Skip to content

Using Indirect Calorimetry for Liver Transplants Patients

Assessing the Appropriate Energy Expenditure Requirement Using Indirect Calorimetry for Liver Transplant Recipients

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03622268
Enrollment
50
Registered
2018-08-09
Start date
2017-12-01
Completion date
2018-08-01
Last updated
2018-08-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Indirect Calorimetry

Keywords

indirect calorimetry, energy expenditure assessment, intensive care unit

Brief summary

Although predicted REE calculated using the Penn state 1988 method agreed (ICC 0.61, p=0.00014) with the measured REE, all three predictive equations had a fixed bias and appeared to be inaccurate for predicting REE for liver transplant recipients. Therefore, precise measurements using indirect calorimetry may be helpful when treating critically ill patients to avoid underestimating or overestimating their metabolic needs.

Detailed description

Rationale: The aim of this study was to compare predictive equations with indirect calorimetry and identify the appropriate energy expenditure requirement of liver transplant(LT) recipients in South Korea. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in a surgical ICU in an academic tertiary hospital over three months. Thirty mechanically ventilated patients who had received liver transplants and were expected to stay in the ICU more than 2 days were studied. Resting energy expenditure(REE) was measured 48 hours after ICU admission using open-circuit indirect calorimetry. Theoretical REE was estimated using three predictive equations: Harris-Benedict methods, lreton-Jones ventilated, and Penn state 1988. The REEs derived from each predictive equation were compared with the measured REE using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and a Bland-Altman plot.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Asan Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* mechanically ventilated patients who had received liver transplants and were expected to stay in the ICU more than 2 days were studied.

Exclusion criteria

* Refusal * patients who were extubated before 36 hrs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparing REE with the measurement for each predictive equation and indirect calorimetry1 yearThe REEs derived from each predictive equation were compared with the measured REE using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and a Bland-Altman plot.

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026