enrolled participants. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 16, 48, 52, 56, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4845.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9257.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5647.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1615.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10059.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9662.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5242.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5642.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1621.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4832.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5238.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9241.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9646.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10043.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9232.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4821.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10037.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9634.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5623.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5225.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid and Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1613.1 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Intraretinal fluid was measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the central subfield (center 1 mm). The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world); Asia and rest of the world regions were combined due to a small number of enrolled participants. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 16, 48, 52, 56, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5242.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10061.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9258.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5649.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4845.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1616.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9663.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5642.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1621.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4833.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5238.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9243.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9647.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10044.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9233.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4821.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10037.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9634.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5623.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5225.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1613.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Subretinal fluid was measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the central subfield (center 1 mm). The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world); Asia and rest of the world regions were combined due to a small number of enrolled participants. Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 16, 48, 52, 56, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4897.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9294.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5697.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1695.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10094.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9697.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5295.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5697.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1694.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4895.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5295.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9294.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9694.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10097.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9296.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4896.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10097.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9696.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5697.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5298.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Fluid in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1695.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event

This analysis of adverse events (AEs) includes both ocular and non-ocular (systemic) AEs. Investigators sought information on AEs at each contact with the participants. All AEs were recorded and the investigator made an assessment of seriousness, severity, and causality of each AE. AEs of special interest included the following: Cases of potential drug-induced liver injury that include an elevated ALT or AST in combination with either an elevated bilirubin or clinical jaundice, as defined by Hy's Law; Suspected transmission of an infectious agent by the study drug; Sight-threatening AEs that cause a drop in visual acuity (VA) score ≥30 letters lasting more than 1 hour, require surgical or medical intervention to prevent permanent loss of sight, or are associated with severe intraocular inflammation.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug through end of study (up to 2 years)

Population: The safety-evaluable population comprised all participants who received at least one injection of active study drug (faricimab or aflibercept) in the study eye.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventAE of Special Interest (AESI)6.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventAdverse Event (AE)92.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventAE Leading to Withdrawal from Study Treatment2.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventSerious AE (SAE)35.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventAE Leading to Withdrawal from Study Treatment2.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventAE of Special Interest (AESI)7.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventSerious AE (SAE)37.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventAdverse Event (AE)91.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventAE of Special Interest (AESI)4.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventSerious AE (SAE)29.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventAE Leading to Withdrawal from Study Treatment1.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Adverse EventAdverse Event (AE)89.1 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least One Non-Ocular Adverse Event

This analysis of adverse events (AEs) only includes non-ocular (systemic) AEs. Investigators sought information on adverse events (AEs) at each contact with the participants. All AEs were recorded and the investigator made an assessment of seriousness, severity, and causality of each AE. The non-ocular AE of special interest was: Cases of potential drug-induced liver injury that include an elevated ALT or AST in combination with either an elevated bilirubin or clinical jaundice, as defined by Hy's Law.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug through end of study (up to 2 years)

Population: The safety-evaluable population comprised all participants who received at least one injection of active study drug (faricimab or aflibercept) in the study eye.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Non-Ocular Adverse EventAE of Special Interest (AESI)0.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Non-Ocular Adverse EventAE Leading to Withdrawal from Study Treatment1.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Non-Ocular Adverse EventAdverse Event (AE)76.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Non-Ocular Adverse EventSerious AE (SAE)31.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Non-Ocular Adverse EventAESI, Elevated ALT or AST with Either Elevated Bilirubin or Clinical Jaundice0.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Non-Ocular Adverse EventAE Leading to Withdrawal from Study Treatment1.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Non-Ocular Adverse EventAdverse Event (AE)80.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Non-Ocular Adverse EventSerious AE (SAE)31.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Non-Ocular Adverse EventAE of Special Interest (AESI)0.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Non-Ocular Adverse EventAESI, Elevated ALT or AST with Either Elevated Bilirubin or Clinical Jaundice0.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Non-Ocular Adverse EventAESI, Elevated ALT or AST with Either Elevated Bilirubin or Clinical Jaundice0.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Non-Ocular Adverse EventAE of Special Interest (AESI)0.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Non-Ocular Adverse EventAdverse Event (AE)77.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Non-Ocular Adverse EventAE Leading to Withdrawal from Study Treatment1.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Non-Ocular Adverse EventSerious AE (SAE)27.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow Eye

This analysis of adverse events (AEs) only includes ocular AEs, which are categorized as having occurred either in the study eye or the fellow eye. Investigators sought information on AEs at each contact with the participants. All AEs were recorded and the investigator made an assessment of seriousness, severity, and causality of each AE. Ocular AEs of special interest included the following: Suspected transmission of an infectious agent by the study drug; Sight-threatening AEs that cause a drop in visual acuity (VA) score ≥30 letters lasting more than 1 hour, require surgical or medical intervention to prevent permanent loss of sight, or are associated with severe intraocular inflammation.

Time frame: From first dose of study drug through end of study (up to 2 years)

Population: The safety-evaluable population comprised all participants who received at least one injection of active study drug (faricimab or aflibercept) in the study eye.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: AE of Special Interest (AESI)3.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: AE Leading to Withdrawal from Treatment1.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: SAE2.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: AESI, Drop in VA Score ≥30 Letters2.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: Serious AE (SAE)3.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: AE40.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: AESI, Associated with Severe IOI0.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: AESI, Drop in VA Score ≥30 Letters2.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: AESI, Intervention Req. to Prevent Permanent Vision Loss1.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: Treatment-related AE3.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: AESI, Intervention Req. to Prevent Permanent Vision Loss1.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: Adverse Event (AE)47.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: Treatment-related SAE0.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: AESI, Associated with Severe IOI0.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: AESI2.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: AESI2.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: Adverse Event (AE)46.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: Serious AE (SAE)4.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: AE Leading to Withdrawal from Treatment1.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: Treatment-related AE2.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: Treatment-related SAE1.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: AE of Special Interest (AESI)4.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: AESI, Drop in VA Score ≥30 Letters2.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: AESI, Associated with Severe IOI1.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: AESI, Intervention Req. to Prevent Permanent Vision Loss1.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: AE42.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: SAE3.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: AESI, Drop in VA Score ≥30 Letters1.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: AESI, Associated with Severe IOI0.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: AESI, Intervention Req. to Prevent Permanent Vision Loss1.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: AE of Special Interest (AESI)2.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: AESI, Associated with Severe IOI0.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: SAE2.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: Treatment-related SAE0.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: Treatment-related AE1.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: AESI2.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: AE Leading to Withdrawal from Treatment0.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: Adverse Event (AE)46.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: AESI, Drop in VA Score ≥30 Letters1.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: AESI, Associated with Severe IOI0.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: Serious AE (SAE)2.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: AESI, Intervention Req. to Prevent Permanent Vision Loss0.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeStudy Eye: AESI, Drop in VA Score ≥30 Letters2.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: AESI, Intervention Req. to Prevent Permanent Vision Loss1.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With at Least One Ocular Adverse Event in the Study Eye or the Fellow EyeFellow Eye: AE46.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive Populations

BCVA was measured on the ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For each participant, an average BCVA value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was then used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants per treatment arm who met the endpoint. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world). Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, average of Weeks 48, 52, and 56

Population: ITT Population and Treatment-Naive Population. Only participants with at least one non-missing, valid assessment at Weeks 48, 52, or 56 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population2.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population2.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population1.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population1.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population1.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population1.8 Percentage of participants
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the ITT Population.95% CI: [-1.8, 2.9]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the ITT Population.95% CI: [-2.2, 2.3]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the Treatment-Naive Population.95% CI: [-2, 3.6]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the Treatment-Naive Population.95% CI: [-2.6, 2.5]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement invisual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 281.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 240.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 321.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 41.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 681.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 361.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 961.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 641.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 401.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 881.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 601.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 443.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 82.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 561.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 481.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 840.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 522.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 800.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 160.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 922.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 121.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 201.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1002.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 760.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 721.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 761.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 561.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 962.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 42.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 83.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 122.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 162.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 201.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 241.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 281.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 321.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 361.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 402.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 441.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 482.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 521.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 601.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 642.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 682.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 721.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 802.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 841.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 881.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 922.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1002.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 321.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1001.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 681.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 241.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 922.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 721.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 161.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 763.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 121.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 281.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 803.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 82.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 960.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 841.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 41.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 481.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 201.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 441.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 561.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 401.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 882.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 601.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 361.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 521.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 641.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score attainable), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: Treatment-Naive Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization. Participants were grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 201.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 761.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 481.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 240.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 41.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 442.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 281.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 721.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 401.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 321.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1002.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 361.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 801.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 681.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 841.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 641.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 82.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 922.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 602.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 121.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 881.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 561.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 160.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 961.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 522.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 962.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 642.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 921.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1002.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 42.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 83.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 122.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 162.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 201.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 241.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 281.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 321.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 361.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 402.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 442.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 482.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 521.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 561.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 601.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 681.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 721.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 761.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 802.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 841.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 881.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 763.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 521.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 121.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 641.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 82.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 562.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 601.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 41.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1001.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 803.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 681.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 960.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 321.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 882.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 361.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 281.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 721.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 401.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 241.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 922.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 441.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 201.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 841.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 481.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse (BCVA ≤38 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 161.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive Populations

BCVA was measured on the ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. For each participant, an average BCVA value was calculated across the three visits, and this averaged value was then used to determine if the endpoint was met. The results were summarized as the percentage of participants per treatment arm who met the endpoint. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥69 vs. \<69 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world). Treatment policy strategy and hypothetical strategy were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline, average of Weeks 48, 52, and 56

Population: ITT Population and Treatment-Naive Population. Only participants with at least one non-missing, valid assessment at Weeks 48, 52, or 56 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population71.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population72.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population77.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population75.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population74.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Averaged Over Weeks 48, 52, and 56, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population77.4 Percentage of participants
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the ITT Population.95% CI: [-10.2, 3.8]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the ITT Population.95% CI: [-4.3, 9.2]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the Treatment-Naive Population.95% CI: [-12.6, 3.1]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the Treatment-Naive Population.95% CI: [-8.9, 6.4]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥69 vs. \<69 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7672.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 860.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1264.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1666.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2070.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2471.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2871.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3271.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3671.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4069.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4470.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4873.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5269.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5674.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6071.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6474.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6874.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7273.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 453.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8074.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8473.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8872.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9275.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9675.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10075.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2874.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7677.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3274.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3679.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9278.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4075.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8077.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4477.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4878.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5276.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8477.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5679.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6076.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10070.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8876.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6476.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 460.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6878.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 865.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1269.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1670.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7276.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2069.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2476.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9674.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8873.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 457.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4473.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3274.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7676.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6075.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3673.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7271.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9673.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4073.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10075.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1674.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8073.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2875.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4872.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9277.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2471.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5275.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 866.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6873.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5672.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8477.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2070.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1268.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6471.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive Population

Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥69 vs. \<69 letters) and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. Invalid BCVA values were excluded from analysis. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: Treatment-Naive Population: all participants randomized in the study who had not received any intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the study eye prior to randomization. Participants were grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1266.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2473.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 455.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 862.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1668.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2072.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2873.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3271.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3674.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4070.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4471.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4874.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5271.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5676.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6073.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6477.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6877.6 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7276.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7672.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8076.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8475.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8871.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9275.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9677.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10077.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9673.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2873.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3272.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10070.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3679.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8076.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4074.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4476.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7675.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4875.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8477.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5274.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5677.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6075.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8875.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6475.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6877.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9277.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 460.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7275.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 866.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1269.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1668.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2067.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2474.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8876.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6875.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2877.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7678.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3673.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 3275.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4075.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4476.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5674.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6078.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8076.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1270.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 7274.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 10077.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 4875.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2072.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 460.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 5277.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 8477.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 1675.8 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9675.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 9279.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 869.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 2472.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better (BCVA ≥69 Letters) in the Study Eye Over Time, Treatment-Naive PopulationWeek 6474.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Without High-Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Baseline Who Developed High-Risk PDR at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive Populations

The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced PDR. High-risk PDR was defined as an ETDRS DRSS score of ≥71 on the 7-field/4-wide field color fundus photographs assessment by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: ITT Population and Treatment-Naive Population. Only participants with non-missing, valid assessments at Baseline and Week 52 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Without High-Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Baseline Who Developed High-Risk PDR at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population0.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Without High-Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Baseline Who Developed High-Risk PDR at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population0.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Without High-Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Baseline Who Developed High-Risk PDR at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population0.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Without High-Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Baseline Who Developed High-Risk PDR at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population0.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Without High-Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Baseline Who Developed High-Risk PDR at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population0.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Without High-Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Baseline Who Developed High-Risk PDR at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population0.0 Percentage of participants
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the ITT Population.95% CI: [-0.4, 1.2]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the ITT Population.95% CI: [0, 0]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the Treatment-Naive Population.95% CI: [0, 0]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the Treatment-Naive Population.95% CI: [0, 0]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Without Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Baseline Who Developed New PDR at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive Populations

The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) classifies diabetic retinopathy into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). PDR was defined as an ETDRS DRSS score of ≥61 on the 7-field/4-wide field color fundus photographs assessment by a central reading center. The weighted percentages of participants were based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% CI is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: ITT Population and Treatment-Naive Population. Only participants with non-missing, valid assessments at Baseline and Week 52 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Without Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Baseline Who Developed New PDR at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population0.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Without Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Baseline Who Developed New PDR at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population0.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Without Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Baseline Who Developed New PDR at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population0.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants Without Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Baseline Who Developed New PDR at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population1.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Without Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Baseline Who Developed New PDR at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsITT Population0.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants Without Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) at Baseline Who Developed New PDR at Week 52, ITT and Treatment-Naive PopulationsTreatment-Naive Population0.6 Percentage of participants
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the ITT Population.95% CI: [-1.1, 2]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the ITT Population.95% CI: [-1.1, 2]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8W minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the Treatment-Naive Population.95% CI: [-1.9, 0.6]
Comparison: This is the difference in percentage of participants in Arm B: Faricimab 6 mg PTI minus Arm C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8W for the Treatment-Naive Population.95% CI: [-1.5, 2.5]
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT Population

Retinal dryness was defined as achieving a central subfield thickness (ILM-BM) of \<280 microns. Central subfield thickness was defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and Bruch's membrane (BM) as assessed by a central reading center. The weighted estimates of the percentage of participants was based on the Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) weights stratified by baseline BCVA (≥64 vs. \<64 letters), prior IVT anti-VEGF therapy (yes vs. no), and region (U.S. and Canada vs. rest of the world; Asia and rest of the world regions were combined). Treatment policy strategy (i.e., all observed values used) and hypothetical strategy (i.e., all values censored after the occurrence of the intercurrent event) were applied to non-COVID-19 related and COVID-19 related intercurrent events, respectively. Missing data were not imputed. 95% confidence interval (CI) is a rounding of 95.04% CI.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 56, 60, 64, 68, 72, 76, 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, and 100

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized in the study, grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. At each timepoint, only participants with non-missing, valid assessments were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1638.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6861.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4057.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10071.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 415.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4451.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8872.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6468.5 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4863.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2045.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6060.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5257.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9672.7 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5666.3 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8467.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2453.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1232.4 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8070.1 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2845.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 824.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7665.9 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3255.0 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9266.2 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7265.8 Percentage of participants
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3648.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6455.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 416.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 824.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1234.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1642.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2040.6 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2448.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2850.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3243.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3654.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4051.3 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4451.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4850.1 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5254.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5656.9 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6054.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6857.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7258.5 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7654.8 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8054.7 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8461.2 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8858.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9258.0 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9661.4 Percentage of participants
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10060.5 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6852.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3230.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 412.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7247.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2834.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9257.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 7653.9 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2426.6 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 816.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8051.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 2029.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 10060.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8456.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1623.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5242.3 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 9658.0 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 5641.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4836.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 8854.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6047.7 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4437.1 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 4032.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 6447.4 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 3639.2 Percentage of participants
C: Aflibercept 2 mg Q8WPercentage of Participants With Retinal Dryness in the Study Eye Over Time, ITT PopulationWeek 1222.1 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Plasma Concentration of Faricimab Over Time

Faricimab concentration in plasma was determined using a validated immunoassay method.

Time frame: Pre-dose on Day 1 (Baseline); Weeks 4, 28, 52, 76, and 100

Population: This analysis only included participants in Arms A and B who received treatment with faricimab and with at least one plasma sample, provided sufficient dosing information (dose and dosing time) was available. The number of participants analyzed at a given timepoint includes those with an available plasma sample and dosing information at that timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPlasma Concentration of Faricimab Over TimeWeek 40.0211 micrograms per millilitre (μg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.0337
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPlasma Concentration of Faricimab Over TimeBaseline0.0000 micrograms per millilitre (μg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.0001
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPlasma Concentration of Faricimab Over TimeWeek 280.0033 micrograms per millilitre (μg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.0053
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPlasma Concentration of Faricimab Over TimeWeek 520.0052 micrograms per millilitre (μg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.0104
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPlasma Concentration of Faricimab Over TimeWeek 760.0048 micrograms per millilitre (μg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.0085
A: Faricimab 6 mg Q8WPlasma Concentration of Faricimab Over TimeWeek 1000.0052 micrograms per millilitre (μg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.0087
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPlasma Concentration of Faricimab Over TimeWeek 760.0068 micrograms per millilitre (μg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.0255
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPlasma Concentration of Faricimab Over TimeWeek 40.0181 micrograms per millilitre (μg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.0139
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPlasma Concentration of Faricimab Over TimeBaseline0.0000 micrograms per millilitre (μg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.0001
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPlasma Concentration of Faricimab Over TimeWeek 520.0100 micrograms per millilitre (μg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.0132
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPlasma Concentration of Faricimab Over TimeWeek 1000.0077 micrograms per millilitre (μg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.0126
B: Faricimab 6 mg PTIPlasma Concentration of Faricimab Over TimeWeek 280.0089 micrograms per millilitre (μg/mL)Standard Deviation 0.0145

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 17, 2026