Skip to content

Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene Versus Compression Mold Conventional Polyethylene in Cruciate-substituting Total Knee Arthroplasty in Young Patients, a Randomized Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03622398
Enrollment
125
Registered
2018-08-09
Start date
2006-01-31
Completion date
2018-06-30
Last updated
2019-07-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Arthroplasty, Total

Keywords

total knee arthroplasty, highly cross-linked polyethylene

Brief summary

The aim of this study was to determine clinical and radiographic results after posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasties with highly cross-linked polyethylene in one knee and compression mold conventional polyethylene in the contralateral knee in the same patients.

Interventions

PROCEDURETotal knee arthroplasty with HXLPE liner

Replacing arthritic knee with a metal device, and using a highly cross-linked polyethylene(HXLPE) liner in between metallic surfaces.

PROCEDURETotal knee arthroplasty with conventional polyethylene liner

Replacing arthritic knee with a metal device, and using a conventional polyethylene liner in between metallic surfaces.

Sponsors

Ewha Womans University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Total knee arthroplasty is performed on patients with knee osteoarthritis. One group will receive a highly cross-linked polyethylene liner and one group will receive a conventional polyethylene liner. Other parts of procedures will be the same.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Younger than 65 years old * with end stage knee arthritis bad enough for knee replacement

Exclusion criteria

* inflammatory arthritis * combined foot and ankle disorders. * dementia * patient older than 65 years old.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knee society knee scoreminimum 10 year follow up after the index surgerya proven score for the measurement of knee function, the score ranges from 0 to 100, 100 being the best possible score, indicating normal knee function

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
WOMAC(Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) Scoresminimum 10 year follow up after the index surgeryA tool to evaluate patient function associated with knee. The WOMAC measures five items for pain (score range 0-20), two for stiffness (score range 0-8), and 17 for functional limitation (score range 0-68). The total score is summed from individual sections, and 0 is the best possible score.
Range of motionminimum 10 year follow up after the index surgerymaximum flexion of the knee

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026